IWMP-2 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

IWMP-II Motidevrupan Project in Umarpada Block, Surat Page 0

Contents 

Project Background .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 

Project wise village area distribution (in Percent) ............................................................................................................................................................................... 10 

Table no.1: Basic project information ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 

Need of Watershed Development Programme:- ................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 

Table no.2: Weight age of the project ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 

Table no: 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 

Table no.3: Watershed information .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 

Other Projects / Scheme running in the project area:- .................................................................................................................................................................... 16 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:................................................................................................................................................. 17 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 

CHAPTER-2 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 

2.1. Project Implementing Agency .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 

Table no. 6: PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 

Basic Information of Project Area:- ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 26 

Land Use and Land Cover pattern ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 29 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 30 

Land and Agriculture:- ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31 


Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 

Table no. 15: Agriculture .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 

Irrigation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 35 

Table no. 16: Irrigation ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 

Crop details and Productivity: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 

Table no. 17 -A: Crop details: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36 

Table no. 17 -B: Crop details: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37 

17 .0 Reasons of Low productivity of various crops.................................................................................................................................................................... 38 

Table no. 18: Livestock ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 

Infrastructure Facilities:- .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 

Table no. 19: Drinking water ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ......................................................................................................................................................................... 42 

21. Socio-Economic Profile ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42 

Table no. 21: Demographic information ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 43 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 45 

Migration Pattern:-............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46 

Table no. 23: Migration details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 

Poverty............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 

Table no. 24: Poverty.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 

25 Infrastructure facilities ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 


Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 

Livelihood pattern:- ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 50 

Table no. 27: Income .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 

28. Dependence on Common Property Resource ............................................................................................................................................................................ 52 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 52 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)............................................................................................................................................................... 53 

Watershed Activities ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55 

Problems Identification .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 62 

Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning ................................................................................................................................................................................... 63 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ............................................................................................................................................. 64 

Institutional formation in watershed .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 65 

Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details in Motidevrupan Village .............................................................................................................................................. 66 

Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details in Umardha Village ..................................................................................................................................................... 67 

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details in Navachakara Village .............................................................................................................................................. 68 

Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details in DongripadaVillage ................................................................................................................................................. 69 

Table no. 31.5: Watershed Committee details in Rudhigavan Village ................................................................................................................................................ 70 

Table no. 31.6: Watershed Committee details in Vadgam Village ....................................................................................................................................................... 71 

Table no. 31.7: Watershed Committee details in Bardipada Village ................................................................................................................................................... 72 

Table no. 31.8: Watershed Committee details in Nana Sutkhadaka Village........................................................................................................................................ 73 

Table no. 31.9: Watershed Committee details Chimipatal in Village ................................................................................................................................................... 74 

Table no. 31.10: Watershed Committee details in Sevlan Village ....................................................................................................................................................... 75 

Table no. 32: SHG detail ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 77 

Table no. 33: UG detail ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 80 


34: Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-II ...................................................................................................................................................................... 82 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................................................ 83 

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ...................................................................................................................... 84 

36. Watershed Development Works: .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 85 

4.3.2.2Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development: ................................................................................................................................. 86 

Name Of Work: Constructions of Dug Well Recharging Structure .................................................................................................................................................... 87 

Measurement sheet ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 89 

4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level: ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 93 

Table no.36.1: Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .......................................................................................... 94 

Table no.36.2:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................................... 94 

Table no.36,3:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................................... 96 




Table no.36.7:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ....................................................................................... 100 



Table no.36.10:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ..................................................................................... 103 

Table no.37.1: Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ..................................................................................... 104 










Table no.37.10 Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .................................................................................... 109 

Livelihood Intervention ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 109 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .......................................................................................................... 112 

Livelihood Intervention .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 117 

Model of a Vermi-compost Unit (10 ft *3 ft *2.5 ft) ................................................................................................................................................................... 120 

Returns from vermicomposting .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 120 

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed workphase proposed target .......................................................................................................................................... 122 

Table no.40.1: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* .............................................................................................................................................. 123 









Table no.40.10: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ............................................................................................................................................ 131 

Table no.41.1: Details of activities related forestation in watershed works (In lakhs) ........................................................................................................................ 132 










Table no.41.10: Details of activities related forestation in watershed works (In lakhs) ...................................................................................................................... 136 

Table no.42.1: Details of allied / other activities ............................................................................................................................................................................... 137 

Production System and Microenterprise Development (13%) ........................................................................................................................................................... 137 









Table no.42.10: Details of allied / other activities ............................................................................................................................................................................. 147 

Production System -2 Forest Nursery. ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 148 

Yield and Income .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 150 

Economics of Forest Nursery on 0.25 ha ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 150 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ...................................................................................................................................................... 151 


4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration ..................................................................................................................................................................... 153 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 154 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 155 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ................................................................................................................................................ 155 

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project................................................................................................................................................................................ 157 

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (In Lcks) ...................................................................................................................... 158 

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ......................................................................................................................................................................... 159 

Table no.50.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ............................................................................................................................................... 160 









Table no.50.10: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes .............................................................................................................................................. 169 

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ......................................................................................................................................................... 169 

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area: ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 170 

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ........................................................................................................................................................... 171 

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) .............................................................................................................. 172 

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 173 

Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas ............................................................................................................................................. 174 

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 177 


Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 178 

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (For fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ............................... 179 

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 181 

Logical Framework Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 182 

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 186 

7.2 Plans For Project management: .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 187 

CHAPTER -8 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 189 

MAPS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 189 


CHAPTER-1 

PROJECT BACKGROUND 

Project Background 

Moti Devrupan (IWMP-II) project is located in Umarpada Taluka, Surat District of Gujarat State. The Project is a cluster of Five micro 

watershed with 5C1B3b1g, 5C1B3b2f, 5C1B3d2b, 5C1B3d2c, 5C1B3d2d as their respective codes. The total project area of the watershed is 

about 6414.30 ha. of which 5000 ha is proposed for treatment under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP). 


Surat is the commercial capital of Gujarat and also the second-largest commercial hub of western India after Mumbai. Moti Devrupan 

Project is situated in Umarpada Taluka. The nearest Railway Station is Kosamba on Mumbai - Vadodara route which is around 54 km from the 

project area. All villages are well connected with pacca roads.. The project includes 10 villages of which largest village are the Moti Devrupan 

after which the project is named. All the villages are named after different water bodies which give the historical significance of water in the 

lives of the villagers. The project area is homogenously populated by tribes which include Chaudhari, Vasava, Gamit, and some Muslims 

communities. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rain fed agriculture, animal husbandry, and wage labour. 

Project wise village area distribution (in Percent) 



Table no.1: Basic project information 

Sl 

No. 

Name of the 

project 

Name 

Villages 

Census code 

Gram 

Panchayats 

Taluka 

District 

Area of the 

project 

Area 

propose 

d to be 

treated 

Total 

project 

cost 

(Lacs) 

PIA 

1 

Moti 

Devrupen 

220030164210000 

Moti 

Devrupen 

3091.1 2840 

2 

Umarda 220030164200000 Umarda 461.9 260 

3 

Nava Chakra 220030164220000 Nava Chakra 358.1 270 

4 

5 

6 

7 

IWMP-II 

Moti 

devrupan 

Project in 

Umarpada 

Block 

Dongripada 220030164460000 Dongripada 334.3 215 

Rudhi gavan 220030164450000 Rudhi gavan 338.0 260 

Vadgam 220030164470000 Vadgam 

Umarpada 

399.4 230 

Surat 

Nana 

Bardipada 220030164440000 

328.3 235 

Sutkhadaka 

600.00 

Rajpipla 

West, 

Forest 

Division 

8 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 

220030164180000 

Nana 

Sutkhadaka 

372.6 130 

9 

Chimipatal 220030164230000 Chimipatal 381.8 260 

10 

Sevlan 220030164240000 

Nana 

Sutkhadaka 

348.8 300 

6414.30 5000 


Need of Watershed Development Programme:- 

Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of 12 parameters namely poverty index, percentage of ST population, 

actual wages, small & marginal farmers, ground water status, area under rain fed agriculture, drinking water, situation in the area, productivity 

potentials of the land continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated. Based on these twelve parameters a composite 

ranking has been given to the watershed project as given in Table no. 2. The cumulative score is 109.5. 

The total number of families under BPL is 2080, which is less than 73.65 percent of total households of the villages. Hence a score of 7.5 is 

allotted. The percentages of schedule traibe in the cluster villages are more than 78 percent to the total population; hence a score of 10 is 

allotted. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village. Less than 50 percent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature 

and the actual wages earned by the labour is significantly less than minimum wages hence a composite rank of 3 and 5 are allotted respectively. 

The rains in this area are comparatively good but due to Geo hydrolical situation, the moisture index is low. Drinking water is not a 

major problem even though people are facing crises during summer season. WASMO has created a drinking water facility by constructing 

overhead tanks in the village Moti Devrupan, Vadgam, Umarda, Rudhigavan and Nana Sutkhadka 

Table no.2: Weight age of the project 

Project Project 

name type 

Weight age 

Moti Micro I Ii Iii Iv v Vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii Total 

devrupan 

7.5 10 5 5 2 15 10 0 10 10 5 15 15 109.5 


Table no: 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed 

S.No. Criteria Maximum 

Ranges & scores 

Score 

I Poverty index(% of poor to 10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 %(7.5) 50 to 20%(5) Below 20 

population) 

Ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40%(10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20%(3) 

Iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are 

significantly lower 

than minimum wages 

Actual wages are equal 

to or higher than 

minimum wages (0) 

(5) 

Iv % of small and marginal 10 More than 80%(10) 50 to 80%(5) Less than 50 %(3) 

farmers 

V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Criteria (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) 

Vi Moisture index/DPAP 

/DDP Block 

15 -66.7 & Below (15) 

DDP Block 

-33.3 to -66.6(10) 

DPAP block 

0 to -33.2 (0) 

Non DPDAP/DDP 

Block 

Vii Area under rain-fed 

agriculture 

15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90 %(10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 

70%(Reject) 

Viii Drinking water 10 No Source(10) Problematic Partially covered(5) Fully Covered(0) 

village(7.5) 

Ix Degraded land 15 high-above 20%(15) Medium-10 to 20%(10) Low-less than 10% of 

X 

Xi 

Productivity Potential of 

the land 

Contiguity to another 

watershed that has already 

been developed/treated 

15 Land with low 

production & where 

productivity can be 

significantly enhanced 

with reasonable 

efforts (15) 

10 Contiguous to 

previously treated 

watershed & 

Lands with moderate 



enhanced with 

reasonable efforts (10) 

Contiguity within the 

micro watersheds in 

the project but non 

TGA (5) 

Lands with high 



marginally enhanced 

with reasonable 

efforts (5) 

Neither contiguous to 


watershed nor 


Xii 

Xiii 

Cluster approach in the 

plains (more than one 

contiguous microwatersheds 

in the project) 

Cluster approach in the 

hills (more than one 

contiguous microwatersheds 

in the project) 

contiguity within the 


the project (10) 

15 Above 6 micro – 

watersheds in cluster 

(15) 

15 Above 5 micro – 


(15) 

contiguous to 


watershed (5) 

4 to 6 micro 


(10) 

3 to 5 micro 


(10) 

contiguity within the 


the project (0) 

2 to 4 micro 


(5) 

2 to 3 micro 


(5) 

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5 

Table no.3: Watershed information 

Name of the project 

No. Of watersheds to be 

treated 

IWMP-II- Motidevrupan 5 

Watershed code 

5C1B3b1g ,5C1B3b2f, 5C1B3d2b, 

5C1B3d2c, 5C1B3d2d 

Watershed regime/type/order 

Micro Watershed 


Other Projects / Scheme running in the project area:- 

The following works have been taken up under the scheme during last two years. 

(1) MGNREGS: Pond deepening and widening of road works completed in Nana Sutkhadka,chimipatal,Nava Chakra, Moti 

Devrupan.Bardipada Rudhigavan and Vadgam.Construction of road and desilting of three check dams at the cost of 7.30 lakh in Nana 

Sutkhadka and Cimipatal desilting of percolation tank at the cost of 2.55 lakhs has been completed till date. 

(2) Prehariyali/ Hariyali watershed programme: Under IWDP project, total area of 5000 ha in total project area have been treated 

where all activities related to soil and water conservation measures have been taken care. Three solar street-lamps installed so far 

under IWDP to promote non conventional source of energy in each village. 

(3) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 3120 toilets in BPL Houses and 1346 toilets in APL houses in project villages has been constructed 

under TSC programme in the project area. All the remaining house hold will be covered under this scheme. 

(4) Indira Awas Yojana: There are 672 houses have been constructed in the villages of Project area 80 in Moti Devrupan, 56 in Umarda, 58 in 

Navachakra, 63 in Rudhigavan, 70 in Vadgam, 34 in Bardipada, 41 in Nana Sutkhadka, 52in Cimipatal, 60 in Dogripadan and 158 in Sevlan 

under IAY. 

(5) Sardar Awas Yojana: There are 264 houses have been constructed in the villages of Project area 27 in Moti Devrupan, 26 in Umarda,24 in 

Navachakra, 28 in Rudhigavan, 29 in Vadgam, 20 in Bardipada,25 in Nana Sutkhadka, 31 in Cimipatal, 26 in Dogripadan and 28 in Sevlan under 

SAY. 

(6) WASMO/Sector reform: In the project villages 54 % of the houses get water by tap connection under WASMO programme. 


Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: 

Sl 

no 

1 TSC 


programme/scheme 

2 Indira Avas Yojana 

3 NREGS 

4 Sardar Avas Yojana 

5 WASMO 

Sponsoring 

agency 

Rural 

Development 

Dept. 



Dept. 



Dept. 

Govt of 

Gujarat 

Govt of 

Gujarat 

Objectives of the 

programme/scheme 

Year of commencement 

Villages 

covered 

Estimated 

number of 

beneficiaries 

Sanitation 2007-08 8 4466 

Housing 1992-93 10 672 

Employment 2007-08 10 2770 

Housing 1995-96 10 264 

Water facilities 2003-04 9 75 


Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: 

Sl 

n 

o 

Project 

name 

Year 

started 

Name of 

villages 

No. Of 

micro 

waters 

hed 

Watershed 

codes 

Area 

under 

treatm 

ent 

Fund 

ing 

sourc 

e 

Nodal 

agenc 

y 

PIA 

Total 

cost 

(Lacs) 

Expendit 

ure 

incurred 

up to 

start of 

IWMP 

% 

financi 

al 

comple 

tion 

% 

physical 

completi 

on 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

Hariyali 

surat-4 

(IWDP) 

Batch 

no.11 

2005-06 

Moti 

Devrupen 

Umarda 

Nava Chakra 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipada 

5 

5C1B3b1g 

5C1B3b2f 

5C1B3d2b 

5C1B3d2b 

5C1B3d2b 

5C1B3d2b 

5C1B3d2d 

201 

189 

142 

102 

72 

161 

87 

DoLR 

and 

Gov. 

of 

Gujar 

at 

DRDA 

Taluka 

Pancha 

yat, 

Umarp 

ada 

10.25 

9.64 

7.24 

5.2 

3.67 

8.21 

4.44 

8.95 

8.51 

6.36 

4.49 

3.17 

7.18 

3.86 

87.32 87.32 

88.28 88.28 

87.85 87.85 

86.35 86.35 

86.38 86.38 

87.45 87.45 

86.94 86.94 

8 Nana 

Sutkhadka 

9 

Chimipatal 

5C1B3d2c 

5C1B3d2c 

143 

109 

Total 1206 

87.65 87.65 

7.29 

6.39 

87.59 87.59 

5.56 

4.87 

61.50 53.78 87.45 87.45 


CHAPTER-2 

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY 


2.1. Project Implementing Agency 

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), 

the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for 

implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/ Central 

Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for this watershed 

Project is Rajpipla west Forest Division. 

2.2 About Project Implementing Agency, Rajpipla West division: 

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: 

PIA for Moti Devrupan project IWMP-II is Rajpipla forest Division(West). The Deputy Conservator of Forest (DCF) is the head of division. PIA 

has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Range Forest Officer (RFO)(Nodal officer) and a watershed development team of civil 

engineer, agriculture expert and community mobilizer, Data Entry Operator, surveyor, and accountant. The objective of the PIA is supervising, 

planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities at project level as 

per guidelines. This also submits the documents at the district level . 

Strength:- 

(1) Dedicated and experience staff and multidisciplinary team. 

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency. 


(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agriculture universities, South Gujarat University and NGOs for capacity 

building technical guidance. 

(4) Scientific plan in watershed project with the help of BISAG, Ghandhinagar. 

(5) District level monitoring, coordination and cooperation committee. 

(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audit. 

Weakness:- 

(1) Insufficient funds for complete watershed project per hectare. 

(2) No permanent staff. 

(3) No permanent office building. 

(4) Project area is located far away from PIA’s head quarter. 

Opportunities:- 

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation for landless and assetless. 

(2) Improvement of socio economic status of poors. 

(3) Awareness generation among the illiterate through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities. 

(4) Reduction of migration rate. 

(5) Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities. 

Threates:- 

(1) Lack of sustainable agriculture development. 

(2) Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority. 


(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people. 

(4) Erratic rainfall in the project area. 

(5) Low literacy rate in the project area. 

Table no. 6: PIA: 

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

1 

IWMP-II, Motidevrupan 

Project 

(i) Type of organization Forest and Enviranmention Department 

(ii) Name of organization Rajpipla West, Forest Division 

(iii) Designation & Address DCF, Rajpipla West Division,Dist.-Narmada. 

(iv) Telephone (02640) 220124 

(v) Fax (02640) 220125 

(vi) E-mail surdwduiwmp2@gmail.com, dcfrjpw@yahoo.com 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 

Sl 

no 

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned 

Monthly 

remuneration 

1 A.G.Vasava 53 M Project Manager GFS 30 yrs 

Project 

Management 

40681 

2 T.N.Chaudhari 45 M R.F.O, Vadpada BSc 20 yrs Nodal Officer 25000 

3. Amrutbhai Chaudhari 33 M WDT-Civil Diploma in civil 

7 yrs &3 

months 

civil work 10000 

4 Ranjitbhai Chaudhari 32 M WDT-Agri BRS 5 yrs 

Agri & forestry 

Work 

10000 

5 Suddhaben Chaudhari 35 F WDT-Com.Mobilizer B A ,Bed 4 yrs Mobilization 8000 

6 Jayeshbhai Prajapati 28 M Accountant Mcom 1 yrs Accounting 8000 



Chapter-3 

Basic Information of Project Area 


Basic Information of Project Area:- 

Moti Devrupan project is located in the district of Surat about 115 kms. From district head quarters&about90kms from PIA head 

quarter. The area is having moderate rainfall and temperature. The total geographical area of the project is 6414.30 ha.out of of which 5000 ha 

will be treated under IWMP. The forest area proposed for treatment is 2485 ha, rest of the area include farm land, gaucher land, waste land. The 

area is having moderate to gentle slope. 

Land Use Pattern. 

The net geographical area of Moti Devrupan watershed project is 6414.30 ha, out of which 45 % is forest area which is about 2916.82 ha. 

The area is having sparse vegetation due to over grazing & unathourise cultivation. About 3171.38 ha land is under agriculture, out of which 

537.90 ha are irrigated through dugwells & bores, rest of the agriculture land is rainfed. 


Table no. 8: Land use pattern: 

Wasteland 

Geographical Area 

Land under Rainfed Perm-anent 

S. No. Names of villages 

Forest Area 

Noncultivable 

of the village 

agricultural use area pastu-res Cultivable 

1 

Moti Devrupen 3091.1 2755 336.1 3039.3 0 51.8 0 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Umarda 461.9 6.8 455.1 316.9 0 145 0 

Nava Chakra 358.1 0 358.1 234.2 0 123.9 0 

Dongripada 334.3 12 346.3 290.4 0 43.9 0 

Rudhigavan 338 0 306.2 314.7 45.8 23.3 31.8 

Vadgam 399.4 0 317.8 399.4 95.2 0 81.6 

Bardipada 328.3 0 328.3 304.2 0 24.1 0 

Nana Sutkhadka 372.6 96.4 229.4 348.1 65.2 24.5 46.8 

Chimipatal 381.8 0 327.2 351 69.4 30.8 54.6 

Sevlan 348.8 46.62 166.88 278.2 150.3 70.6 135.3 

Total 6414.3 2916.82 3171.38 5876.4 425.9 537.9 350.1 


Land Use and Land Cover pattern 


Soil and topography 

Moti Devrupan Watershed Project (IWMP-II) falls under South Gujarat Agro chemist zone. The soil is mainly Black cotton and brown. 

The soil is brown to very grayish brown in surface color. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 20 to 70 cm. The predominant texture of 

soil is loamy sand and silt and clay. The fertility of soil is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The order of soil is mainly arid 

sol and inseptisols. The topography of the area is flat to moderate ranging from 0-10% slope and undulating in the forest area. 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: 


Names of the 

Agro-climatic 

S. No. 

Area in ha villages 

zone covers 

project area 

1 

3091.1 Moti Devrupen 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

South Gujarat 

Agro Climating 

Zoe 

461.9 Umarda 

358.1 Nava Chakra 

334.3 Dongripada 

338.0 Rudhi gavan 

399.4 Vadgam 

328.3 Bardipada 

372.6 Nana Sutkhadka 

381.8 Chimipatal 

348.80 Sevlan 

Major soil types 

a)Type 

Black cotton and brown 

Black cotton and Brown 





Black cotton 




Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope 

b) Area in ha 

2781.99 

Topography 

Flat to moderate slop 

415.71 Flat to moderate slop 










Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: 

Sr no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 

Moti Devrupen 

In 1994 Once 

Nil 

2 

Umarda In 1994 Once Nil 

3 

Nava Chakra In 1994 Once Nil 

4 

Dongripada In 1994 Once Nil 

5 

Rudhigavan In 1994 Once Nil 

6 

Vadgam In 1994 Once Nil 

7 

Bardipada In 1994 Once Nil 

8 

Nana Sutkhadka In 1994 Once Nil 

9 

Chimipatal In 1994 Once Nil 

10 

Sevlan In 1994 Once Nil 


11. Edaphic Factors 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH 

Moti Devrupen 

Umarda 

Nava Chakra 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 177 

Vadgam 179 

Bardipada 5 

Nana Sutkhadka 65 

Chimipatal 1 

Sevlan 1 

Type of Salinity 

(Inherent/Ingress) 

212 7.70 Nutral 

232 7.50 

1 8.20 

66 7.50 

7.70 

7.60 

7.90 

7.80 

8.00 

7.50 

Nutral 

Nutral 

Nutral 

Nutral 

Nutral 

Nutral 

Nutral 

Nutral 

Nutral 


Land and Agriculture:- 

The area is completely dependent on rain fall. The rain fall is highly scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought two to 

three years. The average rain fall of this area is about 1650 mm (from past six year data) with a highest intensity of 160 mm (in a day).This 

uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the stream and rivulets. 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: 

Average temperature 

S. 

Average rainfall (mm) 

Summer 

Winter 

No 

last 5 years 

Max Min Max Min 

1 2004 1572 40 26 30 21 

2 2005 1650 39 21 34 16 

3 2006 2877 38 20 31 24 

4 2007 1968 40 25 29 19 

5 2008 2017 42 28 32 20 

6 2009 2371 38 22 31 18 

The project area receives ample amount of rainfall during monsoon but assess of surface water runoff has decreased sufficient base for 

irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 1 ha. Of which the land holding is ranging from 1 Ha to 3 ha. The 

excess rainfall and lack of proper vegetative cover has resulted high rate of surface runoff of both soil and water. Paddy, Tuwer,Jowar. Oilseeds 


and Cotton are 4 main Kharif Crops grown. Wheat and Sorghum are 2 main Rabi crops grown. Paddy is the main kharif crop covered 70% area 

under the Kharif crops. The land conservation measures, surface water recharge activities; 

Pasture development can also become a major resource for animal husbandry. By these activities dairy productivities can be increase. 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams 

Moti Devrupen 

0-15 meters 0-10% Karjan River 

Lack of check of surface water has decreased sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The average land 

holding is about 1 ha. For which the land holding is ranging from 1 to 3 ha. Lack of irrigation resulting into less agriculture productivity & the 

same forces landless people as well as some farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. This effect directly the demographic profile of the 

villages. The major crop cultivated by farmers is Jawar (sorghum) and Paddy in the project area. Some of the farmers cultivates groundnut and 

vegetable those who has having irrigation facilities. The land conservation measures, surface water recharge activities, farmers to take up rabi 

crop of ground nut, vegetable etc.Pasture development can also become a major resource for animal husbandry. By this productivity of dairy 

animal can be increase. 


Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

Sl 

no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Total owned land 

Village 

Gen OBC SC ST 

Moti Devrupen 0 0 0 336.1 

HHs giving land 

on lease (Acer) 

Nil 

HHs taking land 

on lease (Acer) 

Umarda 4.81 0 4 446.29 Nil Nil 

Nava Chakra 0 0 0 358.1 Nil Nil 

Dongripada 82.8 0 0 263.5 Nil Nil 

Rudhigavan 69.67 5.84 0 230.69 Nil Nil 

Vadgam 0 0 0 317.8 Nil Nil 

Bardipada 23.78 0 16.38 288.14 Nil Nil 

Nana Sutkhadka 63.38 6 1.3 158.72 Nil Nil 

Chimipatal 0 0 0 327.2 Nil Nil 

Sevlan 58.19 0 1 107.69 Nil Nil 

Total 302.63 11.84 22.68 2834.23 

Nil 


Table no. 15: Agriculture 

Sr no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Village 

Net sown area 

One time Two times Three times 

Moti Devrupen 336.1 134.44 

0 

Umarda 455.1 182.04 

0 

Nava Chakra 358.1 143.24 

0 

Dongripada 346.3 138.52 

0 

Rudhigavan 306.2 122.48 

0 

Vadgam 317.8 127.12 

0 

Bardipada 328.3 131.32 

0 

Nana Sutkhadka 229.4 91.76 

0 

Chimipatal 327.2 130.88 

0 

Sevlan 166.88 66.75 

0 

Total 3171.38 1268.55 

0 


Irrigation 

The irrigated area is 1268.55 ha, which is 19.77 % of the total agricultural area of the village. Main source of irrigation is from previously 

constructed pond, check dams ponds or wells/tubes. A few farmers of Sevlan and Nana sutkhadka get irrigation to their field by check dams 

and from earthen dams which were previously constructed by different departments. 

Table no. 16: Irrigation 

Sl 

no 

1 

2 

Village 

Moti Devrupen 

Umarda 

Availability 

months 

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well/Bore Well 

Net area 

(Ha) 

Gross 

area (Ha) 

Availability 

months 

Net area 

(Ha) 

Gross 

area (Ha) 

Availability 

months 

- - - - - - 4 month 

- - - - - - 

Net area 

(Ha) 

Gross 

area 

(Ha) 

134.44 134.44 

4 month 182.04 182.04 

3 Nava Chakra - - - - - - 4 month 143.24 143.24 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipada 

Nana Sutkhadka 

Chimipatal 

Sevlan 

- - - - - - 

- - - - - - 

- - - - - - 

- - - - - - 

- - - - - - 

- - - - - - 

- - - - - - 

4 month 138.52 138.52 

4 month 122.48 122.48 

4 month 127.12 127.12 

4 month 131.32 131.32 

4 month 91.76 91.76 

4 month 130.88 130.88 

4 month 66.75 66.75 

Total 1268.55 1268.55 


Crop details and Productivity: 

The productivity is low not because that the land is unproductive or the farmer's lack the skills to managing their crop but it is due lack 

of source of irrigation, salty water and scarcity of rain. 

The cluster villages come under draught prone zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they 

generally grow high value crops as discussed above. In case of low rainfall they go for Groundnut, Tuwer and Juwar. So we can say that 

monsoon decides cropping patterns of the project villages. 

Table no. 17 -A: Crop details: 

Sr 

no 

1 

Village 

Area 

Kharif (Monsoon) 

Crop 1(Jawar) Crop 2(Tuver) Crop 3 (Ground nut) 

Production Productivity 


Production 

Area 

Area 

(in 1000) (in kg) 

(in 1000) (in kg) 

(in 1000) 

Productivity 

(in kg) 

Moti 

Devrupen 102 0.408 400 44 0.132 300 70 0.21 300 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

Umarda 50 0.25 500 20 0.08 400 25 0.1 400 

Nava Chakra 90 0.36 400 69 0.345 500 102 0.51 500 

Dongripada 69 0.345 500 156 0.624 400 89 0.356 400 

Rundhigavan 48 0.216 450 30 0.15 500 12 0.06 500 

Vadgam 39 0.2145 550 28 0.084 300 24 0.072 300 

Bardipada 123 0.492 400 108 0.432 400 98 0.392 400 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 39 0.2145 550 40 0.2 500 32 0.16 500 


9 

10 

Chimipatal 25 0.1125 450 30 0.12 400 18 0.072 400 

Sevlan 42 0.231 550 43 0.129 300 22 0.066 300 

Total 627 2.8435 568 2.296 492 1.998 

Table no. 17 -B: Crop details: 

Sl 

no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Rabi (Winter) 

Crop 1 (Jawar) Crop 2 (Tuver) Crop 3 (Ground nut) 

Village 




Area 

Area 

Area 

(in 1000) (in kg) 

(in 1000) (in kg) 

(in 1000) (in kg) 

Moti Devrupen 46 0.184 400 46 0.138 300 10 0.03 300 

Umarda 34 0.17 500 34 0.136 400 25 0.1 400 

Nava Chakara 12 0.048 400 12 0.06 500 25 0.125 500 

Dongripada 29 0.145 500 29 0.116 400 46 0.184 400 

Rundhigavan 5 0.0225 450 5 0.025 500 10 0.05 500 

Vadgam 15 0.0825 550 15 0.045 300 28 0.084 300 

Bardipada 56 0.224 400 56 0.224 400 45 0.18 400 

Nana sutkhadaka 6 0.033 550 6 0.03 500 4 0.02 500 

Chimipatal 8 0.036 450 8 0.032 400 13 0.052 400 

Sevlan 16 0.088 550 16 0.048 300 15 0.045 300 

Total 227 1.033 227 0.854 221 0.87 


17 .0 Reasons of Low productivity of various crops 

Over a period of time by continuous usage of fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides, there is deterioration in the quality of soil particularly 

reduction of carbon content and increase of salinity. One of the reasons ascribed to low response of bio-fertilizers in dry lands is their low 

status of soil organic matter. Rejuvenation of soil characteristics is an important area to tackle, with specific emphasis on recovery of its 

nutritional value. More thrust need to be given on adopting methods such as multi-cropping, rotation of crops and organic farming. Organic 

farming, nutrient management continues to be a focal issue in dry lands as the fertilizer use is not likely to pick up significantly unless water 

supply is assured. Soil fertility in dry lands can be sustained only through maintenance of organic matter and achieving better fertilizer-use 

efficiency through integration of moisture-conservation practices along with soil-fertility management. 

Quality of Seeds: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher 

land productivity. In project villages, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in 

irrigated condition. The agricultural land of the cluster villages however totally depend on rainfall. In villages mostly farmers use 

nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land. 

Traditional farming methods: This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot of ignorance about the use of new farming 

methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. 

Erratic/Low rainfall: The Villagers mainly depend on monsoon. Without monsoon they cannot get any crop because irrigation water is salty .Water is 

essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain 

monsoon. Therefore the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production. The rains, as a source 

of irrigation, are unreliable due to two factors; 

Untimely Rainfall: The rains are sometimes received when the crops are ready for harvesting. The ready crop may be ruined due to untimely 

rain. 

Inadequate Rainfall: The dependence on the uncertain rainfall is a factor that contributes to low productivity of land. 


Lack of Rural Credit: Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit 

mainly for the purchase of various inputs such as seed, fertilizers, and pesticides and for repair of implements. They use long term 

credit for buying land, and for investment to improve the quality of land, buying the new implements and improving irrigation facilities. 

Livestock 

The cluster villages have total of 2106 cows and 1744 number of buffaloes out of which majority are of local breed, there are 1942 

bullock, 10 sheep. Due saline water at a shallow depth and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture area for their animals. 

This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. 

Table no. 18: Livestock 

Sl 

no 

1 

Village 

Moti 

Devrupen 

Buffalo(ltr/yr) Cow(ltr/yr) 

Total Milk 

(Buffalo+C 

ow) 

Goat(ltr/yr) 

No Milk ltr. No Milk ltr.. Milk ltr. No Milk ltr.. 

247 355680 136 114240 469920 

Sheep Bullock Hen 

Othe 

rs 

- - - 198 2300 - 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Umarda 30 43200 100 84000 127200 

Nava Chakra 206 296640 147 123480 420120 

Dongripada 200 288000 410 344400 632400 

Rudhigavan 51 73440 179 150360 223800 

Vadgam 122 175680 291 244440 420120 

- - - 200 2500 - 

- - - 164 1200 - 

- - - 300 2400 - 

- - - 240 2500 - 

- - - 230 2500 - 


7 

8 

9 

10 

Bardipada 296 426240 95 79800 506040 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 

302 434880 406 341040 775920 

Chimipatal 180 259200 137 115080 374280 

Sevlan 110 158400 205 172200 330600 

Total 1744 2511360 2106 1769040 4280400 

- - - 50 2000 - 

- - 10 170 1800 - 

- - - 240 600 - 

- - - 150 1500 - 

10 1942 19300 

Infrastructure Facilities:- 

Villages of project area are well connected with pacca roads with taluka place Umarpada. Electricity facilities are provided under Jyoti Gram 

Yojana of G.O.G. Almost 85 % is having their personal electric meters. All villages are having primary school facilities. For middle & higher 

secondary high school education, the students have to go to Umarpada Taluka which is about to 22 k.m. away. Villages do not have primary 

health centre for which they have to go to Dogaripada and Umarpada. Nine villages have independent panchayats, where as three villages have 

group panchayat. State transport facilities are insufficient, Hence people have to walk down up to Bedvan. 


Table no. 19: Drinking water 

Sl 

no 

1 

Village 

Ground water Source of drinking water 

Availability in months 

table (ft.) Tube Well Well Tube Well Well 

Quality 

Moti 

Devrupen 25 60 3 12 Month 8 month Slightly Saline 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

Umarda 

Nava Chakra 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipada 

32 32 5 

22 30 1 

30 25 0 

24 68 3 

19 52 2 

23 12 1 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 27 22 0 

12 Month 8 month Slightly Saline 


12 Month - Slightly Saline 





9 

Chimipatal 

23 25 0 


10 

Sevlan 

30 20 0 


Total 

346 15 


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources 

S. 

No. 

Names 

of 

project 

CPR 

Particulars 

Pvt. Persons 

Total Area (ha) 

Area owned/ In possession of 

Govt. 

(specify deptt.) 

PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. 

Specify) 

Area available for treatment (ha) 

Pvt. 

persons 

Govt. 

(specify 

dept.) 

Pastures 438 - 694.64 - 2164.90 - 350.10 - 

Forest - 3038.88(forest) - - - 2485 - - 

Village Ponds/ Tanks - - - - - - - 

Community Buildings - 10(Dist.Panchayat) 5 - - - - - 

Weekly Markets - - - - - - - - 

Permanent markets - - - - - - - - 

Temples/ Places of 

worship 

Others (Pl. specify) 

PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. 

Specify) 

- - 4 - - - - - 

21. Socio-Economic Profile 

Demographic Status: 

Cluster villages have total family of 2824 numbers. There are 12958 persons in the project villages (From the door to door survey report), out 

of which 6364 male and 6394 female members. The average family size is 5 to 6 percent. Six major caste systems prevail in the village 

namely:Vasava, Gamit, Choudhri and Muslim. Around 2 % of the population of the cluster villges belongs to SC families and 88% of the 

population belongs to ST families. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry. 


Table no. 21: Demographic information 

Sr 

no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Village 

Population SC ST 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 

Moti 

Devrupen 1939 943 996 0 0 0 0 1844 1106 738 95.10% 

Umarda 1175 576 599 0 0 0 0 1156 694 462 98.38% 

Nava Chakra 957 477 280 0 0 0 0 487 292 195 50.89% 

Dongripada 1529 742 787 0 0 0 0 1522 913 609 99.54% 

Rudhigavan 1760 885 875 4 2 2 0.23 1735 1041 694 98.58% 

Vadgam 2661 1290 1371 9 5 4 0.34% 2633 1580 1053 98.95% 

Bardipada 573 296 277 53 32 21 9.25% 519 311 208 90.58% 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 563 271 292 3 2 1 0.53% 551 331 220 97.87% 

Chimipatal 964 472 492 0 0 0 0.00% 945 567 378 98.03% 

Sevlan 837 412 425 0 0 0 0 837 502 335 100.00% 

Total 

12958 6364 6394 69 41 28 12229 7337 4892 


Population Distribution category wise 


Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sr no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Village 

Literacy Literacy % Literacy % 

Total % Male % Female % above age 14 below age 14 

Moti Devrupen 747 38.53 475 50.37 272 27.31 57.83 42.17 

Umarda 735 62.55 415 72.05 320 53.42 77.14 22.86 

Nava Chakra 376 39.29 216 45.28 160 57.14 85.37 14.63 

Dongripada 957 62.59 592 79.78 365 46.38 57.26 42.74 

Rudhigavan 610 34.66 243 27.46 367 41.94 20.33 79.67 

Vadgam 1484 55.77 914 70.85 570 41.58 56.94 43..06 

Bardipada 430 75.04 264 89.19 166 59.93 67.21 32.79 

Nana Sutkhadka 224 39.79 128 47.23 96 32.88 55.36 44.64 

Chimipatal 471 48.86 292 61.86 179 36.38 60.51 39.49 

Sevlan 306 36.56 196 47.57 110 25.88 50.65 49.35 

Total 6340 48.92 3735 58.68 2605 40.74 58.86 36.83 


Migration Pattern:- 

The declining yield and product, steady erosion of soil fertility and diminishing returns to the farmers and almost zero investment on land 

development has set in motion a dynamic problem of degradation. Many small and marginal seek alternate livelihood means and w ork as 

wage labour in nearby areas. Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. On account of agriculture and animal 

husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour. 

Migrate to nearby cities like Surat, Ankleshwar, Bharuch, Navsari and Bardoli as daily wages agricultural labours and factory workers. Lack of 

fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant also forces these farmers to migrate to other places. 

Table no. 23: Migration details 

Sl no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

Village 

Total 

population 

Moti Devrupen 1939 

Umarda 1175 

Nava Chakra 957 

Dongripada 1529 

Rudhigavan 1760 

Vadgam 2661 

Bardipada 573 

Nana Sutkhadka 563 

Migration 

Total Male Female 

130 

70 60 

80 

47 33 

175 

125 50 

378 

282 96 

210 

53 157 

325 

279 46 

128 

70 58 

78 

50 28 

Up to 3 

months 

Migration by months 

3-6 months 

More than 

6 months 

- 130 - 

Main reason 

for 

migration 

Discussed as 

above 

Income 

during 

migration 

/ month 

Rs 4000/- 

in month 

- 80 - “ “ 

- 175 - “ “ 

- 378 - “ “ 

- 210 - 

- 325 - 

- 128 - 

- 78 - 

“ “ 

“ “ 

“ “ 

“ “ 


9 

Chimipatal 964 

77 

60 17 

- 77 - 

“ “ 

10 

Sevlan 837 

78 

40 38 

- 78 - 

“ “ 

Total 12958 1659 1076 583 

1659 

Poverty 

The villages have very poor population due to lack opportunity to the villagers. Nearly 65.49 per cent of the total household are poor of which 

34 per cent lies 0-16 while other 31 per cent are in 16- 20. There is an ample opportunity for various livelihood actives to increase the 

opportunities. 

Table no. 24: Poverty 

Sr. no. Village Total Household 

BPL 

% of land less 

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH 

0-16 17-20 Total 

HH 

Moti 

1 Devrupen 432 124 223 347 80.32 108 25.00 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

Umarda 

280 99 83 

182 65.00 

75 26.78 

Nava 

Chakra 170 45 65 110 64.70 104 61.17 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipada 

517 125 220 

577 166 180 

479 230 74 

97 28 40 

345 66.73 

346 59.96 

304 63.40 

68 70.10 

117 22.63 

94 16.29 

219 43.74 

64 65.97 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 190 56 37 93 48.94 30 15.78 


9 

10 

Chimipatal 

224 72 45 

117 52.23 

37 16.51 

Sevlan 

290 103 65 

168 57.93 

112 38.62 

Total 2824 1048 1032 2080 73.65 960 33.99 

25 Infrastructure facilities 

All watershed villages are well connected with mandvi and Valiya taluka with pucca roads. Each village has electricity connectivity under 

Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 85 per cent of households in the villages have their personal electric meters. The villages 

have primary school with all facilities like personal computers. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to 

Umarpada and Jhankhvav village which are about 22 kilometres away from Motidevrupan, Umarda, Dongripada, Vadgam, and Rudhigavan. Out 

of Ten villages nine villages have separate GPs, with panchayat office. 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

Schools 

Pucca 

road 

Sl 

Village to the 

no 

LP UP HS 

village 

(Y/N) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

Colleges 

(Numbe 

r) 

Post 

Office 

(Distan 

ce) Km. 

Banks 

(Number 

) K.M. 

Distanc 

e from 

nearest 

market 

yard 

Km. 

Milk 

collectio 

n centre 

(Number 

) 

Milk 

cooperativ 

e 

(Number) 

Other 

cooperativ 

es / CBIs 

(Number) 

Moti 

Devrupen Y Y N N N 3 10 20 1 - - 

Umarda 

Y Y Y N N Y 11 21 1 - - 

Nava 

Chakra Y Y N N N 2 10 10 1 - - 

Dongripada 

Any other 

institution 

PHC, 

Aanganvadi.Gra 

m Panchayat 

Aanganvadi, 

Gram Panchayat 

Aanganvadi. 


Y Y N N N Y 8 18 1 1 - PHC, 


5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipada 

Y Y N N N 2 6 16 1 - - 

Y Y N N N 1 6 16 1 - - 

Aanganvadi.Gra 

m Panchayat 

Aanganvadi, 


Aanganvadi. 


Y Y N N N 1 2 10 1 - - Aanganvadi.Gruo 

p Panchayat 

Nana 

Sutkhadka Y Y N N N Y 9 9 1 - - 

Chimipatal 

Sevlan 

Y Y N N N 3 10 10 1 - - 

Y Y N N N 2 8 8 1 - - 

Aanganvadi. 

Gruop Panchayat 

Aanganvadi, 


PHC, 

Aanganvadi. 

Group Panchayat 

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets 

Sl 

no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

Village 

Moti Devrupen 

Umarda 

Nava Chakra 

Dongripada 

HHs with 

electricity 

HHs with 

safety 

latrines 

HHs with phones 

HHs with vehicle 

Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler 

HHs with 

TV set 

HHs with 

cooking 

gas 

HHs with 

Drinking 

water 

302 345 0 34 21 3 7 2 0 3 

196 224 0 29 29 7 11 28 0 7 

119 136 0 17 22 4 13 7 0 4 

361 413 0 31 26 6 18 22 0 2 

HHs 

with 

freedge 


5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipada 

403 461 

0 

33 31 8 27 28 0 6 

335 383 0 36 33 4 13 23 0 3 

67 77 0 22 11 2 11 1 0 2 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 133 152 0 23 13 3 17 4 0 3 

Chimipatal 

Sevlan 

156 179 0 27 28 5 22 1 0 6 

203 232 0 17 16 2 14 19 0 2 

Total 2275 2602 0 269 230 44 153 135 0 38 

Livelihood pattern:- 

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they go as daily wage laborers at sugarcane 

field of Kim, Sayan and Bardoli. Another major occupation of the people is Mahuda flower collection and fire wood collection which they collect 

from the community land or forest. 


Table no. 27: Income 

Sr no Village Agriculture (in lack) 

Animal husbandry Casual labour (in 

(in lack) 

lack) 

Others (in lack) Total (in lack) 

1 

Moti Devrupen 1.102 46.90 5.20 0 53.202 

2 

Umarda 0.836 12.72 3.20 0.10 16.756 

3 

Nava Chakra 1.448 42.01 7.0 0 50.458 

4 

Dongripada 1.77 63.24 15.12 0.20 80.13 

5 

Rundhigavan 0.5235 22.38 8.40 0 31.3035 

6 

Vadgam 0.582 42.01 13.0 0 55.592 

7 

Bardipada 1.944 50.60 5.12 0.20 57.664 

8 

Nana Sutkhadka 0.6575 77.59 3.12 0 81.3675 

9 

Chimipatal 0.4245 37.42 3.08 0 40.9245 

10 

Sevlan 0.607 33.06 3.12 0 36.787 

Total 9.8945 427.93 66.36 0.50 504.685 


28. Dependence on Common Property Resource 

The vast majority of the denizens of this region depend on Common property resources. Most of them continue to live a virtually hand-tomouth 

existence. Their pathetic poverty seems, in fact, to have further worsened in recent years, as their traditional pasture lands have been 

rapidly depleting due to over-grazing and encroachments. Excessive runoff of surface water has also resulted into erosion of fertile land. This 

has also resulted in diversion of the natural drains and disturbing the natural hydrology of the area. 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 

Sr no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Village 

Benefit type 1 (Grass) Benefit type 2 (Fuel) Benefit type 2 Total 

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income income 

Moti Devrupen 40.52 4596 52.20 5429 - - 10025 

Umarda 35.00 1560 33.00 3290 - - 4850 

Nava Chakra 42.36 4236 25.90 2679 - - 6915 

Dongripada 62.35 7320 41.25 4281 - - 11601 

Rudhigavan 40.42 2760 46.23 4928 - - 7688 

Vadgam 52.32 4956 59.20 7450 - - 12406 

Bardipada 58.20 4692 20.10 1604 - - 6296 

Nana Sutkhadka 68.20 8496 25.23 1576 - - 10072 

Chimipatal 39.25 3804 35.65 2699 - - 6503 

Sevlan 36.52 3780 46.55 2343 - - 6123 

Total 46200 36282 82482 


Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 

Sr 

no 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Village 

Total 

workforce 

Agriculture 

Animal 

husbandry 

(AH) 

Agriculture 

+ AH 

Moti Devrupen 1736 201 352 270 

Umarda 1075 189 380 355 

Nava Chakra 957 86 77 163 

Dongripada 1529 102 335 473 

Rudhigavan 1660 72 372 444 

Vadgam 2061 235 238 473 

Bardipada 573 94 127 221 

Nana Sutkhadka 563 143 109 252 

Chimipatal 964 109 133 242 

Sevlan 837 152 120 272 

Casual 

labour 

432 

300 

104 

117 

94 

219 

64 

30 

37 

112 

Services Handicraft Others 

3 0 0 

5 1 0 

5 0 0 

2 2 0 

5 0 0 

1 0 0 

2 2 0 

3 0 0 

4 0 0 

5 0 0 

Total 11955 1383 2243 3165 1509 35 5 0 


CHAPTER-4 

Watershed Activities 


Watershed Activities 

Watershed management as a strategy is been adapted by government of India especially in the rain fed region of semi-arid tropics. These 

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, law literacy and high incident of 

migration. The inheritant low fertility of crops results in high productivity of crops which have very law biological efficiency. 

Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The 

common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development. 

(1) Cluster Approach 

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Vad project 

consist of four micro-watersheds namely 5C1B3b1g, 5C1B3b2f, 5C1B3d2b, 5C1B3d2c, 5C1B3d2d as their respective codes. Further 

Motidevrupan watershed project is in continuation with other watershed programme namely IWDP. 

(2) Baseline survey 

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be constructed. This acts a 

benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was been 

undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and village level data collection from Talati-cum mantri. 

Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every house-hold in the village. 

This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, 

cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, and average milk production of the castles and varies schemes running and their 

benefits. 


Bio-physical survey was been undertake to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil 

typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. 

a) Door to Door Survey 

The primary data was generated through questionnaire surveys in all the villages. The questionnaire was structured so as to derive the 

information related to the objectives set forth. Mostly talked to 

• Head of the families 

• Mostly females (between 65% and 70%) 

• Mostly younger adults (Age group : 25 – 44) 

• High School education 

• Sarpanch and Talati of respective Gram Panchayats. 

• Farmers, Agricultural labours, Diamond polishing workers, handicraft unit workers,electric drum making units and workers of thresher 

units. 

• Cattle Breeders 


• Landless labour 

The questionnaire was divided into nine modules through which information is extracted pertaining to 

1. Village details 

2. Population details 

3. Water supply details 

4. Water source details 

5. Questions about community engagement 

6. Questions about Livelihood 

7. Awareness about Specific programme: Watershed 

8. Desire to do more activities related to occupation 

9. Productivity of farms 

The secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data pertaining to social profile is also collected through Census reports. 

Secondary data related to different kinds of capital assets were collected from different departments of Government agencies such as Revenue 

Office, Primary Health Center, District Rural development Agency initiative-SGSY Programme office, working on poverty alleviation, Village 

Panchyat, other NGOs and development societies etc. 

b) Field to field Survey: 

Field to field survey was also carried out in the farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram Panchayat. It also includes the soil 

profiles, no of wells in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. The details 

of agriculture as well as pasture lands of the village where the existing condition and structures to be proposed, were written down. Almost all 

the farmers of the village were there to support the survey team. The purpose of the survey was also to understand water availability, patterns 


of water use and peoples’ understanding & perceptions about both surface and groundwater resources in this area. Village agreements will be 

done on the basis of such detailed work. This also survey looked at the pattern of surface and groundwater use and the basic understanding of 

farmers regarding groundwater recharge and discharge. This understanding was expected to help in improved planning for any watershed 

programme and to develop longer-term protocols of groundwater management in respective areas. 

c) Demand survey: 

To know about the livelihood pattern of the village and the present status and practice capacities required are discussed. Quantitative involved 

also on possible micro enterprise development for sustainable development of village extensively for SC/ST and landless/migrated poor 

people. 


(3) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the 

program me. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological knowledge 

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach Provide a new path for planning, 

implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the 

stakeholders. This decrease the effort of the ground staff i.e. WDT members and involves more of 

villagers as implementers. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and 

season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in 

general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers ease than the complicated 

questionnaires. Various tools like matrix ranking, vane diagram were used to indentify various 

local vegetation (apt for a forestation), fodders crops, various institution and their significance in 

the life of the farmers. 

In order to understand the social, economic and political aspect of all the villages of the cluster, we conducted Participatory Rural 

Appraisal (PRA) exercise with the help of the villagers. It was really a useful tool to appreciate the village in its totality. We had the opportunity 

to interact with more than 600 numbers of people in each village. To reach a concrete conclusion we requested a few villagers for focused 

discussion and it was entertained. As per their convenience we conducted focused group discussion at the Community hall and Panchayat 

Bhavan ground. In majority of the discussion, we listened to them carefully and tried to appreciate the discussion. Output generated through 

these exercise is placed below. 


(i) Resource Map: - Through resource map we came to know about all the residential pattern of village, community pasture land, farm 

areas, about the river etc. It also gave us a fair idea about the pasture land, other land distribution pattern and different resources of 

the village. 

(ii) Social Map: - After this exercise we came to know the approximate location of different institution of the village. During this exercise we 

also had informal discussions with the participants about the importance of these institutions. Important location pointed out during this 

exercise was Community Centre, Panchayat Bhavan, temple, Primary School etc. We cross checked all the location. 

(iii) Seasonal Diagram:- With this exercise we came to know about the major engagements of villagers across the twelve months of the 

year. We found that rainfed agriculture and animal husbandry keep them busy at least for seven to eight months of the year. About drinking 

water they informed that, situation in the month of March to June is really difficult as they get water once in three days. 

(iv) Tree matrix:- We came to know about different trees of the villages and their respective utilities as fruit, fuel, fodder, medicine , 

timber etc. Major trees pointed out by villagers under this exercise were Pipal, Neem, Bor, Lemon, Banyan and Pipara etc. Taking into 

consideration all the utilities it was found that the tree having maximum utility is Chiku and lemon. 


(v) Crop Pattern:- Agriculture is the primary source of liveihood for more than 70% household . After this exercise we came to know that 

there are two major cropping pattern Kharif and partially in Rabbi. Under Kharif cotton,ground nut and fodder crops and in rabi, major crops 

grown are wheat, cumin, gram and vegetables. 

(vi) Income-Expenditure Pot: - Under this exercise we came to know about the different sources of income of villagers and how the money 

earned by the villagers is being spent under different heads. It was found that major source of earning among villagers are farming, dairy, 

service etc. Major expenditure component were food, fuel, fodder, schooling of children, medicines, festivals, relatives, and paan etc. 

One focussed group discussion was organised to understand the status of different Self help Group operating in the village. This discussion 

concentrated around the activities of SHG, terms and conditions of membership, working pattern of different SHG and their role in the 

development of society etc 

Another curiosity in our mind was about the political institution of the village. Apart from different institution discussion was 

concentrated about gram panchayat issue. Here the major discussion point was participation of women and deprived section of the society in 

the decision making process, their representation in the panchayat. How the panchayat facilitates the process of development and poverty 

alleviation. In this process its relation with different institution of village like dispensary, Aanganwari Kendra, Primary School and High school 

was also discussed. 

The whole purpose was to identify the employment opportunities available during the different seasons in a year, income, expenditure, crisis 

management, daily activities and time allotted to each activity, the leisure time of men and women, and market network for agricultural 

produce etc. In the gender analysis, an attempt was made to find out the gendered division of labour, the status of women in relation to the 

right to use, to own and sell different household properties, the means of production of the household, and the role and participation of women 

in decision-making at intra household and community levels. 

To identify different problems faced by villagers a separate focussed discussion was carried out. The villagers were grouped in to different 

types as shown below to know all the details of the village in a stipulated time. 


Small and marginal farmers 

Large farmers 

Landless farmers 

Women 

Gram Panchayat members 

Cattle grazing population 

Business man and women 

Problems Identification 

After analysis the information collected during PRA exercise, the main problems identified as 

Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity 

Soil Erosion from farm land 

Improper Crop Rotation 

Less use of bio-fertilizers 

Almost negligible cultivation of arid fruits 

Less cultivation of vegetables 

Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds 

No use of vermi compost 

Lack of value addition practices 

Drinking Water 

Less availability of fodder 

Market (No nearby) 

Migration 

Sanitation Problems 

Less Nutritional Level 

Malnutrition in few farm families 


Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning 

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. 

a) prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geomorphological, 

Soil, BPL population, ST/ST population, Ground water status, and Drinking water situation slope percent. These were all given 

proper weight ages according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 

b) Planning 

A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope 

percent, soil depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agriculture land. 

Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This 

will be used to create a map. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific 

for soil and water conservation structures. 

C) Hydrological modelling 

Hydrological modelling technique was being used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and Flow accumulation. 

This model overlaid over cadastral map hell to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to 

remove the human error which generally occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam. 


Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 

S. No. 

Scientific criteria/ inputs used 

Whether scientific criteria was 

used 

(A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

Yes 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of 

the Institute 

Yes-BISEG 

Baseline survey 

Yes 

Hydro-geological survey 

Yes 

Contour mapping 

Yes 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

Yes 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover - 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

Yes 

Online IT connectivity between 

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes 

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes 

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes 

Availability of GIS layers 

1. Cadastral map 

Yes 

2. Village boundaries 

3. Drainage 

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) 

5. Land use 

6. Ground water status Yes 

7. Watershed boundaries Yes 

8. Activity 

Crop simulation models # 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 


Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high 

speed soil nutrient analysis 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# 

Weather Station 

(B) Inputs 

1. Bio-pesticides 

2. Organic manures Yes 

3. Vermicompost Yes 

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 

5. Water saving devices Yes 

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 

7. Bio-fencing Yes 

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No 

Any other (please specify) 

No 

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum 

Institutional formation in watershed 

(1) Watershed Committees (WC) 

These are the committees formed by gram sabha to implement the watershed project works within their village with technical support 

of WDTs’. These committees are to be registered under societies Registration Act-1860. Chairman & secretary of the committee are 

selected by gram sabha. Both the persons are from their villages. Capacity building training to watershed committee members was given 

by WDT members. 

The watershed committee has pivotal role during various process like PRA & overall planning. 


Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details in Motidevrupan Village 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 

Names of 

WCs 

Date of 

Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


Member 

Designati 

on 

M 

/ 

F 

Vikarmbhai G. 

Vasava 

Presiden 

t 

Partapbhai 

A.Vasava Secretary M 

SC ST SF MF LF 

Village:- Motidevrupan in Umarpada Block 

Educa 

Function 

Any -tional 

Land 

/s 

UG SHG GP othe qualifi 

-less 

assigned 

r - 

# 

cation 

M - 1 1 - - - - - 1 - L.l.b. - 

- 1 1 - - - 1 - - - 8 th - 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

Motidevr 

upan 

Watershe 

d 

committe 

e 

Under 

Progress 

Amarutbhai WDTcivil 

P.Vasava 

M 

Raysingbhai 

F.Vasava Member F 

Kesarsingbhai 

k. Vasava 

Member F 

Uttriyabhai k. 

Vasava Member M 

Divnjibhai 

A.Vasava 

Shakarambhai 

G. Vasava 

Ashaben K. 

Vasava 

Janakbhai C. 

Vasava 

Shantilal B. 

Vasava 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

M 

M 

F 

M 

M 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - DCE - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - Illitera 

t 

- 1 1 - - - 1 - - - 5 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - illierta 

t 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 7 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 5 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 3 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 2 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 12th - 

- 

- 


Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details in Umardha Village 

Village:- Umarda in Mangrol Block 

Sl. 

No 

. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 


WCs 

Umarda 

Watershe 

d 

committe 

e 


Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Under 

Progress 


Member 

Vasantbhai S. 

Padhvi 

Parkeshbhai J. 

Padhvi 

Amrutbhai 

P.Chaudhari 

Bhimsingbhai 

D. Vasava 

Ravidasbhai j. 

Vasava 

Rameshbhai G. 

Vasava 

Jalputbhai G. 

Vasava 

Parn iyabhai H. 

Vasava 

Partapbhai N. 

Vasava 

Paremilaben C. 

Vasava 

Ranjibhai M 

Vasava 

Designati 

on 

Educational 

qualification 

Presiden 

t 

Secretar 

y 

WDTcivil 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

M 

/ 

F 


Land 

-less 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

M - 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 10th - 

M 

M 

F 

F 

M 

M 

M 

M 

F 

M 

Functi 

on/s 

assign 

ed# 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 12th - 

- 1 - - - - - - 1 - DCE - 

- 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 10 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 4 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - 1 - illiterate - 

- 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 - 5th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - illierate - 

- 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 7th - 

- 1 - - - 1 - - - - Illierate - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 7th - 


Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details in Navachakara Village 

Village:-Navachakra in Umarpada 

Block 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 


WCs 

Navachak 

ra 

Watershe 

d 

committe 

e 


Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Under 

Progress 


Member 

Shantubhai B . 

Gamit 

Ghanputbhai 

G. Gamit 

Amrutbhai 

P.Chaudhari 

Vasuben L. 

Gamit 

Varshaben N. 

Gamit 

Ganbhirbhai J. 

Vasava 

Surjibhai A 

.Gamit 

Bhagvanbhai D 

.Gamit 

Esaverbhai B. 

Gamit 

Jashubhai N 

.Gamit 

Jivanbhai S 

.Gamit 

Designati 

on 

Presiden 

t 

Secretary 

WDTcivil 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

M 

/ 

F 


Land 

-less 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

othe 

r 

Educa 

-tional 

qualifi 

- 

cation 

Function 

/s 

assigned 

# 

M - 1 - 1 - - - - 1 - 10 th - 

M 

M 

F 

F 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 11 th - 

- 1 - - - - - - - - D.C.E. - 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 9 th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - 12 th - 

- 1 - - - 1 - 1 1 - 10 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 7 th - 

- 1 - - 1 - - - - - 8 th - 

- 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - 5 rd - 

- 1 - - - 1 - - - - 4 th - 

- 1 - - 1 - - - - - 5 th - 


Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details in DongripadaVillage 

Village:- Dongripada in umarpada Block 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 


WCs 

Dongripa 

da 

Watershe 

d 

committe 

e 


Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Under 

Progress 


Member 

Virsingbhai 

S.Vasava 

Vijaybhai 

S.Vasava 

Amrutbhai 

P.Chaudhari 

Panditbhai 

M.Vasava 

Kaileshben 

V.Vasava 

Dharmendarbh 

ai R. Vasava 

Remtaben 

B.Vasava 

Chhaganbhai 

V.Vasava 

Nimjibhai S. 

Vasava 

Subheshbhai P. 

Vasava 

Chapakbhai 

G.Vasava 

Designati 

on 

Presiden 

t 

Secretary 

WDTcivil 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

M 

/ 

F 


Land 

-less 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

othe 

r 

Educa 

-tional 

qualifi 

- 

cation 

Function 

/s 

assigned 

# 

M - 1 1 - - - - - - - 3 th - 

M 

M 

M 

F 

M 

F 

M 

M 

M 

M 

- 1 1 - - - 1 - - - 10 th - 

- 1 - - - - - - - - DCE - 

- 1 - - 1 - - - - - 7th - 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 8th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 8th - 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 6th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 10th - 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 4th - 

- 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - B.a. - 

- 1 - - - 1 - - - B.a. - 


Table no. 31.5: Watershed Committee details in Rudhigavan Village 

Village:- Rudhigavan in Umarpada Block 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 


WCs 

Rudhigav 

an 

Watershe 

d 

committe 

e 


Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Under 

Progress 


Member 

Karmsingbhai 

G. Vasava 

Ranjibhai M. 

Vasava 

Amarutbhai 

P.Chaudhari 

Radhaben K. 

Vasava 

Suganben B. 

Vasava 

Dinkarbhai F. 

Vasava 

Jathriyabhai G. 

Vasava 

Vashubhai S. 

Vasava 

Bhimsingbhai 

D. Vasava 

Rameshbhai U. 

Vasava 

Ravidasbhai J. 

Vasava 

Designati 

on 

Educational 

qualification 

Presiden 

t 

Secretar 

y 

WDTcivil 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

M 

/ 

F 


Land 

-less 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

M - 1 1 - - - - - - - 10th - 

M 

M 

F 

F 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

Functi 

on/s 

assign 

ed# 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 12th - 

- 1 - - - - - - - - DCE - 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 10th - 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 4th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - illiterate - 

- 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 5th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - Illierate - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 7th - 

- 1 - - - 1 - - - - illierate - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 7th - 


Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

Table no. 31.6: Watershed Committee details in Vadgam Village 


WCs 

Vadgam 

Watershe 

d 

committe 

e 


Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Under 

Progress 


Member 

Bhimsingbhai 

V.Vasava 

Shivdasbhai V. 

Vasava 

Amrutbhai 

P.Chaudhari 

Induben 

D.Vasava 

Kamuben V. 

Vasava 

Gulabbhai 

S.Vasava 

Bhimsingbhai J. 

Vasava 

Jatriyabhai 

S.Vasava 

Gemubhai F. 

Vasava 

Jemubhai R. 

Vasava 

Jalputbhai D. 

Vasava 

Designati 

on 

Presiden 

t 

Secretary 

WDTcivil 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

M 

/ 

F 


Land 

-less 

Village:-Vadgam in Umarpada Block 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

othe 

r 

Educa 

-tional 

qualifi 

- 

cation 

Function 

/s 

assigned 

# 

M - 1 1 - - - - - - - 5th - 

M 

M 

F 

F 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

- 1 1 - - - 1 - - - 12th - 

- 1 - - - - - - - - D.C.E. - 

- 1 1 - - - 1 1 - - 10 th - 

- 1 1 - - - 1 1 - - 4 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 7th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - 1 7 th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 4th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 7rd - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 4 th - 

1 1 - 

- 1 - - - - 

5 th 

- 


Table no. 31.7: Watershed Committee details in Bardipada Village 

Village:-Bardipada In Umarpada 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 


WCs 

Bardipada 

Watershe 

d 

committe 

e 


Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Under 

Progress 


Member 

Designati 

on 

M 

/ 

F 

Aemthbhai M 

.Vasava 

Presiden 

t 

Jaysingbhai A 

.Vasava 

Secretary M 

Amrutbhai P WDTcivil 

.Chaudhari 

M 

Gumanbhai S 

.Vasava 

Member M 

Fatesingbhai K 

.Vasava 

Member M 

Gambabhai M. 

Vasava 

Member M 

Amarsingbhai 

N. Vasava 

Member M 

Jashubhai V 

.Vasava 

Member M 

Ramaben J. 

Vasava 

Member F 

Kamaben S. 

Vasava 

Member F 

Motubhai B. 

Vasava Member M 


Land 

-less 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

othe 

r 

Educa 

-tional 

qualifi 

- 

cation 

Function 

/s 

assigned 

# 

M - 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - B . A . - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - B. A. - 

- 1 - - - - - - - - D.C.E. - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 9 rd - 

- 1 - - 1 - - - - - 12th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - 5th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - 1 - 9 th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - 7th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 10 rd - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 9 th - 

1 - 

- 1 - - - - 

illitera 

t 

- 


Table no. 31.8: Watershed Committee details in Nana Sutkhadaka Village 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 


WCs 

Nana 

Sutkhada 

ka 

Watershe 

d 

committe 

e 


Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Under 

Progress 


Member 

Jaharsingbhai 

C.vasava 

Jaykisanbhai F. 

Vasava 

Amrutbhai 

P.Chaudhari 

Dheliyabhai P. 

Vasava 

Keshavbhai D. 

Vasava 

Partapbhai D. 

Vasava 

Jamnaben B. 

Vasava 

Sonjibhai M 

Vasava 

Tuleshibhai G. 

Vasava 

Ashaben G. 

Vasava 

Pachiyabhai l. 

Vasavas 

Designati 

on 

Educational 

qualification 

Presiden 

t 

Secretar 

y 

WDTcivil 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

M 

/ 

F 


Land 

-less 

Village:- Nana Sutkhadaka Umarpada Block 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

M - 1 1 - - - - - 1 - 7th - 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

F 

M 

M 

F 

M 

Functi 

on/s 

assign 

ed# 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 11th - 

- 1 - - - - - - - - DCE - 

- 1 - - 1 - - - - - illierate - 

- 1 - - - - - - - - illierate - 

- 1 - - 1 - - - - - illierate - 

- 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 4th - 

- 1 1 - - - - - - - 5th - 

- 1 - - - 1 - - - - 2 th - 

- 1 - - - - - 1 - - 6 th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - illiterate 


Table no. 31.9: Watershed Committee details Chimipatal in Village 

Village:- Chimipatal in Umarpada Block 

Sl. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 


WCs 

Chimipatal 

Watershed 

committee 


Registra 

tion as 

a 

Society 

(dd/mm 

/ yyyy) 

Under 

Progress 


Member 

Shamsingbhai 

C. Vasava 

Kantilalbhai S. 

Vasava 

Amarutbhai 

P.Chaudhari 

Ramilaben 

B.Vasava 

Ashaben 

S.Vasava 

Kalidasbhai H. 

Vasava 

Kanjibhai T. 

Vasava 

Jayantibhai 

M.Vasava 

Karmsingbhai 

D. Vasava 

Gamanbhai B. 

Vasava 

Ashokbhai 

K.Vasava 

Designati 

on 

Educational 

qualification 

Presiden 

t 

Secretar 

y 

WDTcivil 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Member 

M 

/ 

F 


Land 

-less 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

othe 

r 

M - 1 - - 1 - - - 1 - 8th - 

M 

M 

F 

F 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

M 

Functi 

on/s 

assign 

ed# 

- 1 - - - 1 - - - - M.A. - 

- 1 - - - - - - - - DCE - 

- 1 - 1 - - - 1 1 - 5 th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - 8th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - 6 rd - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - 10 th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - 4th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - 10 th - 

- 1 - - - - 1 - - - 10th - 

- 1 - 1 - - - - - - 6th - 


Table no. 31.10: Watershed Committee details in Sevlan Village 

Sl. 

No. 


WCs 


Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 


Member 

1 

Asvinbhai A. 

Vasava 

2 Nanjibhai 

U.Vasava 

3 Amrutbhai P. 

Chaudhari 

4 Margiyabhai S 

.Vasava 

5 Gunvatbhai M . 

Sevlan 

Vasava 

6 Watershe 

Under 

Parbhubhai K. 

d 

Vasava 

Progress 

7 committe 

Ramabhai J. 

e 

Vasava 

Designati 

on 

M 

/ 

F 

SC ST SF MF LF Land 

-less 

Village:-Sevlan in Umarpada Block 

UG SHG GP Any Educa Function 

othe -tional /s 

r qualifi assigned 

- # 

cation 

Presiden M - 1 1 - - - - - - - 7 th - 

t 

Secretary M - 1 - - - 1 - - - - 11 th - 

WDTcivil 

M - 1 - - - - - - - - D.C.E. - 

Member M - 1 1 - - - - - - - 4 th - 

Member M - 1 - 1 - - - - - 5 th - 

Member M - 1 - 1 - - - - - - 3 th - 

Member M - 1 1 - - - - - - - illitera 

t 

- 

8 Varshaben Member F - 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - 10 th - 

9 Sumanben R 

.Vasava 

10 Dineshbhai R . 

Vasava 

11 Ramjibhai L 

.Vasava 

Member F - 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - 7 rd - 

Member M - 1 - - 1 - - - - - 12 th - 

Member M - 1 - 1 - - - - - - 5s th - 


# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. 

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning 

C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments 

E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation 

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed 

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify). 

(2) Self Help group (SHG) 

Self Help group are motivated, small homogeneous group organised together through highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self 

Help Group initiative especially for women to uplift their livelihood. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm 

women, BPL household, SC/ST women. 

SHG initiative in Vad watershed was being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogeneous 

communities of women based on their livelihood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their facilitators. The major 

problems identified are: 

(a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institutes. 

(b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders. 

(c) Lack of attitude of saving among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structure. 

(d) Lack of small micro- loans without collaterals and high interest rates. 

(e) Lack of knowledge on credit, Thrift activity and banking. 

With a view point of these problems it was planned to organized these women to a into group consisting of 12 to 20 to each groups and it 

was also proposed to have 8 groups. 

With detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEWA, it was planned to have some capacity building 

training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment this 

included spices packing, embroidery activities with forward and backward linkage. This will ultimately lead into a better human 

development in the village. 


Table no. 32: SHG detail 

S. No. 

Village Name 

With 

only 

Men 

Total no. of registered SHGs 

With 

only 

Women 

With 

both 

1 Motidevrupan 0 4 0 4 

2 Umarda 0 2 0 2 

3 

Navachakra 

0 1 0 1 

4 Dongripada 0 3 0 3 

5 Rudhigavan 0 2 0 2 

No. of members 

No. of SC/ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

Total Categories M F Total ST SC Total M F Total 

(i) Landless - - - -- - - - - - 

(ii) MF 46 46 46 - 46 - 35 35 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 46 46 46 - 46 35 35 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 29 29 29 - 29 - 16 16 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 29 29 29 - 29 - 16 16 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 13 13 13- - 13 - 6 6 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - -- - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 13 13 13 - 13 - 6 6 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 36 36 36 - 36 - 20 20 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 36 36 36 - 36 - 20 20 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 24 24 24 - 24 - 16 16 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 


- 24 24 24 - 24 - 16 16 

6 Vadgam 0 1 0 

7 Bardipada 0 2 0 2 

8 

Nana 

Sutkhadaka 

0 1 0 1 

9 Chimipatal 0 2 0 2 

10 Sevlan 0 2 0 2 

Total 

1 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 14 14 14 - 14 - 11 11 

(iii)SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF 

- - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 14 14 14 - 14 - 11 11 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 20 20 20 - 20 - 10 10 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 20 20 20 - 20 - 10 10 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 13 13 13 - 13 - 13 13 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 13 13 13 - 13 - 13 13 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 21 21 21 - 21 - 11 11 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 21 21 21 - 21 - 11 11 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF - 10 10 10 - 10 - 10 10 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL - 10 10 10 - 10 - 10 10 

226 226 226 - 226 - 148 148 


(3)User Group:- 

These are homogeneous group of persons having land holding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an activity or 

asset on long term basis. The user group collects user charge from their members. Some of the point with was considered while forming a user 

group in Motidevrupan was: In case of check dam all the beneficiary of the individual check dam where involved as user group members. In 

case of Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries of animal husbandry are considered as potential members. Membership was on voluntary 

and democratic. Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential 

members. It was advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. 


Table no. 33: UG detail 

Village Name 

S. No. 

Motidevrupan 

1 

2 Umarda 

3 

Navachakra 

4 Dongripada 

5 Rudhigavan 

With 

only 

Men 

Total no. of registered SHGs 

With 

only 

Women 

With 

both 

11 0 0 11 

8 0 0 8 

8 0 0 8 

6 0 0 6 

8 0 0 8 

No. of members 

No. of SC/ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

Total Categories M F Total ST SC Total M F Total 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF 240 - 240 240 - 240 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 240 - 240 240 - 240 0 0 0 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF 71 - 71 71 - 71 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 71 - 71 71 - 71 0 0 0 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF 128 - 128 128 - 128 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 128 - 128 128 - 128 0 0 0 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF 61 - 61 61 61 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 61 - 61 61 - 61 0 0 0 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

(ii) MF 83 - 83 83 - 83 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 


Total 83 - 83 83 - 83 0 0 0 

6 

Vadgam 

7 Bardipada 

8 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 

9 Chimipatala 

10 Sevlan 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

7 0 0 7 

(ii) MF 86 - 86 86 - 86 0 0 0 

(iii)SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 86 - 86 86 - 86 0 0 0 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

7 0 0 7 

(ii) MF 58 - 58 58 - 58 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 58 - 58 58 0 58 0 0 0 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

6 0 0 6 

(ii) MF 60 - 60 60 - 60 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 60 - 60 60 - 60 0 0 0 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

5 0 0 5 

(ii) MF 149 - 149 149 - 149 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 149 - 149 149 - 149 0 0 0 

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - 

8 0 0 8 

(ii) MF 151 - 151 151 - 151 0 0 0 

(iii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - 

TOTAL 151 - 151 151 - 151 0 0 0 

74 0 0 74 - - - - - - - - - - 

Total 

1087 - 1087 1087 0 1087 0 0 0 


34: Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-II 

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of 

watershed Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group Discussion was conducted 

with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the amount of Rs. 13.37 lakh in Motidevrupan, 1.20 

lakh in Umarda, 1.30 lakh in Nava Cakra, 1.08 lakh in Dogripada, 1.20 Lakh in Rudhigavan, 1.08 Lakh in Vadgam, 1.08 Lakh in Bardipada, 0.96 

Lakh in Nana Sutkhadka, 1.30 Lakh in Chimipatal and1.44 Lakh in Sevlan was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated 

budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only 

those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources and common benefits . It was also taken into priority and convergences 

with different departments were also proposed, which will result in sustainability of activities. 


Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

S. No. 

Names of Amount earmarked for 

Entry Point Activities planned 

Villages 

EPA 

Unit 

Estimated cost (lac) 

Bore Well/Hand pump Repairing 10 1.00 

Pipe Line (mtr) 1000 mtr 4.87 

Havada Ripering And Ele. Motar 1 1.50 

1 

Motidevrupan 

13.37 

Plat Form Arround Tree 3 0.60 

Vermi Compost Demo 1 1.50 

Compundwall in School 1 2.00 

Checkdam Repairing 1 1.50 

Filter Plant With Cooler 1 0.40 

2 


1.20 

Umarda 

Solar With Motar 1 1.00 


3 

1.30 

3 

Plat Form Arround Tree 

Navachakra 

0.60 

4 


1.08 

Dongripada 


5 Rudhigavan 1.20 


Solar With Motar 1 1.00 

6 vadgam 1.08 


Filtet Plant With cooler 1 0.40 

7 Bardipada 1.08 

Pipe Line 250(mt) 0.58 

Tank With Pipe Line 200 (mt). 0.50 

8 

250(mt) 

0.96 Tank With Pipe Line 

NanaSutkhadka 

0.96 

9 Chimipatal 1.30 

Plat Form Arround Tree 3 0.60 

Community Domo Plot 1 0.70 

10 Sevlan 1.44 


Water Tank with stand Post 400(mt) 0.94 

Total 24.00 24.00 


Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

S. 

No. 

Name of villages 

Initiation of 

village level 

institution 

Capacity 

building 

IEC activities 

Baseline 

survey 

Hydro-geological 

survey 

Identifying 

technical 

support 

agencies 

Any other 

(please 

specify) 

Estimated 

Cost (Rs. in 

lakh) 

1 Moti Devrupen 2.60 6.94 3.47 1.73 0.87 0.87 0.87 17.35 

2 Umarda 0.39 1.04 0.52 0.26 0.13 0.13 0.13 2.6 

3 Nava Chakra 0.30 0.8 0.4 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 2.00 

4 Dongripada 0.28 0.75 0.38 0.19 0.09 0.09 0.09 1.87 

5 Rudhigavan 0.28 0.76 0.38 0.19 0.09 0.09 0.09 1.88 

6 Vadgam 0.34 0.90 0.45 0.22 0.12 0.12 0.12 2.27 

7 Bardipada 0.28 0.74 0.37 0.19 0.09 0.09 0.09 1.85 

8 Nana 

Sutkhadaka 0.31 0.84 0.42 

0.21 0.10 0.10 0.10 2.08 

9 Chimipatal 0.33 0.86 0.43 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.11 2.16 

10 Sevlan 0.29 0.77 0.38 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 1.94 

Total 5.40 14.40 7.20 3.60 1.80 1.80 1.80 36.00 

#One of the following may be entered in columns: Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started 


36. Watershed Development Works: 

Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase of watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point of the watershed 

and move progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river of the watershed. Work is 

location-specific, varying according to slope and geology as also the size of the stream being treated. The aim is to weave interventions into the 

contours of nature, not to seek mastery over it. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work. 

36.1 Ridge Area Treatment Plans 

In a watershed, the slopes falling from the ridge to the beginning of the plains are called ridge area. It is very important to treat the higher reaches 

of the ridge has this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly highly and forest region in the watershed. Various 

watershed managing structures should be building to arrest the erosion and degradation of forest with grasses in upper ridges. 

1. Gabions 

1. Contour Bund/trench 

2. Boulder Checks 

3. Gabions 

4. Grass seedling/planatation 

Gabion structures are rock and wire dams constructed across drainage lines with a catchment area of 50-500 ha. They are also constructed to 

reinforce highly erodible stream embankments. The main aim of constructing gabion structures is to reduce the velocity of water flowing through 

the drainage line. By reducing the velocity of runoff, gabion structures help in 

1. Reduction in soil erosion 

2. Trapping silt, which reduces the rate of siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches of the watershed. 

3. Increasing recharge of groundwater and 


4. Increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity of the water harvesting structures created downstream on the 

drainage line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills. 

4.3.2.2Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development: 

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water conservation or 

surface water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more of manual labour so schemes like National Rural 

Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. Following structures has been proposed in the project villages. 

1. Check dams 

2. Waste Weir 

1. Check dams 

Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or weathered 

formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined to stream 

course and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess runoff 

water cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such check dams are to be 

constructed to have recharge on regional scale in project villages. 

2. Dugwell Recharge Structure 

Ground water plays vital role in food production, drinking water supply, drought mitigation economic development etc beside 

environment sustenance in country. Presently more than 85% or rural water supply 50% of urban water needs and 50% of water requirement 

for irrigation in the country are met from ground water sources. As per the latest ground water resourse assessment carried out by Central 

Ground Water Board (CGWB). The situation in 112 areas is a matter of series concern in Gujarat state. In all 31 areas are over exploited, 12 

areas are critical and 69 areas are semi critical. 

Artificial Recharge of ground water is one of the most efficient ground water management tools for ensuring sustainability of 

ground water resources. Keeping in view the concen on problems of over exploitation of ground water resourses in the country as well as to 


ensure sustainable water resources management and assured irrigation facilities in the affected areas, activity “Artificial Recharge to ground 

water through Dugwell” has been prepared. 

Name Of Work: Constructions of Dug Well Recharging Structure 

Qty Unit Item Rate Per Total Amt. 

13.136 Cm Item1: Excavation for Foundation in all sort of 

Soil including sandy gravelly soil. Soft murmur 

including depositing the excavated stuff as 

directed incl. back filling the trenches with 

suitable excavated stuff etc. comp. for lead up to 

50 and lift as under. (Manually without 

dewatering ) (a) lift up to 1.5 meter SOR Pg. No. 

17-Sr. No.5(a) 

0.644 Cm Item 2 : Filling in foundation with concrete of 

cement, sand and metal (up to 5 Cm Size) in 

following proportion including centering 

,Shutering , Temping , Smootj Finishing curing 

etc. for lead 50 mt. and lift 1.5 mt. (1) 1:4:8 SOR 

Pg. No 23-Sr. No 17(ii) 

4.177 Cm Item 3: Providing and Laying burnt brick 

(Conventional size ) Masonry for foundation in 

ordinary Portland cement mortar 1:5 mm 

depth curing etc. complete for all lead and lift 

0.500 Cm Item 4: Providing and Laying plain / Reinforced 

cement concert of cement ,sand & metal (20 

mm to 25 mm size) in following propos. Laid in 

situ incl. centering, shuttering, temping , 

69.60 Cm 914.27 

2236.30 Cm 1440.18 

2111.30 Cm 8818.48 

3186.00 Cm. 1593.00 


smooth finishing curing etc. complete as 

directed for all leads & lifts.(iv) 1:2:4 SOR Pg. No 

23-Sr. No .18(iv) 

6.000 sm Item 5: Plastering cement plastering various 

thickness plastering of cement & sand 1:3,13 

mm and proportion incl. smooth finishing , 

curing , scaffolding. Comp. for all leads and lifts 

as under (a) cement mortar 1:3 proportion. (i) 

20 mm thick SOR Pg No. 26-Sr. No. 35(a) (i) 

1.95 Cm. Item 6 Providing filter sand of effective size 

and uniformity coefficient and required F/S and 

U/C SOR Pg. No. 56-Sr. No.3 

0.97 Cm. Item 7 : Providing filter crust stone aggregate 

of size with up to 20 mm with required F/S and 

U/S SOR Pg. No.56-Sr. No.4(iii) 

3.75 Cm Item 8: Providing and laying PVC standard size 

pipe 110 mm dia 6 kg / cm with all lead lift as 

per req. by EIC as per side condition SOR Pg. No 

.63 sr.no 170(7) 

114.30 sm 4114.80 

135.00 Cm 262.83 

425.00 Cm 827.42 

275.00 Mt 1031.25 

Total 19002.22 


Name of Work : Construction of Dug well Recharging structure 

Measurement sheet 

Item -1 Excavation for foundation in all sort of soil. Incl. Sandy gravelly soil, soft murrum incl. depositing … Etc. comp. For lead up to 

50 mt. and lift as under 

Chamber 1 X 2.80 X 2.30 X 1.90 

Av. 

Pipe 1 X 1.00 X 0.50 X 1.80 

Av. 

12.236 cm 

0.900 Cm 

Total 13.136 Cm 

Item -2 : Filling in foundation with concrete of cement, sand and metal (up to 5 Cm. Size) in following proportion(1:4:8) incl… smooth 

finishing etc. for lead 50 mt. And lift 1.5 mt. 

Chamber 1 X 2.80 X 2.30 X 0.10 

Av. 

0.644 cm 



Item -3 : Providing and laying burnt brick (conventional size) masonry for foundation in ordinary Portland cement…etc.cop 

Chamber 2 X 2.27+1.77 X 1.90 X 0.23 3.531 Cm 

1 X 1.56 X 1.80 X 0.23 0.646 Cm 

Total 4.177 cm 

Item -4 : Filling in foundation with concrete of cement , sand and metal (up to 5 cm. Size ) in following proportion (1:2:4) incl.. Smooth 

finishing etc. for lead 50 mt. And lift 1.5 mt. 

Chamber 1 X 2.50 X 2.00 X 0.10 

Av. 

0.500 Cm 

Total 0.500 cm 

Item – 5 : Plastering cement plaster in various thickness of cement & sand 1:3 20 mm thick … etc comp. 

O/S 2 X 2.50 X 2.00 10.00 Cm 

2 X 2.00 X 2.00 8.00 Sm 

I/S 2 X 2.50 X 2.00 10.00 Sm 

2 X 2.00 X 2.00 8.00 Sm 

Total 36.00 Sm 


Item -6 : Providing , Filter sand of effective size and uniformity coefficient and required F/S and U/C etc. comp. 

Chamber 1 X 1.56 X 1.04 X 1.20 1.947 Cm 


Item -7 : Providing , filter gravel of effective size and Uniformity Coefficient and required F/S and U/C ….etc. comp. 

Chamber 1 X 1.56 X 1.04 X 0.60 0.973 Cm 


Item -8 : Providing supplying and fixing of slandered length of ISI mark Rigid Un-plasticized PVC pipe incl. cost of solvent cement and 

other material etc. complete 6 kg/cm 2 no. of 110 mm dia. Pipe. 

3no. X 1.25 3.75 Mt. 



4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level: 

1. Percolation tank 

2. Farm bund 

3. Afforestation 

1) Percolation tank 

Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part of the 

catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part of the catchment. Such dams can also be made in 

the immediate upstream portion of wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity of the dam and duration of water storage, the dam can have 

secondary benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security of marginal farmers and landless labourers. 

2) Farm bund 

Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soil erosion and improving the so il moisture profile. Ideally, 

bunds on farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the fi eld into 

irregular sections. In such a situation, it becomes inconvenient to maneuver bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing. 

Due to these 

3). Afforestation 

Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use of available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees can either be of similar species or 

mixed in a manner that will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout of the area and the soil conditions, trees 

that have the greatest growth potential are selected like Babool, Neem, Sesame and Ailanthus. 


Table no.36.1: Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Augmentation/ repair of existing 

Construction of new structures 

structures 

S. 

No. Village name Type of structures Area to 

Area to 

be Storage Estimated 


No. 

No. 

irrigated capacity cost 


Proposed target 

(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - 

- 

- 

- 

40 - 

- 

2.00 - 

Pacca Nala Plug - 

Gabion Structure - 

1 Motidevrupan 

Check Wall - 

Gully Plug - 

Staggered Trench - 

Land levling - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

9 - 

30 - 

35 - 

400 - 

20000 - 

Total 20524 

- 

- 

- 

10 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

3.60 - 

7.50 - 

51.00 - 

2.40 - 

10.00 - 

2.00 - 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Estimated 

cost 

2.00 

3.60 

7.50 

51.00 

2.40 

10.00 

2.00 

78.50 78.50 

Table no.36.2:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 




Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 


be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated 

No. 

No. 


irrigated capacity cost irrigated capacity cost 


(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 


- 

- 

- 

25 - 

- 

1.25 - 

- 

1.25 

2 Umarda 



Check Wall - 


Total 58 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

5 - 

16 - 

2 - 

10 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.00 - 

4.00 - 

3.00 - 

2.00 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.00 

4.00 

3.00 

2.00 

12.25 12.25 


Table no.36,3:- Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 



Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 

be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated 

No. 

No. 

irrigated capacity cost irrigated capacity cost irrigated capacity cost 


(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 


- 

- 

- 

10 - 

- 

0.50 - 

- 

0.50 

3 Navachakra 




Total 28 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2 - 

10 - 

6 - 

- 

- 

- 

0.80 - 

2.50 - 

1.20 - 

- 

- 

- 

0.80 

2.50 

1.20 

5.00 5.00 





Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 


No. 

No. 



(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt - - 

- 

- 10 - 

- 

0.50 - 

- 

0.50 

4 Dongripada 

Pacca Nala Plug - - 

Gabion Structure - - 

Check Wall - - 

- 

- 

- 

- 5 - 

- 20 - 

- 5 - 

- 

- 

- 

2.00 - 

5.00 - 

7.50 - 

Total 40 15.00 15.00 

- 

- 

- 

2.00 

5.00 

7.50 





Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 


No. 

No. 



(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 


- 

- 

- 

10 - 

- 

0.50 - 

- 

0.50 

5 Rudhigavan 



Check Wall - 


Total 41 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

3 - 

20 - 

2 - 

6 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1.20 - 

5.00 - 

3.00 - 

1.20 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1.20 

5.00 

3.00 

1.20 

10.90 10.90 





Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 


No. 

No. 



(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 


- 

- 

- 

10 - 

- 

0.50 - 

- 

0.50 

6 Vadgam 



Check Wall - 


Total 45 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

6 - 

20 - 

3 - 

6 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.40 - 

5.00 - 

4.50 - 

1.20 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.40 

5.00 

4.50 

1.20 

13.60 13.60 





Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 


No. 

No. 



(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 


- 

- 

- 

10 - 

- 

0.50 - 

- 

0.50 

7 Bardipada 



Check Wall - 


Total 46 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

5 - 

20 - 

2 - 

10 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.00 - 

5.00 - 

1.50 - 

2.00 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.00 

5.00 

1.50 

2.00 

11.00 11.00 





Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 


No. 

No. 



(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 


- 

- 

- 

10 - 

- 

0.50 - 

- 

0.50 

8 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 



Check Wall - 


Total 42 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

7 - 

15 - 

4 - 

6 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.80 - 

3.75 - 

6.00 - 

1.20 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.80 

3.75 

6.00 

1.20 

14.25 14.25 





Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 


No. 

No. 



(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 


- 

- 

- 

10 - 

- 

0.50 - 

- 

0.50 

9 Chimipatal 



- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

11 - 

19 - 

- 

- 

4.40 - 

4.75 - 

Land Levling 6 1.20 1.20 

- 

- 

4.40 

4.75 

Total 46 

10.85 10.85 





Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Area to 


No. 

No. 



(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 


- 

- 

- 

10 - 

- 

0.50 - 

- 

0.50 

10 Sevlan 



Check Wall - 

Land levelling 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 11 

Total 51 

7 - 

21 - 

2 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.80 - 

5.25 - 

3.00 - 

2.20 - 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2.80 

5.25 

3.00 

2.20 

13.75 13.75 


Table no.37.1: Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 




structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 

be Storage Estimated be 

Estimated 

No. 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated capacity cost irrigated 

cost 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

Check dam 

- 

- 

- 

- 

13 

908 390 

109.00 

Percolation Tank 

- 

- 


Check dam Repairing 2 18 

Total 

Dugwell Recharge 

- 

70.00 

- 

2.00 

9 

- 

375 270 

- - 

45.00 

- 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

908 390 

375 

18 

270 

70 

Estimated 

cost 

109.00 

45.00 

- - - - 6 - - 1.20 - - 1.20 

2 18 70.00 2.00 28 1283 660 155.20 1301 730 157.20 

2.00 






structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 


be 

Estimated 

No. 

No. 

capacity 


irrigated 

cost 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

- 

- 1 

40.00 

Check dam 

- - 

25 

2 Umarda 


Total 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

3.00 1 40.00 

Estimated 

cost 

- - - - 4 - - 0.80 - - 0.80 

- 

- - 

- 

3.00 

5 25 40.00 3.80 1 40.00 3.80 





structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 

Storage 

be 

Estimated be 

Estimated 

No. 

capacity 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated 

cost irrigated 

cost 

(ltr) 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

Check dam 

- 3 

75 

120.00 

3 Navachakra 


Total 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

9.00 75 120.00 

Estimated 

cost 

- - - - 2 - - 0.40 - - 0.40 

5 

75 120.00 

9.40 

9.00 

75 120.00 9.40 






Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 

Storage 

Area to be 

be 

Estimated be 

Estimated 

Storage Estimated 

No. 

capacity 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated 

irrigated 


cost 

capacity cost 

(ltr) 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

4 Dongripada 


- 

- 

- 

- 

7 1.40 1.40 

Total 

- 

- - 

- 7 1.40 1.40 





structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 

Storage 

Area to be 

be 

Estimated be 

Estimated 

No. 

capacity 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated 

irrigated 


cost 

(ltr) 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

5 Rudhi gavan Check dam 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

25 40.00 

3.00 

Total 

- 

- - 

- 1 

25 40.00 

3.00 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

25 40.00 

Estimated 

cost 

3.00 

25 40.00 3.00 






Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 

Storage 

Area to be 

be 

Estimated be 

Estimated 


No. 

capacity 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated 

irrigated 


cost 

capacity cost 

(ltr) 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

6 Vad gam 

- 

- 

9 1.80 1.80 


- 

- 

Total 

- 

- - 

- 9 1.80 

1.80 





Total target 

structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 

Storage 

Area to be 

be 

Estimated be 

Estimated 


No. 

capacity 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated 

irrigated 


cost 

capacity cost 

(ltr) 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

7 Bardipada 

- 

- 

2 0.40 0.40 


- 

- 

Total 

- 

- - 

- 2 0.40 

0.40 



S. 

No. 

Village name 

Type of structures 

8 Nanasutkhadka Percolation tank 

Total 


structures 

Area to 

Storage 

be 

Estimated 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated 

cost 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

1 

13 

30.00 

1.50 

1 

13 30.00 



No. 

- 

1.50 - 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

(ltr) 

- - 

- - 

Estimated 

cost 

- 

- 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

13 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

30.00 

13 30.00 

Estimated 

cost 

1.50 

1.50 





structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 

Storage 

be 

Estimated be 

Estimated 

No. 

capacity 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated 


cost 

(ltr) 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

- 

- 3 

0.60 

9 Chimipatal Dugwell Recharge 

- - 

- - 

Total 

- 

- - 

- 3 

- - 

0.60 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

- - 0.60 

- - 

0.60 


Table no.37.10 Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 




structures 

S. 


Area to 

Storage 

Storage 

be 

Estimated be 

Estimated 

No. 

capacity 

No. 

capacity 

irrigated 


cost 

(ltr) 

(ltr) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

10 Sevlan Dugwell Recharge 

- 

- - 

- 1 

- - 

0.20 

Total 

- 

- - 

- 1 

- - 

0.20 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

- - 

- - 

Estimated 

cost 

0.20 

0.20 

Livelihood Intervention 

Promotion of micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an important aspect of empowerment. Although it is extremely 

difficult to find remunerative self employment, there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These include both on-farm and 

off-farm opportunities. Typically families living below poverty line, SC, ST and landless in a cluster of villages are motivated to take part in 

holistic development through livelihood opportunities through multidisciplinary interventions. 

Advantages of Agro-Based Activities: While promoting various income generation activities, agro-based activities have advantages because 

of the following reasons: 

1. Target groups are acquainted with most of the basic skills. 

2. Easy access to inputs. 


3. No problems of marketing, as most of the outputs are locally consumed as food. 

4. As over 50-60 % of the rural families own land and livestock, income generation activities can be initiated immediately without heavy capital 

investment. 

5. Risk of failure due to improper technology, poor quality, low demand and poor price recovery are very low. Hence, the chances of success are 

high. 

6. Infrastructure required for promotion of on-farm activities has been very well established. Hence, the entrepreneurs can progress even in 

backward regions, which are deprived of regular power supply and electronic information connectivity. It is therefore advantageous to tap all 

the opportunities to promote various on-farm activities. The experience has confirmed that the best strategy to promote income generation 

activities through SHGs is to analyze the on-going agro-based activities undertaken by the members and introduce suitable interventions to 

enhance the production. There are also excellent opportunities to improve post production management of the produce through grading, 

storage, processing and marketing. 

Various micro-enterprises activities through UG and Self Help Groups will be promoted. The list of micro-enterprises taken up by various SHGs 

is presented below. Among these activities, agriculture followed by animal husbandry, 

Support Needed for Promotion of Micro-enterprises 

Following support is needed to promote micro-enterprises through women SHGs. 

1. Motivation of the target communities, particularly women and landless farmers 

2. Formation of Self Help Groups and their Federations 

3. Gender sensitization 

4. Training and capacity building 


5. Micro-finance. Provision of credit facilities and linkage with banks 

6. Development of infrastructure, particularly through the SHG Federations to provide necessary support services and marketing 

7. Trade networking and establishment of market outlets 

8. Village level Information Centre: The multi-disciplinary team interacted with the SHGs and User groups to explore the potentials for 

development of various enterprises and extend necessary support for dissemination of technologies, procurement of inputs, and training of 

members and establishment of linkage with the market. There should be some agency to provide guidance to the entrepreneurs as and when 

needed. 

The selected production activities for the watershed villages follow the above-mentioned process, and are selected in such a way that they 

should be: 

 

 

 

 

 

economically viable 

environmentally sustainable 

socially equitable 

energy efficient 

employment generation 


Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 

S. No. 

1 

2 


Villages 

Motidevrupan 

Major activities of the SHGs 

Name of activity 

No. of SHGs involved 

Average annual income from 

activity per SHG (In Lakh) 

Animal husbandry 5 5.30 

Farm Machinery 3 2.00 

Agri demonstration plot 3 1.00 

Drum Drip irrigation 5 0.90 

Vermi compost 4 1.00 

Bamboo Work With 

Motor 

3 1.50 

Catering Set For Comm. 1 1.00 

Cycle For Veg. Ferry 4 0.20 

Trolly 2 0.10 

Floormill 3 1.50 

Cycle Reparing Kit 1 0.40 

Carpenter Kit 3 0.15 

Meson Kit 3 0.15 

Black Smeath 1 0.05 

Bullocks 5 1.50 

Bullock Carts 4 2.00 

Nursary 3 0.90 

R.I.R. Birds 2 1.00 

Haricutin Salloon Kit 3 0.75 

Horticulture 3 0.80 





Trolly 2 0.10 



Umarda 










3 

4 

Navachakra 






Trolly 2 0.20 
















Dongripada Trolly 5 0.25 










5 

6 

Rudhigavan 






Trolly 5 0.25 














Trolly 1 0.05 


Vadgam Carpenter Kit 1 0.05 






7 Bardipada 






Trolly 5 0.25 







8 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 





Trolly 3 0.15 





9 Animal husbandry 2 1.00 




10 

chimipatal 

Sevlan 


Trolly 5 0.25 






















Livelihood Intervention 

Production System -1: Vermi composting unit for Project villages 

Introduction: 

The wide spread problems of soil degradation and desertification are threatening agricultural sustainability. Throughout the 

project village large populations of domestic animals producing large amounts of organic wastes. These organic residues, or ‘waste materials’, 

can be transformed more quickly and into a more useful vermi-compost, available for urban and land application. Nutrients within vermicomposted 

material are readily available to plants, and can be added to agricultural land to improve soil structure and fertility or used as good 

quality and marketable additive to potting soil or plant growth media. The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise 

spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1 m wide and 0.3 m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in 

between the layers @ 350 worms per m 3 of bed volume. The beds are maintained at about 40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 - 

30° C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the 

matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants. 

Objectives 

• To train farmers / SHGs in organic farming and vermi-culture. 

• To promote production of vermi-castings as a viable small business venture 

About The Worms 

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The worms 

feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermi-composting units are ideally suited to locations / 

units with generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks lays one egg 

capsule (containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under 


optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make 

'worm meal' which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed. 

Location 

All villages of Vad project have lots of animal so it can become good composting center as well as good source of livelihood. Vermicompost is 

very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity of product in per unit area. 

Market/Use 

Vermi compost is a valuable input for sustainable agriculture and wasteland development. This also can be used widely in pot culture and in 

home gardens. Several farmers are successfully using vermi-comost. Vermi compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer 

so by the use of compost we can reduce the use of chemical fertilizer. Vermi compost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of 

hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water and nutrient holding capacities of soil. 

Components of A Commercial Unit 

Sheds 

Shed is necessary as the temperature in summer is high. We can make it by the use of concrete pillars because this will act as a source of income 

for those in the village who produce pillars. It will prevent wetting of beds due to rain on a windy day. While designing the sheds adequate room has to 

be left around the beds for easy movement of the labour attending to fill and harvest the beds. 

Vermi-beds 

Scientific bed size proposed here is 10ft by 3 ft by 2.5 ft. The whole bed area should be above the ground. The bed should have a uniform height over 

the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The proper bed width should not be more than 4.5 ft to 

allow easy access to the centre of the bed. 


Land 

About 500 square ft of land is required to set up a vermi compost production unit in each village. It should have at least one super structure to 

cover the 10 beds. It should have an arrangement for watering and other equipments as required because moisture is very essential for 

compost production. Land can be taken from Gram panchayat on lease of at least 10-15 years. 

Seed Stock 

This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m 3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year. 

Fencing 

The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the stray animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length 

of the periphery of the farm. 

Water Supply System 

We have to maintain always 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system of conveying and 

applying the water to vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for continuous supply and saving on 

water. Such a water supply/application system requiring considerable initial investment, however, reduces the operational costs on hand 

watering and proves economical in the long run. The cost of these items depends on the capacity of the unit and the type of water supply chosen. 

Machinery 

Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermisheds, 

loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary 

implements and the machinery have to be included in the project cost. 


Model of a Vermi-compost Unit (10 ft *3 ft *2.5 ft) 

S. No Particulars Quantity Rate Amount (Rs.) 

1 Construction of bed 10 (Rs.) 6000 60000 

2 Erection of shed 

A Cost of Polls (8 ft * 5) +(10 ft* 5) =10 10 25 2250 

B Cost of iron angle (16 ft * 5) + (40 ft *2) = 7 7 42 6720 

C Nylon roof matting 1008 sqr ft 40 40320 

D Labour charge + Transport - - 7000 

3 Cow dung @ 275Kg per bed *10 bed 2750 0.35 960 

4 Agri waste @ 70 kg per bed *10 bed 700 0.50 350 

5 Worms 1.5 kg per bed *10 bed 15 300 4500 

6 Tools - - 2000 

7 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) - - 2000 

8 Miscellaneous - - 2000 

9 Water canal on periphery - - 1420 

10 Remaining cost for 1 year ( 8 cycle) - - 20480 

Total cost 150000 

Returns from vermicomposting 

Benefits 

1. Sale of vermin compost of 40 tones @ Rs.3500/- per ton 40*3500=1,40,000 Rs 

2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 300per kg 200*300=60,000 Rs 

3.Total 

Net benefit 

2,00,000 Rs/- 

50,000Rs/- 

Training will be provided to all the stakeholders by KVK which can be divided in to two categories and shown below. 


A. Theoretical 

• Introduction to Organic Farming 

• Need and the importance of Organic farming 

• Introduction to Composting methods 

• Vermi-culture 

• Earth Worms, nature, identification and selection 

• Vermi-castings 

• Vermi-compost 

• Marketing Avenues 

• Application of vermicomposting 

• Addresses of the suppliers of worms. 

B. Practical 

• Production Methods 

• Raw Materials 

• Site and the type of Infrastructure 

• Tank 

• Vermi-bed 

• Harvest 

• Quality Analysis 

• Storage & Packaging 

• Dos and Don’ts 


Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed workphase proposed target 

S. No. 

Ridge area Drainage line Nursery Land Crop Pasture Total 


treatment treatment raising development demonstrations development Estimated cost 

villages 

(ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (Rs. In lakhs) 

1 Motidevrupan - - 1937 232.50 775 93.0 10 5.0 20 2.50 1375 15.00 342.50 

2 Umarda - - 110 13.25 3.75 0.45 10 5 5 0.50 11.60 1.40 20.60 

3 Navachakra - - 106 12.80 7.5 0.90 6 3.00 20 2.50 25 3.00 22.20 

4 Dongripada - - 125 15.00 7.5 0.90 - - 5 0.50 12.5 1.50 17.90 

5 Rudhigavan - - 105 12.70 7.5 0.90 6 3.0 8.5 1.00 4.16 0.50 18.10 

6 Vadgam - - 103 12.40 6 0.75 6 3.00 8.5 1.00 12.5 1.50 18.65 

7 Bardipada - - 75 9.00 3.75 0.45 10 5.00 2 0.25 15.0 1.80 16.50 

Nana 

8 

Sutkhadaka - - 133 14.55 5 0.60 6 3.00 8.50 1.00 12.50 1.50 20.65 

9 Chimipatal - - 80 9.65 5 0.60 6 3.00 20 2.50 25.50 3.10 18.85 

10 Sevlan - - 96 11.55 7.5 0.90 11 5.50 20 2.50 19.50 2.30 21.25 


Table no.40.1: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* 

Executing 

Type of treatment Type of land 

Target 

agency 

(i) UG 

S. 

No. Village name Name of structures (i) (ii) 

(iii) 

No. of Estimated cost 

Expected 

(iii) (i) 

(ii)SHG 

Ridge Drainage 

(ii) Others 

units (No./ (Rs. in lakh) 

month & 

Land Private 

Others (pl. 

(iii) 

year of 

area line 

Community (pl. 

cu.m./ 

dev. (L) 

(R) (D) 

specify) 

rmt) M W O T 

completion 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 

1 

Motidevrupa 

n 

Nala Plug - D - P - - UG 40 - - - 

Pacca Nalaplug - D - p - - UG 9 - - - 

2.00 

3.60 

Jan-2012 

Jan-2012 

Check Wall - - L P - - UG 35 - - - 51.00 March- 

2012 

Land Levelling with farm 

bunding 

- - L P - - UG 10 - - - 

2.00 

April-2012 

Gabion structures - D - P - - UG 30 - - - 

7.50 

June-2012 

Check dam - D - P C - UG 13 - - - 109.00 Jan-2013 

Staggered Trench - D - - - F Ug 20000 - - - 10.00 Jun-2012 

Galliy Pulg - D - P C - UG 400 - - - 

Checkdam Repairing - - - - C - UG 2 - - - 

PercolationTank 

Repairing 

2.40 

Jan-2012 

2.00 March- 

2012 

- D - - C - UG 9 - - - 45.00 Jan-2013 

Dugwell Rechage - - L P - - UG/SHG 6 - - - 

Total 20554 

1.20 

235.7 

0 

Jan-2013 

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total) 



S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

Name of structures 

(i) Ridge 

area (R) 

Type of treatment 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. (L) 

(i) 

Private 

Executing 

Type of land 

Target 

agency 

(i) UG 

Estimated 

(iii) 

No. of units 

(ii)SHG 

cost (Rs. in 

(ii) Others 

(No./ 

(iii) Others 

lakh) 


cu.m./ 

(pl. 

specify) 

rmt) M W O T 

specify) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

2 Umarda 

Nala Plug - D P UG 25 1.25 Jan-2012 

Pacca Nalaplug D P UG 5 2.00 Jan-2012 

Gabion structures D P UG 16 4.00 

March- 

2012 

Check Wall D P UG 2 3.00 April-2012 


bunding 

L P UG 10 2.00 June-2012 

Straggered trench 

Check dam D C UG 1 3.0 Jan-2013 

Dugwell Rechage - - L P - - UG/SHG 4 - - - 0.80 Jan-2013 

Total 63 16.05 




S. 

No. 

3 

Village 

name 

Navachakr 

a 



Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 

Estimated Expected 

(ii) 

(iii) 


(iii) (i) 

(ii)SHG No. of units cost (Rs. in month & 

(i) Ridge Drainage 

(ii) Others 

Land Private 

(pl. cu.m./ rmt) 

completion 

(iii) Others (No./ lakh) year of 

area (R) line 


dev. (L) 

(D) 

specify) 

M W O T 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 

Nala Plug - D P UG 10 0.50 JAN-2011 

Pacca Nalaplug D P UG 2 0.80 Des-2011 

Gabion structures D P UG 10 2.50 June-2012 

Check Wall 

Land Levelling with 

farm bunding 

L P UG 6 1.20 Des-2012 


Check dam D C UG 3 9.0 Des-2011 

Total 33 

14.4 

0 




Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 


S. Village 

(ii) 

(iii) 


(iii) (i) 


No. name 


(ii) Others 

Land Private 


completion 


area (R) line 


dev. (L) 

(D) 

specify) 

M W O T 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 



4 Dongripada Gabion structures D P UG 20 5.00 June-2012 

Check Wall D P C UG 5 7.50 June-2012 

Dugwell Rechage - - L P - - UG/SHG 7 1.40 Jan-2013 

Total 47 

16.4 

0 





Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 


S. 

No. Village name Name of structures (ii) 

(iii) 

(iii) (i) 



(ii) Others 

Land Private 


completion 


area (R) line 


dev. (L) 

(D) 

specify) 

M W O T 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 



Gabion structures D P UG 20 5.00 

March- 

2012 

5 Rudhigavan 

March- 

Check Wall D P UG 2 3.00 

2012 


farm bunding 

L P UG 6 1.20 Des-2013 

Check dam L C UG 1 3.00 JAN-2013 

Total 42 

13.9 

0 




S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

6 Vadgam 



Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 


(ii) 

(iii) 


(iii) (i) 



(ii) Others 

Land Private 


completion 


area (R) line 


dev. (L) 

(D) 

specify) 

M W O T 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 



Gabion structures D P C UG 20 5.00 June-2012 

Check Wall D P C UG 3 4.50 June-2011 


bunding 

L p UG 6 1.20 Des-2013 


Total 54 

15.4 

0 



S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

7 Bardipada Check Wall D P UG 1 1.50 



Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 


(ii) 

(iii) 


(iii) (i) 



(ii) Others 

Land Private 


completion 


area (R) line 


dev. (L) 

(D) 

specify) 

M W O T 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 

Nala plug - D P UG 10 0.50 JAN-2011 

Pacca Nalaplug D p UG 5 2.00 Des-2011 

Gabion structures D P UG 20 5.00 Mar-2012 

March- 

2012 


farm bunding 

L P UG 10 2.00 Des-2012 


Total 48 

11.4 

0 





Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 


S. 

No. Village name Name of structures (ii) 

(iii) 

(iii) (i) 



(ii) Others 

Land Private 


completion 


area (R) line 


dev. (L) 

(D) 

specify) 

M W O T 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 

Nala Plug - D P UG 10 0.50 

Pacca Nalaplug D p UG 7 2.80 Des-2011 

Gabion structures D P UG 15 3.75 June-2012 

Nana 

8 

Check Wall D P UG 4 6.00 Mar-2012 

Sutkhadaka 


L P UG 6 1.20 Des-2013 

farm bunding 

Check dam Repring C UG 1 1.50 Mar-11 

Total 43 

15.7 

5 






Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 


Village 

(ii) 

(iii) 


(iii) (i) 


name 


(ii) Others 

Land Private 


completion 


area (R) line 


dev. (L) 

(D) 

specify) 

M W O T 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 


Pacca Nalaplug D P UG 11 4.40 Dec-2011 

Gabion structures D p UG 19 4.75 June-2012 

9 Chimipatal Check Wall 


farm bunding 

L P UG 6 1.20 Dec-2013 


S. 

No. 

Total 49 


11.4 

5 



S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

10 Sevlan 


(i) Ridge 

area (R) 


(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. (L) 

(i) 

Private 

Executing 


Target 

agency 

(i) UG 

Estimated 

(iii) 

(ii)SHG No. of units cost (Rs. in 

(ii) Others 

(iii) Others (No./ lakh) 



specify) 

M W O T 

specify) 

Nala Plug - D P UG 10 

Pacca Nalaplug D P UG 7 

Gabion structures D P UG 21 


bunding 

L P UG 11 

Check Wall D P UG 2 

Check dam D P UG 11 

Dugwell Rechage - - L P - - UG/SHG 1 

Total 52 19.45 


0.50 

2.80 

5.25 

2.20 

3.00 

5.50 

0.20 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

JAN-2011 

Dec-2011 

Mar-2012 

Dec-2013 

Mar-2012 

Mar-2013 

Jan-2013 


Table no.41.1: Details of activities related forestation in watershed works (In lakhs) 

S. 

No. 

Name of village 


structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 

No. of 

plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Forest land 

1 Motidevrupan plantation 

L F - 300 - 90.00 Jun-2012 

Silve Pasture L F UG 100 - 15.0 Jun-2012 

Total 400 - 105.00 


S. 

No. 


2 Umarda 


structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

IWMP-II Motidevrupan Project in Umarpada Block, Surat Page 132 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Common waste 

land plantation 

L P C UG 1 0.90 Jun-2012 

Farm forestry L P UG 4 15000 0.45 Jun-2011 

Pasture 


L P C UG,SHG 5 20 0.50 Jan-2011 

GramVatika C UG 4 0.50 

Total 14 15020 2.35


S. 

No. 


3 Navachakra 


structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Common waste 


L P C UG 12.5 1 1.50 Jun-2012 

Farm forestry L P C UG 7.5 30000 0.90 Jun-2011 

Pasture 


L P C UG,SHG 20 100 2.50 Jan-2012 

GramVatica C UG 12 1.50 

Total 52 30101 6.40 


S. 

No. 


4 Dongripada 


structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Common waste 



Pasture 

L P C UG,SHG 4 20 0.50 Jan-2012 


Gram vatika C UG 12.5 1.50 

Total 24 30020 2.90 



S. 

No. 



structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 


Pasture 

5 Rudhigavan Development 

L P C UG,SHG 8 40 1.00 Jan-2012 

Gram vatika 

Upgaradation 

C UG 4 0.50 

Total 19.5 30040 2.40 


S. 

No. 



structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Farm forestry L P UG 6.25 25000 0.75 Jun-2011 

Garm Vatica C UG 12.5 1.50 

Pasture 

6 Vadgam 

L P UG,SHG 8 40 1.00 Jan-2012 


Total 26.75 25040 3.25 



S. 

No. 


7 Bardipada 


structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Common waste 


L P UG 1 0.30 Jun-2012 


Garmvatica C UG 12.5 1.50 

Pasture 

L C UG,SHG 2 10 0.25 Jan-2013 


Total 19.50 15010 2.50 


S. 

No. 

8 



structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 


Nana Pasture 

Sutkhadka Development 

L C UG,SHG 8 40 1.00 Jan-2012 


Total 25.50 20040 3.10 



S. 

No. 


9 Chimipatal 


structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Common waste 


L C UG 13 2 1.60 Jun-2012 



Pasture 

L C UG,SHG 20 100 2.50 Jan-2012 


Total 49.50 200102 6.20 


S. 

No. 


10 Sevlan 


structure/ 

work 


(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Common waste 


L P UG 6.50 1 0.80 Jun-2012 

Farm forestry L P UG 7.50 30000 0.90 Jun-2011 

Garmvatica C UG 12 1.50 

Pasture 

L C UG,SHG 20 100 2.50 Jan-2013 


Total 56 30101 5.70 


Table no.42.1: Details of allied / other activities 

S. 

No. 





(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 

of completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

Production System and Microenterprise Development (13%) 

Animal husbandry Private - - SHG 10.00 Des-2012 

Farm Machinery - Community - UG,SHG 6.00 Dec-2013 

Agri demonstration plot Private - - UG,SHG 2.00 Jan-2011 

Drip irrigation Private - - UG,SHG 3.00 Des-2012 

Vermi compost Private - - SHG 4.00 Des-2012 

Bhabu Work with Motar Private _ - SHG 4.50 Dec-2013 

Catering Set - Community - SHG 2.00 Mar-2013 

Bullocks Private - - SHG 7.80 Mar-2013 

Bullock Carts Private - - SHG 2.00 Mar-2013 

Nursary Private Community - SHG 0.90 Dec-2011 

R.I.R. Birds Private - - SHG 1.00 Jun-2012 

Horticulture Private Community - SHG 3.50 Jun-2012 

Total of Microenterprise and Production systems: 

Livelihood Activities for landless people. (10%) 

Cycle Private - - 

Trolley Private - - 

Animal Husbandry Private - - 

Flore Mill Private - - 

Vocational Kit 

Meson Kit Private - - 

Black Smeath Kit Private - - 

46.70 lakhs 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC\ WDT 

WC\ WDT 

0.20 Dec-2012 

0.10 Jun-2011 

30.30 Jan-2011 

1.50 Dec-2012 

0.15 Dec-2012 

0.05 Dec-2012 


Carpenter Kit Private - - 

WC/WDT 

0.15 Jun-2011 

Haircutting kit 

Private 

Cycle repairing Kit 

Private 

Total Livelihood Activities for landless people: 

33.60 lakhs 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

0.75 Dec-2012 

0.40 Jun-2011 


S. 

No. 


2 Umarda 

2 Umarda 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 















WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

10.10 lakhs 

0.10 Jun-2011 

2.40 Jan-2011 

0.50 Dec-2012 






Private 


Private 


WC\ WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

3.85 lakhs 

0.10 Dec-2012 

0.10 Jun-2011 

0.25 Dec-2012 

0.40 Jun-2011 


S. 

No. 


3 Navachakra 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 


Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 













3 Navachakra Cycle Private - - 

7.30 lakhs 

WC\WDT 

0.04 Jun-2011








Private 


WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC\ WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

4.24 lakhs 

0.25 Jun-2011 

3.00 Jan-2011 

0.50 Dec-2012 

0.10 Dec-2012 

0.10 Jun-2011 

0.25 Dec-2012 


S. 

No. 


4 Dongripada 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 










4 Dongripada 




6.50 lakhs 



WC\WDT 

0.04 Jun-2011 


WC/WDT 

0.25 Jun-2011 


WC/WDT 

2.10 Jan-2011 



WC\ WDT 

0.10 Dec-2012 


WC/WDT 

0.10 Jun-2011 


Private 

WC/WDT 

0.25 Dec-2012 


Private 

- - 

WC|WDT 

0.40 Dec-2012 

Total Livelihood Activities for landless people: 3.24 lakhs 


S. 

No. 


5 Rudhigavan 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 






5 Rudhigavan 








7.00 lakhs 



WC\WDT 

0.08 Jun-2011 







Private 


WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC\ WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

3.78 lakhs 

0.25 Jun-2011 

3.00 Jan-2011 

0.10 Dec-2012 

0.10 Jun-2011 

0.25 Dec-2012 



S. 

No. 


6 Vadgam 

6 Vadgam 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 


















Private 


WC\WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC\ WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

3.44 lakhs 

5.30 lakhs 

0.04 Jun-2011 

0.05 Jun-2011 

3.00 Jan-2011 

0.05 Dec-2012 

0.05 Jun-2011 

0.25 Dec-2012 



S. 

No. 


7 Bardipada 

7 Bardipada 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 


















Private 


4.95 lakhs 

WC\WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC\ WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

3.18 lakhs 

0.08 Jun-2011 

0.25 Jun-2011 

2.40 Jan-2011 

0.10 Dec-2012 

0.10 Jun-2011 

0.25 Dec-2012 



S. 

No. 

8 

8 


Nana 

Sutkhadka 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 
















Private 

Private 


- - 

WC\WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC\ WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC|WDT 

4.10 lakhs 

5.00 lakhs 

0.20 Jun-2011 

0.15 Jun-2011 

3.00 Jan-2011 

0.05 Dec-2012 

0.05 Jun-2011 

0.25 Dec-2012 

0.40 



S. 

No. 


9 Chimipatal 

9 Chimipatal 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 





Bullocks Private - - UG 1.20 DCe-2012 

Bullock Carts Private - - UG 0.50 Dec-2012 

Nursary Private Community - UG 0.60 Dec-2011 

R.I.R. Birds Private - - UG 0.30 May-2012 












Private 

Private 


- - 

WC\WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC\ WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC|WDT 

3.70 lakhs 

7.00 lakhs 

0.20 Jun-2011 

0.25 Jun-2011 

2.40 Jan-2011 

0.10 Dec-2012 

0.10 Jun-2011 

0.25 Dec-2012 

0.40 



S. 

No. 


10 Sevlan 

10 Sevlan 


(i) Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) WC 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/yyyy) 





Bullocks Private - - UG 1.20 DCe-2012 

Nursary Private Community - UG 0.60 Dec-2011 

R.I.R. Birds Private - - UG 0.30 May-2012 











7.60 lakhs 

WC\WDT 

WC/WDT 

WC|WDT 

WC\ WDT 

WC/WDT 

4.70 lakhs 

0.40 Jun-2011 

3.60 Jan-2011 

0.50 March-2012 

0.10 Dec-2012 

0.10 Jun-2011 


Production System -2 

Forest Nursery. 

Unit Cost of Forest Nursery in 0.25 ha 

1.25 lakh seedlings 

Wage Rate :Rs.50/MD 

Sr.No. Particulars of works Unit Cost. (Rs.) 

Fixed Cost 

1 Site Preparation 8 MD 400 

2 Fencing with barbed wire for 150 RMT Rs.30/RMT 4500 

3 Preparation of compost pit, nursery 

10 MD 500 

path 

4 Maintenance of irrigation source LS 2000 

5 5 HP Diesel Pumpset LS 25000 

6 Cost of pipeline for irrigation (100 

Rs.15/RMT 1500 

mts.) 

7 Cost of implements for nursery 

LS 2500 

operations 

8 Cost of Water Tank LS 5000 

9 Preparation of Polybeds (120) 100 MD 5000 

10 Cost of Net for providing shade and 

LS 30000 

installation 

11 SubTotal 76400 

12 Contingency 5% 3820 

Total 80220 


Sr.No. Particulars of works Unit Cost. (Rs.) 

Recurring Cost 

1 Rent for land 0.25 ha. Rs.2500/yr 2500 

2 Preparation of Seed beds (10) 10MD 500 

3 Cost of seeds LS 5000 

4 Cost of Polybags (400 Polybags/kg) Rs.40/kg 12000 

5 Cost of Pot mixture including loading, 

Rs.120/MT 30000 

unloading @ 2 kg/bag 

6 Cost of fertilizer @ 10 gm/polybag Rs.10/kg 12000 

7 Cost of chemicals for plant protection LS 2500 

8 Cost of diesel and lubricants for 

1 ltr. /hr @ Rs.22/ltr. 3300 

pumpsets @ 1.5 hrs for 100 days 

9 Cost of thatching material LS 1000 

10 Cost of sowing on seed beds 10 MD 500 

11 Cost of weeding and hoeing 50 MD 2500 

12 Cost of picking up from germi beds 50 MD 2500 

13 Filling up of polybags @ 200 Polybags 

625 MD 31250 

/MD 

14 Shifting of polybags 50 MD 2500 

15 Cost of labour for irrigation 100 MD 5000 

16 Cost of fertilizer application 25 MD 1250 

17 Cost of application of insecticides 25 MD 1250 

18 Maintenance of paths 10 MD 500 

19 Maintenance of pumpset LS 2500 

20 Watch and ward Rs.1000/month 12000 

Subtotal 130550 

Cost of supervision 5% 6527 

Total 137077 

Grand Total 217297 


Yield and Income 

Year No. of Saplings Saleable seedlings @ 

90% 

Actual Sale @ 90% Income @ Rs.2.50 per 

sapling 

1 125000 112500 101250 253125 

2 125000 112500 101250 253125 

3 125000 112500 101250 253125 

4 125000 112500 101250 253125 

5 125000 112500 101250 253125 

Economics of Forest Nursery on 0.25 ha. 

Years 1 2 3 4 5 

Cost 217297 137077 137077 137077 137077 

Benefits 253125 253125 253125 253125 253125 

Net Benefit 35828 116048 116048 116048 116048 


Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 

Name(s) of the 

villages 

CPR particulars 

Activity proposed 

Target area under the 

activity (ha) 

Target 

Estimated expenditure 

(Rs.) 

Expected no. of 

beneficiaries 

Motidevrupan 

Umarda 

Navachakra 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 

Forest Plantion Forest Plantion 300 90.00 35 Housedhol 

Silve Pastures Silve Pastures 100 15.00 25 Housedhol 

Total for village 105.00 

Waste land Plantation 7.5 0.90 35 Housedhol 

Waste land Farm forestry 3.75 0.45 25 Housedhol 

Community pasture land 

Pasture 


4 0.50 18 Housedhol 

Waste land Gram.Va.UP. 4 0.50 15 Housedhol 





Pasture 



Waste land Gramvatica 12.50 1.50 35 Housedhol 





Pasture 




Waste land 

Plantation 



Pasture 



Waste land Gramvatika 12.50 1.50 35 Housedhol 



Vadgam 

Bardipada 

Nana 

Sutkhadaka 

Chimipatal 

Sevlan 




Pasture 





Waste land Farm forestry 4 0.45 25 Housedhol 



Pasture 




Waste land 

Plantation 



Pasture 


8.5 1.00 25 Housedhol 



Waste land Plantation 13 1.60 25 Housedhol 


Waste and Gramvatica 12.50 1.50 35 Housedhol 


Pasture 




Waste land Plantation 7 0.80 45 Housedhol 




Pasture 





4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration 

Watershed management and development requires the collaboration of a wide range of farmers’ organizations as well as extension and 

research institutions at various levels. This gives implementers access a wider technical resource base, creates better information flows and 

encourages mutual learning. Watersheds serve as a confluence between lands and communities, providing ample opportunities for members to 

share complementary expertise. A watershed contains producers (farmers), possibly actors that add value to produce, traders and consumers 

information, and education institutions to test their joint efforts to make a difference. Watersheds can be also a good ground for learning and 

demonstration of expertise. 

Scope of capacity building at Project Villages 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income Generation Activities 

o Stiching 

o Food Processing 

o Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management 

Crop Information 

Meteorological Information 

Alternative Land Use Plan 

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices 

Scientific planning of Soil and Moisture conservation 

Information dissemination on Audio/Video 

Dairy Development and Management 


Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: 

S. No. 

1 

2 


Training 

Institute 

Krishi Vigyan 

Kendra,Vyara 

Agriculturale 

university, 

Navsari 

Full Address with 

contact no., 

website & e-mail 

Vyara 

Navsari 

3 BAIF,Baroda Baroda 

4 SPIPA Ahmedabad 

5 BISAG Ghandhinagar 

Type of 

Institute 

Reserch 

institute 

University 

Trainning 

institution 

Trainning 

institution 

Space 

application 

Area(s) of 

specialization 

Agriculture/ 

Horticulture/ 

Animal 

Husbandry 

Agriculture/ 

Horticulture/ 

Animal 

Husbandry 

Capacity 

building 

Capacity 

building 

Remote 

sensing 

Accreditation 

details 

Reference Year 

Trainings 


trainings 

assigned 


trainees to be 

trained 

GOI 2012-2014 3 70 

GOI 2012-2014 3 40 

NGO 2012-13 4 50 

GOG 2012-14 3 30 

GOG 2010-15 3 9 

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) 

$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ 

Forestry/ livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify) 

Early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration and communication in capacity building is also important from the point viewpoint of “leveling the 

playing field” in anticipation of disputes that may arise. Filling strategic skills/capacity gaps supports Integrated Water resources Management, 

facilitates dispute resolution, and builds practical understanding of the scope of sustainable natural resource development challenges and 

opportunities. 


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: 

S. No. Project Project Stakeholders 

Total no. of No. of persons to be No. of training 

persons 

trained 

programmes 

Estimated cost(in lacs) 

PIA 12 12 4 3.00 

IWMP-II 

WDTs 9 9 12 9.00 

1 

Motidevrupan 

UGs 836 400 2 5.00 

(Umarpada 

SHGs 324 250 4 5.00 

block) 

WCs 132 132 10 3.85 

GPs 20 20 3 0.50 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: 

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) 

1 Street plays Local drama group 0.55 

2 Video shows DWDU, Surat 0.55 

3 

Wall paintings/ Focussed 

DWDU,Surat 

Group discussion 

0.55 

4 Pamphlets and posters 

DWDU,Surat 

1.00 

5 Banners and hoardings 

DWDU, Surat 

Total: 3.65 

1.00 

Outcome 

Awareness generation and 

making beneficiaries accountable 

for sustainable development 


CHAPTER-5 

BUDGETING 


Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project 

Sr no Budget component Cost requirement (in lacks) 

1 Administrative costs (10%) 60.00 

2 Monitoring 

3 Evaluation 

(2%) 12.00 

4 Entry Point activity (4%) 24.00 

5 Institution and Capacity Building (5%) 30.00 

6 Detailed Project Report (1%) 6.00 

7 Watershed Development Works (50%) 300.00 

8 Livelihood activities for asset less (10%) 60.00 

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises (13%) 78.00 

10 Consolidation phase (5%) 30.00 

TOTAL 600.00 


Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (In Lcks) 

Activity 

Sr 

no 

Village Name 

EPA 

(4%) 

Institution 

and CB 

DPR 

Watershed 

development 

Work (50%) 

Livelihood 

for asset 

less (10%) 

Production 

system and 

Microenterprises 

(13%) 

Consolidation 

(5%) 

1 Motidevrupan 13.37 - - 167.10 33.42 43.45 16.71 274.05 

2 Umarda 1.20 - - 15.00 3.00 3.90 1.50 24.60 

3 Navachakra 1.30 - - 16.20 3.24 4.21 1.62 26.57 

4 Dongripada 1.08 - - 13.50 2.70 3.51 1.35 22.14 

5 Rudhigavan 1.20 - - 15.00 3.00 3.90 1.50 24.6 

6 Vadgam 1.08 - - 13.50 2.70 3.51 1.35 22.14 

7 Bardipada 1.08 - - 13.50 2.70 3.51 1.35 22.14 

Total 

8 Nana 

0.96 - - 12.00 2.40 3.12 1.20 

Sutkhadaka 

19.60 

9 Chimipatal 1.30 - - 16.20 3.24 4.21 1.62 26.57 

10 Sevlan 1.44 - - 18.00 3.60 4.68 1.80 29.52 

Total 24.00 30.00 6.00 300.00 60.00 78.00 30.00 528.00 


Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 

Sr 

No 

Village Total cost requirement Total funds 

available under 


Gap in funds 

requirement 

1 Motidevrupan 434.37 257.34 177.03 

2 Umarda 33.55 23.10 10.45 

3 Navachakra 33.64 24.95 8.69 

4 Dongripada 30.12 20.79 9.33 

5 Rudhigavan 28.28 23.10 5.18 

6 Vadgam 28.47 20.79 7.68 

7 Bardipada 23.11 20.79 2.32 

8 Nana Sutkhadaka 28.89 18.48 10.41 

9 Chimipatal 29.65 24.95 4.70 

10 Sevlan 38.89 27.72 11.17 

Total 708.97 462.00 246.96 


Table no.50.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out 


Fund made available to 

IWMP due to 

convergence (Rs. in 

lakh) 

Name of Scheem 

under 

convergence 

Reference no. 

of activity/ 

task/ 

structure in 

DPR 

Level at which 

decision for 

convergence 

was taken 

Land levling 2.00 MG NREGA Table no;-40.1 PIA Level 

Checkdam 27.25 MG NREGA Table no;-40.1 PIA Level 

Check Wall 12.75 MG NREGA Table no;-40.1 PIA Level 

Forest land Plantation 40.17 Social forestry Table no;-41.1 PIA Level 

Van Talav 3.70 

MGNREGA 

Table no;-41.1 

PIA Level 

Forest Plantation 90.00 Social Table no;-41.1 PIA Level 

Forestry/West 

Forest Division 

Dugwell Recharge 1.20 MG NREGA Table no;-40.1 PIA Level 

Total 177.07 




2 Umarda 

Land levling 



convergence (Rs. in 

lakh) 


under 

convergence 

Reference no. 


task/ 

structure in 

DPR 

2.00 MG NREGA Table no;-40.2 

Checkdam 6.00 MG NREGA Table no;-40.2 

Check Wall 1.00 MG NREGA Table no;-40.2 


decision for 

convergence 

was taken 

PIA Level 

PIA Level 

PIA Level 

Common West land 


0.53 Social forestry 

Plantation 

PIA Level 


Farm Forestry 0.12 

Social forestry 


PIA Level 

Total 10.45 




3 Navachakra 

Nala Plug up 5-10 mt 

Pacca Nala Plug 

Check Dem 

Gabion Structure 

Check Wall 

Land levling 


IWMP due to convergence 

(Rs. in lakh) 


under convergence 


Plantation 


Farm Forestry 0. 10 


Reference no. of 

activity/ task/ 

structure in DPR 


decision for 

convergence was 

taken 

0.30 MG NREGA Table no;-40.3 PIA level 








PIA level 

PIA level 


Pasture Development 0.11 Social forestry Table no;-41.3 PIA level 

Total 8.69 



Fund made 

S. No. Village 

available to 

Activity to be carried 

Name of Scheem under 


out 

convergence 

convergence (Rs. 

in lakh) 



Check Wall 




Level at which decision 

for convergence was 

taken 




Checkdam 0.50 MG NREGA Table no;-40.4 PIA level 

4 Dongripada 




PIA level 


Plantation 




PIA level 

Pasture Development 0.05 



PIA level 

Total 9.35 








IWMP due to convergence 

(Rs. in lakh) 



Reference no. 


task/ structure 

in DPR 


decision for 

convergence 

was taken 




5 Rudhigavan 

Check Wall 

Land levling 



Checkdam Repiring 1.50 MG NREGA Table no;-40.5 PIA level 


Plantation 


Total 5.20 


PIA level 



Fund made 


available to 

Activity to be carried 


out 

convergence (Rs. 

in lakh) 

6 Vadgam 



Checkdam 

Land levling 







decision for 


taken 





Checkdam Repring 1.00 MG NREGA Table no;-40.6 PIA level 




PIA level 


Plantation 

Total 7.70 



Fund made 


(Rs. in lakh) 

Activity to be carried available to IWMP 

out 

due to convergence 

7 Bardipada 



Land levling 

Name of Scheem under 

convergence 





decision for 


taken 





Total 2.40 



Fund made available 


lakh) 

Activity to be to IWMP due to 

carried out convergence (Rs. in 

8 

Nana 

Sutkhadaka 

Nala Plug up 5-10 

mt 

1.08 







decision for 


taken 

MG NREGA Table no;-40.8 PIA level 

Pacca Nala Plug 0.80 MG NREGA Table no;-40.8 PIA level 


Check Wall 

Land levling 

Checkdam 

Repiring 0.80 






Plantation 




Pasture 



Total 10.44 




PIA level 

PIA level 

PIA level 



Fund made 


(Rs. in lakh) 

Activity to be available to IWMP 

carried out due to convergence 

9 Chimipatal 

Nala Plug up 5-10 

mt 

0.20 







decision for 


taken 


Pacca Nala Plug 0.43 MG NREGA Table no;-40.9 PIA level 

Land levling 

Check Wall 




Dugwell Recharge 0.60 MG NREGA Table no;-40.1 PIA level 


Plantation 




Pasture 



Total 4.70 




PIA level 

PIA level 

PIA level 



Fund made 


(Rs. in lakh) 

Activity to be available to IWMP Name of Scheem 

carried out due to convergence under convergence 

10 Sevlan 


Check Wall 


Land levling 





decision for 


taken 






Dugwell Recharge 1.00 MG NREGA Table no;-40.1 PIA level 


Plantation 




Pasture 



Total 11.20 




PIA level 

PIA level 

PIA level 

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects 

Type of agreement signed 

S. 

No. 

a)MoU b)Contract 


Private Sector 

Partner 

Agency 

c) Any other 

(pl. specify) 

Financial contribution 


Private 

sector 

Partnership 

Interventions 

Expected 

Outcomes 

Comments 


Table no. 52: Employment in Project area: 

S. 

NO. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Wage employment 

Self employment 


No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries 

Villages 

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 

Motidevrupan 0 3520623 181377 2406300 3702000 0 830 43 567 873 1 42 2 28 45 

Umarda 0 457481 7519 302250 465000 0 520 9 344 529 0 26 0 17 26 

Navachakra 0 191340 184660 244400 376000 0 219 212 280 431 0 11 11 14 22 

Dongripada 0 298627 1373 195000 300000 0 685 3 447 688 0 34 0 22 34 

Rundhigavan 850 368688 4462 243100 374000 2 781 9 515 792 0 39 0 26 39 

Vadgam 1245 364128 2627 239200 368000 4 1185 9 778 1197 0 59 0 39 59 

Bardipada 35148 344188 664 247000 380000 24 234 0 168 258 1 12 0 8 13 

Nana 

Sutkhadaka 2030 372879 6091 247650 381000 1 248 4 164 253 0 12 0 8 12 

Chimipatal 0 306831 6169 203450 313000 0 425 9 282 434 0 21 0 14 21 

Sevlan 0 451000 0 293150 451000 0 377 0 245 377 0 19 0 12 19 


Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area 

Sl. No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Names of villages 

Motidevrupan 

Umarda 

Navachakra 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipada 

Nana Sutkhadaka 

Chimipatal 

Sevlan 

No. of persons migrating 

No. of days per year of migration 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project 

130 

36 

120 30 

80 

20 

90 30 

175 

67 

120 60 

378 

40 

120 60 

210 

22 

60 30 

325 

19 

90 30 

128 

97 

90 30 

78 

67 

120 60 

77 

36 

60 30 

78 

20 

90 30 


Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 

S. No. Names of villages Sources Pre-Project level (ft) 

Expected Increase/decrease 

(Post- Project)(ft) 


Open wells 15 10 

Bore wells 18 13 

2 Umarda 



3 Navachakra 



4 Dongripada 



5 Rudhigavan 



6 Vadgam 



7 Bardipada 



8 Nana Sutkhadaka 



9 Chimipatal 



10 Sevlan Open wells 14 9 


Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water 

S. 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 


Villages 

Motidevrupan 

Umarda 

Navachakra 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipada 

Availability of drinking water 

Quality of drinking water 

(no. of months in a year) 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project 

Comments 

8 12 Slightly Saline Potable - 

9 12 

10 12 

9 12 

11 12 

9 12 

Slightly Saline 





10 12 saline 

Nana 

Sutkhadaka 8 12 


Potable 

Potable 

Potable 

Potable 

Potable 

Potable 

Potable 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

9 

Chimipatal 

8 12 


Potable 

- 

10 

Sevlan 

10 12 


Potable 

- 


Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas 

Sr No. 

Pre-project 

Expected Post-project 


Name of crops 

village 

Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha) 

1 

2 

Motidevrupan 

Umarda 

3 Navachakra 

Average Yield per ha 

(qtl) 

Kharif 

Juvar 102 400 70 700 

Tuver 55 300 65 600 

Groundnut 70 300 102 650 

Rabi 

Juvar 46 400 36 750 

Groundnut 10 300 26 750 

Zaid 0 0 

Fodder - - 20 2000 

Kharif 

Juvar 50 500 25 900 

Tuver 20 400 25 850 

Groundnut 25 400 65 900 

Rabi 

Juvar 34 500 25 950 

Groundnut 25 400 45 900 

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 20 2000 

Kharif 

Juvar 

90 

Tuver 69 500 80 950 

Groundnut 102 500 150 900 

Rabi 

Juvar 12 400 34 850 

Groundnut 25 500 35 950 


400 

70 

750

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 20 2500 

4 Dongripada Kharif 

Juvar 69 500 85 900 

Tuver 156 400 175 850 

Groundnut 89 400 105 900 

Rabi 

Juvar 29 500 35 950 

Groundnut 46 400 65 1000 

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 20 2200 

5 Rudhigavan Kharif 

Juvar 48 450 65 900 

Tuver 30 500 50 960 

Groundnut 12 500 25 870 

Rabi 

Juvar 5 450 15 950 

Groundnut 10 500 25 900 

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 20 2000 

6 Vadgam Kharif 

Juvar 39 550 60 1000 

Tuver 28 300 55 780 

Groundnut 24 300 50 800 

Rabi 

Juvar 15 550 25 1050 

Groundnut 28 300 50 870 

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 20 2200 

7 Bardipada Kharif 

Juvar 123 400 150 890 

Tuver 108 400 120 750 

Groundnut 98 400 115 670 


8 

9 

10 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 

Chimipatal 

Sevlan 

Rabi 

Juvar 56 400 70 900 

Groundnut 45 400 65 700 

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 25 2200 

Kharif 

Juvar 39 550 65 950 

Tuver 40 500 65 900 

Groundnut 32 500 50 670 

Rabi 

Juvar 6 550 20 1060 

Groundnut 4 500 15 700 

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 20 2000 

Kharif 

Juvar 25 450 45 750 

Tuver 30 400 60 750 

Groundnut 18 400 30 650 

Rabi 

Juvar 8 450 20 700 

Groundnut 13 400 25 670 

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 20 2000 

Kharif 

Juvar 42 550 65 900 

Tuver 43 300 60 670 

Groundnut 22 300 45 700 

Rabi 

Juvar 16 550 25 950 

Groundnut 15 300 25 670 

Zaid 

Fodder 0 0 15 2000 


Table no. 57: Area under horticulture 

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Motidevrupan 

Umarda 

Navachakra 

Dongripada 

Rudhigavan 

Vadgam 

Bardipadal 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 

Chimipatal 

Sevlan 

Area under horticulture proposed to be 

covered through IWMP 

0 29 

1 8.5 

0 8.5 

1 4.0 

0 8.5 

0 4 

5 6.25 

1 8.5 

3 8.5 

2 12.5 


Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover 

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed(ha) 

1 

Motidevrupan 

2755 2485 

2 

Umardha 

6.8 0 

3 

Navachakra 

0 0 

4 

Dongripada 

12 0 

5 

Rudhigavan 

0 0 

6 

Vadgam 

0 0 

7 

Bardipadal 

0 0 

8 

Nana 

Sutkhadka 

96.4 0 

9 

Chimipatal 

0 0 

10 

Sevlan 

46.70 0 


Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (For fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income 

in Rs.) 

S. No. 

Pre-Project 

Expected Post-project 


Type of Animal 

Yield 

Village 

No. Yield (ltr) Income No. 

Income 

(ltr) 

Remarks 

Milch-animals 

Cow(Per animal/day) 136 4 18 200 4 20 - 

Buffalo(Per animal/day) 247 3 27 350 5 30 - 


Animals for other 

- 

purpose 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 35 100 55 100 - 

Milch-animals - 



2 Umarda 


- 

purpose 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 250 100 300 100 - 




3 Navachakra 


- 

purpose 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 114 100 150 100 - 




4 Dongripada 


- 

purpose 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 360 100 400 100 - 


5 Rudhigavan 



Animals for other - 


6 Vadgam 

7 Bardipada 

8 

Nama 

Sutkhadaka 

9 Chimipatal 

10 Sevlan 

purpose 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 41 100 55 100 - 





purpose 

- 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 56 100 100 100 - 





purpose 

- 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 300 100 330 100 - 





purpose 

- 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 269 100 300 100 - 





purpose 

- 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 0 0 30 100 - 





purpose 

- 

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 200 100 250 100 - 


Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.) 

1 IWMP-II 

Backward linkages 

Seed certification 

Seed supply system 

Fertilizer supply system 

Pesticide supply system 

Credit institutions 

Water supply 

Extension services 

Nurseries 

Tools/machinery suppliers 

Price Support system 

Labour 


Forward linkages 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 

Storage (including cold storage) 

Road network 

Transport facilities 

Markets / Mandis 

Agro and other Industries 

Milk and other collection centres 

Labour 



Logical Framework Analysis 

Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact 

Village Institution Formation of One Watershed 

Project can be 

Formation 

Watershed 

Committee, User 

Committee each 

village 

implemented and 

managed in a 

Unity and 

prosperity in the 

Group 

Number of User group 

depending on the 

democratic and 

participatory way 

village 

management. 

coverage of particular 

intervention 

ensuring equity. 

Strengthening 

Institutions 

Village 

 

 

 

 

Organise training 

and awareness 

programme for 

Village institutions 

Capacity building 

workshops and 

exposure visits 

User Group and 

Watershed 

Committee 

Failitating and 

monitoring the 

functioning of UGs 

and WCs 

Strengthen 

linkages between 

 

 

 

 

awareness camps to 

be organized. 

trainings and 

exposure visits UGs 

and WCs to be held 

Capacity building 

workshops to be 

organised 

1 Federations of UGs 

and WC to be formed 

People's 

Participation and 

positive perception 

towards the 

programme 


 

 

 

 

Quality of 

management of 

common resources 

improved. 

Quality of 

distribution of 

benefits between 

people improved. 

Increased 

awareness amongst 

women about 

village resources. 

Women 

participation 

enhanced in 

decision-making of

UGs and WCs and 

Panchayat 

Institutions 

Gender 

sensitisation of 

UGs and WCs to 

increase 

inclusiveness of 

samuh decisionmaking. 

 

GVCs. 

Involvement of 

youth and children 

in village 

development 

increased. 

 

Sensitise village 

communities to 

involve children 

and youth in 

development. 

Fund Management Improve 

management and 

utilisation of UGs 

and WCs. 

 

Prepare 

communities to 

explore other 

sources of income 

for UGs and WCs. 

 

UGs and WCs 

operating bank 

account and managing 

resources on their 

own 

 

 

Purpose, frequency 

and volume of use 

of the fund 

enhanced. 

Volume of funds 

generated for UGs 

and WCs from 

other sources of 

income increased. 

Ecological Restoration Protection, 

treatment and 

regeneration of 

 

Common and private 

lands to be brought 

under new plantations 

 

Fodder availability 

from common and 

private lands 

 

Better Ecological 

order in the area 


common and 

private lands 

Protection, 

treatment and 

regeneration of 

forest lands 

Plantation of fruits 

and forest species 

Impart trainings, 

conduct meetings 

and organise 

exposure visits for 

communities, 

village volunteers 

and staff to 

effectively plan, 

execute and 

monitor activities 

 

 

 

and agro-hortiforestry 

like Neem, 

Adusa, prosopis, 

Banyan and Peepul 

Forest lands to be 

brought under new 

plantations and 

protection 

Trainings, exposure 

visits and meetings to 

be organised for 

communities, village 

volunteers and staff 

Income generation 

intervention 

promoted 

 

increased 

Accessibility to 

common and forest 

lands increased 

with removal of 

encroachments and 

resolution of 

conflicts 

 

 

Increase in the 

proportion of 

households having 

more security of 

fodder 

Reduction in 

drudgery of fodder 

and fuel collection, 

especially women 

 

Identification and 

promotion of nontimber 

forest 

produce based 

income generation 

activities 


CHAPTER -7 

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES 


7 Quality and Sustainability Issues 

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The 

system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of 

Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to 

soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to 

ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details 

obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas 

of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. 

The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows 

the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an 

aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project. 

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground 

staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up 

official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works 

in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during 

the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is 

reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by 

means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time. 


7.2 Plans For Project management: 

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the 

village level institutes.In Eval, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance 

of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation 

stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major 

kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project. 

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: 

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will 

comes mainly fund the following: 

7.4 User Charges: 

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed 

during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed 

committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following. 


CHAPTER -8 

MAPS 


CHAPTER -8 

MAPS 


Base Line MAP 




Other MAP 








Action Plan MAP

IWMP-2 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?