Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog
Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog
Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures SACOG 2010 HCM Multimodal LOS Ped LOS LOS LOS # Pseg A 1.99 MMLOS Range Check Pint B 2.60 Mode LOS LOS # v/c ADT 5,819 (>=0 vpd) OK Yes Model 1 C 3.37 Auto D 3.65 0.4001 % HV 5% (0-100%) OK No Model 2 D 3.57 Transit F 6.51 Buses/hr 0 (>=0 bph) OK Yes RCDF 1 A 1.20 Bicycle D 3.36 Peds/hr 90 (>=0 pph) OK If Very High RCDF 2 A 1.20 Pedestrian C 3.37 Intersection signal ROW 69 ft Street Cross-Section Range Checks Sidewalk Buffer Parking Bike Ln Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Median Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Bike Ln Parking Buffer Sidewalk 5 5 10 0 0 0 14.5 0 15 0 0 0 10 5 5 OK (all entries in feet, enter zero for non-existant lanes) Location: California St. from W. Court St. to W. Main St. Important? Key Parameters Street : California St. Yes Signal Spacing: 464 (200-10,560 ft.) OK From: W. Court St. slight Progression Quality: 3 (1=poor, 6=excellent) OK To: W. Main St. slight Speed Limit 25 (15-70 mph) OK no Bus Stops w. Shelter: 0% (0-100%) OK no Pavement Quality: 4 (1=poor, 5=excellent) OK Additional Parameters Draft, for internal evaluation only Spreadsheet by: R. Dowling, Dowling Associates, Inc., July 5, 2007, Updated 02/12/08. Auto LOS Inputs Important? Pedestrian LOS Inputs Important? Transit LOS Inputs Important? Bicycle LOS Inputs Important? Peaking Factor (k) 0.09 Yes % Parking Occ. 0% Yes % On Time 86% No Unsig Conflicts/Mile 23 No Directional Factor (d) 0.55 Yes Barrier (Yes/No) yes Yes % Stops w. Benches 0% No Peak Hr. Fac. (PHF) 0.80 Yes RTOR+Perm LT (vph) 61 slight Load Factor (p/seat) 0.50 No Adj. Sat Flow (vphgl) 1800 Yes X-Street Vol. (vph) 439 Yes CBD (Yes/No) Yes No Through g/c 0.50 slight X-Street Speed (mph) 30 Yes Bus Stops/segment 0.00 No Cycle Length (sec) 60 slight X-Street Lanes (#) 2 slight Delay/Bus Stop (sec) 20 No Right Turn Islands (#) 0 slight Issue Date: June 2011 0.50 Potential 74
Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures SACOG 2010 HCM Multimodal LOS Ped LOS LOS LOS # Pseg A 1.70 MMLOS Range Check Pint B 2.22 Mode LOS LOS # v/c ADT 4,736 (>=0 vpd) OK Yes Model 1 C 2.76 Auto D 3.70 0.3256 % HV 5% (0-100%) OK No Model 2 C 2.83 Transit F 6.41 Buses/hr 0 (>=0 bph) OK Yes RCDF 1 A 1.05 Bicycle E 3.79 Peds/hr 90 (>=0 pph) OK If Very High RCDF 2 A 1.04 Pedestrian C 2.76 Intersection signal ROW 60 ft Street Cross-Section Range Checks Sidewalk Buffer Parking Bike Ln Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Median Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Bike Ln Parking Buffer Sidewalk 5 5 8 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 8 5 5 OK (all entries in feet, enter zero for non-existant lanes) Location: W. Lincoln Ave. from West St. to Grand Ave. Important? Key Parameters Street : W. Lincoln Ave. Yes Signal Spacing: 438 (200-10,560 ft.) OK From: West St. slight Progression Quality: 3 (1=poor, 6=excellent) OK To: Grand Ave. slight Speed Limit 25 (15-70 mph) OK no Bus Stops w. Shelter: 0% (0-100%) OK no Pavement Quality: 4 (1=poor, 5=excellent) OK Additional Parameters Draft, for internal evaluation only Spreadsheet by: R. Dowling, Dowling Associates, Inc., July 5, 2007, Updated 02/12/08. Auto LOS Inputs Important? Pedestrian LOS Inputs Important? Transit LOS Inputs Important? Bicycle LOS Inputs Important? Peaking Factor (k) 0.09 Yes % Parking Occ. 50% Yes % On Time 86% No Unsig Conflicts/Mile 5No Directional Factor (d) 0.55 Yes Barrier (Yes/No) yes Yes % Stops w. Benches 0% No Peak Hr. Fac. (PHF) 0.80 Yes RTOR+Perm LT (vph) 39 slight Load Factor (p/seat) 0.50 No Adj. Sat Flow (vphgl) 1800 Yes X-Street Vol. (vph) 188 Yes CBD (Yes/No) No No Through g/c 0.50 slight X-Street Speed (mph) 25 Yes Bus Stops/segment 0.00 No Cycle Length (sec) 60 slight X-Street Lanes (#) 2 slight Delay/Bus Stop (sec) 20 No Right Turn Islands (#) 0 slight Issue Date: June 2011 0.50 Potential 75
- Page 23 and 24: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 25 and 26: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 27 and 28: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 29 and 30: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 31 and 32: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 33 and 34: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 35 and 36: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 37 and 38: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 39 and 40: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 41 and 42: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 43 and 44: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 45 and 46: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 47 and 48: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 49 and 50: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 51 and 52: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 53 and 54: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 55 and 56: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 57 and 58: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 59 and 60: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 61 and 62: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 63 and 64: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 65 and 66: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 67 and 68: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 69 and 70: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 71 and 72: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 73: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 77 and 78: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 79 and 80: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 81 and 82: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 83 and 84: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 85 and 86: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 87 and 88: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 89 and 90: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 91 and 92: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 93 and 94: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 95 and 96: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 97 and 98: Application of New Pedestrian Level
<strong>Application</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>Measures</strong><br />
SACOG<br />
2010 HCM Multimodal LOS Ped LOS LOS LOS #<br />
Pseg A 1.70<br />
MMLOS<br />
Range Check Pint B 2.22 Mode LOS LOS # v/c<br />
ADT 4,736 (>=0 vpd) OK Yes Model 1 C 2.76 Auto D 3.70 0.3256<br />
% HV 5% (0-100%) OK No Model 2 C 2.83 Transit F 6.41<br />
Buses/hr 0 (>=0 bph) OK Yes RCDF 1 A 1.05 Bicycle E 3.79<br />
Peds/hr 90 (>=0 pph) OK If Very High RCDF 2 A 1.04 <strong>Pedestrian</strong> C 2.76<br />
Intersection signal<br />
ROW<br />
60 ft<br />
Street Cross-Section<br />
Range<br />
Checks<br />
Sidewalk Buffer Parking Bike Ln Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Median Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Trav. Lane Bike Ln Parking Buffer Sidewalk<br />
5 5 8 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 8 5 5 OK<br />
(all entries in feet, enter zero for non-existant lanes)<br />
Location: W. Lincoln Ave. from West St. to Grand Ave.<br />
Important?<br />
Key Parameters<br />
Street : W. Lincoln Ave. Yes Signal Spacing: 438 (200-10,560 ft.) OK<br />
From: West St. slight Progression Quality: 3 (1=poor, 6=excellent) OK<br />
To: Grand Ave. slight Speed Limit 25 (15-70 mph) OK<br />
no Bus Stops w. Shelter: 0% (0-100%) OK<br />
no Pavement Quality: 4 (1=poor, 5=excellent) OK<br />
Additional Parameters<br />
Draft, for internal evaluation only<br />
Spreadsheet by: R. Dowling, Dowling Associates, Inc., July 5, 2007, Updated 02/12/08.<br />
Auto LOS Inputs Important? <strong>Pedestrian</strong> LOS Inputs Important? Transit LOS Inputs Important? Bicycle LOS Inputs Important?<br />
Peaking Factor (k) 0.09 Yes % Parking Occ. 50% Yes % On Time 86% No Unsig Conflicts/Mile 5No<br />
Directional Factor (d) 0.55 Yes Barrier (Yes/No) yes Yes % Stops w. Benches 0% No<br />
Peak Hr. Fac. (PHF) 0.80 Yes RTOR+Perm LT (vph) 39 slight Load Factor (p/seat) 0.50 No<br />
Adj. Sat Flow (vphgl) 1800 Yes X-Street Vol. (vph) 188 Yes CBD (Yes/No) No No<br />
Through g/c 0.50 slight X-Street Speed (mph) 25 Yes Bus Stops/segment 0.00 No<br />
Cycle Length (sec) 60 slight X-Street Lanes (#) 2 slight Delay/Bus Stop (sec) 20 No<br />
Right Turn Islands (#) 0 slight<br />
Issue Date: June 2011<br />
0.50 Potential<br />
75