20.06.2014 Views

The origins of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder a

The origins of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder a

The origins of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 JOHN S. AUERBACH<br />

omnipotence <strong>and</strong> come to realize instead that independent selfhood<br />

requires, <strong>and</strong> is limited by, recognition by other independent selves.<br />

This recognition by independent others is precarious because other<br />

persons, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as they are truly independent selves, can always<br />

choose not to bestow recognition but to withhold it-to be ab<strong>and</strong>oning,<br />

critical, or rejecting. Thus, to discover one’s autonomy is also to discover<br />

one’s dependence <strong>and</strong> limitation.<br />

Independent selfhood <strong>and</strong> the human capacity for reflexive selfawareness<br />

arise, therefore, from the intepersonal matrix, <strong>and</strong> are constituted<br />

only on the basis <strong>of</strong> mutual self-recognition (Benjamin, 1990;<br />

Buber, 1923/1970; Habermas, 1968/1971; Kirshner, 1991; Winnicott,<br />

1971/1982). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, because mutual self-recognition necessarily<br />

involves dependence <strong>and</strong> limitation, there is always the temptation<br />

to retreat from intersubjectivity to <strong>narcissism</strong>. One may either<br />

deny the other by asserting a gr<strong>and</strong>iose, illusory self-sufficiency or<br />

deny the self through merger with the totality (Andreas-Salome, 19211<br />

1962; Bach, 1985; Balint, 1959; Grunberger, 1971/1979; Rothstein,<br />

1984). Each <strong>of</strong> these <strong>narcissistic</strong> strategies, either shameless gr<strong>and</strong>iosity<br />

or shame-ridden timidity, indicates a failure in the regulation <strong>of</strong> reflexive<br />

self-awareness (Bach, 1985; Broucek, 1982; Kinston, 1983,<br />

1987).<br />

Recognizing the dangers <strong>of</strong> illusory, <strong>narcissistic</strong> responses to ineradicable<br />

human dilemmas, Benjamin (1990, p. 40) writes, ”From the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>point <strong>of</strong> intersubjective theory, the ideal resolution <strong>of</strong> the paradox<br />

<strong>of</strong> recognition is for it to continue as a constant tension between recognizing<br />

the other <strong>and</strong> asserting the self.” This is a resolution based<br />

on an awareness <strong>of</strong> the tragic <strong>and</strong> ironic aspects <strong>of</strong> human existence<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the tensions that necessarily emerge in a dialogue between two<br />

independent perspectives. Because <strong>of</strong> the human need for <strong>narcissistic</strong><br />

illusions, whether <strong>of</strong> omnipotence or <strong>of</strong> tensionless merger, it is foolish,<br />

if not impossible, to eliminate such fantasies, But if there is an antidote<br />

to the pervasiveness <strong>of</strong> human <strong>narcissism</strong>, a real solution to the dilemmas<br />

<strong>of</strong> human weakness <strong>and</strong> frailty, it is in the continuing dialogue<br />

<strong>of</strong> self <strong>and</strong> other.<br />

Summary<br />

Freud was <strong>of</strong> at least two minds regarding early infant development.<br />

His most well-known theory, found largely in his later writings, is that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!