IWMP-2 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State
IWMP-2 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State
IWMP-2 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Detail Project Report<br />
2009-10<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong> -2 Mahiyari<br />
PIA<br />
Forest Division,<br />
Porbandar<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Contents<br />
Chapter 1 Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7<br />
Table no.1: Basic project information ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8<br />
Table no.2: Weightage <strong>of</strong> the project .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11<br />
Table no.3: Watershed information ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14<br />
Table no.4: <strong>Development</strong>al programmes running in the project area: ................................................................................................................................................... 14<br />
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ......................................................................................................................................................... 16<br />
Chapter 2 Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 17<br />
Table no. 6: PIA: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 167<br />
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21<br />
Chapter 3 Basic Information <strong>of</strong> the Project Areas ................................................................................................................................................................... 23<br />
Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22<br />
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24<br />
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25<br />
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)............................................................................................................................................................................. 26<br />
Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 26<br />
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27<br />
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27<br />
Table no. 14: Land ownership details .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27<br />
Table no. 15: Agriculture ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28<br />
Table no. 16: Irrigation .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30<br />
Table no. 17: Crop details: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30<br />
Table no. 18: Livestock .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32<br />
Table no. 19: Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32<br />
Table no. 20: Details <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources .................................................................................................................................................................................. 33<br />
Table no. 21: Demographic information ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 35<br />
Table no. 22: Literacy rate ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 35<br />
Table no. 23: Migration details ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36<br />
Table no. 24: Poverty .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37<br />
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38<br />
Table no. 27: Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38<br />
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41<br />
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ................................................................................................................................................................... 39<br />
Table no. 30: Details <strong>of</strong> Scientific Planning and Inputs in <strong>IWMP</strong> projects* ........................................................................................................................................... 39<br />
Chapter 4 Watershed Activity ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 56<br />
Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 54<br />
Table no. 32: SHG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 62<br />
Table no. 33: UG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 63<br />
Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................................................................................... 69<br />
Table no.35: Details <strong>of</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .............................................................................................................. 74<br />
Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ................................................................ 75<br />
Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................... 78<br />
Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .................................................................................................. 79<br />
Table no. 39: Other activities <strong>of</strong> watershed works phase – Proposed target ....................................................................................................................................... 81<br />
Table no.40: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works* ..................................................................................................................................................... 81<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no.41: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ................................................................................................................ 92<br />
Table no.42: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities................................................................................................................................................................................................. 94<br />
Table no.43: Details <strong>of</strong> activities in the CPRs in the project areas ............................................................................................................................................................ 99<br />
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 101<br />
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 102<br />
Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: .................................................................................................................................................. 103<br />
Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 105<br />
Chapter 5 Budgeting ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 116<br />
Table no. 48: Budget at a glance .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116<br />
Table no.49: Details <strong>of</strong> Convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong> with other Schemes ...................................................................................................................................................... 105<br />
Table no. 50: Public-Private Partnership in the <strong>IWMP</strong> projects* ........................................................................................................................................................... 106<br />
Chapter 6 Outcomes .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 119<br />
Table no. 51: Employment in Project area: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 108<br />
Table no. 52: Details <strong>of</strong> seasonal migration from Project area ............................................................................................................................................................... 109<br />
Table no. 53: Details <strong>of</strong> average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ...................................................................................................... 110<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 54: Status <strong>of</strong> Drinking water* ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110<br />
Table no. 55: Details <strong>of</strong> Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas .............................................................................................................................................. 111<br />
Table no. 56: Area under horticulture .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 112<br />
Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 113<br />
Table no. 58: Details <strong>of</strong> livestock in the project areas * ............................................................................................................................................................................. 113<br />
Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 114<br />
Chapter 2 Quality and Sustainability Issues 128<br />
Chapter 8 Maps 138<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Sl<br />
No.<br />
1.1 Project Background<br />
Mahiyari (<strong>IWMP</strong>-2) project is located in Kutiyana Taluka, Porbandar District <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> state. The project is a cluster <strong>of</strong> 7 microwatersheds<br />
with 5G1C1a2a, 5G1A6a1d, 5G1A6a1e, 5G1A5a2h, 5G1A6a2b, 5G1AClale, 5G1A6a2b being their respective codes. The total project<br />
area <strong>of</strong> the watershed is about 5292.5 Ha, <strong>of</strong> which has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme<br />
(<strong>IWMP</strong>) starting year 2009-10.<br />
The watershed includes three Villages Mer, SC & Brahmin are the primary inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the village. The livelihood <strong>of</strong> these people is<br />
primarily based on rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, goat and sheep rearing.<br />
The Project area falls under the IWDP according to DoLR Classification. It is a very poor and desolate village on the border <strong>of</strong> Porbandar.<br />
The Mahiyari Project was heavily every year Flood. This has resulted in Productivity <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Land was too low camper another villages <strong>of</strong><br />
Kutiyana Block.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
project<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-2<br />
Name<br />
MAHIYARI<br />
Villages<br />
Census code<br />
(00797600)<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-2 REVADRA (00797800)<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-2<br />
TARKHAI<br />
(00797700)<br />
Gram<br />
Panchayats<br />
MAHIYARI<br />
REVEDRA<br />
TARKHAI<br />
Table no.1: Basic project information<br />
Taluka<br />
District<br />
Area <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
project<br />
Area<br />
proposed<br />
to be<br />
treated<br />
Total project<br />
cost<br />
KUTIYANA PORBANDAR 3759.7 3759.7 45116400.00<br />
KUTIYANA PORBANDAR 581.60 581.60 6979200.00<br />
KUTIYANA PORBANDAR 951.20 951.20 11414400.00<br />
PIA<br />
SOCIAL FOREST<br />
PORBANDAR<br />
SOCIAL FOREST<br />
PORBANDAR<br />
SOCIAL FOREST<br />
PORBANDAR<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Porbandar District<br />
Mahirayri Project<br />
Figure 1, Geographical Location <strong>of</strong> Mahiyari<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
1.2 Need <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme<br />
Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme is prioritised on the basis <strong>of</strong> thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage <strong>of</strong> SC/ST,<br />
Actual wages, Percentage <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water<br />
situation in the area, Percentage <strong>of</strong> the degraded land, Productivity potential <strong>of</strong> the land, Continuity <strong>of</strong> another watershed that has already<br />
developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to<br />
Mahiyari Watershed project as given in table no. 2.<br />
The total number <strong>of</strong> families under BPL is 203, which is less than 20 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total households <strong>of</strong> the village. Hence a score <strong>of</strong> 2.5 is<br />
allotted. The percentage <strong>of</strong> schedule castes in the village is about 5% per cent to the total population; hence a score <strong>of</strong> 3 was allotted. Rainfed<br />
agriculture forms the primary occupation <strong>of</strong> the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 65 per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a<br />
composite rank <strong>of</strong> 5, 3 and 10 are allotted respectively.<br />
Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under IWDP block. Drinking water<br />
is problematic in the village. Majority <strong>of</strong> land is degraded due to inherent salinity and ingress <strong>of</strong> salt from Saline Water. The soil is very<br />
permeable and production <strong>of</strong> the land can be significantly enriched with the availability <strong>of</strong> timely irrigation. Mahiyari watershed falls in<br />
continuity with other watersheds namely Kansabad, Kadegi. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration four micro-watersheds<br />
covering a total area <strong>of</strong> 5292.5 ha. Thus a cumulative score <strong>of</strong> 66 all the parameters taken together give a cumulative score <strong>of</strong> 66 to the<br />
watershed (reference Table 2.1 below).<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Mahiyari<br />
Project<br />
type<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2<br />
Area proposed to be treated<br />
Table no.2: Weightage <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
Weightage<br />
i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii<br />
2.5 3 0 5 3 10 5 7.5 10 10 5 0 66<br />
Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection <strong>of</strong> watershed<br />
Sr.<br />
Criteria<br />
Maximum<br />
Ranges & Scores<br />
No.<br />
Score<br />
i<br />
Poverty index (% <strong>of</strong> poor to<br />
population<br />
10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)<br />
ii % <strong>of</strong> SC/ST population 10 More than 40% (10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20% (3)<br />
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are<br />
significantly lower than<br />
minimum wages (5)<br />
Actual wages are<br />
equal to or higher<br />
than minimum<br />
wages (0)<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
iv % <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers 10 More than 80% (10) 50 to 80% (5) Less than 50 % (3)<br />
v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)<br />
vi<br />
Moisture index / DPAP / DDP<br />
15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP<br />
-33.3 to -66.6 (10)<br />
0 to -33.2 (0) Non<br />
Block<br />
Block<br />
DPAP Block<br />
DPAP / DDP Block<br />
vii Area under rain – fed agriculture 15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90% (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70%<br />
(Reject)<br />
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic<br />
village (7.5)<br />
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20% (15) Medium – 10 to<br />
20% (10)<br />
Partially covered<br />
(5)<br />
Low-less than<br />
10% <strong>of</strong> TGA (5)<br />
Fully covered (0)<br />
x Productivity potential <strong>of</strong> the land 15 Lands with low production<br />
& where productivity can<br />
be significantly enhanced<br />
with reasonable efforts<br />
(15)<br />
Lands with<br />
moderate<br />
production &<br />
where<br />
productivity can<br />
be enhanced with<br />
reasonable efforts<br />
Lands with high<br />
production &<br />
where<br />
productivity can<br />
be marginally<br />
enhanced with<br />
reasonable efforts<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
(10) (5)<br />
xi<br />
Contiguity to another watershed<br />
that has already been<br />
developed/treated<br />
10 Contiguous to previously<br />
treated watershed &<br />
contiguity within the micro<br />
watersheds in the project<br />
(10)<br />
Contiguity within<br />
the micro<br />
watersheds in the<br />
project but non<br />
contiguous to<br />
previously treated<br />
watershed (5)<br />
Neither<br />
contiguous to<br />
previously treated<br />
watershed nor<br />
contiguity within<br />
the micro<br />
watersheds in the<br />
project (0)<br />
xii<br />
Cluster approach in the plains<br />
(more than one contiguous<br />
micro-watersheds in the project<br />
)<br />
15 Above 6 micro-watersheds<br />
in cluster (15)<br />
4 to 6 micro<br />
watersheds in<br />
cluster (10)<br />
2 to 4 micro<br />
watersheds in<br />
cluster (5)<br />
xiii<br />
Cluster approach in the hills<br />
(more than one contiguous<br />
micro-watersheds in the project<br />
)<br />
15 Above 5 micro-watersheds<br />
in cluster (15)<br />
3 to 5 micro<br />
watersheds in<br />
cluster (10)<br />
2 to 3 micro<br />
watersheds in<br />
cluster (5)<br />
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no.3: Watershed information<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the Village No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order<br />
Mahiyari 3<br />
5G1C1a2a, 5G1A6a1d,<br />
5G1A6a1e<br />
Mini Watershed<br />
Revadra 2 5G1A5a2h, 5G1A6a2b Mini Watershed<br />
Tarkhai 2 5G1AClale, 5G1A6a2b Mini Watershed<br />
1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Mahiyari village<br />
This village being very back ward, has been on top priority <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> developmental projects. These programmes are Mahatma<br />
Gandhi National <strong>Rural</strong> Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) and Sakhi<br />
Mandal Besides, previously.<br />
i. MGNREGS: Construction <strong>of</strong>, murram road 38 has been taken-up under NREGA.<br />
ii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 766 individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. All the remaining house hold will be<br />
covered under the scheme.<br />
iii. Sakhi Mandal Yojna– 47 Mandals are linked with bank and given loan <strong>of</strong> Rs.47000.<br />
iv. Indira Awas Yojana: (Total 102 house have been constructed in the Mahiyari village under various Awas Yojana (in which under Indira<br />
Awas Yojana= 38, Earth Quake Awas Yojana covered 64 beneficiaries)<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
v. WASMO: All villages have covered by this scheme for drinking water facility.<br />
Table no.4: <strong>Development</strong>al programmes running in the project area:<br />
Estimated<br />
Sl<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Sponsoring<br />
Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Villages<br />
Year <strong>of</strong> commencement<br />
number <strong>of</strong><br />
no programme/scheme<br />
agency<br />
programme/scheme<br />
covered<br />
beneficiaries<br />
1 WASMO DWSSB WASMO 2007-08-09 3 5828<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
3<br />
2 MGNREGS<br />
Employment 2009<br />
1303<br />
Department<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
3<br />
IAY<br />
Housing 2005-08-09<br />
104<br />
3<br />
Department<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
3<br />
4 TSC<br />
Sanitation<br />
2004-05 -still<br />
766<br />
Department<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Figure 2, Geographical Condition <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
2.1. Project Implementing Agency<br />
The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by <strong>Gujarat</strong> <strong>State</strong> Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA),<br />
the <strong>State</strong> Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (<strong>IWMP</strong>) in <strong>Gujarat</strong>. The PIAs are responsible for<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under <strong>State</strong>/ Central<br />
Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for Mahiyari<br />
watershed Project is Deputy Conservator <strong>of</strong> Forest (Social Forest), Porbandar.<br />
2.2 About Forest Devision, Porbandar<br />
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:<br />
PIA <strong>of</strong> the Mahiyari project is Social Forestry Division, Porbandar. The Deputy Conservator <strong>of</strong> Forest (DCF) is the head <strong>of</strong> this. Office <strong>of</strong><br />
Deputy Conservator <strong>of</strong> Forest – Forest Division Porbandar was established by Govt. Resolution No.VNM-102006-600 Dt. 31-08-2007. PIA has<br />
dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Range forest <strong>of</strong>ficer (Nodal <strong>of</strong>ficer) and a watershed development team <strong>of</strong> agriculture expert,<br />
community mobilization expert, civil engineer, surveyor, accountant and Data Entry Operator,. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Porbandar are<br />
supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the<br />
district as per guidelines.<br />
2.2.2 Programmes/projects <strong>of</strong> Deputy Conservator <strong>of</strong> Forest –Forest Department, Porbandar:<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
At present 3 <strong>IWMP</strong> projects have been sanctioned by Government <strong>of</strong> India for Porbandar district. The entry point activities <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
Three <strong>IWMP</strong> projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Porbandar Forest Division is PIA for 1 projects (<strong>IWMP</strong>- 2) and<br />
DWDU f is PIA for rest <strong>of</strong> the two projects (<strong>IWMP</strong>-1 & 3).<br />
2.3 SWOT Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Deputy Conservator <strong>of</strong> Forest (<strong>IWMP</strong>-2), Porbandar:<br />
Strength:<br />
(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team<br />
(2) Independent District Level Organization.<br />
(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, North <strong>Gujarat</strong> University and NGOs for<br />
Capacity building and technical guidance<br />
(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help <strong>of</strong> BISAG, Gandhinagar,<br />
(5) District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee<br />
Weakness:<br />
(1) No permanent <strong>of</strong>fice building.<br />
(2) No Vehicle.<br />
(3) Not any Technical Expert person in any Project <strong>of</strong> Watershed in Porbandar.<br />
Opportunities:<br />
(1) A number <strong>of</strong> different other development schemes <strong>of</strong> the government are running so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence<br />
<strong>of</strong> programmes.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
(2) Better financial provision under <strong>IWMP</strong>.<br />
(3) Usage <strong>of</strong> new ICT tools like GIS, GPS.<br />
Threats:<br />
(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited<br />
Impact<br />
(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning<br />
(3) Lack <strong>of</strong> contribution and cooperation from local people<br />
(4) Low literacy rate in the project area.<br />
(5) Because <strong>of</strong> flood prone area flood water remains for longer revised, farmer can’t take any monsoon Crop.<br />
(6) Soil is saline.<br />
Table no. 5: PIA:<br />
Sl. No. Names <strong>of</strong> project Details <strong>of</strong> PIA<br />
Deputy Conservator <strong>of</strong> Forest – Forest Department,<br />
(i) Type <strong>of</strong> organization<br />
Porbandar<br />
1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-2<br />
Deputy Conservator <strong>of</strong> Forest – Forest Department,<br />
(ii) Name <strong>of</strong> organization<br />
Porbandar<br />
(iii) Designation & Address Deputy Conservator <strong>of</strong> Forest, Porbandar<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
(iv) Telephone (0286) 2242551<br />
(v) Fax (0286) 2210373<br />
(vi) E-mail fo-por@gujarat.gov.in<br />
Table no. 6: Staff at PIA level:<br />
Sl<br />
Monthly<br />
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned<br />
no<br />
remuneration<br />
1 M.M.Bhalodi 50 M<br />
Deputy<br />
conservator <strong>of</strong> B.Sc (Agri.) 19 years<br />
Deputy<br />
conservator <strong>of</strong> 44948<br />
Forest<br />
Forest<br />
2<br />
Khengarbhai K<br />
Range Forest<br />
57 M<br />
Bharvad<br />
Officer<br />
Old SSC 37 Years Nodel Officer 35000<br />
3 Pravin. J. Bagada 25 M WDT (Engg.)<br />
B. Tech (Agri<br />
.Engg.)<br />
2 Year Civil Engineer 8000<br />
4<br />
Rakeshbhai N<br />
Makwana<br />
26 M WDT (Surveyer) I.T.I. Surveyer 1 Year Surveyer 8000<br />
5 Asmita R. Parmar 24 F WDT (A/C) M.Com 2.5 year Accountant 8000<br />
6 Chavda Arvindbhai D 34 M WDT (Agri.) M.Sc (Forestry) 5 Years<br />
Agricultural<br />
<strong>Development</strong><br />
8000<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology<br />
3.1.1 Land use pattern:<br />
The net geographical area <strong>of</strong> Mahiyari watershed is about 5292.5 ha out <strong>of</strong> which has no forest area. About 86% <strong>of</strong> land is under agriculture<br />
which is completely rain-fed; mainly a Kharif & Rabi crop is taken. About 13% <strong>of</strong> the total land is classified under wasteland <strong>of</strong> which 4 percent<br />
is uncultivable and hilly and rest is cultivable. The watershed consists <strong>of</strong> thorny species <strong>of</strong> Ground Nuts which was mainly broadcasted to stop<br />
the spread <strong>of</strong> desert.<br />
Table no. 7: Land use pattern:<br />
S. No.<br />
Geographical<br />
Wasteland<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
Forest Land under Rainfed Perm-anent<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Noncultivable<br />
villages<br />
Area agricultural use area pastu-res Cultivable<br />
village<br />
1 Mahiyari 3759.7 - 3257.8 3257.8 324.2 - 177.8<br />
2 Revadra 581.60 - 559 559 15.50 - 7.10<br />
3 Tarkhai 951.20 - 779.9 779.9 132.3 - 39<br />
Total<br />
5292.5 - 4596.7 4596.7 472 - 223.9<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
3.1.2 Soil and topography:<br />
Mahiyari watershed project (IMWP) falls under Saurashtra South Zone . The soil is mainly sandy loamy and saline. The soil is Sticky Black to<br />
very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The depth <strong>of</strong> soil is moderate to deep about 22 to 73 cm. The predominant texture <strong>of</strong> soil is loamy<br />
sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The soil falls in Undulated to Flat. The<br />
topography <strong>of</strong> the area is moderate ranging from 0-1% slope.<br />
Table no. 8: Soil type and topography:<br />
S. No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the Agro-climatic<br />
zone covers project area<br />
Area in ha<br />
Names <strong>of</strong> the<br />
villages<br />
Major soil types<br />
a)Type<br />
b) Area in ha<br />
Topo-graphy<br />
1<br />
3759.7 Mahiyari<br />
3759.7<br />
Sticky Black/<br />
Saurashtra South Zone – 7<br />
Sandy long –<br />
2 581.60 Revadra<br />
Saline<br />
581.60<br />
Moderate<br />
Undulated to flat<br />
3 951.20 Tarkhai 951.20<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no 9: Flood and drought condition:<br />
Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)<br />
1 Mahiyari<br />
Every Year<br />
3-4 Years<br />
2 Revadra<br />
3 Tarkhai<br />
10. Edaphic Factors<br />
Table no. 10.1: Soil Erosion<br />
Cause Type <strong>of</strong> erosion Area affected (ha)<br />
Water erosion<br />
a Sheet 4233.02<br />
b Rill 650.11<br />
c Gully 409.37<br />
d<br />
Ravenous<br />
Sub-Total 5292.5<br />
Wind erosion<br />
Total<br />
Run <strong>of</strong>f<br />
(mm/ year)<br />
NA<br />
Average soil loss (Tonnes/<br />
ha/ year)<br />
Yet not measured<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 10.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the Village Survey Number Soil pH<br />
Mahiyari All most all the land area -<br />
Revadra All most all the land area -<br />
Tarkhai All most all the land area -<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Salinity<br />
(Inherent/Ingress)<br />
Ingress<br />
Table no. 10.3: Waterlogging Conditions<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the Village Survey Number Reasons<br />
Mahiyari<br />
All most all the land area<br />
Sakh, Bobdi & Ojat rivers are nearest to the<br />
village and run<strong>of</strong>f water washout the soil.<br />
Revadra<br />
All most all the land area<br />
Sakh River is nearest to the village and run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
water washout the soil.<br />
Tarkhai<br />
All most all the land area<br />
Sakh & Ebhelven rivers are nearest to the<br />
village and run<strong>of</strong>f water washout the soil<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon Flood every year. The average rainfall <strong>of</strong> this area is about 833 mm<br />
(from past five year data) with a highest intensity <strong>of</strong> 84 mm within span <strong>of</strong> a day. This uneven distribution is leading to run<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> soil every year<br />
to the streams, rivulets and depressed area saline.<br />
Table no. 11: Climatic conditions:<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> project Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature<br />
Summer<br />
Winter<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2<br />
833<br />
Max Min Max Min<br />
Mahiyari<br />
42 35 40 39<br />
Table no. 12: Physiography and relief<br />
Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams<br />
Mahiyari 43 Meters 0-1 % Sakh River<br />
3.1.3 Land and Agriculture:<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> surface water source and high salinity <strong>of</strong> ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The<br />
average land holding is ranging from 1 to 4 ha. Lack <strong>of</strong> irrigation source forces the majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers to take one Crop in all seasons. This<br />
affects directly the demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the village. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Ground nuts and Jowar (Sorghum). Some <strong>of</strong><br />
the farmers take up rain-fed castor crop if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area<br />
will help them to take up a rabi crop <strong>of</strong> wheat and Chana in the residual moisture.<br />
Table no. 13: Land ownership details<br />
Sl<br />
Total owned land<br />
Village<br />
no<br />
Gen OBC SC ST<br />
1 Mahiyari - 2868.4580 - -<br />
2 Revadra 22.5444 464.6993 23.0589 -<br />
3 Tarkhai - 807.6688 - -<br />
HHs giving land<br />
on lease<br />
HHs taking land<br />
on lease<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Figure 3, Bio Physical Survey <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 14: Agriculture<br />
Sl no Village Net sown area (in ha)<br />
One time Two times Three times<br />
1 Mahiyari 2875.20 1791.55<br />
NA<br />
2 Revadra 419.25 232.93<br />
3 Tarkhai 388.20 267.81<br />
NA<br />
NA<br />
Sl<br />
Village<br />
no<br />
1 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 15: Irrigation<br />
Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well<br />
Availability<br />
Gross Availability<br />
Gross Availability<br />
Gross<br />
Net area<br />
Net area<br />
Net area<br />
months<br />
area months<br />
area months<br />
area<br />
2 50 ha 50 ha<br />
NA NA NA NA NA NA<br />
2 Revadra<br />
NA NA NA NA NA NA<br />
NA NA NA<br />
3 TarkhaiI<br />
NA NA NA<br />
NA NA NA NA NA NA<br />
Table no. 16: Crop details:<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
Kharif (Monsoon)<br />
Ground Nuts Bajri Cotton<br />
Area<br />
Production<br />
(in Kg.)<br />
Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity<br />
1 MahiyariI 2875.20 747552 260 - - - - - -<br />
2 Revadra 419.25 88043 210 - - - - - -<br />
3 Tarkhai 388.2 77640 200 - - - - - -<br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
Rabi (Winter)<br />
Jowar Chana Crop 3<br />
Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity<br />
1 Mahiyari 1556 233400 150 235.55 30621 130 - - -<br />
2 Revadra 139.75 18866 135 93.18 10715 115 - - -<br />
3 Tarkhai 168.25 21031 125 99.56 12445 125 - - -<br />
3.1.4 Livestock:<br />
The village has 450 cows, 1500 buffaloes, 1000 bullocks, 3000 goats and 2000 sheep. Majority <strong>of</strong> rabari community depends on goat and sheep<br />
rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are <strong>of</strong> local breed. Lack <strong>of</strong> rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
availability for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts <strong>of</strong> the state with their herds <strong>of</strong> goats and sheep. Milk production is so<br />
low in the village.<br />
Table no. 17: Livestock<br />
Sl<br />
Total Milk<br />
Village Buffalo Cow<br />
no<br />
(Buffalo+Cow)<br />
Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others<br />
No milk No Milk No Milk<br />
1 Mahiyari 1500 9000/DAY 450<br />
1800<br />
/DAY<br />
10800/DAY 3000 6000/DAY 2000 1000 - 36<br />
2 Revadra 138 1518/DAY 21 126 /DAY 1644/DAY 90 90/DAY 20 70 - 90<br />
3 Tarkhai 400 2800/DAY 20 105 /DAY 2905/DAY 1 1/DAY 2 140 - 48<br />
Total 2038 13318/DAY 491 2031/DAY 15349/DAY 3091 6091/DAY 2022 1210 - 174<br />
Table no. 18: Drinking water<br />
Sl no Village Ground water table (mt) Source <strong>of</strong> drinking water<br />
Availability in<br />
months<br />
Quality<br />
1 Mahiyari 25-30 mt<br />
Bore Water Pipe Line From<br />
Paswari<br />
9 Month Not Good<br />
2 Revadra 25-30 mt Bore Water Pipe Line From 9 Month Not Good<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
3 Tarkhai 25-30 mt<br />
Paswari<br />
Bore Water Pipe Line From<br />
Paswari<br />
9 Month Not Good<br />
Table no. 19: Details <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources<br />
S.<br />
N<br />
o.<br />
Names<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
project<br />
Name<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Villag<br />
e<br />
CPR<br />
Particulars<br />
Total Area (ha)<br />
Area owned/ In possession <strong>of</strong><br />
Govt.<br />
Any other<br />
Pvt. persons (specify PRI (Pl.<br />
deptt.)<br />
Specify)<br />
Area available for treatment (ha)<br />
Govt.<br />
Pvt.<br />
Any other<br />
(specif<br />
person<br />
PRI (Pl.<br />
y<br />
s<br />
Specify)<br />
deptt.)<br />
Wasteland/<br />
land<br />
degraded<br />
3257.8 39 3257.8 39<br />
1<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-<br />
2<br />
Mahiy<br />
ari<br />
Pastures 324.2<br />
Village Ponds/ Tanks 8<br />
324.<br />
2<br />
Community Buildings 1<br />
Temples/ Places <strong>of</strong><br />
worship<br />
9<br />
2<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-<br />
2<br />
Revad<br />
ra<br />
Wasteland/<br />
land<br />
degraded<br />
559.00 7.10 559.00 7.10<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Pastures 15.50<br />
15.5<br />
0<br />
Village Ponds/ Tanks 2<br />
Community Buildings 1<br />
Temples/ Places <strong>of</strong><br />
worship<br />
2<br />
Wasteland/<br />
land<br />
degraded<br />
517.60 39.00 517.60 39.00<br />
3<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-<br />
2<br />
Tarkh<br />
ai<br />
Pastures 132.3<br />
Village Ponds/ Tanks 2<br />
132.<br />
3<br />
Community Buildings 1<br />
Temples/ Places <strong>of</strong><br />
worship<br />
2<br />
Others (Pl. specify)<br />
3.2. Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
3.2.1 Demographic Status:<br />
Mahiyari watershed project has a total <strong>of</strong> 1299 households with a population <strong>of</strong> 6605 (as per base-line survey) out <strong>of</strong> which 3559 are male and<br />
3046 female .The sex ratio is 855 female to 1000 male. There are 203 BPL families. The average family size is 5. The literacy rate is very low i.e.<br />
44.51 per cent; male literacy rate is per cent (<strong>of</strong> total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as 15.65 per cent (<strong>of</strong> total female<br />
population). It is noticeable that only 75 Percent persons have reached up to ninth standard. The major castes in the village are Mer (OBC), Gen<br />
and Schedule Tribe . Majority <strong>of</strong> population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.<br />
Table no. 20: Demographic information<br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village Population SC ST<br />
Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %<br />
1 Mahiyari 5000 2700 2300 250 138 112 5 - - -<br />
2 Revadra 599 329 270 70 42 38 11.68 - - -<br />
3 Tarkhai 1006 530 476 65 30 35 6 2 1 1 0.1<br />
Total 6605 3559 3046 385 210 185 7.56 2 1 1 0.1<br />
Table no. 21: Literacy rate<br />
Sl no<br />
Village<br />
Literacy Literacy %<br />
Total % Male % Female %<br />
above age 14<br />
Literacy %<br />
below age 14<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
1 Mahiyari 1982 39.64 1265 46.85 717 31.17 29.73 9.91<br />
2 Revadra 239 39.90 137 41.64 102 37.77 29.93 9.97<br />
3 Tarkhai 544 54 360 67.92 184 38.65 40.51 13.5<br />
Total<br />
2765 44.5133 1762 52.1367 1003 35.8633 33.39 11.1267<br />
Migration Pattern:<br />
People migrate for the lake <strong>of</strong> employment to different parts <strong>of</strong> the District like Kutiyana, Porbandar & Junagadh District as daily wagers,<br />
agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack <strong>of</strong> fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant force these people to migrate<br />
to other places.<br />
Migration<br />
Sl<br />
Total<br />
Village<br />
no<br />
population Total Male Female<br />
Table no. 22: Migration details<br />
Migration by months<br />
Income<br />
Up to 3 3-6 More than<br />
months months 6 months<br />
1 Mahiyari 5000 91 53 38 Na 3-6Months Na<br />
Main reason during<br />
for migration migration<br />
/ month<br />
Lake <strong>of</strong><br />
2000<br />
Employment<br />
2 Revadra 599 65 38 27 Na 3-6Months Na Lake <strong>of</strong> 2000<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
3 Tarkhai 1006 85 57 28 Na 3-6Months YES<br />
Employment<br />
Lake <strong>of</strong><br />
Employment<br />
2000<br />
Table no. 23: Poverty<br />
Sl no Village Total Household<br />
BPL<br />
% <strong>of</strong> land less<br />
% <strong>of</strong> BPL HH Total Land less HH<br />
0-16 16-20 Total<br />
HH<br />
1 Mahiyari 840 38 74 112 12.49 110 13.01%<br />
2 Revadra 102 8 12 20 19.60 15 14.70 %<br />
3 Tarkhai 205 17 35 52 25.36 26 12.68 %<br />
Infrastructure facilities:<br />
Mahiyari watershed is well connected with Kutiyana Taluka with pucca roads. The village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram Yojana <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>State</strong> Government. Nearly 99 per cent <strong>of</strong> households in the village have their personal electric meters. Mahiyari village has a primary school<br />
& Higher Secondery School with all facilities. This also contributes to midium education level <strong>of</strong> the people. The villages have their own Primary<br />
Health Centre. The village comes under not Group Panchayat.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 24: Village infrastructure<br />
Pucca Schools<br />
Distance<br />
road<br />
Post<br />
Sl<br />
Colleges<br />
Village to the<br />
Office<br />
no<br />
LP UP HS (Number)<br />
village<br />
(Distance)<br />
(Y/N)<br />
In the<br />
1 Mahiyari Y LP UP HS 0<br />
Village<br />
from<br />
Banks<br />
nearest<br />
(Number)<br />
market<br />
yard<br />
Milk<br />
collection<br />
centre<br />
(Number)<br />
Other<br />
Milk<br />
cooperatives Any other<br />
cooperative<br />
/ CBIs institution<br />
(Number)<br />
(Number)<br />
1 25 KM 4 1 0 1<br />
2 Revadra Y LP 0 4 Km 0 22KM 1 1<br />
3 Tarkhai Y LP UP 0 6 KM 0 22 KM 1 1 0 0<br />
Table no. 25 : Facilities / HH assets<br />
HHs with phones HHs with vehicle<br />
HHs<br />
HHs with<br />
HHs HHs with<br />
HHs<br />
Sl<br />
HHs with<br />
with<br />
Village<br />
safety<br />
2-<br />
4- with TV cooking<br />
with<br />
no<br />
electricity<br />
Land line Mobile<br />
Drinking<br />
latrines<br />
wheeler wheeler set gas<br />
freedge<br />
water<br />
1 Mahiyari 1000 456 52 956 765 53 900 200 1 450<br />
2 Revadra 102 35 7 102 15 4 102 38 NA 5<br />
3 Tarkhai 205 100 0 187 28 1 101 10 175 6<br />
3.3. Livelihood pattern:<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers in<br />
Kutiyana & Junagadh District and as agriculture labour in other parts <strong>of</strong> the District.<br />
Table no. 26: Income<br />
Sl no Village Agriculture<br />
Animal<br />
husbandry<br />
Casual labour Others Total<br />
1 MahiyariI 89.87 9.46 8.95 24.30 64.58<br />
2 Revadra 41.14 6.12 8.41 0.60 56.27<br />
3 Tarkhai 12.95 3.29 7.79 5.28 87.32<br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
Table no. 27: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)<br />
Animal<br />
Total<br />
Agriculture Casual<br />
Agriculture husbandry<br />
Services Handicraft Others<br />
workforce<br />
+ AH labour<br />
(AH)<br />
1 Mahiyari 2457 385 657 1042 1196 30 - 132<br />
2 Revadra 168 37 34 56 36 - - 5<br />
3 Tarkhai 229 195 189 384 34 1 0 1<br />
3.4. Comparative data <strong>of</strong> the crop productivity <strong>of</strong> the area:<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Project area vs. District vs. <strong>State</strong> vs. Country vs. World:<br />
“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit <strong>of</strong> factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare <strong>of</strong><br />
land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output <strong>of</strong> a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”<br />
Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for Mahiyari village), Handbook <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For <strong>Gujarat</strong> and India),<br />
and Final district plan (IWDP) <strong>of</strong> Dept. <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (for Porbandar). The results indicate that Mahiyari Watershed Project has very low<br />
productivity compared to world, India, <strong>Gujarat</strong> and Porbandar. The productivity is low not only because that the land is unproductive or the<br />
farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to <strong>of</strong> source <strong>of</strong> irrigation, salty water and scarcity <strong>of</strong> rain.<br />
The Mahiyari village comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow high<br />
value crops like Ground nut, Juwar etc. In case <strong>of</strong> low rainfall they can’t take any crops. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns<br />
<strong>of</strong> Mahiyari Project.<br />
The world productivity <strong>of</strong> Ground nuts is 665.80 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 7.3 lakh hectares with a production <strong>of</strong> 8.0 lakh tonnes and<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> 1,094 kg/ha. <strong>Gujarat</strong> alone produces about 80% <strong>of</strong> the total castor <strong>of</strong> our country from 50% <strong>of</strong> the area with a record<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> about 1950 kg/ha. Porbandar district has very good productivity 1300 kg /ha. The Mahiyari project area has only 250 kg/ha<br />
productivity. It is very low compare to district, <strong>State</strong>, India and world.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Pearl millet is the fourth most important grain crop next to rice, wheat and sorghum.The crop is cultivated for grain as well as fodder in the<br />
semi arid tropical regions. Pearl millet traditionally is an indispensable component <strong>of</strong> dry-land farming system. In world pearl millet<br />
productivity is 984 kg/ha and India has 1094 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> Bajara productivity and <strong>Gujarat</strong> is far better than world and India. The productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
pearl millet is 1500 kg/ha for Porbandar, whereas for Mahiyari Project, it is only 250 kg/ha.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Rapeseed (mustard) is the second most important oilseed crop after groundnut, contributing nearly 25-30% <strong>of</strong> the total oilseed production in<br />
the country.The world productivity <strong>of</strong> Rapeseed-mustard is 529 kg/ha. We can see that Mahiyari Project has very low productivity in<br />
comparison to Porbandar, <strong>Gujarat</strong>, India and world.<br />
The world and India productivity <strong>of</strong> cumin are 550 kg,400 kg per hectare respectively.<strong>Gujarat</strong> is a major cumin producing state in India with<br />
the productivity <strong>of</strong> 516 kg/ha. Cumin productivity <strong>of</strong> Porbandar is 450 kg/ha and Mahiyari village has very poor productivity with 225 Kg/ha.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
The Mahiyari project area has low productivity because <strong>of</strong> the following reasons:<br />
i) Full dependence on monsoon:<br />
Mahiyari Project is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence <strong>of</strong> proper irrigation facility,100% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the success or failure <strong>of</strong> the monsoon determines the success or failure <strong>of</strong><br />
agriculture production. The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate.<br />
ii) Low use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer per unit cropped area:<br />
Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack <strong>of</strong> water, scarcity <strong>of</strong> fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times<br />
they don’t get fertilizer at the right time. and the salinity also decrees his fertility.<br />
iii) Traditional farming methods:<br />
This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot <strong>of</strong> ignorance about the use <strong>of</strong> new farming methods and technologies such as multiple<br />
cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low<br />
productivity.<br />
iv) Lack <strong>of</strong> adequate farm machinery:<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Even today a large number <strong>of</strong> farmers in Mahiyari use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill. So, old<br />
machineries take more time in tillage practices.<br />
v) Lack <strong>of</strong> finances for farmers:<br />
In Mahiyari most <strong>of</strong> the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and other<br />
inputs.<br />
vi) Lack <strong>of</strong> good quality seeds and fertilizers:<br />
Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use <strong>of</strong> good quality leads to higher land<br />
productivity. In Mahiyari, however, there are two limitations in the use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition.<br />
But in Mahiyari 100 per cent <strong>of</strong> land depend on rainfall. In Mahiyari mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers, especially urea, it can’t decrees<br />
salinity. This has resulted in disproportionate use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer depleting the quality <strong>of</strong> land.<br />
vii) Lack <strong>of</strong> other facilities such as storage and marketing:<br />
5-10% <strong>of</strong> agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity <strong>of</strong> proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders<br />
at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means <strong>of</strong> transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage<br />
facilities.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Watershed Activities<br />
Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government <strong>of</strong> India especially in the rain-fed regions <strong>of</strong> semi-arid tropics. These<br />
regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need <strong>of</strong> a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development.<br />
The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.<br />
4.1. Scientific Planning:<br />
i) Cluster Approach<br />
This envisages a broader vision <strong>of</strong> Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster <strong>of</strong> micro-watershed. The Mahiyari Project consists <strong>of</strong><br />
four micro- watersheds namely 5G1C1a2a, 5G1A6a1d, 5G1A6a1e as their respective codes. Further Mahiyari watershed project is in<br />
continuation with other watershed projects.<br />
ii) Base line Survey<br />
To access the impact <strong>of</strong> any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any<br />
intervention during and post implementation <strong>of</strong> any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved<br />
household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a<br />
detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details <strong>of</strong> the demographic<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number <strong>of</strong> BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the<br />
village, average milk production <strong>of</strong> the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area,<br />
crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources <strong>of</strong> irrigation in the field.<br />
iii) Participatory <strong>Rural</strong> Appraisal (PRA)<br />
The past experience <strong>of</strong> watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability <strong>of</strong> the stakeholders towards the programme.<br />
This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while<br />
planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal activities<br />
with a complete accountability <strong>of</strong> the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were<br />
used to understand the physical and social orientation <strong>of</strong> the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease<br />
than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for<br />
afforestation), Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />
iv) Use <strong>of</strong> GIS and Remote sensing for planning<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> various high science tools has been promoted at various stages <strong>of</strong> watershed development.<br />
a) Prioritization<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil,<br />
BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage<br />
according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization <strong>of</strong> various watershed areas.<br />
b) Planning<br />
A action plan matrix was formulated by <strong>State</strong> Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil Depth,<br />
Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each<br />
and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map <strong>of</strong> vertical interval <strong>of</strong> 1<br />
meter at a scale <strong>of</strong> 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures.<br />
c) Hydrological modelling<br />
Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid<br />
over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area <strong>of</strong> each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which<br />
generally occurs while calculating the catchment area <strong>of</strong> a check dam.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 28: Details <strong>of</strong> Scientific Planning and Inputs in <strong>IWMP</strong> projects<br />
S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used<br />
Whether scientific criteria was<br />
used<br />
(A) Planning<br />
Cluster approach<br />
Yes<br />
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name <strong>of</strong><br />
the Institute<br />
Baseline survey<br />
Yes<br />
Hydro-geological survey<br />
Yes<br />
Contour mapping<br />
Yes<br />
Participatory Net Planning (PNP)<br />
Yes<br />
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/run-<strong>of</strong>f cover<br />
Yes<br />
Ridge to Valley treatment<br />
Online IT connectivity between<br />
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes<br />
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes<br />
(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong> GIS layers<br />
1. Cadastral map Yes<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
2. Village boundaries Yes<br />
3. Drainage Yes<br />
4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes<br />
5. Land use Yes<br />
6. Ground water status Yes<br />
7. Watershed boundaries Yes<br />
8. Activity Yes<br />
Crop simulation models #<br />
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high<br />
speed soil nutrient analysis<br />
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#<br />
Weather Station<br />
Yes<br />
Yes<br />
Yes<br />
(B) Inputs<br />
1. Bio-pesticides Yes<br />
2. Organic manures Yes<br />
3. Vermicompost Yes<br />
4. Bio-fertilizer Yes<br />
5. Water saving devices Yes<br />
6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
7. Bio-fencing Yes<br />
8. Nutrient budgeting No<br />
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No<br />
Any other (please specify)<br />
Figure No. 4 Focus Group Discussion<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Figure No.5 PRA Exercise<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 29: Watershed Committee details<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
WCs<br />
Date <strong>of</strong><br />
Registration<br />
as a Society<br />
(dd/mm/<br />
yyyy)<br />
Name &<br />
Designation<br />
M/F SC ST SF MF LF<br />
UG SHG GP<br />
Any<br />
other<br />
Landless<br />
Educational<br />
qualification<br />
Function/s<br />
assigned#<br />
Parmar<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Bhimabhai G.<br />
M<br />
√<br />
B.A.<br />
(President)<br />
Parmar<br />
Lakhmanbhai<br />
M<br />
√<br />
√<br />
10<br />
1<br />
Mahiyari<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Under<br />
Progress<br />
A. (Secretary)<br />
Odedra<br />
Jesabhai M.<br />
(Member/<br />
M<br />
B.Sc.<br />
LLB<br />
Secretary)<br />
Mokariya<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Rajubhai P.<br />
M<br />
7<br />
(Member)<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Chanchiya<br />
√<br />
Naranbhai G.<br />
M √ √<br />
4<br />
(Member)<br />
Parmar<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Meraman D.<br />
M<br />
4<br />
(Member)<br />
Kodiyatar<br />
√<br />
Balabhai H.<br />
M √ √<br />
3<br />
(Member)<br />
Makwana<br />
√<br />
Savjibhai J.<br />
M √ √<br />
10<br />
(Member)<br />
Parmar<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Miniben G.<br />
F<br />
√ 10<br />
(Member)<br />
Parmar<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Jayniben A.<br />
F<br />
0<br />
(Member)<br />
Parmar<br />
√<br />
Rajiben B.<br />
F<br />
√<br />
4<br />
(Member)<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Parmar<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Rupiben H.<br />
F<br />
4<br />
(Member)<br />
Odedra<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Hareshbhai<br />
M (Member)<br />
M<br />
4<br />
Parmar<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Hajabhai G.<br />
M<br />
10<br />
(Member)<br />
Under<br />
Progress<br />
Odeara Arshi<br />
L. (President)<br />
M<br />
√<br />
√<br />
√ 5<br />
2<br />
Revadra<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Odedara<br />
Deva H.<br />
(Secretary)<br />
Odedra<br />
Jesabhai M.<br />
(Member/<br />
M<br />
M<br />
√<br />
√<br />
10<br />
B.Sc.<br />
LLB<br />
Secretary)<br />
Odedara<br />
M<br />
√<br />
√<br />
3<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Aarjan S.<br />
(Member)<br />
Odedara<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Samat S.<br />
M<br />
9<br />
(Member)<br />
Odedara<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Bhimabhai B.<br />
M<br />
4<br />
(Member)<br />
Odedara<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Rajubhai M.<br />
M<br />
8<br />
(Member)<br />
Odedara<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Abhabhai R.<br />
M<br />
1<br />
(Member)<br />
Balva<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Kalabhai M.<br />
M<br />
√<br />
0<br />
(Member)<br />
Odedara<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Bhiniben G.<br />
F<br />
√ 0<br />
(Member)<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Kodiyatar<br />
√<br />
Sanjanbhai R.<br />
M √ √<br />
0<br />
(Member)<br />
Under<br />
Progress<br />
Tarkhala<br />
Savdasbhai M<br />
(President)<br />
M<br />
√<br />
√<br />
√ 10<br />
Tarkhala<br />
Nagajan M.<br />
M<br />
√<br />
√<br />
12<br />
(Secretary)<br />
3<br />
Tarkhai<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Odedra<br />
Jesabhai M.<br />
(Member/<br />
Secretary)<br />
M<br />
B.Sc.<br />
LLB<br />
Joshi<br />
√<br />
Dhirajbhai D.<br />
M<br />
√<br />
7<br />
(Member)<br />
Tarkhal<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Merkhibhai<br />
M<br />
12<br />
V. (Member)<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Tarkhala<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Rambhai D.<br />
M<br />
0<br />
(Member)<br />
Tarkhal<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Vejiben K.<br />
(Member)<br />
F<br />
0<br />
Vyas<br />
√<br />
Minakshiben<br />
F<br />
√<br />
10<br />
M (Member)<br />
Joshi<br />
√<br />
√<br />
Hansaben R.<br />
F<br />
10<br />
(Member)<br />
Keshwala<br />
√<br />
Puriben R.<br />
F<br />
√<br />
0<br />
(Member)<br />
Chavda<br />
√<br />
Rameshbhai<br />
M<br />
√<br />
10<br />
K. (Member)<br />
Odedra<br />
√<br />
Balubhai.D.<br />
M<br />
√<br />
10<br />
(Member)<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Keshwala<br />
Mohanbhai R.<br />
(Member)<br />
M<br />
√<br />
√<br />
10<br />
Table no. 30: SHG detail<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> registered SHGs<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />
category<br />
category<br />
Village<br />
With<br />
Name<br />
With only With<br />
only<br />
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
Women both<br />
Men<br />
(i) Landless 26 13 39 11 13 24 5 5 10<br />
Mahiyari 3 3 1 7<br />
(iv) LF<br />
(ii) SF 18 20 38<br />
(iii) MF<br />
Total 3 3 1 7 44 33 77 11 13 24 5 5 10<br />
Revadra 2 1 1 4<br />
(i) Landless - 11 11 11 11<br />
(ii) SF 22 11 33<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
(iii) MF<br />
(iv) LF<br />
Total 2 1 1 4 22 22 44 11 11<br />
(i) Landless 11 11 22 4 4<br />
Tarkhai 2 2 1 5<br />
(ii) SF 8 12 20<br />
(iii) MF 7 6 13<br />
(iv) LF<br />
Total 2 2 1 5 26 29 55 4 4<br />
User Group:<br />
User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user groups collect<br />
user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal<br />
rules and have a feeling <strong>of</strong> ownership with community spirit.<br />
Table no. 31: UG detail<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />
Village<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />
category<br />
category<br />
Name.<br />
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
Mahiyari 5 0 10 (i)Landless - - - - - - - - -<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
5 (ii) SF 88 7 95 - - - - - -<br />
(iii) MF 3 0 3 - - - - - -<br />
(iv) LF 4 0 4 - - - - - -<br />
Total - - 102 - - - - - -<br />
(i)Landless - - - - - - - - -<br />
(ii) SF 18 6 24 - - - - - -<br />
Revadra 0 0 5 5<br />
(iii) MF 26 0 26 - - - - - -<br />
(iv) LF - - - - - - - - -<br />
Total 50<br />
(i)Landless - - - - - - - - -<br />
(ii) SF 66 4 70 - - - - - -<br />
Tarkhai 3 0 6 9<br />
(iii) MF 17 3 20 - - - - - -<br />
(iv) LF - - - - - - - - -<br />
Total 90<br />
Livelihood Intervention ;<br />
Production System-1: Fodder bank for Mahiyari Watershed<br />
Introduction:<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
"The fodder bank technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to provide fodder for<br />
livestock sector." It provides a wide range <strong>of</strong> animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the potential as good and sustainable<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> income in many areas. However, lack <strong>of</strong> fodder in terms <strong>of</strong> quality and quantity, is one <strong>of</strong> the major constraints towards the low<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> cattle in Mahiyari watershed Project.<br />
The fodder bank ensures fodder availability which in turn reduces the distressed migration <strong>of</strong> the people resulting in sustainable livelihood<br />
opportunities and enhances natural resource security in the project area.<br />
Objective <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank:<br />
1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution <strong>of</strong> fodder during drought and scarce situation. .<br />
2. Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder production, in<br />
association with dairy co-operatives.<br />
3. Control regulates and charge in the community grazing and pastures lands.<br />
4. Undertake the distribution <strong>of</strong> fodder seeds and slips in the village.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Primary problem <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
Mahiyari village comes under totally rain fed agriculture because <strong>of</strong> this migration percentage is very high. Soil is very suitable for fodder crop<br />
mainly sorghum but due the scarcity <strong>of</strong> irrigation water only one crop can be taken throughout the year. So fodder bank play an important<br />
role to solve this problem. Majority <strong>of</strong> farmers own less than 2.5ha <strong>of</strong> land for food and fodder production but lack <strong>of</strong> irrigation water has<br />
made these lands unproductive. The concept <strong>of</strong> fodder bank can overcome the problem <strong>of</strong> seasonal feed shortage, migration and poor animal<br />
performance. A<br />
It is the milch animal, which is the worst affected during these periods <strong>of</strong> drought, due to lack <strong>of</strong> productivity <strong>of</strong> sufficient fodder and water. As<br />
a result, the poor are forced to let go with their animals in search <strong>of</strong> fodder and green pastures to other parts <strong>of</strong> the state. This eventually this<br />
leads to colossal loss <strong>of</strong> income generating assets, poor demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> village and low education level <strong>of</strong> their Children.<br />
Even in good years, during the harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when supply is<br />
higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them, mostly at higher prices<br />
during the months <strong>of</strong> scarcity.<br />
To meet the critical needs <strong>of</strong> fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices during the summer months,<br />
fodder banks are proposed to be setup at the village level<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Fodder Bank:<br />
A detailed survey and Focused Group Discussion was conducted in Mahiyari watershed area. The number and type <strong>of</strong> cattle as well as the<br />
fodder production capacity <strong>of</strong> the village was collect during these surveys. In focused group discussion several factors like the various types <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder available locally, the quantity <strong>of</strong> fodder to be stored in the fodder bank, the size <strong>of</strong> fodder bank, the amount <strong>of</strong> finances required to<br />
operate a fodder bank etc were discussed with the farmers, User group and Watershed committee. The fodder bank should be sustainable and<br />
towards that, the sale price <strong>of</strong> fodder should cover operating costs and losses in storage. All these decisions were taken jointly with the member<br />
<strong>of</strong> operating fodder bank.<br />
Table 34 .I Primary Model for A Fodder Bank<br />
A Total Dairy farmers 70<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> adult animals<br />
100 50<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> calves<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Cattle to be catered by one fodder bank.<br />
Total<br />
Fodder requirement per day [10kg dry fodder for<br />
adult Fodder and requirement 4kg for calf). for 180 days.<br />
Fodder come from community land<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production (See table:2)<br />
150<br />
1000 kg( per Day >500 kg( per Day )= 1500 Kg<br />
2700 quintal<br />
15 hec *150=2250 quintal<br />
70,000 Rs<br />
2700-2250=450 quintal<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Remaining requirement for 120 days Total Cost Avg.<br />
Procurement rate in harvesting season, Rs.600 per<br />
Qt. including transportation *.'<br />
600*450= Rs.2,70,000/-3,40,000<br />
Net Cost <strong>of</strong> Fodder Production "K' (cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation +<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> procurement)<br />
B. Area development for fodder bank Land required Rs7200<br />
c.<br />
Approx. 3000 m 2 (preferably land will be allotted by<br />
Gram Cl. Fencing Panchayat + Weighing @ Rs.600 machine per month) + Small shed + Other Rs.50,000/-<br />
D. tools. Total Cost for Fodder bank (A+B) Rs. 3,47,200/-<br />
Table no: 34.2, Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production<br />
Cost Detail<br />
Unit cost<br />
1. Cost for tillage<br />
2. Cost for seed<br />
4.5 hour*15 hec*400<br />
Rs=27000 12 kg seed *15 hec<br />
3. Cost for fertilizer *100=18000<br />
10,000 Rs<br />
4. Cost for irrigation 5,000 Rs<br />
5. Depreciation cost <strong>of</strong> Cl.[20%) 10,000 Rs<br />
Rs<br />
Rs<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Total cost for 15 hec Rs. 70,000<br />
Table No. 34.3, Revenue and return Details.<br />
S. No Return Details Cost (in Rs.)<br />
1 Cost <strong>of</strong> fodder Per Kg = 3,47,200/270000<br />
1.28 Rs/kg<br />
2. Selling Price <strong>of</strong> Fodder Rs 2 /Kg<br />
3. Net selling Price Rs. 5,40,000<br />
4. Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it Rs 1,92,800<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> Fodder:<br />
We will produce 2250 quintal fodder from community land <strong>of</strong> Gram Panchayat and for remaining requirement we can fulfill by two ways first<br />
one buy the fodder at the time <strong>of</strong> harvesting and second we can take land on lease agreement from some other government as well as private<br />
agency.<br />
Table no.32: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
S. No. Names <strong>of</strong> Villages<br />
Amount earmarked<br />
for EPA<br />
Entry Point Activities planned Estimated cost<br />
1 Mahiyari 18.04<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Store Room For<br />
Smasan<br />
2.12<br />
Expected<br />
outcome<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Gutter Work-1 3.95<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Gutter Work-2 5.12<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Washing Ghat-1 1.51<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Washing Ghat-2 1.51<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Washing Ghat-3 1.51<br />
Fancing Work <strong>of</strong> Smasan 0.45<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Causeway 1.57<br />
Vanikaran 0.15<br />
Total :- 17.89<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> RCC Slab for Averada<br />
2.63<br />
2 Revadra<br />
2.79<br />
Vanikaran<br />
0.11<br />
Total :- 2.74<br />
3 Tarkhai 4.56<br />
Fencing Work <strong>of</strong> Smasan 0.44<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Aotal Around Trees 2.40<br />
Excavation <strong>of</strong> Ponds 1.54<br />
Vanikaran 0.14<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
4.52<br />
Total :-<br />
32.1 Construction <strong>of</strong> Gutter at Village Mahiyari (EPA Activity)<br />
NO Description No L B D/H Qty T.Qty Rate Per Amount<br />
1 Excavation <strong>of</strong> Trench for Gutter 1 390 0.91 0.69 244.88 244.88<br />
a) Loose or S<strong>of</strong>t Soil 40 % <strong>of</strong> Total 97.95 47.00 Cum 4603.76<br />
b) Dense or Hard Soil 40 % <strong>of</strong><br />
Total<br />
97.95 60.00 Cum 5877.14<br />
c) Hard Murrum 20 % <strong>of</strong> Total 48.98 101.00 Cum 4946.60<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
2 P.C.C.-1:3:6 for foundation 1 390 0.91 0.15 53.24 53.24 1757.00 Cum 93587.13<br />
3 White Bella Stone Masonry Work 1 390 0.23 0.46 82.52 82.52 2530.00 Cum 208785.72<br />
4 15 mm thick cement plaster 4 390 0.45 - 702.00 881.40 85.00 Sq mt 74919.00<br />
2 390 0.23 - 179.40<br />
TOTAL AMOUNT :- 392719.35<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
0.23<br />
mt<br />
0.45<br />
mt<br />
0.91 mt<br />
390.00 mt<br />
Plan<br />
0.45 mt<br />
0.23<br />
0.23<br />
Elevation<br />
Fig.32.1 Plan and Elevation Detail <strong>of</strong> Gutter<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Figure No.6 Proposed sites for EPA activity<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no.33: Details <strong>of</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
Identifying Printing DPR<br />
Initiation <strong>of</strong><br />
Hydrogeological<br />
Cost (Rs. in<br />
Estimated<br />
S. Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Capacity IEC Baseline<br />
technical and mapping<br />
village level<br />
No. villages<br />
building activities survey<br />
support <strong>of</strong> project<br />
institution<br />
survey<br />
lakh)<br />
agencies area<br />
1 Mahiyari 4.53 11.23 4.53 1.15 0.49 4.53 0.61 27.07<br />
2 Revadra 0.69 1.77 0.69 0.19 0.07 0.69 0.09 4.19<br />
3 Tarkhai 1.15 2.86 1.15 0.32 0.09 1.15 0.13 6.85<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Table no.34: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
Proposed target<br />
Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />
Total target<br />
structures<br />
Village<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> structures Area to<br />
Area to<br />
Area to<br />
name<br />
Storage<br />
Storage<br />
Storage<br />
be<br />
Estimated be<br />
Estimated be<br />
Estimated<br />
No.<br />
capacity<br />
No.<br />
capacity<br />
capacity<br />
irrigated<br />
cost irrigated<br />
cost irrigated<br />
cost<br />
cmt<br />
cmt<br />
cmt<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
1 Mahiyari<br />
(i) Pond 5 103 91800 57.95 1 14 41400 26.66 117 133200 84.61<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
(ii ) Causeway 4 100 18000 13.55 100 18000 13.55<br />
(iii) Waste Wear 3 28 27000 4.99 28 27000 4.99<br />
(iv) Gauchar Sudharana 1 - - 53.94 - - 53.94<br />
(v) Land Levelling 22 - - 11.00 - - 11.00<br />
(vi) RCC Wall <strong>of</strong> HOJ 1 - 13000 9.76 - 13000 9.76<br />
(vii) Wire Fancing <strong>of</strong><br />
Ponds<br />
2 - 54400 2.57 - 54400 2.57<br />
(viii) Pitching <strong>of</strong> Ponds 2 - 54400 24.00 - 54400 24.00<br />
(ix) Farm Bunding 16 - - 16.00 - - 16.00<br />
(x) Any others (Please<br />
specify)<br />
Total 5 103 91800 57.95 56 142 208200 162.46 245 300000 220.42<br />
(i) Pond 2 40 8400 5.44 1 26 8000 5.15 66 16400 10.59<br />
Revadra (ii ) Check dam 2 47 36000 8.31 47 36000 8.31<br />
(iii) Causeway 1 21 4500 3.66 21 4500 3.66<br />
(iv) Waste Wear 2 46 9000 3.33 46 9000 3.33<br />
(v)Gauchar Sudharana 1 1.02 1.02<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
(vi) Fancing <strong>of</strong> Private<br />
Land<br />
6 4.59 4.59<br />
(vii) Land Levelling 5 2.50 2.50<br />
(viii) Farm Pond 1 0.89 0.89<br />
Total 2 40 8400 5.44 19 140 57500 29.45 180 65900 34.89<br />
3<br />
Tarkhai<br />
(i) Pond 1 13 8000 5.15 3 50 46000 29.62 63 54000 34.77<br />
(ii ) Causeway 3 54 13500 12.20 54 13500 12.20<br />
(iii) Waste Wear 2 32 9000 3.33 32 9000 3.33<br />
(iv)Gauchar Sudharana 1 1.77 1.77<br />
(v) Land Levelling 10 5.00 5.00<br />
Total 1 13 8000 5.15 19 136 68500 51.92 149 76500 57.07<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no.35: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />
Proposed target<br />
Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> new<br />
existing recharging<br />
recharging structures<br />
S. No. Name <strong>of</strong> Villages Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />
structures<br />
Total target<br />
No.<br />
Area to be<br />
Area to be<br />
Area to be<br />
Estimated<br />
Estimated<br />
Estimated<br />
irrigated<br />
No. irrigated<br />
irrigated<br />
cost<br />
cost<br />
cost<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
(ha)<br />
Mhaiyari<br />
(i)Open wells<br />
(ii)Bore wells<br />
(iii) Shallow Well 4 800 5.16 800 5.16<br />
1<br />
Total for the village<br />
Total for the<br />
Project<br />
4 800 5.16 800 5.16<br />
2 Revadra<br />
(i)Open wells NA NA NA NA NA NA<br />
(ii)Bore wells<br />
(iii) Shallow Well<br />
Total for the village<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Total for the<br />
Project<br />
3<br />
Tarkhai<br />
(i)Open wells NA NA NA NA NA NA<br />
(ii)Bore wells<br />
(iii) Shallow Well<br />
Total for the village<br />
Total for the<br />
Project<br />
Table no. 36: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas<br />
Major activities <strong>of</strong> the SHGs<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
S. No.<br />
Average annual income from<br />
Villages<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> SHGs involved<br />
activity per SHG<br />
1 Mahiyari Fisheries 1 1.58<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Dori Vanat Kam 1 0.50<br />
Vegetables Shop 1 1.30<br />
Santing 1 1.50<br />
2 Revadra<br />
Vermicompost 1 0.72<br />
Handicraft 1 0.40<br />
Santing 1 5.50<br />
Making Masala 1 0.40<br />
3 Tarkhai<br />
Handicraft 1 0.25<br />
Electric Service 1 0.75<br />
Santing 1 1.50<br />
Making Masala 1 0.50<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 37: Other activities <strong>of</strong> watershed works phase – Proposed target<br />
Any<br />
Drainage<br />
Nonconventional<br />
Estimated<br />
Total<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Ridge area<br />
Nursery Land Crop Pasture Fishery<br />
other<br />
S.<br />
line<br />
villages treatment<br />
raising development demonstrations development development<br />
(please<br />
No.<br />
treatment<br />
energy<br />
cost (Rs.<br />
specify)<br />
In lakhs)<br />
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)<br />
1 Mahiyari 7 18.49 49 192.12 1 9.76 220.42<br />
2 Revadra 127.50 15.30 1 0.12 154.83 19.59 5 2.00 5.1 0.75 37.76<br />
3 Tarkhai 5 15.53 5 36.39 51.92<br />
Table no.38: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works*<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Village<br />
name<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> structures<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
(i) (ii) (iii)<br />
(i)<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
(ii) (iii)<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
(i) UG<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Target<br />
Estimated cost<br />
Expected<br />
Ridge Drainage Land dev.<br />
Pri- Communi Others<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
units<br />
(Rs. in lakh)<br />
month &<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
1<br />
2 Revadra<br />
area line (L) vate ty (pl. (iii) Others (No./<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
(R) (D)<br />
specify) (pl. specify) cu.m./<br />
completio<br />
rmt) M W O T n<br />
(mm/yyy<br />
y)<br />
(i) Pond D C 6 84.61 May 2010<br />
(ii ) Causeway R D C 4 13.55 June 2010<br />
March-<br />
(iii) Waste Wear D C 3 4.99<br />
Mahiyari<br />
2013<br />
(vi) RCC Wall <strong>of</strong> HOJ D C 1 9.76<br />
(viii) Pitching <strong>of</strong> Ponds D C 2 24.00<br />
Any others (pl. specify)<br />
Total 16<br />
136.9<br />
1<br />
(i) Pond L C DWDU 3 10.59 May- 2012<br />
June-<br />
(ii ) Check dam R C DWDU 2 8.31<br />
2012<br />
(iii) Causeway R C DWDU 1 3.66 Jan.-2013<br />
March-<br />
(iv) Waste Wear R C DWDU 2 3.33<br />
2013<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
(v)Gauchar Sudharana L C DWDU 1 1.02 May-2014<br />
(vi) Fancing <strong>of</strong> Private<br />
Land<br />
L P DWDU 6 4.59 May-2015<br />
(vii) Land Levelling L P DWDU 5 2.50 Dec.-2015<br />
(viii) Farm Pond L P DWDU 1 0.89 Jan.2013<br />
Any others (pl. specify)<br />
Total 22 34.89<br />
3<br />
Tarkhai<br />
(i) Pond D C 3 34.77 May- 2012<br />
(ii ) Causeway R D C 3 12.20 Jan.-2013<br />
(iii) Waste Wear D C 2 3.33<br />
March-<br />
2013<br />
(iv)Gauchar Sudharana L C 1 1.77 May-2014<br />
(v) Land Levelling L P 10 5.00 Dec.-2015<br />
Any others (pl. specify)<br />
Total 19 57.07<br />
38.1 Construction <strong>of</strong> Check Dam at Village Revadra (Work Phase Activity)<br />
NO Description No L B D/H Qty T.Qty Rate Per Amount<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
1 Excavation for foundation<br />
…<br />
Body wall...... 1 25.00 2.60 1.00 141.75<br />
Key wall (L) side........ 1 2.00 0.60 1.00 1.20<br />
Key wall (R) side........ 1 2.00 0.60 1.00 1.20<br />
Side wall......... 2 4.00 0.60 1.00 4.80<br />
End wall....... 1 25.00 0.45 0.45 5.06<br />
Apron..... 1 25.00 2.00 0.60 54.51<br />
208.53<br />
'Excavation in Soil (70% 0f<br />
total) 145.97<br />
'Excavation in SOft Rock<br />
(20% <strong>of</strong> total) 41.71<br />
'Excavation in Hard Rock<br />
10% <strong>of</strong> total) 20.85<br />
47.00 Cum<br />
60.00 Cum<br />
101.00 Cum<br />
6861.00<br />
2502.00<br />
2106.00<br />
2 C.C. in foundation 1:3:6<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Body wall...... 1 25.00 2.60 0.10 6.50<br />
Key wall (L) side........ 1 2.00 0.60 0.10 0.12<br />
Key wall (R) side........ 1 2.00 0.60 0.10 0.12<br />
13.35 2256.00 Cum 30106.00<br />
Side wall......... 2 4.00 0.60 0.10 0.48<br />
End wall....... 1 25.00 0.45 0.10 1.13<br />
Apron..... 1 25.00 2.00 0.10 5.00<br />
3 White stone bela masonry<br />
work<br />
125.12 2530.00 Cum 316560.00<br />
Body wall...... 1 25.00 1.80 1.75 78.75<br />
Key wall (L) side........ 1 2.00 0.60 2.90 3.48<br />
Key wall (R) side........ 1 2.00 0.60 2.90 3.48<br />
Side wall......... 2 4.00 0.60 2.00 9.60<br />
End wall....... 1 25.00 0.45 0.65 7.31<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Apron..... 1 25.00 2.00 0.45 22.50<br />
4 C.C. Coping (1:2:4 mix)<br />
12.94 2747.00 Cum 35539.00<br />
Body wall...... 1 25.00 1.00 0.15 3.75<br />
Key wall (L) side........ 1 2.00 0.60 0.00 0.00<br />
Key wall (R) side........ 1 2.00 0.60 0.00 0.00<br />
Side wall......... 2 4.00 0.60 0.00 0.00<br />
End wall....... 1 25.00 0.45 0.15 1.69<br />
Apron..... 1 25.00 2.00 0.15 7.50<br />
5 Cement Plaster 20 mm<br />
thickness<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
207.80 152.00 Cum 31586<br />
Body wall top.. 1 25.00 1.00 0.00 25.00<br />
Body wall D/S side... 1 25.00 2.00 0.00 50.00<br />
Body wall u/S side... 1 25.00 2.00 0.00 50.00<br />
Side wall top........ 2 4.00 0.60 0.00 4.80<br />
Side wall inner side.. 2 4.00 3.00 0.00 24.00<br />
Side wall front side.. 2 4.00 3.00 0.00 24.00<br />
End wall side…. 2 25.00 0.45 0.00 22.50<br />
End wall top… 1 25.00 0.30 0.00 7.50<br />
6 Name plate 1 1 Nos 1218.00 Sq cm 1218.00<br />
TOTAL AMOUNT :- 426478.25<br />
SAY :- 426480.00<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Key Wall<br />
White Bala<br />
Masonary<br />
Stone<br />
0.81<br />
Body Wall<br />
0.15m<br />
pc 1:2:4<br />
2.00<br />
25.00<br />
Apron<br />
0.10m pc 1:3:6<br />
1.00<br />
End<br />
Wall<br />
Side<br />
Wall<br />
1. Cross Section<br />
2. Elevation<br />
3. Plan<br />
Fig.38.2 Cross Section, Elevation and Plan Detail <strong>of</strong> Check Dam<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
38.3Excavation <strong>of</strong> Pond at Village Tarkhai (Work Phase Activity)<br />
NO Description No L B D/H Qty T.Qty Rate Per Amount<br />
1 Excavation up to 1.00 mt to 1.50 mt 1 150 30 1.50 6750<br />
a) Loose or S<strong>of</strong>t Soil 40 % <strong>of</strong> Total 2700 47.00 Cum 126900.00<br />
b) Dense or Hard Soil 40 % <strong>of</strong> Total 2700 60.00 Cum 162000.00<br />
c) Hard Murrum 20 % <strong>of</strong> Total 1350 101.00 Cum 136350.00<br />
Total 425250.00<br />
2 Excavation up to 1.50 mt to 3.00 mt 1 150 30 0.50 2250<br />
a) Loose or S<strong>of</strong>t Soil 40 % <strong>of</strong> Total 900 52.00 Cum 46800.00<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
b) Dense or Hard Soil 40 % <strong>of</strong> Total 900 65.00 Cum 58500.00<br />
c) Hard Murrum 20 % <strong>of</strong> Total 450 109.00 Cum 49050.00<br />
Total 154350.00<br />
Net Total 579600.00<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
L=150.00 mt<br />
D=2.00 mt<br />
B=30.00 mt<br />
Fig.38.4 Excavation <strong>of</strong> Pond<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no.39: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
Target<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
village<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
structure/<br />
work<br />
(i)<br />
Ridge<br />
area<br />
(R)<br />
(ii)<br />
Drainage<br />
line<br />
(D)<br />
(iii)<br />
Land<br />
dev.<br />
(L)<br />
(i)<br />
Private<br />
(ii)<br />
Community<br />
(iii)<br />
Others<br />
(pl.<br />
specify)<br />
(i) UG<br />
(ii)SHG<br />
(iii)<br />
Others (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
plants<br />
Estimated<br />
cost<br />
(Rs. in lakh)<br />
Expected<br />
month &<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
completion<br />
(mm/ yyyy)<br />
Afforestation L C Forest 25 56000<br />
14,15120.00<br />
MAY-2012<br />
1 Mahiyari<br />
Fuel wood L C Forest<br />
Fodder L C SHG<br />
Pasture dev. L C Forest<br />
Nursery raising L C SHG<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Others (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
Afforestation L C Forest 10 16000<br />
4,04320.00<br />
MAY-2012<br />
2 Revadra<br />
Fuel wood L C Forest<br />
Fodder L C SHG<br />
Pasture dev. L C Forest<br />
Nursery raising L C SHG<br />
Others (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
Afforestation L C Forest 10 16000<br />
4,04320.00<br />
MAY-2012<br />
3 Tarkhai<br />
Fuel wood L C Forest<br />
Fodder L C SHG<br />
Pasture dev. L C Forest<br />
Nursery raising L C SHG<br />
Others (pl.<br />
specify)<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
S.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />
No.<br />
1 Mahiyari<br />
Table no.40: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Executing<br />
agency<br />
Target<br />
Expected<br />
(iii) (i) UG Estimated<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
month &<br />
(ii) Others (ii)SHG cost<br />
(i) Private<br />
year <strong>of</strong><br />
Community (pl. (iii) Others (Rs. in<br />
completion<br />
specify) (pl. specify) lakh)<br />
(mm/yyyy)<br />
Production System & Micro<br />
Enterprise<br />
Crop demonstration P Individual 8.86<br />
Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 3.00<br />
Hybrid Seeds Distribution P 1.10<br />
Kitchen Gardening 500 nos.<br />
X900<br />
P Individual 4.50<br />
Tailoring Machine P Individual 2.26<br />
Mandap Service P SHG 1.50<br />
Santing C SHG 1.50<br />
Dairy development C SHG 2.00<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Leafplate & Cup Making Machine SHG 2.25<br />
Lift Irrigation Equipment SHG 1.75<br />
Farm Bunding<br />
P Individual 3.24<br />
De-worming<br />
P Individual 1.19<br />
Agricultural Componet UG 1.20<br />
Organic Agriculture (3 Ha) UG 2.70<br />
Veterinary Kit ( 600 Unit) UG 5.75<br />
SHG Revolving Fund SHG 1.10<br />
Provision Shop Individiual 1.00<br />
Lamon Plantation (5 Ha.) SHG 5.75<br />
Fodder Unit ( 5.1 Hact) UG 8.00<br />
Livelly Hood Activity<br />
Nursery<br />
C SHG 2.00<br />
Vermi Compost net house unit<br />
C SHG 5.62<br />
Animal Husbandary (Bafflow<br />
Unit)<br />
SHG 11.80<br />
Chiko plantatio C UG 3.50<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Papad Making C SHG 2.60<br />
Chaff cutter 89 nos. X 2000 UG 1.78<br />
Bio Gas (50 Unit) P Individual 7.37<br />
Floor Mil P Individual 1.45<br />
Snake Preparation P SHG 0.55<br />
Non Conventional energy Saving<br />
devices (bio Fuel) 5 Hc<br />
P Individual 1.65<br />
Pasture <strong>Development</strong> (6 Ha.) C SHG 5.00<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong> Water Harvesting<br />
Structure<br />
C SHG 1.80<br />
Total<br />
103.77<br />
2 Revadra<br />
Production System & Micro<br />
Enterprise<br />
Crop demonstration P Individual 1.50<br />
SHG Revolving Fund P 0.30<br />
Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.50<br />
Hybrid Seeds Districbution P 1.10<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Kitchen Gardening 55 nos. X900 P Individual 0.49<br />
Tailoring Machine P Individual 0.95<br />
Lift Irrigation Equipment SHG 0.75<br />
Dairy development C SHG 1.20<br />
Canting C SHG 1.20<br />
Leafplate & Cup Making Machine SHG 1.08<br />
Livelly Hood Activity<br />
Nursery<br />
C SHG 0.40<br />
Vermi Compost net house unit<br />
Animal Husbandary (Bafflow<br />
Unit)<br />
BIO Gas (10 Unit)<br />
C SHG 2.62<br />
SHG 1.74<br />
Individual 1.47<br />
Chiko plantation C UG 0.75<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
3 Tarkhai<br />
Total 16.05<br />
Production System & Micro<br />
Enterprise<br />
Crop demonstration P Individual 1.50<br />
Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.50<br />
Haybird Seeds Distribution P 1.10<br />
Lift Irrigation Equipment SHG 0.75<br />
Kitchen Gardening 89 nos. X900 P Individual 0.80<br />
Tailoring Machine P Individual 1.20<br />
Mandap Services P SHG 1.00<br />
Canting C SHG 1.20<br />
Dairy development C SHG 1.80<br />
Leafplate & Cup Making<br />
Machine<br />
SHG 2.71<br />
SHG Revolving Fund<br />
Veterinary Kits ( 120)<br />
De-worming<br />
SHG 0.40<br />
Individual 1.09<br />
P Individual 0.79<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Livelly Hood Activity<br />
Nursery<br />
Vermi Compost net house unit<br />
Animal Husbandary (Bafflow<br />
Unit)<br />
Ground Nuts Processing<br />
C SHG 1.00<br />
C SHG 0.90<br />
SHG 3.40<br />
SHG 2.00<br />
Sitaphal plantatio C UG 1.05<br />
Papad Making C SHG 0.40<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong> Water Harvesting<br />
Structure<br />
C SHG 1.20<br />
Chaff cutter 73 nos. X 2000<br />
UG 1.46<br />
Total 26.25<br />
S. No.<br />
Name(s) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
villages<br />
Table no.41: Details <strong>of</strong> activities in the CPRs in the project areas<br />
Target<br />
CPR particulars Activity proposed<br />
Target area under the Estimated expenditure Expected no. <strong>of</strong><br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
activity (ha) (Rs.) beneficiaries<br />
1<br />
Mahiyari<br />
Total for village<br />
Gauchar<br />
Sudharana<br />
10 53.94 All Village<br />
Total for project<br />
Revadra<br />
Total for village<br />
2<br />
Total for project<br />
Tarkhai<br />
Total for village<br />
3<br />
Total for project<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
S. No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Training<br />
Institute<br />
Full Address<br />
with contact no.,<br />
website & e-mail<br />
1 KVK PORBNDAR<br />
2<br />
Junagadh<br />
Agriculture<br />
University<br />
Junagadh<br />
3 BISAG Gandhinagar<br />
Table no. 42: Capacity Building Institution:<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Institute#<br />
Research<br />
Institution<br />
University<br />
Space<br />
Application<br />
Agriculture,<br />
Animal<br />
Husbandry,<br />
Horticulture<br />
Agriculture,<br />
Animal<br />
Husbandry,<br />
Horticulture<br />
Remote<br />
Sensing &<br />
GIS<br />
Area(s) <strong>of</strong><br />
specialization$<br />
Accreditation<br />
details<br />
Reference<br />
Year<br />
Trainings<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
trainings<br />
assigned<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
trainees to<br />
be trained<br />
GOI 2011-2014 4 600<br />
GOI 2011-14 2 130<br />
GOG 2010-2015 3 6<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
S. No.<br />
Project<br />
1 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 43: Capacity Building plan:<br />
Project Stakeholders<br />
Total no. <strong>of</strong> No. <strong>of</strong> persons to be No. <strong>of</strong> training<br />
persons<br />
trained<br />
programmes<br />
Estimated cost<br />
PIA 2 2 2 0.20<br />
WDTs 4 4 2 0.38<br />
UGs 262 78 8 13.58<br />
SHGs 176 176 5 10.44<br />
WCs 45 45 5 0.84<br />
GPs 3 3 2 0.72<br />
Community 250 250 5 5.60<br />
Others<br />
(Pl. specify)<br />
Total 31.76<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Project<br />
Mahiyari<br />
Table no.44: Information, education and Communication Activities:<br />
Activity<br />
Executing agency<br />
Estimated expenditure<br />
(Rs.)<br />
Street Play Local Groups 15000<br />
Bhavai Team Groups 24000<br />
Video Shows Forest Division, Porbandar 9000<br />
Pamplete and Posters Forest Division, Porbandar 6000<br />
Banners, Hording Forest Division, Porbandar 15000<br />
Outcome<br />
(may quantify, wherever<br />
possible)<br />
Awareness for the impotent <strong>of</strong><br />
Watershed Projects<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 45: Village wise- activity wise budget<br />
Sl<br />
no<br />
Village<br />
Activity<br />
EPA<br />
Institution<br />
and CB<br />
DPR<br />
Watershed<br />
development<br />
Work<br />
Livelihood<br />
for asset<br />
less<br />
Production<br />
system and<br />
Microenterprises<br />
Consolidation<br />
1 Mahiyari 18.04 22.56 451.16 225.58 45.11 58.65 22.56<br />
2 Revadra 2.79 3.49 69.79 34.89 6.97 9.07 3.50<br />
3 Tarkhai 4.56 5.71 114.44 57.07 11.41 14.85 5.71<br />
N<br />
o<br />
Village<br />
Projec<br />
t area<br />
(Ha)<br />
Total<br />
Fund<br />
In<br />
Lakhs<br />
Admini<br />
strative<br />
costs<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
Monit<br />
oring<br />
Table no. 46: Budget at a Glance<br />
Evalua<br />
tion<br />
Entry<br />
Point<br />
activi<br />
ty<br />
Institu<br />
tion<br />
and<br />
Capaci<br />
ty<br />
Buildi<br />
ng<br />
Detaile<br />
d<br />
Project<br />
Report<br />
Watershe<br />
d<br />
Develop<br />
ment<br />
Works<br />
Liveliho<br />
od<br />
activitie<br />
s for<br />
asset<br />
less<br />
Product<br />
ion<br />
system<br />
s and<br />
microenterpr<br />
ises<br />
Consoli<br />
dation<br />
phase<br />
10% 1% 1% 4% 5% 1% 50% 10% 13% 5% 100%<br />
1 Mahiya 3759.7 451.1 45.11 4.52 4.52 18.04 22.56 4.51 225.58 45.11 58.65 22.56 451.16<br />
ri<br />
6<br />
2 Revadr 581.6 69.79 6.97 0.7 0.7 2.79 3.49 0.7 34.9 6.97 9.07 3.5 69.79<br />
a<br />
3 Tarkhai 951.2 114.1 11.41 1.14 1.14 4.56 5.71 1.14 57.07 11.41 14.85 5.71 114.14<br />
Total
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
4<br />
Table no.47: Details <strong>of</strong> Convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong> with other Schemes<br />
Was this fund<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
included in<br />
Names <strong>of</strong> Fund made<br />
activity/task/structure<br />
Rs.12,000/<br />
Departments available to<br />
undertaken with converged<br />
15,000 per<br />
Sr. No with Schemes <strong>IWMP</strong> due to<br />
funds<br />
ha.<br />
converging with convergence<br />
(a) Structures<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong> (Rs. in lakh)<br />
Yes No<br />
(b) livelihoods<br />
(c ) Any other (pl. specify)<br />
1<br />
MGNREGS 28.00 NO Structure<br />
2 DIC 3.75 No. Livelihoods<br />
3 Forest 9.72 Yes Structure<br />
Reference no. <strong>of</strong><br />
activity/ task/<br />
structure in DPR<br />
Level at which<br />
decision for<br />
convergence<br />
was taken<br />
District Level<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
6.1 Expected Outcomes<br />
6.1.1 Employment<br />
Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations <strong>of</strong> the people are dry land agriculture, animal husbandry and<br />
casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop, which<br />
keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack <strong>of</strong> fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not<br />
keep them engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.<br />
The project plans for creation <strong>of</strong> both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by engaging<br />
people in watershed physical works like construction <strong>of</strong> earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. Self employment would be<br />
created by providing the people with cash support in the form <strong>of</strong> direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise<br />
development.<br />
S.<br />
NO.<br />
Names<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
Table no. 48: Employment in Project area:<br />
Wage employment<br />
Self employment<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> mandays No. <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries No. <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total<br />
1 Mahiyari 20430 - 78210 14850 113490 227 - 869 165 1261 35 - 1046 115 1196<br />
2 Revadra 8730 - 5220 1170 15120 97 - 58 13 168 5 - 23 8 36<br />
3 Tarkhai 6750 900 8280 1620 17550 75 10 92 18 195 8 5 14 7 34<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
6.1.2. Migration<br />
Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well <strong>of</strong>f farmers bring fodder from Mahiyari (approximately<br />
100kms away) collectively; but the resource poor cannot afford it. On account <strong>of</strong> agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time<br />
employment for some part <strong>of</strong> the year, the people migrate for a better half <strong>of</strong> the year for wage labour.<br />
Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.<br />
Table no. 49: Details <strong>of</strong> seasonal migration from Project area<br />
Sl. No. Names <strong>of</strong> villages No. <strong>of</strong> persons migrating<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> days per year <strong>of</strong><br />
migration<br />
Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project<br />
Expected post<br />
project<br />
Mahiyari 91 22 90 35<br />
Revadra 65 30 90 25<br />
Tarkhai 85 23 90 30<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
6.1.3 Ground water table<br />
Rainfall has been average but every year water logging & salinity problem has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has<br />
depleted over the years. Presently it stands at 25 m. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in<br />
increasing water table depth from 25-30 m in the pre-project level to 12-17 m in the post project period. & water quality will be good as well as<br />
pre – project time<br />
Table no. 50: Details <strong>of</strong> average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)<br />
S. No. Names <strong>of</strong> Villages Sources Pre-Project level<br />
Expected Increase/decrease<br />
(Post- Project)<br />
1 Mahiyari Depend upon Monsoon<br />
2 Revadra<br />
Depend upon Monsoon<br />
25-30 mt<br />
12-17 mt<br />
3 Tarkhai<br />
Depend upon Monsoon<br />
6.1.4 Drinking water<br />
The villages has not own drinking water source they have to depend upon other village known as Paswari. This village’s water quality too bad<br />
that why many people suffer form various problems like kidney stone, joint pain & much saline water related problems<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> drinking water would improve.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 51: Status <strong>of</strong> Drinking water<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Names <strong>of</strong><br />
Villages<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong> drinking water<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong> drinking water<br />
(no. <strong>of</strong> months in a year)<br />
Expected Postproject<br />
Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project<br />
Comments<br />
1 Mahiyari 9 Months<br />
2 Revadra<br />
9 Months<br />
3 Tarkhai<br />
9 Months<br />
12 Month<br />
Saline with<br />
high TDS<br />
Potable<br />
-<br />
6.1.5 Crops<br />
Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Mahiyari Project. The surface water is scanty due to average or high<br />
rainfall and ground water is saline, which is unfit for crop production.<br />
All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned earthen bunds would prevent<br />
the saline water from the Sea <strong>of</strong> Arb Sagar to mix with the sweet rain water and also help percolate sweet water underground, and preserve<br />
some moisture in the soil. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more<br />
than one season <strong>of</strong> crops. Different varieties <strong>of</strong> crops can be taken.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 52: Details <strong>of</strong> Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas<br />
Pre-project<br />
Expected Post-project<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Project<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> crops<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Average Yield per ha<br />
(qtl)<br />
Kharif<br />
Ground Nut 3682.65 247.9831 285.1805<br />
Rabi<br />
Mahiyari<br />
Juwar 1825.15 147.07887 170.6114<br />
Chana 455.36 124.9451 146.1857<br />
Zaid - - -<br />
Project total 5963.16 520.00397 601.9776<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Table no. 53: Area under horticulture<br />
S. No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Existing area under horticulture (ha)<br />
Area under horticulture proposed to be<br />
covered through <strong>IWMP</strong><br />
1 Mahiyari 0 10<br />
2 Revadra 0 3<br />
3 Tarkhai 0 5<br />
1.7 Vegetative cover<br />
There is negligible area under tree cover. The villages have no forest area. It is planned that 15 ha land to be covered under new plantation<br />
Table no. 54: Forest/vegetative cover<br />
S. No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed<br />
1 Mahiyari 0 5/<br />
2 Revadra 0 5/<br />
3 Tarkhai 0 5/<br />
6.1.8 Livestock<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
The village has quite a good <strong>of</strong> livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The interventions like<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy<br />
development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from<br />
them.<br />
Table no. 55: Details <strong>of</strong> livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income<br />
in Rs.)<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
Pre-Project<br />
Expected Post-project<br />
S. No.<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Animal<br />
Remarks<br />
Project<br />
No. Yield Income No. Yield Income<br />
Milch-animals 5620 21440 1415250 6115 22650 1475630<br />
Draught Purpose animals 1210 283050 1312 301070<br />
1 Mahiyari<br />
Animals for other purpose 2196 188700 2286 195500<br />
Linkages:<br />
The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the<br />
desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.<br />
Table no. 56: Backward-Forward linkages<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
S. No. Project Type <strong>of</strong> Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)<br />
Backward linkages<br />
Seed certification<br />
Seed supply system 1 1<br />
Fertilizer supply system<br />
Pesticide supply system<br />
Credit institutions Bank -1 Bank - 2<br />
Water supply<br />
Depend upon other<br />
villages<br />
Own System<br />
Extension services KVK KVK<br />
Nurseries Not available 3 Nurseries<br />
Tools/machinery suppliers<br />
Price Support system<br />
Labour<br />
Any other (please specify)<br />
Forward linkages<br />
Harvesting/threshing machinery<br />
Storage (including cold storage)<br />
Road network<br />
Transport facilities<br />
Markets / Mandis<br />
Agro and other Industries<br />
Milk and other collection centres Milk Collection Centre -1 1<br />
Labour<br />
Any other (please specify) Vermi compost—3 3<br />
Fodder Bank-1 1<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact<br />
Village<br />
Institution<br />
Formation<br />
Committee, User Group<br />
Committee each village<br />
implemented and managed<br />
in a democratic and<br />
participatory way ensuring<br />
equity.<br />
in the village management<br />
group depending on the<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
intervention<br />
Participation and positive<br />
perception towards the<br />
programme<br />
Strengthenin<br />
g Village<br />
Institutions<br />
awareness programme for Village<br />
institutions<br />
be organized.<br />
management <strong>of</strong> common<br />
resources improved.<br />
in the village management.<br />
and exposure visits User Group and<br />
Watershed Committee<br />
exposure visits UGs and<br />
WCs to be held<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> benefits<br />
between people improved.<br />
Participation and positive<br />
perception towards the<br />
programme<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
functioning <strong>of</strong> UGs and WCs<br />
amongst women about<br />
village resources.<br />
workshops to be organized<br />
participation enhanced in<br />
decision – making <strong>of</strong> GVCs.<br />
UGs and WCs and Pandhayat<br />
Institutions.<br />
and WC to be formed.<br />
youth and children in<br />
village development<br />
increased.<br />
ization <strong>of</strong> UGs<br />
and WCs to increase inclusiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> samuh decision making.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
to involve children and youth in<br />
development.<br />
Fund<br />
Management utilization <strong>of</strong> UGs and WCs.<br />
s<br />
operating bank account<br />
and managing resources on<br />
their own<br />
and volume <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fund enhanced.<br />
explore other sources <strong>of</strong> income for<br />
UGs and WCs.<br />
generated for UGs and WCs<br />
from other sources <strong>of</strong><br />
income increased.<br />
meetings and organize exposure<br />
visits for communities, village<br />
volunteers and staff to effectively<br />
plan, execute and monitor activies<br />
intervention promoted<br />
<strong>of</strong> non timber forest produce based<br />
income generatation activities<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
Rainfed Area<br />
<strong>Development</strong><br />
improved soil and moisture<br />
conservation practices on<br />
watershed basis<br />
under improved soil<br />
moisture conservation<br />
practices<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> treated<br />
land<br />
Increase in<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> households<br />
having more security <strong>of</strong><br />
food<br />
agricultural practices horticulture,<br />
improved crop and vegetable<br />
practices to be promoted<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> water in<br />
wells<br />
practices<br />
g<br />
be promoted<br />
agriculture production<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
income to the household<br />
income.<br />
established<br />
organic farming practices<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
livelihood income<br />
generation activities to be<br />
promoted<br />
farmers enhanced.<br />
increase fodder security and<br />
promote dairy development among<br />
communities<br />
structures to be<br />
constructed<br />
<strong>of</strong> water for 9 to 12 month<br />
<strong>of</strong> agriproduce based income<br />
generation activities like grading,<br />
processing and packaging.<br />
facilities to be distributed<br />
among farmers<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> water for<br />
livestock<br />
practices like drip irrigation<br />
person days <strong>of</strong> employment<br />
to be generated<br />
irrigation water<br />
established<br />
meetings and organize exposure<br />
visits <strong>of</strong> communities, village<br />
visits and meetings to be<br />
crops in a year.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
volunteers and staff to effectively<br />
plan, execute and monitor activities.<br />
organized for communities,<br />
village volunteers and staff<br />
agricultural productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
land<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong><br />
drinking water enhanced<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
7 Quality and Sustainability Issues<br />
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation<br />
A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system<br />
would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the project. The system shows the entire state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong><br />
and all <strong>of</strong> those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type,<br />
Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership,<br />
irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users <strong>of</strong> the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from<br />
the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form <strong>of</strong> a database which will help the stakeholders know areas <strong>of</strong> importance<br />
viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system<br />
would also show the satellite imageries <strong>of</strong> various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to<br />
evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool<br />
to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
Yet another component <strong>of</strong> the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias<br />
WDTs (Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up <strong>of</strong>ficial in<br />
charge <strong>of</strong> the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means <strong>of</strong> an SMS. The system works in the<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information <strong>of</strong> various treatment areas during the<br />
DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported<br />
to the server by means <strong>of</strong> an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal <strong>of</strong>ficer or higher-up <strong>of</strong>ficial can view the progress in a project by means <strong>of</strong><br />
summarized reports generated over frequent periods <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
7.2 Plans for Project management:<br />
The Project management <strong>of</strong> any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the village<br />
level institutes. In Kansabad project, watershed committee, various user groups and SHGs have been formulated for post project operation and<br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit <strong>of</strong> the project even after<br />
implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will<br />
act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.<br />
7.3 Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund:<br />
The major source <strong>of</strong> financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund. The contribution <strong>of</strong> it will comes<br />
mainly fund the following:<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari<br />
7.4 User Charges:<br />
Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary <strong>of</strong> watershed committee<br />
(WC) shall maintain the records <strong>of</strong> the following.<br />
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari
District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Porbandar<br />
<strong>IWMP</strong>-2 Mahiyari