Misteguay Creek Intercounty Drain - Saginaw County
Misteguay Creek Intercounty Drain - Saginaw County
Misteguay Creek Intercounty Drain - Saginaw County
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Misteguay</strong> <strong>Creek</strong><br />
<strong>Intercounty</strong> <strong>Drain</strong><br />
April 13, 2010<br />
Informational Meeting<br />
Albee Twp Hall<br />
Need for Dike Improvements
<strong>Misteguay</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Intercounty</strong><br />
<strong>Drain</strong>age Board<br />
Michigan Department of Agriculture<br />
– Michael Gregg<br />
<strong>Saginaw</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public Works<br />
Commissioner<br />
– James Koski<br />
Genesee <strong>County</strong> <strong>Drain</strong> Commissioner<br />
– Jeffrey Wright<br />
Shiawassee <strong>County</strong> <strong>Drain</strong><br />
Commissioner<br />
– Tony Newman
Presentation Agenda<br />
<strong>Drain</strong>age District<br />
Role/jurisdiction of <strong>Drain</strong>age Board<br />
Work completed in past 10 years<br />
Recent inspections/current deficiencies<br />
Recommended improvements<br />
Projected cost of improvements<br />
Questions
<strong>Drain</strong>age District<br />
Lands that drain towards the <strong>Misteguay</strong><br />
<strong>Creek</strong> – Approx. 115,000<br />
<strong>Drain</strong>age district includes:<br />
– Landowners<br />
– Townships, Villages, Cities<br />
– Counties<br />
– Railroad<br />
– MDOT<br />
Lands in district subject to special<br />
assessment of work<br />
– Typically 65 to 80 percent to landowners<br />
– Typically 20 to 35 percent to government
<strong>Drain</strong>age District<br />
Township in district<br />
– Albee<br />
– Maple Grove<br />
– St. Charles<br />
– Spaulding<br />
– James<br />
– Taymouth<br />
– Calendonia<br />
– Hazelton<br />
– New Haven<br />
– Venice<br />
– Clayton<br />
– Flushing<br />
– Montrose
<strong>Drain</strong>age Board<br />
Jurisdiction and Responsibility<br />
Maintain or improve the following:<br />
– <strong>County</strong> <strong>Drain</strong><br />
Approx. 20 miles are county drain<br />
Approx. 20 miles are not county drain<br />
– Dikes<br />
Approx. 22 miles of dike part of drain<br />
– Dams<br />
3 flood control structures
<strong>Drain</strong> Code Rules<br />
<strong>Drain</strong>age Board can do $5,000 mile per<br />
of county drain per year to complete<br />
maintenance without petition or<br />
resolution<br />
Large scale maintenance can be<br />
completed upon resolution from<br />
township that exceeds 20% of<br />
assessment district<br />
Improvement or large scale project<br />
needs to be petitioned for
Recent Work<br />
2000 – Flint River to Gary Road<br />
2001 – Structure 4 riser<br />
2002 – Structure 4 emergency spillway<br />
2004 to 2009 – various maintenance<br />
Ongoing mowing and debris removal
Flint River to Gary Road<br />
Removed trees<br />
Removed sediment bars<br />
Placed riprap in various area for<br />
erosion control<br />
Construction cost: $390,000
Before<br />
After<br />
Structure No. 4 Riser<br />
Remove riser<br />
Install trash rack<br />
Provide access around base of dam<br />
Construction Cost: $240,000
Structure No. 4 Emergency Spillway<br />
Constructed spillway with roller<br />
compacted concrete (RCC)<br />
Construction Cost: $880,000
2003 – 2009 Maintenance<br />
2006 – Channel maintenance between<br />
New Lothrop to North Byron Roads<br />
(Shiawassee and Genesee)<br />
– Construction cost - $50,000<br />
2004 & 2009 – Dike repairs and rip rap<br />
– Construction cost - $70,000<br />
2003 to 2010 – Ongoing debris removal<br />
and mowing and minor maintenance items<br />
– Approx. $6,000 annually
2009 Inspection<br />
Severe erosion and wash outs<br />
– Verne Road to upstream of Burt Road<br />
– Structure No. 4
Inspection Conclusion<br />
Dikes near Burt Road to Verne Road<br />
are prone to fail without corrective<br />
measures<br />
Significant erosion<br />
Horizontal cracking<br />
Near vertical banks<br />
25% have experience severe erosion<br />
50% in near “sloughing” condition
Severe Erosion to Top of Dike between<br />
Birch Run and Burt Road
Erosion Between Birch Run and Burt Road
Erosion – Loss of Dike Width – Between<br />
Fergus and Birch Run Road
Cracks in Soil of Dike – Near Burt Road
Erosion and Sloughing between Burt and<br />
Birch Run Road
Near Sloughing Conditions
Near Fergus Road<br />
2003<br />
2009
Between Fergus and Birch Run Road<br />
2003<br />
2009
Between Birch Run and Burt<br />
Road<br />
2003<br />
2009
Between Birch Run and Burt<br />
Road<br />
2003<br />
2009
Dike in Condition Poor Condition<br />
Erosion has significantly increased<br />
since 2003 inspection<br />
Dikes are at risk of failure<br />
Highly recommend to implement<br />
improvements
High Risk of Dike Failure<br />
Failure during storm results in:<br />
– Emergency conditions<br />
– Significant flooding<br />
– Damage to farmland<br />
– Damage to houses likely<br />
– Damage to roads and culverts likely<br />
– Environmental problems likely<br />
– Risk of injury or death<br />
– Emergency services
Minimum Recommended<br />
Improvements to Dike<br />
Reshape / reconstruct dikes slopes to<br />
2 horizontal on 1 vertical<br />
Construct two stage low-flow channel<br />
with 10-foot shelf<br />
Expand dike top width to minimum<br />
of 16 feet<br />
Add riprap at bends to control<br />
erosion
Typical Cross Section
Structure No. 4<br />
Erosion near outlet structure<br />
Install toe of<br />
slope<br />
protection<br />
Channe<br />
l<br />
cleanou<br />
t<br />
Install<br />
heavy<br />
riprap
Projected Cost<br />
$2.5 million<br />
– Reconstruction of Dike from Verne and<br />
upstream of Burt Road<br />
– Erosion control measures at Structure 4<br />
– Surveying and Engineering<br />
– Smaller maintenance in other areas<br />
– Future maintenance needs
Questions?