20.06.2014 Views

The origins of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder a

The origins of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder a

The origins of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ORIGINS OF NARCISSISM 91<br />

infants are born into an objectless state-that is, without interest in<br />

objects or knowledge <strong>of</strong> them-<strong>and</strong> only come to discover other persons<br />

through frustration <strong>and</strong> hatred. This theory is consistent with the economic<br />

assumptions <strong>of</strong> his thought-specifically, a limited quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

libido <strong>and</strong> a drive to eliminate tension-but Freud had many reservations<br />

about this account <strong>of</strong> early development.<br />

According to his earlier theory, which Freud never fully ab<strong>and</strong>oned,<br />

<strong>narcissism</strong> is a developmental stage between autoerotism <strong>and</strong> object<br />

love. It begins when an infant first becomes capable <strong>of</strong> forming an ego<br />

or, in modern terms, a self-representation. Infants then shift from autoerotic<br />

gratification to a libidinal investment in the early self-image.<br />

Self-inflation is therefore fundamental to the ego. Freud also held that<br />

the autoerotic stage is preceded by a period in which infants seek<br />

objects (i.e., the breast) out <strong>of</strong> the self-preservative drive. But although,<br />

in this early theory, the neonate has complex interactions with the<br />

object world, Freud’s economic assumptions drove him increasingly to<br />

describe babies as monads.<br />

Freud’s confusions about early development have since given way<br />

to a surprising unanimity <strong>of</strong> psychoanalytic opinion. Both classical <strong>and</strong><br />

object-relations theorists, despite bitter theoretical battles over the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> primary indifference to objects versus primary attachment,<br />

describe the infant as fused with or undifferentiated from mother. Narcissism<br />

is thus conceptualized as a tensionless state, a continuation <strong>of</strong><br />

prenatal existence.<br />

Current empirical research increasingly disputes this characterization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first year <strong>of</strong> life. Recent findings suggest that differentiation<br />

between self <strong>and</strong> object begins at birth, if not before. Because this<br />

research also portrays newborns as active, stimulation-seeking organisms<br />

who establish with their caregivers a system <strong>of</strong> mutual affective<br />

regulation, traditional accounts <strong>of</strong> a tensionless, <strong>narcissistic</strong> stage are<br />

<strong>of</strong> dubious validity.<br />

Although the concept <strong>of</strong> primary <strong>narcissism</strong> is problematic, Freud’s<br />

first theory <strong>of</strong> <strong>narcissism</strong>-that <strong>narcissism</strong> begins with the formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the self-representation-is far more in accord with the findings <strong>of</strong><br />

social <strong>and</strong> developmental psychology, as are several psychoanalytic<br />

concepts used to describe the second year <strong>of</strong> life (e.g., rapprochement,<br />

the mirror stage, <strong>and</strong> transitional object usage). Because research in<br />

social cognition confirms Freud’s insight that normal self-esteem is<br />

<strong>narcissistic</strong> (i.e., self-enhancing), this chapter proposes a theory <strong>of</strong> nor-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!