IWMP-11 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

Detail Project Report 

IWMP - 11 (Shedubhar Project) 

District: Amreli 

PIA: District Watershed Development Unit, Amreli

PIA: DWDU, Amreli 

Contents 

Table no.1: Basic project information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 

Table no.2: Weight-age of the project ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 

Table no.3: Watershed information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 

Chapter: 2....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 

Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 

Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 

Table no. 6: PIA ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 

Chapter: 3....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 

Basic Information of Project Area ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 

Table no. 15: Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 

Table no. 16: Irrigation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 

Table no. 17: Crop details ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 

District Watershed Development Unit, Amreli 2


Table no. 18: Livestock ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 

Table no. 19: Drinking water ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 

Socio-Economic Profile ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 

Table no. 23: Migration details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 

Table no. 24: Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 

Table no. 27: Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 27 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 41 

Table no. 33: SHG detail.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 

Table no. 34: UG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................................................................................... 49 

Watershed Development Works ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 50 

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works ................................................................................................................................................... 51 

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................................ 57 

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises ............................................................................................................................... 64 

Table no.40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ....................................................................................................................................... 70 

Table no.41: Linkages developed at village level ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works..................................................................................................................................................... 73 



Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 75 

Capacity Building ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 76 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 76 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 77 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 79 

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 82 

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP .............................................................................................................................................................................. 83 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 84 

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84 

Table no. 52: Environmental Benefits ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 86 

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 86 

Table no. 54: Crop area and yield in the project area ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 87 

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture / other crops............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 87 

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)................................ 88 

Table no. 57: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 89 

Table no. 58: Seasonal migration from Project area .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 89 

Table no. 59: Per capita Income ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 90 

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 91 



Chapter: 1 

Project Background 



IWMP-11 

Shedubhar Cluster 



Shedubhar Cluster (IWMP-11) project is located in Amreli Taluka, Amreli District of Gujarat State. The project is a cluster of ten microwatersheds 

with 5G2B5a4a, 5G2B5a4b, 5G2B5c3e, 5G2B3c2h, 5G2B3c2f, 5G2B3c2k, 5G2B5a2g, 5G2B5a3a, 5G2B5a2e, 5G2B5a2c as their 

respective codes. Total area of watershed (six villages Shedubhar, Haripura, Mota Machiyala, Nana Machiyala, Timba, Suragpura) is about 

6876 Ha of which 5271 Ha is proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP). Cluster is well 

connected with pacca road and from Amreli it’s about 10-12 Km away. 

Table no.1: Basic project information 

Sl 

No 

1 

Name of 

the project 

Name 

Villages 

Census code 

Gram 

Panchayats 

Shedubhar 130050092580000 Shedubhar 

Taluka 

District 

Area of 

the 

project 

Area 

proposed 

to be 

treated 

Total 

project 

cost 

2501 1997 239.64 

2 Haripura 130050092600000 Haripura 1095 1092 131.04 

3 Mota Machiyala 130050092610000 Mota Machiyala 1170 667 80.04 


Amreli Amreli 

4 Nana Machiyala 130050092680000 Nana Machiyala 1476 973 116.76 

5 Timba 130050092570000 Timba 314 313 37.56 

6 Suragpura 130050092590000 Suragpura 230 229 27.48 

Total 6786 5271 632.52 

PIA 

DWDU Amreli 


Need of Watershed Development Programme 


Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual 

Wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed Agriculture, Drinking water 

situation in the area, percentage of degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Contiguity of another watershed that has already 

developed/treated Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking was been given to 

cluster. 

Since the waste land is maximum in the project area and due to the low moisture index the area is classified under IWDP block. Drinking 

water is a major problem in this project area. In a broader view the soil of this region is suitable for agriculture crops and cash crops but 

due to lack of water harvesting structures and irrigation water agriculture itself has become a constraint and the productivity potential has 

considerable gone low. The soil is very porous and hence rate of infiltration is more however production of the land can be significantly 

enriched with the help of better management practices and availability of timely irrigation and use of organic and inorganic fertilizer. 

Table no.2: Weight-age of the project 

Weightage under the criteria 

Project name Project type 

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii Total 

IWMP 11 Others 7.5 3 0 5 3 10 10 7.5 10 10 10 15 0 91 


Criteria and weight-age for prioritization 

Parameters include components related to Natural Resources and Socio Economic conditions 

S. No Criteria 

Maximum 

score 

Ranges & Scores 


1 Poverty Index 10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50% (7.5) 50 to 20% (5) Below 20% (2.5) 

2 % of SC/ST population 10 >40% (10) 20 to 40% (5) 80% (10) 50 to 80% (5) 20% (15) 10 to 20% (10)


Table no.3: Watershed information 

Name of the 

project 


Villages 

Shedubhar 

Haripura 

Mota Machiyala 

Nana Machiyala 

Timba 

Suragpura 

No. Of watersheds to be 

treated 

10 

Watershed code 

5G2B5a4a, 5G2B5a4b, 5G2B5c3e, 

5G2B3c2h, 5G2B3c2f, 5G2B3c2k, 

5G2B5a2g, 5G2B5a3a, 5G2B5a2e, 

5G2B5a2c 

Watershed 

regime/type/order 

Mini Watershed 


Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area 


Sl no 

Village Name 


programme/scheme 

Sponsoring 

agency 

Objectives of the 

programme/scheme 

Year of 

commencement 

Estimated 

number of 

beneficiaries 

1 Shedubhar 

2 Haripura 

3 Mota Machiyala 

4 Nana Machiyala 

5 Timba 

6 Suragpura 

N. A. 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area 

Sl 

no 

Project 

name 

Year 

started 


villages 

No. Of 

micro 

watershed 

Watershed 

codes 

Area 

under 

treatment 

Funding 

source 

Nodal 

agency 

PIA 

Total 

cost 

Expenditure 

incurred up 

to start of 

IWMP 

% 

financial 

completion 

% 

physical 

completion 

1 Batch 5 

1999- 

2000 

Shedubhar 3 

5G2B5A4A, 

5G2B5A4B, 

5G2B5A3B 

2 Haripura NA 

3 

Hariyali- 

3 

4 Batch-8 

2005- 

06 

2002- 

03 

Mota Machiyala 2 

Nana Machiyala 2 

5G2B5A2G, 

5G2B3C2H 

5G2B3C2H, 

5G2B5A2G 

500 Govt DRDA Tech 20.00 20.00 100 100 

500 Govt DWDU 

500 Govt DRDA 

5 Timba NA 

6 Suragpura NA 

Taluka 

Panchyat 

Sarhi 

Youth 

Club 

30.00 30.00 100 100 

30.00 30.00 100 100 

District Watershed Development Unit, Amreli 11


Chapter: 2 

Project Implementing Agency 



Project Implementing Agency 

Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be 

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under 

State/Central Governments, Government Institutes/Research Bodies, Intermediates Panchayats, voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of 

watershed project is District Watershed Development Unit, Amreli. 

District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU) 

The organization and its objectives: 

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Amreli is a district level nodal agency and was established where area is more than 

25000Ha for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of 

the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs compromising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest 

Department) a Technical Expert (on contract basis) and Multidisciplinary team of Agriculture Expert, Community Mobilization Expert, Civil 

Engineer, Computer Operator, Surveyor and Accountant are recruited. 

The objective of DWDU are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related 

development activities in the district. 

DWDU, Amreli will work as PIA for IWMP 11 project. 

SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: 

Strength: 

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team. 

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency. 



(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities and training institutes for capacity building and 

technical guidance. 

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar, 

(5) District level advisory committee for monitoring, coordination & Co-operation. 

(6) Prior acquaintance of nodal officers with the villagers of selected project area, hence ease in implementation of project. 

Weakness: 

(1) No permanent office building at project level. 

(2) Most of the project area is hilly and distance of project area from DWDU is almost 2-3 hours. 

(3) Project area inhabitants mainly composed of schedule tribe class hence, ignorance about developmental projects. 

Opportunities: 

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration an d 

convergence of programmes. 

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP better quality of work can be expected 

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS and MIS integration of the project with the State Level Data Cell for online monitoring and 

evaluation. 

(4) Reputed training centres for capacity building at all level of stakeholders viz, district, block and village level to ensure the proper 

implementation of the project 

Threats: 

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact. 

(2) Options in production system are limited due to the lack of sufficient natural resources and due to limited resource base. 

(3) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning. 

(4) Lack of awareness of the watershed programme and its objectives. 

(5) Low literacy rate in the project area. 



Table no. 6: PIA 

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

(i) Type of organization Government 

(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Amreli 

1 IWMP 1 

(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager 

(iv) Telephone 02792-220015 

(v) Fax 02792-220015 

(vi) E-mail amrdwdu@gmail.com 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level 

Sl no Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned 

1 

2 

Gajjar Dipesh 

Jagdishbhai 

Arvindbhai G. 

japadiya 

3 Bhad Bhavinaben 27 F 

28 M WDT- Engineer D.E. Civil 2 Year,5 Month Engg. Works 

28 M WDT- Agriculture B.R.S./M.R.S. 4 Year Agri. Work 

WDT- Community 

mobilizer 

M.S.W. 

11 Month 

Community 

Mobilization 

Works 



Chapter: 3 

Basic Information of Project Area 



Shedubhar cluster is located about 10-12 Km away from Amreli (District Headquarter). The project area is with high temperature and 

average rainfall. The geographical area of the Shedubhar cluster is 6786 Ha of which 5271 Ha will be treated. Soil of this land is about Black 

and Medium Black and its texture is clay loam to clay. Amreli District is comes under South Saurashtra Agro Climatic Zone. 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern 

The net geographical area is 6786 Ha of which only 620 Ha is under agriculture and 5220 Ha is under Rainfed. Area is not much sloppy so 

there is no water logging in this area. Main crop in this area is cotton and they take this only in Monsoon and those who have well and bore 

they saw only wheat and groundnut. Soil depth is about 25 t o75 cm. 

S. No. 

Names of 

villages 

Geographical 

Area of the 

village 

Forest 

Area 

Land under 

agricultural use 

Rainfed 

area 

Permanent 

pastures 

Cultivable 

Wasteland 

Noncultivable 

1 Shedubhar 2501 0 206 1852 291 0 152 

2 Haripura 1095 0 103 928 64 0 0 

3 Mota Machiyala 1170 0 135 856 169 0 0 

4 Nana Machiyala 1476 0 126 1137 213 0 0 

5 Timba 314 0 28 251 12 0 23 

6 Suragpura 230 0 22 196 7 0 5 

6786 0 620 5220 756 0 180 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography 

S. No. 

Agro-climatic zone 

Names of the 

Major soil types 

Area in ha 

covers project area 

villages 

a) Type b) Area in ha 

1 

2501 Shedubhar 

2501 

2 1095 Haripura 1095 

3 1170 Mota Machiyala Black and Medium 1170 

South Saurashtra 

4 1476 Nana Machiyala Black 

1476 

5 314 Timba 314 

6 230 Suragpura 230 

Topography 

Flat 


Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition 


Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 Shedubhar 

2 Haripura 



5 Timba 

6 Suragpura 

Once in 5 year 

Once in 3 year 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion 

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) 

Water erosion 

A Sheet 2035.8 

B Rill 339.3 

C Gully 67.86 

Sub-Total 2442.96 

Wind erosion 0 

Total 2442.96 

Run off 

(mm/ year) 

30-40% 

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ 

year) 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 

Name of the Project Soil pH Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress) 

IWMP 11 6 0.3 Ingress 

pH: Alkaline < 5.5, Normal 5.5 to 8.2, Ash > 8.2 Salinity: Normal < 1, Less Hazardous 1 to 3, Hazardous > 3 

(Source: Director of Agriculture) 

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions 

Name of the Village 

IWMP 11 

Reasons 

N A 


Land and Agriculture 


The area is completely dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is highly scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of draught three to 

four years. The average rainfall is about 600mm. Average soil erosion in this area is about 15 to 20 %. Whole area is depend s on rainfall 

there is more problem of drinking water as well as for irrigation. The main crop is Cotton which they saw in monsoon and other crops are 

Groundnut, Till and Fodder Crop. Drinking water is available through Narmada Yojna for the 8-9 month. 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions 

Name of project Year Average rainfall- last 5 years 

Temperature 

Max o C 

Min o C 

2010 575 41 19 

2009 550 42 19 


2008 650 42 15 

2007 625 40 15 

2006 600 41 19 

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief 

Project name Elevation (MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams 

Shedubhar 479 Flat NA 

Haripura 479 Flat NA 

Mota Machiyala 453 Flat NA 

Nana Machiyala 440 Flat NA 

Timba 489 Flat NA 

Suragpura 450 Flat NA 



Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

Sl no Village 

Total owned land 

HHs giving land HHs taking land 

Gen OBC SC ST 

on lease 

on lease 

1 Shedubhar 3577 255 524 0 224 88 

2 Haripura 341 103 28 0 42 12 

3 Mota Machiyala 295 55 38 0 85 27 

4 Nana Machiyala 438 125 58 0 80 20 

5 Timba 20 10 0 0 10 3 

6 Suragpura 48 0 7 0 7 3 

Table no. 15: Agriculture 

Sl no 

Village 

Net sown area 

One time Two times Three times 

1 Shedubhar 1852 1092 0 

2 Haripura 1044 315 0 

3 Mota Machiyala 991 365 0 

4 Nana Machiyala 1263 400 0 

5 Timba 278 70 0 

6 Suragpura 218.83 50 0 

Table no. 16: Irrigation 

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well 

Sl no Village 

Availability 

Availability 

Availability 

Net area Gross area 


months 

months 

months 


1 Shedubhar NA 6 1092 2501 

2 Haripura NA 5 665 1095 

3 Mota Machiyala NA 6 610 1170 

4 Nana Machiyala NA 8 960 1476 

5 Timba NA 5 50 314 

6 Suragpura NA 5 50 230 



Table no. 17: Crop details 

Sl 

no 

Village 

Kharif (Monsoon) Rabi (Winter) Zaid (Summer) 

Crop 1 cottan Crop 1 Wheat Crop 1 

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity 

1 Shedubhar 1852 842660 455 1092 502320 460.0 

2 Haripura 1044 469800 450 315 143325 455.0 

3 Mota Machiyala 991 455860 460 365 151475 415 

4 

Nana 

Machiyala 

1263 574665 455 400 168000 420 

5 Timba 278 123710 445 70 22260 318.0 

6 Suragpura 218.83 28447.9 130 50 6549 131.0 

Table no. 18: Livestock 

Total Milk 

Buffalo 

Cow 

Goat 

Sl no Village 

(Buffalo+Cow) 

Sheep Bullock Hen Others 

No milk No Milk Lit/Day No Milk 

1 Shedubhar 354 1416 755 1510 2926 270 310 435 354 0 198 

2 Haripura 131 524 59 112 636 45 50 30 156 0 34 

3 Mota Machiyala 163 652 105 210 862 171 200 21 170 0 67 

4 Nana Machiyala 190 760 208 416 1176 79 90 488 153 0 1118 

5 Timba 21 84 13 26 110 8 15 0 23 0 14 

6 Suragpura 33 198 6 24 222 3 6 0 51 0 16 


Table no. 19: Drinking water 


Sl no 

Village 

Ground water 

table (mt) 

Source of drinking water 

Availability in 

months 

Quality 

1 Shedubhar 24 Narmada Yojna & Local Bore 9 Good 

2 Haripura 26 Narmada Yojna & Local Bore 8 Good 

3 Mota Machiyala 24 Narmada Yojna & Local Bore 9 Good 

4 Nana Machiyala 23 Narmada Yojna & Local Bore 10 Good 

5 Timba 23 Narmada Yojna & Local Bore 10 Good 

6 Suragpura 25 Narmada Yojna & Local Bore 10 Good 



Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources 

S. 

No. 


project 

1 IWMP-11 

CPR 

Particulars 

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of 

Pvt. 

persons 

Govt. (specify 

dept.) 

PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. 

Specify) 

Pvt. 

persons 

Area available for treatment (ha) 

Govt. (specify 

dept.) 

Wasteland/ 

degraded land 

237 237 

Pastures 410.97 410.97 

Orchards 

Village Woodlot 

Forest 

Village Ponds/ 

Tanks 

Community 

Buildings 

Weekly Markets 

Agri.Land 6005.18 5215.18 

Temples/ Places 

of worship 

Others (Pl. 

specify) 

PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. 

Specify) 



Socio-Economic Profile 

Demographic Status: Shedubhar cluster villages have total 2246 household with net population of with 5526 male and 5295 female. There 

are about 424 (18.87%) BPL household. The average family size is about five members. The literacy rate is 54.32% among them 61.63%are 

male and 46.68% are female. 

Sl no Village 

Population SC ST 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 

1 Shedubhar 4356 2173 2183 524 238 286 12.03 0 0 0 0.00 

2 Haripura 1129 559 570 51 26 25 4.52 0 0 0 0.00 

3 Mota Machiyala 2260 1175 1085 452 248 204 20.00 0 0 0 0.00 

4 Nana Machiyala 2495 1325 1170 480 250 230 19.24 0 0 0 0.00 

5 Timba 210 107 103 80 45 35 38.10 0 0 0 0.00 

6 Suragpura 371 187 184 27 12 15 7.28 0 0 0 0.00 

10821 5526 5295 1614 819 795 14.91 0 0 0 0.00 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sl no 

Village 

Literacy 

Total % Male % Female % 

1 Shedubhar 2328 53.44 1283 29.45 1045 23.99 

2 Haripura 290 78.17 160 85.56 130 70.65 

3 Mota Machiyala 1356 60.00 813 35.97 543 24.03 

4 Nana Machiyala 1625 65.13 980 39.28 645 25.85 

5 Timba 89 42.38 55 26.19 34 16.19 

6 Suragpura 190 51.21 115 61.50 75 40.76 

5878 54.32 3406 61.63 2472 46.68 



Table no. 23: Migration details 

Sl no 

Village 

Total 

population 

Migration 

Total Male Female 

Up to 3 

months 

Migration by months 

3-6 months 

1 Shedubhar 4356 430 250 180 5 

2 Haripura 1129 113 75 38 5 

3 Mota Machiyala 2260 175 95 80 5 

4 Nana Machiyala 2495 246 180 66 5 

5 Timba 371 21 13 8 5 

6 Suragpura 371 97 55 42 5 

10982 1082 668 414 

More than 

6 months 

Main reason 

for 

migration 

Better 

employment 

Income 

during 

migration / 

month 

4000- 

5000/month 

Table no. 24: Poverty 

Sl no 

Total 

Household 

BPL 

Total Land less 

HH 

% of land less 

HH 

Village 

0-16 16-20 Total 

% of BPL HH 

1 Shedubhar 941 39 131 170 18.07 150 15.94 

2 Haripura 220 14 8 22 10.28 28 12.73 

3 Mota Machiyala 400 69 3 72 18.00 35 8.75 

4 Nana Machiyala 600 87 65 152 25.33 130 21.67 

5 Timba 30 5 3 8 26.67 4 13.33 

6 Suragpura 55 - - - - 3 1.80 

2246 214 210 424 18.87 350 15.58 



Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

Sl 

no 

Village 

Pucca 

road 

to the 

village 

(Y/N) 

Schools 

LP UP HS 

Colleges 

(Number) 

Post 

Office 

(Distance) 

Banks 

(Number) 

Distance 

from 

nearest 

market 

yard 

Milk 

collection 

centre 

(Number) 

Milk 

cooperative 

(Number) 

Other 

cooperatives 

/ CBIs 

(Number) 

1 Shedubhar Y Y Y Y 0 1 1 13 1 1 N N 

2 Haripura Y Y Y N 0 1 0 17 0 0 N N 

3 Mota Machiyala Y Y Y N 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 N 

4 

Nana 

Machiyala 

Y Y Y N 0 0 0 7 1 0 1 N 

5 Timba Y Y N N N N N 12 N N N N 

6 Suragpura Y Y N N N N N 19 N N N N 

Any other 

institution 

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets 

Sl 

no 

Village 

HHs with 

electricity 

HHs with 

safety 

latrines 

HHs with phones 

HHs with vehicle 

HHs with 

TV set 

HHs with 

cooking gas 

HHs with 

Drinking 

water 

Land 

2- 4- 

Mobile 

line 

wheeler wheeler 

1 Shedubhar 935 882 242 925 901 35 870 630 830 782 

2 Haripura 218 215 10 225 200 10 180 150 215 150 

3 Mota Machiyala 400 350 45 380 385 10 342 175 370 145 

4 Nana Machiyala 590 430 15 600 600 32 512 120 570 145 

5 Timba 30 18 0 30 28 2 23 8 30 7 

6 Suragpura 55 54 1 55 55 4 40 15 55 30 

2228 1949 313 2215 2169 93 1967 1098 2070 1259 

HHs 

with 

fridge 



Table no. 27: Income 

Sl no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labor Others Total 

1 Shedubhar 280000 10000 100000 20000 410000 

2 Haripura 80000 8000 60000 18000 166000 

3 Mota Machiyala 100000 12000 80000 17000 209000 

4 Nana Machiyala 95000 15000 75000 20000 205000 

5 Timba 52000 0 20000 10000 82000 

6 Suragpura 100000 0 55000 10000 165000 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 

Sl no 

Village 

1 Shedubhar 

2 Haripura 



5 Timba 

6 Suragpura 

Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2 Benefit type 3 

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income 

N.A. 

Total income 



Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 

Sl no 

Village 

Total 

workforce 

Agriculture 

Animal 

husbandry 

(AH) 

Agriculture 

+ AH 

Casual labor Services Handicraft Others 

1 Shedubhar 2962 2226 82 42 285 35 0 292 

2 Haripura 732 470 25 15 55 12 0 155 

3 Mota Machiyala 1470 1225 28 25 90 12 0 90 

4 Nana Machiyala 1680 1200 35 20 250 20 0 155 

5 Timba 142 62 8 10 30 2 0 30 

6 Suragpura 371 215 8 10 25 5 0 17 



Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: Project area vs. Taluka vs. District vs. State vs. Country 

The term productivity means the total output per unit of factor input. Land productivity means output per hectare of land. Pr oductivity is 

and average and calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop. 

Data are collected by the baseline survey, Agriculture Dept of District and Taluka. Main crops in this area are Cotton. In more than 80% area 

of the project Cotton is sawn. 

Cotton Productivity (Kg/Ha) 


Main Problems in Cluster 


(I) 

Uneven rainfall 

Most part of cluster is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential for agriculture. Due to uneven rainfall and lack of irrigation facility 

crop cultivation affects. Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of crop production. 

(II) 

Pasture and Wasteland area 

Pasture and wasteland in this area is about 10-12% in Project and which is generally not used for agriculture. 

(III) 

Traditional farming practices 

This leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple 

cropping. They don’t use farm yield management and other input in proper way, so they don’t get 100% output. 

(IV) 

Lack of irrigation facilities 

People in this village follow the traditional method for irrigation and they have lack knowledge of new techniques of irrigation 

facilities. 

(V) 

Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: 

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher 

land productivity. In project, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in 

irrigated condition. But in project 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Jaswantgadh mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers 

especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land. 



Chapter: 4 

Watershed Activities 


Watershed Activities 


Watershed Management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rainfed area of semi-arid tropics. These 

areas are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, low literacy rate, migration, less knowledge about new technology 

used in agriculture and many more. Several studies identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with 

watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development. 

Scientific Planning 

(I) Cluster Approach 

The new approach envisages a broader vision of geo-hydrological units normally of average size of 1,000 to 5,000 hectares comprising 

of clusters of micro-watersheds. 

(II) Baseline Survey 

To access the impact if any watershed development programs 

a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a 

benchmark for any intervention during and post 

implementation of any development program. A detailed 

baseline survey was conducted which involved household 

census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data from 

Talati cum Mantri. Household census survey includes a 

detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each 

and every housed hold in the village. This gave in the details of 

the demographic profile of the literacy percentage, SC/ST 

population, number of BPL household, cattle population and 

net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits. 



Bio-physical survey was conducted to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the 

area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. 

(III) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input 

to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards 

the program. This has created an emphasis to include all the 

stakeholder communities and their local Indigenous 

technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. 

Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, 

implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with 

a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA 

techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and season 

calendars were used to understand the physical and social 

orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. 

These tools put the villagers in ease that the complicated 

questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix Ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), 

Fodders crops, various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers. 



(IV) 

Use of GIS and Remote Sensing for Planning 

Use of various high scientific tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. 

(a) Prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geomorphological, 

Soil, BPL population, SC/ST population, Ground water status, Drinking water facility, Slope percent. These were 

all given proper Weight-age according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 

(b) Planning 

A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking in to account various features like slope percent, 

soil depth, soil texture, soil erosion in the area for waste land, forest land and agriculture land. Global Positioning System (GPS) 

was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. 

Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water 

conservation structures. 

(c) Hydrological modeling 

Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and flow accumulation. This 

model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like check dam, etc. This has helped to 

remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam. 


Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 


S. 

No. 

Scientific criteria/ inputs used 

Whether scientific criteria was used 

(A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

Yes 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? 

If yes, mention the name of the Institute 

Baseline survey 

Yes 

Hydro-geological survey 

Yes 

Contour mapping 

Yes 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

Yes 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/run-off cover 

Yes 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

Yes 

Online IT connectivity between 

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes 

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes 

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes 

Availability of GIS layers 

1. Cadastral map Yes 

2. Village boundaries Yes 

3. Drainage Yes 

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 

5. Land use Yes 

6. Ground water status Yes 

7. Watershed boundaries Yes 

8. Activity Yes 

Crop simulation models 

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium 

spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) 

Weather Station 

Yes 



(B) Inputs 

1. Bio-pesticides 

2. Organic manures 

3. Vermicompost Yes 

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 

5. Water saving devices Yes 

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 

7. Bio-fencing 

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers 

Any other (please specify) 


Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area 


Sr. No. Village Name of the PRA Activity / FGD Date 

Number of people 

present 

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the 

problem/situation 

1 

Biophysical Survey 

Medium salty land 

2 Natural Resource Mapping Low production 

3 Social mapping 9/6/11 TO 

Low water table 

Shedubhar 

180 

4 Timeline 11/6/11 

High use chemical & fertilizer 

5 Transect walk Drinking water problem 

6 Water resource mapping 



present 



1 




3 Social mapping 7/6/2011 to 


Haripura 

60 

4 Timeline 8/6/2011 






present 



1 




3 Mota Social mapping 13/6/11 TO 


110 

4 Machiyala Timeline 14/6/11 







present 




1 




3 Nana Social mapping 15/6/11 to 


125 

4 Machiyala Timeline 16/6/11 






present 



1 




3 Social mapping Low water table 

Timba 

8/7/2011 20 

4 Timeline High use chemical & fertilizer 





present 




1 



3 Social mapping Low water table 

Suragpura 

6/6/2011 40 

4 Timeline High use chemical & fertilizer 





Problem Analysis Tree 



Objective Tree 


Institution Building 


(I) Watershed Committee (WC) 

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. 

This committee is registered under Society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed 

committee with secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed committee was formed accordingly in all villages. Since the 

watershed has only on village so no separate watershed sub-committee was formed in the village. Capacity Building training to the 

watershed committee is given by WDT. The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation 

period. 

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details 

Date of 

Sl. No. 

Registration 


as a Society 

WCs 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Name 

jantibhai bhimjibhai 

gajera 

vithalbhai bachubhai 

gajera 

rameshbhai limbhabhai 

kotadiya 

1 Shedubhar 

G1602/ 

F1550 

devrajbhai jivrajbhai 

gajera 

bhanubhai bhadabhai 

sakriya 

Designation 

M 

/ 

F 

SC ST SF MF LF 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

President M 1 1 1 10 

Secretary M 1 1 10 

Member M 1 1 1 9 

Member M 1 1 5 


bhadrubhai dadbhai vala Member M 1 8 

jerambhai laljibhai 

nakrani 

arvindbhai mohanbhai 

karad 

Member M 1 1 Fyba 

Member M 1 8 


hansaben ghansyambhai 

gajera 

Hansaben 

manshukhbhai nakrani 

nagjibhai lavabhai 

keraliya 

Chandrikaben 

kamleshbhai gajera 

kantaben samatbhai 

bagda 

kiritbhai maganbhai 

ghatt 


Member F 1 1 7 




Member F 1 1 1 7 

Member M 1 TYBA 

Sl. No. 


WCs 

1 Haripura 


Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

G1603/ 

F1551 

Name 

Vinubhai bhikhabhai 

padriya 

ghanshyambhai 

valjibhai monpara 

popatbhai arjanbhai 

gajera 

jerambhai mepabhai 

sakriya 

santibhai mohanbhai 

chavdangar 

arvindbhai ranchodbhai 

kotdiya 

vipulbhai valjibhai 

mugalpara 

krsanbhai lakhmanbhai 

mugalpara 

sobhnaben girishbhai 

vyas 

Prabhaben rajnikant 

bhai nakrani 

Designation 

M/ 

F 


Landl 

ess 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

President M 1 1 9 

Secretary M 1 1 6 


Member M 1 4 

Educational 

qualification 

Member M 1 1 PTC 




Member F 1 8 

Member F 1 10 


anjanben praphulbhai 

agravat 



Sl. No. 

1 


WCs 

Mota 

Machiyala 


Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Name 

devendrbhai 

chaprajbhai dhadhal 

devchandbhai pragjibhai 

dhatala 

dineshbhai bhikhuram 

godaliya 

maganbhai jerambhai 

thalecha 

chaprajbhai dadabhai 

dhadhal 

nitaben sureshbhai 

amreliya 

vimlaben jayntibhai 

chavda 

ranjanben jaysukhbhai 

gosai 

prakasbhai bhagvanbhai 

talsaniya 

vallbhbhai lakhabhai 

gohel 

Designation 

M/ 

F 


Landl 

ess 

UG SHG GP 


Any 

other 

Secretary M 1 1 1 9 

Educational 

qualification 

BA,BPE 

D 

Member M 1 1 1 10 


Member F 1 1 BA,Bed 






Sl. No. 

1 


WCs 

Nana 

Machiyala 


Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

G1601/ 

F1549 

Name 

bavkubhai rambhai 

kothivaal 

Designation 

M/ 

F 


Landl 

ess 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

President M 1 10 

kanubhai laljibhai karad Secretary M 1 5 


ghansyambhai 

manubhai karad 



najubhai rambhai aalani Member M 1 1 5 

vijaybhai ghohabhai 

dangar 


dadbhai bavbhai aalani Member M 1 1 1 6 

champaben ravjibhai 

bhadani 

gitaben kanubhai 

chachiya 

hansaben harjibhai 

damani 

mansukhbhai haribhai 

kamani 

balbhadrabhai kanubhai 

kothivaal 

dhanjibhai manadbhai 

chchiya 

Member F 1 1 


Member F 1 0 




Sl. No. 


WCs 

1 Timba 


Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Name 

Sarvaya Krusnashih 

jamshih 

Sarvaya Dharmendrshi 

Surshih 

Chadubhai Bhimjibhai 

Magroliya 

Makvana Varshaben 

Mansukhbhai 

Sarvaya Raghuvirshih 

Anadbha 

Dhadhukiya Kilashben 

Ashokbhai 

Designation 

M/ 

F 


Landl 

ess 

President M 1 

Secretary M 1 1 

UG SHG GP 

Member M 1 1 


Member M 1 1 

Member F 1 1 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 


Sarvaya Mahavirshih 

Hanubha 

Vaghela Kusumben 

Rajeshbhai 

Labdhirshih kalubha 

Sarvaya 

Teraya Jatasankar 

Jayntibhai 

Pathar sureshbhai 

bhimjibhai 

Vala Natubhai 

Merambhai 

Sarvaya Dashratshih 

Bharatshih 


Member M 1 1 


Member M 1 1 

Member M 1 


Member M 1 1 

Member M 1 1 

Sl. No. 


WCs 

1 Suragpura 


Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

G1600/ 

F1548 

Name 

Rameshbhai kalyanbhai 

vekariya 

Dayalbhai dharamsibhai 

kakdiya 

Nanubhai Devshibhai 

gajera 

Iswarbhai Bhurabhai 

sabhaya 

Kanubhai bachubhai 

sabhaya 

Designation 

M/ 

F 


Landl 

ess 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 


Secretary M 1 4 




Jethabhai najabhai dafda Member M 1 1 1 4 

vasrambhai Popatbhai 

aalgotar 

Asvinbhai Dharmsibhai 

kakdiya 

Ashaben dipalbhai 

vekariya 



Member F 1 10 


Kanchanben Bharatbhai 

kakdiya 

Madhuben 

Ghansyambhai Gajera 


Member F 1 5 

Member F 1 12 

(II) Self Help Group 

Self help Groups are motivated, small homogeneous groups organised together through credit and thrift activities. Self Help Group 

initiative especially for women helps uplift their livelihood. Generally Self Help Groups include landless and poor women. 

Before formation of SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussion (FGDs) was held with the women, which came up with the 

following observations: 

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution 

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lender. 

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people. 

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking. 

With a detailed discussion with some of local NGOs working in the area like SEWA, it was planned to have some capacity building 

training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment. 

Table no. 33: SHG detail 

S. 

No. 

Name of the Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members 

village 

1 Shedubhar 

2 Haripura 


Nana 

4 

Machiyala 

5 Timba 

6 Suragpura 

With 

only 

Men 

With 

only 

Women 

With 

both 

No. of SC/ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

In Progress 


(III) 

User Group (UG) 


User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the program on a long term basis. The user group collects 

user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate certain 

internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. 

Table no. 34: UG detail 


No. of SC/ST in each No. of BPL in each 

Total no. of UGs 

No. of members 

S. No. the 

category 

category 

village Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i)Landless 350 68 418 218 178 396 63 47 110 

1 Shedubhar 36 5 4 45 

(ii) SF 340 48 388 

(iii) MF 280 116 396 

(iv) LF 190 182 372 

Total 45 1160 414 1574 218 178 396 63 47 110 





S. No. the 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 15 35 50 12 12 24 10 10 20 

1 Haripura 17 5 0 22 

(ii) SF 25 8 33 

(iii) MF 80 5 85 

(iv) LF 70 12 82 

Total 22 190 60 250 12 12 24 10 10 20 

S. No. 

1 





the 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 37 11 48 28 18 46 24 36 60 

Mota 

(ii) SF 22 8 30 

16 2 1 19 

Machiyala 

(iii) MF 42 8 50 

(iv) LF 36 17 53 



Total 19 137 44 181 28 18 46 24 36 60 

S. No. 

1 





the 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 45 65 110 65 31 96 85 67 152 

Nana 

(ii) SF 50 35 85 

18 2 2 22 

machiyala 

(iii) MF 68 30 98 

(iv) LF 75 28 103 

Total 22 238 158 396 65 31 96 85 67 152 





S. No. the 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 10 8 18 9 6 15 

1 Timba 9 2 1 12 

(ii) SF 5 3 8 

(iii) MF 18 12 30 

(iv) LF 25 15 40 

Total 12 58 38 96 9 6 15 





S. No. the 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 4 1 5 9 6 15 

1 Suragpura 9 3 0 12 

(ii) SF 35 13 48 

(iii) MF 54 26 80 

(iv) LF 42 15 57 

Total 12 135 55 190 9 6 15 



Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of 

watershed Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group Discussion was 

conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, different suggestion made by the villagers for EPA activity, 

which is 4 per cent of total allocated budget. But finally villagers decided to take activities which they felt is important and useful for all the 

villagers. 

Sl No Names of Villages Activity to be Carried out 

Unit/ 

Quantity 

Total Cost 

(Rs. Lakhs) 

Fund from 

IWMP (Rs. 

Lakhs) 

Fund from 

Convergence 

(Rs. Lakhs) 

Convergence 

Scheme 

1 Shedubhar 

Causeway 3 6.90 6.90 0 

Pond deepening 1 2.68 2.68 0 

2 Haripura Causeway 2 5.24 5.24 0 

3 Suragpura 

Water Trough Renovation 1 0.20 0.20 0 

Pond deepening 1 0.89 0.89 0 

4 Timba Water Tank 1 1.50 1.50 0 

5 Mota Machiyala Causeway 1 3.20 3.20 0 


Causeway 1 3.67 3.67 0 

Checkdam Renovation 1 1.00 1.00 0 

TOTAL 25.28 25.28 0.00 



Watershed Development Works 

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach 

should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 % is allotted for this work. 

Following three types of works are to be take in the work phase 

a) Ridge Area Treatment 

Main objective of ridge area treatment is to Slowing down the velocity of runoff, checking soil erosion and improving local soil 

moisture profile. 

b) Drainage Line Treatment 

Main objective of drainage line treatment is to reducing soil erosion, trapping silt which slows the rate of siltation in wat er 

harvesting structures in the lower reaches of the watershed, creating a hydraulic head locally which enhances infiltration of surface 

runoff into the groundwater system; and increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line. 

c) Land Development 

Main objective of land development is to reducing soil erosion by slow down of the runoff, to maintain the soil moisture and to make 

soil fertile by different types of treatments. 



Afforestation/Agro-Forestry: Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use of available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees 

can either be of similar species or mixed in a manner that will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout of 

the area and the soil conditions, trees that have the greatest growth potential are selected like Neem and Babool. 

Farm Outlet: Farm outlets are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture prof ile. 

Ideally, bunds on farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into 

irregular sections. In such a situation, it becomes inconvenient to maneuver bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing. 

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works 

Type of treatment Type of land Target 

No. of 

S. Village Name of 

(i) 

(iii) 

(iii) 

(ii) 

units 

No. name structures 

Ridge 

Land 

(ii) Others 

Estimated cost (Rs. in 

Drainage (i)Private 

(No./ 

area 

dev. 

Community (pl. 

lakh) 

line (D) 

cu.m./ 

® 

(L) 

specify) 

rmt) 

M W O T 

Afforestation L C 2 Ha 2.50 

1 Shedubhar 

Masonry stop 

D 

dams 

C 19 

65.25 

Nalaplug (Pucca) D C 4 8.30 

Farm outlet L P 220 33.00 

109.05 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

1 Haripura 


structures 



(iii) 

(iii) 

(ii) 

units 

Land 

(ii) Others 


(No./ 

dev. 


line (D) 

cu.m./ 

(L) 

specify) 

rmt) 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

® 


lakh) 

M W O T 

Field Bunding L C 20000rmt 10.00 


Masonry 

dams 

stop 

D 

C 4 

10.00 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 




Farm outlet C 75 11.25 

34.60 

S. 

No. 

1 

Village 

name 

Mota 

Machiyala 


structures 



(iii) 

(iii) 

(ii) 

units 

Land 

(ii) Others 


(No./ 

dev. 


line (D) 

cu.m./ 

(L) 

specify) 

rmt) 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

® 


lakh) 

M W O T 


Masonry stop 

D 

dams 

C 9 

33.25 



41.83 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

S. 

No. 

1 

Village 

name 

Nana 

machiyala 


structures 



(iii) 

(iii) 

(ii) 

units 

Land 

(ii) Others 


(No./ 

dev. 


line (D) 

cu.m./ 

(L) 

specify) 

rmt) 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

® 


lakh) 

M W O T 

FieldBbunding L P 10300rmt 5.15 


Masonry stop 

D 

dams 

C 7 

25.00 


38.00 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 


S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

1 Timba 


structures 




Expected 

(iii) 

(iii) 

(ii) 

units 

month & 

Land 

(ii) Others 



(No./ 


dev. 


lakh) 

line (D) 

cu.m./ 

completion 

(L) 

specify) 

rmt) 

(mm/yyyy) 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

® 

M W O T 

Farm outlet 16 2.40 

2.40 

S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

1 Suragpura 


structures 



(iii) 

(iii) 

(ii) 

units 

Land 

(ii) Others 


(No./ 

dev. 


line (D) 

cu.m./ 

(L) 

specify) 

rmt) 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

® 


lakh) 

M W O T 

Masonry stop 

D 

dams 

C 1 

2.80 

Gully plug D C 2 0.20 


Farm outlet 26 3.90 

8.20 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 



Check dams 

Check dams are constructed across small streams having gentle slope, the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or 

weathered formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The surface water stored in these structures is mostly 

confined to stream course and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid 

scouring from excess runoff water cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such 

check dams are to be constructed to have recharge on regional scale in project villages. 

Pond 

Natural or man-made water bodies which usually serves the population of a village as well as agriculture fields. Ponds greatly vary in size 

depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few meters of length and width and are built across the flow path of natural drainage 

channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a series of ponds are built on one single stream. Each 

pond caters to the irrigation needs of one farm and also augments ground water recharge. 

Waste weirs 

These are constructed for giving a safe passage to the excess runoff from the field and also store some amount of water in the field. The 

water stored in these structures is mostly confined in field and height is normally less than 1 mt. and excess water is allowed to flow over 

the wall. 

Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part of the 

catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part of the catchment. Such dams can also be 

made in the immediate upstream portion of wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity of the dam and duration of water storage, the 

dam can have secondary benefits that are vital for the livelihood security of marginal farmers and landless labourers. 


Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 


S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

Type of 

structures 

Augmentation/ repair of existing 

structures 

Area to 

be Storage Estimated 

No. 

irrigated capacity cost 

(ha) 

No. 

Proposed target 

Construction of new structures 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

1 Shedubhar Pond 7 25.30 25.30 

Total 0 7 25.30 25.30 

S. 

No. 

Village 

name 


structures 


structures 

Area to 


No. 


(ha) 

No. 



Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

1 Haripura Pond 6 23.78 23.78 

Total 0 16 23.78 23.78 

S. 

No. 

1 

Village 

name 


structures 


structures 

Area to 


No. 


(ha) 

No. 



Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Mota 

Pond 1 3.00 3.00 

Machiyala 

Total 0 1 3.00 3.00 


S. 

No. 

1 

Village 

name 


structures 


structures 

Area to 


No. 


(ha) 

No. 



Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 


Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Nana Tank 2 3.00 3.00 

machiyala Pond 5 15.40 15.40 

Total 0 7 15.40 15.40 

S. 

No. 

Village 

name 


structures 


structures 

Area to 


No. 


(ha) 

No. 



Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Pond 2 8.00 8.00 

1 Timba 

Check dam 3 10.00 10.00 

Total 0.00 0 18.00 18.00 

S. 

No. 

Village 

name 


structures 


structures 

Area to 


No. 


(ha) 

No. 



Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Area to 

be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Storage 

capacity 

Estimated 

cost 

Pond 3 5.00 3 5.00 5.00 

1 Suragpura Check dam 1 2.80 1 2.80 2.80 

Percolation tank 1 1.50 1 1.50 1.50 

Total 5 9.30 5 9.30 9.30 



Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

S. No. 


Villages 

Type of structures 


recharging structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 

1 Shedubhar Percolation tank Na 


Construction of new recharging 

structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Estimated 

cost 

S. No. 


Villages 




Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 



structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Estimated 

cost 

1 Haripura Percolation tank 10 15.00 15.00 

S. No. 


Villages 




Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 

1 Mota Machiyala Percolation tank Na 



structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Estimated 

cost 

S. No. 


Villages 




Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 



structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Estimated 

cost 

1 Nana machiyala Percolation tank 6 9.00 9.00 



S. No. 


Villages 

1 Timba 


(i)Open wells 

(ii)Bore wells 



Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 



structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 

Na 

Na 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Estimated 

cost 

S. No. 


Villages 

1 Suragpura 


(i)Open wells 

(ii)Bore wells 



Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 



structures 

Area to be 

Estimated 

No. irrigated 

cost 

(ha) 

Na 

Na 

Area to be 

irrigated 

(ha) 

Total target 

Estimated 

cost 



Vermicompost Unit 

One of the important occupations of the villagers is animal husbandry. At present, the animal waste is not used by the villagers as 

agricultural input. If the farmers start realizing the benefits of compost and vermicompost in particular, the productivity of their land can 

increase manifold. As part of direct livelihood support, the villagers (mainly land less) are going to receive cows, buffaloes and small 

ruminants. These animals in turn are going to produce more waste, which can be used to prepare vermicompost. 

It is planned that a vermicompost unit by another SHG would be supported by the project. The SHG members, with the help of hired 

manpower, can collect animal-dung. They would process this dung to prepare vermicompost and sell it to the farmers in the village or 

outside, as per demand. The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow 

dung in layers of 1.5 m wide and 0.9 m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 wo rms per 

m3 of bed volume. The beds are maintained at about 40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 - 30o C by sprinkling water over 

the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or vermicastings. 

The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants. 

About The Worms 

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The 

worms feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermicomposting units are ideally suited to 

locations / units with generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks 

lays one egg capsule (containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication 

of worms under optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and 

dried in an oven to make 'worm meal' which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed. 



Use 

Vermicompost has more nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer; so, by the use of vermicompost we can reduce use of chemic al 

fertilizer. Vermicompost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure 

leading to increase in water and nutrient holding capacities of soil. 

Components of a commercial unit 

Sheds 

These villages have high temperature in summer; so, a shed structure is needed for the vermicompost unit. It can be made by the use of 

concrete pillars. While designing the sheds adequate room has to be left around the beds for easy movement of the labourers attending to 

the filling and harvesting the beds. 

Vermi-beds 

Scientific bed side is 75 cm - 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage of excess water. The whole bed area should be 

above the ground. The bed should have a uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low 

bed volumes. The proper bed width should not be more that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre of the bed. 

Land 

About 125 square meter of land will be required to set up a vermicompost production unit. It should have at least 2-3 sheds each of about 

180-200 sq. ft. It should have a good watering arrangement and other equipments as required because moisture is very essential for 

vermicompost production. 

Seed Stock 

This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m 3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year. 



Fencing 

The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length of the 

periphery of the farm. 

Water Supply System 

50% moisture content has to be maintained all the time. Water for the purpose would come from a well nearby. 

Machinery 

Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermisheds, 

loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necess ary 

implements and the machinery have to be included in the project cost. 

Estimate for a Vermicompost unit: 

Requirement of nitrogen for 1 hectare sorghum fodder production=90 kg 

1.6% N available in vermicompost 

90 kg N fulfill by the use of 90/1.6*100= 5625 kg vermicompost (5.5 ton) 

Need of vermicompost to fulfill the requirement of nitrogen for 15 hectare 5.5*15 =82.5 (80 ton) 

45 kg phosphorus required for 1 hectare sorghum fodder production 

Requirement of phosphorus for 15 hectare fodder production 15*45=675 kg 

Supply of phosphorus through vermin compost 0.7/100*80000=560 kg 

Remaining requirement of phosphorus 675-560=115 kg 

Remaining dose of phosphorus will be supplied by rock phosphate 



One compost cycle need 45 days so we need 8 cycles for 80 ton vermin compost production. 

Sr. No. Particulars Quantity Unit Rates (Rs.) Amount 

1 Wooden bellies length 3m 20 Nos 50 1000.00 

2 Wooden length 4m 25 Nos 60 1500.00 

3 Shade mats for roof covering 125 Sq M 25 3125.00 

4 Binding wire for tying wooden bellies & mats 20 Kg 50 1000.00 

5 Labour Charges for eraction of shades 20 Nos. 100 2000.00 

6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron basket 2500.00 

7 Weighing scale (100 Kg Capacity) 1 Nos. 2000 2000.00 

8 Cow Dung 10 Tones 800 8000.00 

9 Worms @ 3 Kg per ton 15 Kg 80 1200.00 

10 

Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and 

worms 

10 Beds 250 2500.00 

Total 24825.00 

Cost for 8 cycle 228200.00 



Pasture Development (Fodder Development) 

"The fodder development technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to provide 

fodder for livestock sector." It provides a wide range of animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the potential as good 

and sustainable sources of income in many areas. Through the dairy cooperative societies, farmers will be supplied with seeds of Bajra, 

multi-cut Jowar and cowpea for the summer season; multi cut Bajra, multi cut Jowar and maize for the kharif season and Bajra and Berseem 

for the rabi season. The demand for fodder seeds was the highest for the rabi season. Farmers cite the availability of green grass in 

abundance during the rains as a reason for their not devoting acreage solely for fodder during the kharif season. The accent of the 

programme during the year was to get across the message of growing a mixture of fodder crops providing complete nutrition for the 

animals. The success of the programme lay in making available quality fodder seeds to farmers. One aspect where we could have done 

better was in getting farmers to try out a mix of fodder crops and devote needed acreage to growing fodder for their animals. The fodder 

bank ensures fodder availability which in turn reduces the distressed migration of the people resulting in sustainable livelihood 

opportunities and enhances natural resource security in the project area. 

Objective of a fodder bank: 

1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution of fodder during drought and scarce situation. . 

2. Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder production, in 

association with dairy co-operatives. 

3. Control regulates and charge in the community grazing and pastures lands. 

4. Undertake the distribution of fodder seeds and slips in the village. 


Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises 

Executing 

Type of land 

agency 

S. 

No. 


village 

1 Shedubhar 

Activity/ Type of work 

Crop Demonstration (Wheat, Groundnut, 

Sunflower, Till ) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Unit 


Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 

P UG 20 4.00 

Drip Irrigation P UG 10 6.00 

Nursery C SHG 1 3.50 

Vermicompost C UG/SHG 2 2.70 

HYV Seed Store SHG 1 2.50 

Gramvatika C UG/SHG 1 2.50 

Drum kit P UG/SHG 69 3.45 

Chaff Cutter P UG/SHG 250 5.00 

Cattle Feed Store P UG/SHG 1 2.00 

Cattle Health Camp, Vaccination camp, 

De-worming Camp 

C - 3 3.75 

Bio-gas plant P UG/SHG 11 3.30 

Gruh Udhayog 

(Handicraft & Embroidery) 

SHG 1 2.00 

Agro Forestry C UG/SHG 6400Plant 1.34 

Mandap Service SHG 1 2.00 

Centring unit P SHG 1 1.50 

Target 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 



S. 

No. 


village 

1 Haripura 


(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Unit 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 



P UG 15 3.00 


Nursery with Green House C SHG 1 3.50 


HYV Seed Store SHG 1 2.50 





C - 3 3.00 

Bio-gas plant P UG/SHG 10 3.00 

Gruh Udhayog 


SHG 1 2.00 

Agro Forestry C UG/SHG 5230plant 1.09 

Target 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 



S. 

No. 

1 


village 

Mota 

Machiyala 


(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Unit 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 



P UG 6 1.20 




HYV Seed Store C UG/SHG 1 1.50 





C - 1 2.00 

Biogas plant P UG/SHG 3 0.90 

Agro forestry C UG/SHG 4285Plant 0.90 

Gruh Udhayog 


O SHG 1.00 

Target 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 



S. 

No. 

1 


village 

Nana 

machiyala 


(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Unit 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 



P UG 10 2.00 








C - 2 3.00 


Cattle Feed Store C SHG 1 2.50 

Gruh Udhayog 


O SHG 1 2.50 

Agro forestry C SHG/UG 4765Plant 1.00 

Target 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 



S. 

No. 


village 

1 Timba 


(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Unit 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 



P UG 5 1.00 


Vermicompost P UG 3 0.30 



Milk collection centre UG/SHG 1 1.30 



C Other 1 0.50 


Mandap service SHG 1 1.00 

Agro forestry C UG/SHG 2860Plant 0.60 

Target 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 



S. 

No. 


village 

1 Suragpura 


(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Unit 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 



P 6 1.20 

Drip Irrigation P 1 0.60 

Drum kit P SHG/UG 6 0.30 

Chaff Cutter P 20 0.40 

Biogas plant P SHG/UG 3 0.90 

Gruh Udhayog (Handicraft & Embroidery) SHG 1 1.00 

Agro Forestry C SHG/UG 

4050 

plant 

0.85 

Target 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy) 



Table no.40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 


Major activities of the SHGs 

S. No. 

Villages Name of activity No. of SHGs involved 

1 Shedubhar 

Average annual income from 

activity per SHG 

Nursery 2 60000 

Vermicompost 3 75000 

HYV Seed Store 1 15000 

Gruh Udhayog (Handicraft & Embroidery) 1 35000 

Mandap Service 1 30000 



S. No. 






1 Haripura 





S. No. 











S. No. 




1 Nana machiyala Nursery 1 20000 




Cattle Feed Store 1 15000 




S. No. 





1 Timba 




S. No. 




1 Suragpura Gruh Udhyog (Handicraft & Embroidery) 2 30000 



Table no.41: Linkages developed at village level 

Sr. No. Project Name Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome 

Nursery 

Plant will be sale to farmers who 

are interested in 

Horticulture/Vegetable 

Farmers 

1 IWMP 11 

Vermicompost 

Raw material will be collected 

from village and sale to nursery 

and village level farmer 

Nursery and local 

level 

Group get direct 

contact for selling 

of the product and 

get better income 

HYV Seed Store From Local market Farmers 

Pasture Development On wasteland of Village Animal Keeper 

Gruh Udhayog (Handicraft & 

Embroidery 

Product will be sale at a retail 

outlet 

Retail Outlet 


Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works 

S. 

No. 


village 

1 Shedubhar 


structure/ work 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

Type of treatment 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line (D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 


Target 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 

Afforestation L C DWDU 2 2.50 

Total 2.50 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ 

yyyy) 

S. 

No. 


village 

1 Haripura 



(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 


(ii) 

Drainage 

line (D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


Total 1.25 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ 

yyyy) 

S. 

No. 

1 


village 

Mota 

Machiyala 



(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 


(ii) 

Drainage 

line (D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


Total 1.25 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ 

yyyy) 


S. 

No. 

1 


village 

Nana 

machiyala 



(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 


(ii) 

Drainage 

line (D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 


Target 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


Total 1.25 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ 

yyyy) 

S. 

No. 


village 

1 Timba 



(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 


(ii) 

Drainage 

line (D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 

Afforestation L C DWDU 0.5 0.65 

Total 0.65 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ 

yyyy) 

S. 

No. 


village 

1 Suragpura 



(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 


(ii) 

Drainage 

line (D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 


(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

District Watershed Development Unit, Amreli 74 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 

Afforestation L C DWDU 0.5 0.70 

Kitchen garden 

kits 

L P DWDU 86 0.17 

Total 0.87 

Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/ 

yyyy)


Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 

S. No. Name(s) of the villages CPR particulars Activity proposed 

1 Shedubhar 

Waste land & Pasture 

Land 

Target area under 

the activity (ha) 

Target 

Estimated 

expenditure (Rs.) 

Expected no. of 

beneficiaries 

Afforestation 2 2.50 30 

2 Haripura 


4 Nana machiyala 

5 Timba 

6 Suragpura 


Land 


Land 


Land 


Land 


Land 




Afforestation 0.5 0.65 10 

Afforestation 0.5 0.7 10 

6 7.6 95 



Capacity Building 

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and 

experience needed to solve problems and implement changes. 

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond 

the conventional development targets and measures of success to take in to account improvements to human potential. Capacity Building of 

stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involved participation of stakeholders as all 

levels for effective implementation of projects. 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution 

S. 

No. 


Training 

Institute 

Full Address with 

contact no., website 

& e-mail 


Institute# 

Area(s) of speciali-zation$ 

Accreditation 

details 

Reference 

Year 

Trainings 


trainings 

assigned 


trainees to 

be trained 

1 KVK,Amreli Amreli 

Research 

Institute 

Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal 

Husbandry 

GOVT 

2012- 

2014 

2 

Junagadh 

Agriculture 

University 

Gunagadh 

University 

Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal 

Husbandry 

GOVT 

3 AKRSP, Gadu Gadu(Chrvad Road) NGO Capacity Building Soc. Reg. Act 

4 DSC Ahmedabad NGO Capacity Building Soc. Reg. Act 

2012- 

2014 

2011- 

2014 

2011- 

2014 


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan 

S. No. District Project Stakeholders Total no. of persons 

1 Shedubhar 

PIA 

WDTs 

UGs 

No. of persons to be 

trained 

SHGs 110 70 

WCs 15 15 

GPs 

Community 

Others (Pl. specify) 

No. of training 

programmes 


Estimated cost 


1 Haripura 

PIA 

WDTs 

UGs 


trained 

SHGs 66 25 

WCs 11 11 

GPs 

Community 



programmes 




PIA 

WDTs 


trained 

UGs 181 115 

SHGs 55 40 

WCs 14 14 

GPs 


programmes 



Community 





PIA 

WDTs 


trained 

UGs 138 115 

SHGs 55 40 


GPs 

Community 



programmes 



1 Timba 

PIA 

WDTs 

UGs 


trained 

SHGs 25 25 


GPs 

Community 



programmes 



1 Suragpura 

PIA 

WDTs 

UGs 


trained 

SHGs 25 25 


programmes 




GPs 

Community 



Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities 

S. No. Village Activity Executing agency 

Estimated expenditure 

(Rs.) 

1 

Street Play Local Drama Group 0.10 

2 Video Show DWDU-Amreli 0.05 

Shedubhar 

3 Pamphlets and posters DWDU-Amreli 0.05 

4 Banner and Hoardings DWDU-Amreli 0.05 



(Rs.) 

1 


3 Haripura Pamphlets and posters DWDU-Amreli 0.02 




(Rs.) 

1 

Video Show DWDU-Amreli 0.05 

Mota 


Machiyala 


Outcome 

(may quantify, wherever 

possible) 

Awareness for the importance of 

Watershed Project 

Outcome 


possible) 



Outcome 


possible) 





(Rs.) 

Outcome 


possible) 


1 


Nana 


Machiyala 







(Rs.) 

Outcome 


possible) 

1 

Pamphlets and posters DWDU-Amreli 0.02 Awareness for the importance of 

Timba 





(Rs.) 

Outcome 


possible) 

1 

Pamphlets and posters DWDU-Amreli 0.02 Awareness for the importance of 

Suragpura 





Chapter: 5 

BUDGET 



Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project 

Budget Component % of the Budget Amount 

Net Project Cost 100 27.48 

-Administrative Costs 10 2.75 

-Monitoring 1 0.27 

-Evaluation 1 0.27 

Preparatory phase: 

-Entry point activities 4 1.10 

-Institution and capacity building 5 1.37 

-Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1 0.27 

Watershed Works Phase: 

-Watershed Development works, 56 15.39 

-Livelihood activities for the asset less persons, 9 2.47 

-Production system and micro enterprises 10 2.75 

Consolidation Phase 3 0.82 

Total 100 27.48 



Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP 

Activity 

Sl no 

Village 

EPA 

Institution 

and CB 

DPR 

Watershed 

development 

Work 

Livelihood 

for asset 

less 

Production 

system and 

Microenterprises 

Consolidation 

Total 

1 Shedubhar 9.59 11.97 2.40 134.20 21.57 23.96 7.19 210.88 

2 Haripura 5.24 6.55 1.31 73.38 11.80 13.11 3.93 115.32 

3 Mota Machiyala 0.80 44.80 7.20 8.04 2.40 80.04 0.00 143.28 

4 Nana machiyala 65.38 10.51 11.68 3.50 116.76 0.00 0.00 207.83 

5 Timba 3.38 3.75 1.13 37.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.82 

6 Suragpura 1.10 1.37 0.28 15.39 2.48 2.75 0.82 24.19 

Total 85.49 78.95 24.00 272.07 155.01 119.86 11.94 747.32 

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 

Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement 

1 Shedubhar 263.64 239.64 24.00 

2 Haripura 144.04 131.04 13.00 

3 Mota Machiyala 96.24 80.04 16.20 

4 Nana machiyala 130.56 116.76 13.80 

5 Timba 43.86 37.56 6.30 

6 Suragpura 31.08 27.48 3.60 

Total 709.42 632.52 76.90 


Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 

S. No. Village 

Phase/ Type of 

work* 

Activity to be 

carried out 

Fund made 

available to 

IWMP due to 

convergence (Rs. 

in lakh) 

Scheme with 

which 

convergence took 

place 

1 Shedubhar Work phase Pond Deepning 18.00 NREGA/GLDC 

Drip Irrigation 6.00 GGRC 

Reference no. of 

activity/ task/ 

structure in DPR 


Level at which 

decision for 

convergence was 

taken 

2 Haripura Work phase Pond Deepning 10.00 NREGA 


3 Mota Machiyala Work phase Pond Deepning 15.00 NREGA/GLDC 


4 Nana machiyala Work phase Pond 12.00 NREGA/GLDC 


5 Timba Work phase Pond Deepning 5.00 NREGA/GLDC 


6 Suragpura Work phase Pond Deepning 3.00 NREGA/GLDC 


Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects 

S. No. 


Private 

Sector 

Partner 

Agency 

a)MoU 

Type of agreement signed 

b)Contract 

c) Any other 

(pl. specify) 

Financial contribution 

IWMP 

1 N A 

Private 

sector 

Partnership 

Interventions 

Expected 

Outcomes 

Comments 



Chapter: 6 

EXPECTED OUTCOMES 



Table no. 52: Environmental Benefits 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Soil loss (cmt) 

Preproject 

Water storage 

(Cmt) 

Expected 

postproject 

Preproject 

Expected 

postproject 

Open 

well: 

preproject 

Ground water table (mt) 

Open 

well: 

postproject 

Bore 

well: 

preproject 

Bore 

well: 

postproject 

Area in 

Ha.: 

preproject 

Tree cover 

Area in 

Ha.: 

postproject 

Tree 

count: 

preproject 

1 Shedubhar 2.50 3.25 17 15 40 36 15 17 8000 10200 

2 Haripura 1.50 2.25 20 16 45 39 12 15 5035 7050 

3 Mota Machiyala 5.15 7.40 20 17 45 40 12 15 6800 8050 

4 Nana machiyala 5.29 7.50 18 15 40 36 14 17 7042 9045 

5 Timba 0.90 1.50 20 16 45 39 3 4.5 2150 3020 

6 Suragpura 0.70 1.10 20 16 45 39 4 5 2150 3020 

Tree 

count: 

postproject 

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water 

S. No. Names of Villages 

Availability of drinking water 

Quality of drinking water 

(no. of months in a year) 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project 

1 Shedubhar 9 11 Good Good 

2 Haripura 8 10 Good Good 

3 Mota Machiyala 8 10 Good Good 

4 Nana machiyala 8 10 Good Good 

5 Timba 10 12 Good Good 

6 Suragpura 10 12 Good Good 


Table no. 54: Crop area and yield in the project area 


Sr. No. Name of village Name of crops 

1 Shedubhar 

2 Haripura 



5 Timba 

6 Suragpura 

Area (ha) 

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture / other crops 

Pre-project 

Production in 

Qtl 

Average Yield 

(Qtl) per ha. 

Area (ha) 

Expected Post-project 

Production in 

Qtl 

Average Yield 

per ha (qtl) 

Kharif 1852 8426.6 4.5 1852 9260 5 

Rabi 1092 5023.2 4.6 1285 6425 5 

Kharif 1044 93960 4.5 1060 95000 5 

Rabi 315 1433 4.5 330 1600 5.00 

Kharif 991 4459.5 4.5 1000 4700 4.7 

Rabi 365 1533.00 4.2 410 1845 4.5 

Kharif 1263 5746.7 4.5 1263 5936.1 4.7 

Rabi 400 1680 4.2 490 2205 4.5 

Kharif 278 1264.9 4.55 290 1334 4.60 

Rabi 70 222.6 3.18 95 308.7 3.25 

Kharif 218.83 230 

Rabi 50 60 

S. No. Name of Project Crop Existing area under the crop Area post project 


Mango (Keri) 

Sapota (Chiku) 

Guava (Jamfal) 

Lime (Limbu) 

Pomegranate (Dadam) 

Neem 

16.5 28.5 



Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and 

income in Rs.) 

Pre-Project 

Expected Post-project 

S. No. Name of Village Type of Animal 

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income 

Milch-animals 1379 3236 Lt 48540 1500 4500 Lt 72000 

1 Shedubhar 

Draught Purpose animals 354 423 

Animals for other purpose 198 245 

Milch-animals 235 686 Lt 12000 300 850 Lt 15000 

1 Haripura 



Milch-animals 439 1062Lt 15930 500 1350Lt 25000 




Milch-animals 477 1266 Lt 19000 500 1350Lt 25000 



Animals for other purpose 1118 1200 

Milch-animals 42 125 1875 60 180 2880 

1 Timba 





Milch-animals 42 228 5700 55 300 8400 

1 Suragpura 


Animals for other purpose 

Table no. 57: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area 

Wage employment 

Self employment 

S. Names of 

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries 

NO. Villages 

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 

1 Shedubhar 5500 0 50000 20000 75500 550 0 5000 2000 7550 100 0 1800 1450 3350 

2 Haripura 500 0 40000 25000 65500 50 0 4000 2500 6550 50 0 1300 900 2250 

3 Mota Machiyala 1720 0 20000 18300 40020 172 0 2000 1830 4002 72 0 1150 675 1897 

4 Nana machiyala 1080 0 32000 25300 58380 170 0 3880 1800 5850 150 0 1850 1500 3500 

5 Timba 300 0 3700 1500 5500 30 0 370 150 550 10 0 75 65 150 

6 Suragpura 0 0 2625 1575 4200 0 0 88 52 140 0 0 190 95 280 

Table no. 58: Seasonal migration from Project area 

Sl. No. 

Names of villages 

No. of persons migrating 

No. of days per year of migration 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project 

1 Shedubhar 430 344 120 90 

2 Haripura 113 90 120 90 

3 Mota Machiyala 175 140 110 70 

4 Nana machiyala 246 180 110 70 

5 Timba 21 17 90 70 

6 Suragpura 97 77 100 80 



Table no. 59: Per capita Income 

Sr. No. Project Source of Income Pre-project Expected post project 


Agriculture 280000 325000 

Animal Husbandry 10000 12500 

Casual Labour 100000 150000 

Services 500000 600000 

Business 75000 80000 

Others 20000 22000 


Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 


S. 

No. 

1 IWMP 1 

Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) 

During the project 

(no.) 

Post-project (no.) 

Backward linkages 

Seed certification 

Seed supply system 

Fertilizer supply system 

Pesticide supply system 

Credit institutions 

Water supply 

Extension services KVK, Amreli KVK, Amreli 

Nurseries 

Tools/machinery suppliers 1 1 

Price Support system 

Labor 


Forward linkages 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 

Storage (including cold storage) 

Road network 

Transport facilities 

Markets / Mandis 

Agro and other Industries 

Milk and other collection centres 1 1 

Labour 1 1 



Agriculture Shop 1 1 

Mandap Service 1 1 


Logical Framework Analysis 


Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact 

Village 

Formation of 

One Watershed 

Project can be 

 

Unity and Prosperity in 

Institution 

Watershed Committee, 

Committee each village 

implemented 

and 

the village management. 

Formation 

User Group 

 

Number of User Group 

managed in a 

People’s participation 

depending on the 

democratic 

and 

and positive perception 

coverage of particular 

participatory 

way 

towards the programme 

intervention. 

ensuring equity. 

Strengthening 

 

Organise training and 

Awareness camps to be 

 

Quality of management 

Village 

awareness programme 

organised. 

of common resources 

Institution 

for village institutions 

Training and exposure 

improved. 

Capacity building 

visits UGs and WCs to be 

 

Quality of distribution of 

workshops 

and 

held. 

benefits between people 

exposure visits for User 

Capacity 

building 

improved. 

Group and Watershed 

workshop to be 

Increased awareness 

Committee. 

organised. 

amongst women about 

Facilitating and 

1 Federations of UGs and 

village resources. 

monitoring the function 

WCs to be formed. 

Women participation 

of UGs and WCs. 

enhanced in decision 

Strengthen linkages 

making GVCs. 

between UGs and WCs 

Involvement of youth 

and 

Panchayat 

and children in village 


Institution. 

development increased. 


 

Gender sensitisation of 

UGs and WCs to 

increase 

inclusiveness 

of combine decision 

making. 

Sensitise village 

communities to involve 

children and youth in 

development. 

Fund 

Improve management 

UGs and WCs operating 

 

Purpose, frequency and 

 

Management 

and utilization of UGs 

bank account and 

volume on use of the 

and WCs. 

managing resources on 

fund enhanced. 

 

Prepare communities to 

their own 

Volume of funds 

explore other sources of 

generated for UGs and 

income for UGs and 

WCs from other sources 

WCs 

of income increased. 

Ecological 

Protection, treatment 

Common and private land 

 

Fodder availability from 

 

Better ecological order 

Restoration 

and regeneration of 

to be brought under new 

common and private 

in area. 

common and private 

plantation and agro-horti- 

lands increased. 

Increase in the 

lands 

forestry like Neem, 

 

Accessibility to common 

proportion 

of 

Protection, treatment 

Adusa, Prosopis, Banyan 

and forest lands 

households 

having 

and regeneration of 

and Peepal. 

increased with removal 

more securities of 



forest lands. 

Pasture land to be of encroachments and fodder. 

Plantation of fruits and 

forest spices 

Impart training, conduct 

meeting and organise 

exposure visits for 

communities, village 

volunteer and staff to 

effectively plan, execute 

and monitor activities. 

Rainfed Area Treatment of land 

brought under new resolution of conflicts. 

plantation and protection. 

Training, exposure visits 

and meetings to be 

organised 

for 

communities, village 

volunteers and staff. 

Income generation 

intervention promoted. 

Land to be brought under Improved productivity 

Development through improved soil improved soil moisture of treated land 

and 

moisture conservation practices. Increased availability of 

conservation practices Good agriculture water in wells. 

on watershed basis. 

practices to be promoted. Increase in annual 

Promotion of good Organic farming to be agriculture production. 

agricultural practiceshorticultural, 

promoted. 

Farmers adopt organic 

improved Agriculture based farming practices. 

crop and vegetable. 

livelihood income Increase availability of 

Promotion of organic generation activities to be water. 

farming practices. 

promoted. 

Increased availability of 

Identification and Water harvesting irrigation water 

promotion of agri- structures to be established. 

Reduction in drudgery 

of fodder and fuel 

collection, especially 

women. 

Increase in proportion 

of household having 

more security of food. 

Increased in 

contribution of 

agricultural income to 

the household income. 


produce based income 

constructed. 

 

Farmers take two crops 


generation. 

Drip irrigation facilities to 

in a year. 

Promotion of better 

be distributed among 

 

Increase in agriculture 

irrigation practices like 

farmers. 

productivity of land. 

drip and sprinkler 

Trainings, exposure visits 

 

Availability of drinking 

irrigation. 

and meetings to be 

water enhanced. 

Impart trainings, 

organised 

for 

conduct meetings and 

communities, 

village 

organise exposure visits 

volunteers and staff. 

of communities, village 

Employment to be 

volunteers and staff to 

generated. 

effectively plan, execute 

and monitor activities. 

Women’s 

Formation and 

Women’s SHG groups to 

 

Enhanced capacities o 

 

Position of women in 

Socio-political 

strengthening 

of 

be formed. 

leaders of women’s 

household, community, 

and 

economic 

women’s SHG groups 

Federation of Women’s 

group in taking 

society 

(politically, 

empowerment 

Capacity building of 

SHGs to be formed. 

initiatives to solve 

socially 

and 

women. 

Training to be conducted 

problems at different 

economically) 

as 

Capacity building of 

for employment of 

levels. 

perceived by women 

SHG leaders and 

women. 

Improved access to 

and community at large. 

accountants. 

credit for livelihood 

 

Performance 

Linking SHGs with 

purpose. 

enhancement of SHGs in 

external 

financial 

Increased household 

terms of participation, 



institutions. income. decision making, 

leadership and fund 

management. 

Equity and equality in 

gender relations at 

home (decision making 

expenditure, children’s 

education, health) 

Quality and Sustainability Issues 

(I) Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 

A web-based GIS system is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the in its project in its planning and implementation 

phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system 

shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom on to one 

particular project. Details related to soil type, land use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, 

survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the user of the system. This 

system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form 

of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, 

proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various 

years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the 

treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planner and 

evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project. 


(II) 

(III) 

(IV) 


Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the 

ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, 

any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of 

and SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude -longitude 

information of various treatment areas during DPR. The probable sites are then transferred on to the central server. During the 

works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal 

officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of 

time. 

Plans for Project Management 

The project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and 

the village level institution. In Jaswantgadh, watershed committee and various User Groups have been formulated for post operation 

and maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project 

even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building 

organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project. 

Watershed Development Fund 

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is Watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it 

will comes mainly fund the following. 

User Charges 

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user according to the designated rules formed during 

the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of 

Watershed Committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following. 



MAPS

IWMP-11 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?