Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog
Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog
Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures SACOG Issue Date: June 2011 56
Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures SACOG Appendix B: PPM Methodology Excerpt from: “Bicycle and Pedestrian Level‐of‐Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems” Linda B. Dixon Transportation Research Record 1538 Pedestrian LOS Performance Measures Pedestrian Facility Provided Dominant Facility Type What are the characteristics of the pedestrian facility provided in the corridor? The dominant facility can either be noncontinuous or nonexistent, continuous on one side, or continuous on both sides. When a sidewalk facility has frequent gaps and missing segments it is noncontinuous. If the dominant characteristic is a sidewalk but the sidewalk has one short gap, the facility should be rated according to its dominant characteristic. Solitary short gaps in a sidewalk system should be considered a barrier within the existing facility. A roadway with a continuous sidewalk on one side and a few short sidewalk sections on the opposite side should be rated as having a continuous sidewalk on one side of the street only. Minimum 5 ft Wide and Barrier Free The sidewalk must be at least 5 ft wide for its entire length. The 5‐ft clearance must be maintained around all utility poles, traffic signal poles, cafe railings, benches, newspaper boxes, and other fixtures that may encroach on the sidewalk space. The barrier‐free measure also takes into account the presence of intersection curb ramps, which are required for a sidewalk to be completely barrier free. The curb ramps must meet the ADA accessibility guidelines for width and slope to qualify as barrier free. This criterion also identifies an otherwise continuous sidewalk system with one short missing segment. A roadway segment that does not score points for pedestrian facility provided cannot score points for this criterion. Sidewalk Width Greater than 5 ft When the sidewalk provided is greater than 5 ft wide, the corridor segment will score points in this category. When the sidewalk is greater than 5 ft but has significant barriers that decrease the useable, clear space to less than 5 ft, the segment will still score points, but will not score for the criterion of a minimum 5 ft wide and barrier‐free facility. An example of this situation is a sidewalk 10 ft wide in a downtown with outdoor cafes restricting the clearance width to less than 5 ft. This criterion is only applied to the basic pedestrian facility, which cannot score points when the extra width is on a parallel or alternative facility. A roadway segment that does not score points for pedestrian facility provided cannot score points for this criterion. Off‐Street Parallel Alternative Facility This facility must be located within 0.25 mi of the roadway segment and provide access to the same primary destination points served by the roadway network. This facility is typically located on a separate right of way instead of within the roadway right of way. Examples of such facilities may include, but are not limited to, greenways, rail‐trails, and pedestrian plazas. The study corridor shall be expected to provide basic pedestrian access; therefore, credit for this criterion is not given to parallel Issue Date: June 2011 57
- Page 5 and 6: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 7 and 8: 3. Literature Review of Existing An
- Page 9 and 10: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 11 and 12: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 13 and 14: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 15 and 16: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 17 and 18: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 19 and 20: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 21 and 22: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 23 and 24: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 25 and 26: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 27 and 28: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 29 and 30: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 31 and 32: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 33 and 34: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 35 and 36: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 37 and 38: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 39 and 40: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 41 and 42: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 43 and 44: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 45 and 46: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 47 and 48: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 49 and 50: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 51 and 52: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 53 and 54: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 55: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 59 and 60: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 61 and 62: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 63 and 64: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 65 and 66: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 67 and 68: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 69 and 70: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 71 and 72: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 73 and 74: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 75 and 76: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 77 and 78: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 79 and 80: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 81 and 82: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 83 and 84: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 85 and 86: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 87 and 88: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 89 and 90: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 91 and 92: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 93 and 94: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 95 and 96: Application of New Pedestrian Level
- Page 97 and 98: Application of New Pedestrian Level
<strong>Application</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>Measures</strong><br />
SACOG<br />
Appendix B: PPM Methodology<br />
Excerpt from:<br />
“Bicycle and <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Level</strong>‐<strong>of</strong>‐<strong>Service</strong> Performance <strong>Measures</strong> and Standards for Congestion Management<br />
Systems”<br />
Linda B. Dixon<br />
Transportation Research Record 1538<br />
<strong>Pedestrian</strong> LOS Performance <strong>Measures</strong><br />
<strong>Pedestrian</strong> Facility Provided<br />
Dominant Facility Type<br />
What are the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the pedestrian<br />
facility provided in the corridor? The<br />
dominant facility can either be noncontinuous<br />
or nonexistent, continuous on one side, or<br />
continuous on both sides. When a sidewalk<br />
facility has frequent gaps and missing<br />
segments it is noncontinuous. If the dominant<br />
characteristic is a sidewalk but the sidewalk<br />
has one short gap, the facility should be rated<br />
according to its dominant characteristic.<br />
Solitary short gaps in a sidewalk system<br />
should be considered a barrier within the<br />
existing facility. A roadway with a continuous<br />
sidewalk on one side and a few short sidewalk<br />
sections on the opposite side should be rated<br />
as having a continuous sidewalk on one side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the street only.<br />
Minimum 5 ft Wide and Barrier Free<br />
The sidewalk must be at least 5 ft wide for its<br />
entire length. The 5‐ft clearance must be<br />
maintained around all utility poles, traffic<br />
signal poles, cafe railings, benches, newspaper<br />
boxes, and other fixtures that may encroach<br />
on the sidewalk space. The barrier‐free<br />
measure also takes into account the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> intersection curb ramps, which are<br />
required for a sidewalk to be completely<br />
barrier free. The curb ramps must meet the<br />
ADA accessibility guidelines for width and<br />
slope to qualify as barrier free. This criterion<br />
also identifies an otherwise continuous<br />
sidewalk system with one short missing<br />
segment. A roadway segment that does not<br />
score points for pedestrian facility provided<br />
cannot score points for this criterion.<br />
Sidewalk Width Greater than 5 ft<br />
When the sidewalk provided is greater than 5<br />
ft wide, the corridor segment will score points<br />
in this category. When the sidewalk is greater<br />
than 5 ft but has significant barriers that<br />
decrease the useable, clear space to less than<br />
5 ft, the segment will still score points, but will<br />
not score for the criterion <strong>of</strong> a minimum 5 ft<br />
wide and barrier‐free facility. An example <strong>of</strong><br />
this situation is a sidewalk 10 ft wide in a<br />
downtown with outdoor cafes restricting the<br />
clearance width to less than 5 ft. This criterion<br />
is only applied to the basic pedestrian facility,<br />
which cannot score points when the extra<br />
width is on a parallel or alternative facility. A<br />
roadway segment that does not score points<br />
for pedestrian facility provided cannot score<br />
points for this criterion.<br />
Off‐Street Parallel Alternative Facility<br />
This facility must be located within 0.25 mi <strong>of</strong><br />
the roadway segment and provide access to<br />
the same primary destination points served by<br />
the roadway network. This facility is typically<br />
located on a separate right <strong>of</strong> way instead <strong>of</strong><br />
within the roadway right <strong>of</strong> way. Examples <strong>of</strong><br />
such facilities may include, but are not limited<br />
to, greenways, rail‐trails, and pedestrian<br />
plazas. The study corridor shall be expected to<br />
provide basic pedestrian access; therefore,<br />
credit for this criterion is not given to parallel<br />
Issue Date: June 2011<br />
57