IWMP-9 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 1 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 2 -

Sr.
No.
1.1 Project Background
Contents
Chapter 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
Table No. 1.1 Basic Project Information about 13
1.2 Need of Watershed Development Program me: 14
Table No. 2 Weightage of the project 14
Table No. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed 15
Table No. 3 Watershed Information: 17
1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Villages: 19
Table No. 4 Developmental programmes running in the project area 19
Table No. 5 Previous Watershed programmes in the project area 19
Chapter 2 PROJECT IMPLIMENTIG AGENCY
2.1 Project Implementing Agency 25
2.2 Junagadh(PIA) 25
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: 25
2.2.2 Programs/projects of PIA, Junagadh: 25
2.3 SWOT Analysis of the dwdu junaghda (PIA): 26
Page No.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 3 -

Table No. 6 PIA 26
Table No. 7 Staff at PIA level 26
3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology 28
3.1.1 Land use pattern 28
Table No. 8 Land use pattern 28
3.1.2 Soil and topography 29
Table No. 9 Soil type and topography 29
Table No. 10 Flood and drought condition 30
Table No. 11.1 Soil Erosion 30
Table No. 11.2 Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 30
Table No. 12 Climatic conditions 31
Table No. 13 Physiographic and relief 32
3.1.3 Land and Agriculture 32
Table no. 14 Land ownership details 33
Table no. 15 Agriculture 33
Table no. 16 Irrigation 33
Table no. 17 Crop details 34
3.1.4 Livestock 36
Table no. 18 Livestock 39
Table no. 19 Drinking water 40
Table no. 20 Details of Common Property Resources 41
3.2 Socio-Economic Profile
3.2.1 Demographic Status 42
Table no. 21 Demographic information 42
Table no. 22 Literacy rank 43
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 4 -

3.2.2 Migration Pattern 44
Table no. 23 Migration details 44
Table no. 24 Poverty 45
3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities 45
Table no. 25 Village infrastructure 46
Table no. 26 Facilities / HH assets 47
3.3 Livelihood pattern:
Table no. 27 Per Year Income 48
3.3.1 Dependence on Common Property Resource 49
Table no.28 Dependence on Forest/CPR 50
Table no.29 Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 50
3.4 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World 50-59
The IWMP – 9 keshod Cluster project area
Chapter 4 WATERSHED ACTIVITIES
4.1 Scientific Planning
Table no. 30 Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 60
Table No. 31 Details of PRA Activities Conducted in the Project Area 62
4.2 Institution building
4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC) 67-75
4.2.2 Self Help Group 77-79
Table no. 33 SHG detail
4.2.3 User Group 80-82
Table no. 34 UG detail
4.3 Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP – 9 Keshod Cluster project area
4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) 83-86
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 5 -

4.3.2 Watershed Development Works
Table no.36.1 Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works- 89-93
Table no.36.6 Technical Details of Farm Bund 94
Table no.36.7 Quantity Excavation for Farm bund 94
Table no.37.1 Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas- 95-106
Table no. 38.1 Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas 107-110
Table no.39.1 Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises- 11-123
Production System Vermi Compost unit 126
Table no. 39.5 Model for A Vermi Compost Unit 126
Table no.39.6 Returns from A Vermi Compost Unit 127
Table no.40 Activities Related to Livelihood by Self Help Group (SHGs) in the Project Areas 127-130
Table no.41 Linkages Developed at Village Level 131
Table no.42 Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works 132-134
Table no.42.1 Technical Details of Afforestation Activity 135
Table no.42.2 Cost Estimation for Afforestation Activity 136
4.4 Capacity Building
Table no. 43 Details of Activities in the CPRs in the Project Areas 137
Table no. 44 Capacity Building Institution 138
Table no. 45 Capacity Building plan 139
Table no. 46 Information, education and Communication Activities 139
Chapter 5 BUDGETING
Table no. 47 Village wise Activity wise Budget 141
Table no. 48 Village wise, component wise budget available under IWMP 142
Table no. 49 Village wise gap in funds requirement 143
Table no. 50 Details of convergence of IWMP with other schemes 144
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 6 -

Chapter 6 EXPECTED OUTCOMES
Table 51 Public Private Partnership In the IWMP Projects 146
6.1 Expected Outcomes
Table no. 52 Environmental Benifits 147
6.1.2 Drinking water 148
Table no. 53
Status of Drinking water
Ground water table 148
6.1.3 Crops 149
Table no. 54
Details of crop area and yield in the project area
Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)
6.1.4 Horticulture 150
Table no. 55
Area under horticulture
6.1.5 Livestock 151
Table no. 56
Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs.
And income in Rs.)
6.1.6 Employment 152
Table no. 57
Table no. 58
Employment to be supplemented in Project area
Migration
Seasonal migration from Project area
6.1.7 Vegetative cover
Forest/vegetative cover
Table no. 59 Per Capita Income 153
6.1.9 Linkages 154-155
Table no. 60
Backward-Forward linkage
6.1.10 Logical Framework Analysis
Chapter 7 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 7 -

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 161
7.2 Plans For Project management 161
7.3 Watershed Development Fund 162
7.4 User Charges 162
Chapter 8 MAPS 163-168
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 8 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 9 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 10 -

Project Background
The project IWMP-9 is being implemented in Keshod taluka of Junagadh district with nine villages forming the
cluster. The villages are agatray,manekvada,handala,dervan,badodar,magharvada,jonpur,pasvadiya. The cumulative area
proposed to be treated under the project is 7954.4 hectares. Agatray is the largest village in the cluster with a proposed area of
1804.30 hectares followed by Manekvada (1103.70), Badodar (1069.30) Maghavada (802.70) Handala (903.60) Dervan
(608.60) Madhada (478.90) Pasvadiya (278.00) Jonpur (955.30) The nearest town is Keshod which is about 20 kms from the
nearest village in the project cluster. All the villages are connected by pucca road with the national highway. The major
communities residing in the cluster are Patels, Darbars,Ahir and koli . The people mainly depend on agriculture as their main
source of livelihood with 80% of the people engaged in it. Groundnut is the major crop followed by Wheat, cotton and cumin. The
current generation of youngsters in the villages generally migrate to nearby cities like Surat, Rajkot, Jamnagar and Porbandar for
working in the tile factories and diamond polishing centres. the land is generally plain and forest area is virtually non-existent in
the cluster. Water is available for 4-5 months during the year when all the canals and streams could be seen flooded, but for the
rest part of the year there is an acute scarcity of water in many villages. In our project cluster, drinking water is well available in
two villages by virtue of supply from Narmada canal.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 11 -

Table No.1.1 Basic Project Information about
Sl.
No
Name of
the project
Name
Villages
C2K code
Gram
Panchayats
Taluka District Area of
the
project
Area
proposed
to be
treated
Total
project
cost
PIA
1
Agatray
1200700836900
Agatray
1804.30 1804.30
21651600
2
Badodar
1200700838200
Badodar
1069.30 1069.30
12831600
3
4
IWMP-9
Dervan
Handala
1200700836700
1200700838100
Dervan
Handala
Keshod
Junagadh
608.60 608.60
903.60 903.60
7303200
10843200
DWDU
Junagadh
5
Jonpur
1200700836400
Jonpur
802.70 802.70
9632400
6
Madhada
1200700837100
Madhada
955.30 955.30
11463600
7
Magharvada
1200700836800
Magharvada
478.90 478.90
5746800
8
Manekvada
1200700836600
Manekvada
1103.70 1103.70
13244400
9
Pasvadiya
1200700837000
Pasvadiya
228.00 228.00
2736000
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 12 -

1.2
Need of Watershed Development Programme:
Watershed Development Programmer is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual
wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfaid agriculture, Drinking water situation in
the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated,
Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to IWMP-II Talala Cluster given in
table no. 2.
The total number of families under BPL is less than 30 percent of the total households in the every village. The percentage of schedule castes in
the village is about 17% to the total population. Rain-fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is
saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 60 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the Labour is
less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5, 3 and 5 are allotted respectively.
Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DPAP block. Drinking water is in
good condition. The soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Cluster
approach was followed taking into consideration this micro watershed covering a total area of 5024 Ha.
Table no. 2: Weightage of the project
Name of the Project
IWMP-9
Project type
FLAT
Weightage
i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii
7.5 3 0 5 2 10 7.5 10 15 5 5 90
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 13 -

Table no. 2.1: Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed
S.
No
Criteria
Maxim
um
score
Ranges & scores
i
Poverty index (% of poor to
population)
10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20
% (2.5)
ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are
significantly lower than
minimum wages (5)
Actual wages are equal
to or higher than
minimum wages (0)
iv
% of small and marginal
farmers
10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)
v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)
vi
Moisture index/
15 -66.7 & below (15)
-33.3 to -66.6 (10)
0 to -33.2 (0)
DPAP/ DDP Block
DDP Block
DPAP Block
Non DPAP/ DDP Block
vii Area under rain-fed
agriculture
15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70
%
(Reject)
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village
(7.5)
Partially covered (5)
Fully
covered
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 14 -

(0)
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 %
(10)
Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)
x Productivity potential of
the land
15 Lands with low production &
where productivity can be
significantly enhanced with
reasonable efforts (15)
Lands with moderate
production & where
productivity can be
enhanced with
reasonable efforts (10)
Lands with high production &
where productivity can be
marginally enhanced with
reasonable efforts (5)
xi Contiguity to another
watershed that has already
been developed/ treated
10 Contiguous to previously
treated watershed &
contiguity within the
microwatersheds in the
project (10)
Contiguity within the
microwatersheds in
the project but non
contiguous to
previously treated
watershed (5)
Neither contiguous to
previously treated watershed
nor contiguity within the
microwatersheds in the project
(0)
xii
Cluster approach in the
plains (more than one
contiguous microwatersheds
in the project)
15 Above 6 micro-watersheds
in cluster (15)
4 to 6
microwatersheds in
cluster (10)
2 to 4 microwatersheds in
cluster (5)
xiii
Cluster approach in the hills
(more than one contiguous
micro-watersheds in the
project)
15 Above 5 micro-watersheds
in cluster (15)
3 to 5
microwatersheds in
cluster (10)
2 to 3 microwatersheds in
cluster (5)
Total 150 90 41 2.5
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 15 -

Table no.3: Watershed Information
Name of the project
No. of watersheds to be
Watershed code
Watershed regime/type/order
treated
5G1C2b2b,b2f,b2a, b2e,
a1b,5G1C4a2b,a2c,5G1C2b1f,blg,b2a,
IWMP-9 7
5G1C2b2h,b2g,b1b,b1c,5G1C2blc,b2g,b2a, b2h,
5G1C24a2b, a2a, 5G1C2b2g ,b2b
Micro watershed
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 16 -

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the villages :
This villages being very back ward, has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programs are Eco Development
Commity (EDC), Gokul Gram Yojana, Sampurna Gramin Rojagar Yojana(SGRY),Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee
Scheme(MGNREGS), Bajpai Yojana, TSC Yojana, Sardar Awas Yojana(SAY), Javahar Rojgar Yojana (JRY), Indira Awas Yojana (IAY),WASMO.
1. EDC: Construction of Check Deam and Agriculture land leveling has been taken of under EDC.
2. Gokul Gram Yojana : Contraction of CC Road, Community Hall, Play house, Tube well, Pipeline and Aveda
3. Sampurna Gramin Rojagar Yojana (SGRY): Contraction of Primary school compound,Metal Road and Metal Road Repairing.Activity has
been Taken-up under SGRY.
4. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS): Boribandhs and Road Activity has been taken-up under
NREGA.
5. TSC Yojana: individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. All the remaining house hold will be covered under the scheme.
6. Sardar Awas Yojana (SAY): House has been constructed under Sardar Awas Yojana.
7. Indira Awas Yojana (IAY): House has been constructed under Indira Awas Yojana.
8. WASMO: Construction of water storage tank, underground water storage tank and water pipe line etc. in this Project.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 17 -

Table no.4: Developmental programs running in the project area
Sr.N
o
Name of the
programme/scheme
Sponsoring
agency
Objectives of the
programme/scheme
Year of commencement
Villages
covered
Estimated
number of
beneficiaries
1 WASMO Govt of Gujarat Drinking water pipeline 2006 2 -
2 NREGS CRD Employment 2009 5 -
3 IAY CRD Housing 2005 6 -
4 Sakhi Mandal Govt of Gujarat Savings and Employment 2004 9 -
5 TSC Govt of Gujarat Sanitation 2006 5 -
6 Sardar Patel Awas Yojana Govt of Gujarat Housing 2005 5 -
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programs in the project area
SR
no
Project
name
Year
started
Name
of
villages
No. Of
micro
watershed
Watershed
codes
Area
under
treatment
Funding
source
Nodal
agency
PIA
Total
cost
Expenditure
incurred up
to start of
IWMP
% financial
completion
% financial
completion
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 18 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 19 -

2.1. Project Implementing Agency
The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be
responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/
Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for IWMP-3 is
District Watershed Development Unit, Junagadh.
2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit, Junagadh.
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:
The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Junagadh is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12th June 2008 under
constitution of Para 30 of new guideline, to oversee for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development
Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has a Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) comprising of both experienced and fresh graduates
various backgrounds like engineering, surveying, community mobilization, accounts, agriculture and data entry operations. The DWDU is headed by
the Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) assisted by a Technical Expert (on contract basis) and MDT's. The remaining staff
i.e. MIS coordinator, System Analyst, Livestock specialist will be recruited very soon. The DWDU Junagadh has its own office in the Training Complex
of the DRDA, located at Sardar Baug.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 20 -

The functions of DWDU:
a) Take up the over all responsibility of facilitating preparation of strategic and annual action plans for watershed development projects in the district.
b) Providing professional and technical support to Project Implementing Agencies (PIAs) in planning and execution of watershed development
projects.
c) Develop action plans for capacity building with close involvement of resource organizations to execute the capacity building action plans.
d) Carry out regular monitoring, evaluation and learning.
e) Ensure smooth flow of funds to watershed development projects.
f) Ensure timely submission of required documents to SLNA/Nodal Agency of the Department at central level.
g) Facilitate and co-ordination with relevant programmes of agriculture, horticulture, rural development, animal husbandry, etc with watershed
development and convergence plans for enhancement of productivity and livelihoods interventions for asset less persons.
h) Integrate and co-ordinate watershed development projects/plans into district plans of the district planning committees.
i) Establish and maintain the District Level Date Cell and link it to the State Level and National Level Data Centre.
Moreover, the DWDU, Junagadh is also working as a PIA for three IWMP projects.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 21 -

2.2.2 Programmes/projects running in the district
Junagadh district was assigned 428 projects, covering a total of 2,10,123 hectares, under the Haryali/ Pre- Haryali Watershed Projects.
Completed projects
• There were 59 projects under DPAP Batch 1,2& 4 covering 29488 hectares. The total grant was 1239.27 lakhs against which a cumulative
expenditure of 1169.22 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 95% achievement.
• There were 44 projects under EAS covering 16202 hectares. The total grant was 834.72lakhs against which a cumulative expenditure of 802.01
lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 96.08% achievement.
• There were 47 projects under State Watershed covering 23500 hectares. The total grant was 275.07 lakhs against which a cumulative
expenditure of 275.07 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in100% achievement.
• There were 24 projects under IWDP-1 covering 12000 hectares. The total grant was 482.02 lakhs against which a cumulative expenditure of
480.69 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 99.72% achievement.
Status of Continuing Projects
• There are 160 projects under DPAP- 5 to DPAP-12 covering 79043 hectares. The total grant was 1804.89 lakhs against which a cumulative
expenditure of 1556.97 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 86.26% achievement.
• There are 94 projects under IWDP-2 to IWDP-8 covering 49890 hectares. The total grant was 1245.58 lakhs against which a cumulative
expenditure of 1021.94 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 82.05% achievement.
• Total : There are a total of 254 projects under DPAP and IWDP covering 128933 hectares. The total grant was 3050.47 lakhs against which a
cumulative expenditure of 2578.91 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 84.54% achievement.
Among the ongoing DPAP projects are DPAP – 5 to DPAP – 12 covering 160 projects. The total grant allocation for the ongoing DPAP projects is Rs
4530 lakhs against which Rs 1786.52 lakhs has been released till date jointly by the Centre and State. The achievement rate is 84.07% against the
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 22 -

total grant released. The Centre and state shared the total cost in 75:25 proportion. The balance fund available as on March 31, 2010 stands at Rs
287.67 lakhs.
2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU
Strength:
(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team
(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.
(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, Sourastra University, KVK and NGOs for capacity building and
technical guidance
(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar
(5) District level monitoring, coordination Committee
(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits for transparency and accountability.
Weakness:
(1) Insufficient funds to complete watershed projects per hectare.
(2) Permanent staff is less in numbers.
(3) No permanent office building.
Opportunities:
(1) Sustainable livelihood generation for landless and asset less persons.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 23 -

(2) Improvement of socio-economic status of poor.
(3) Awareness generation among the beneficiaries through information, education and communication activities.
(4) Reduction in migration rate.
(5) Usage of new technologies of watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring of watershed activities.
Threats:
(1) Lack of sustainable agricultural development package.
(2) Lack of voluntary contribution and cooperation from local peoples.
(3) Party politics in village leading to multi-interest groups
Table no. 6: PIA
SI. No.
Name of project
Type of organization
Details of PIA
District Level Nodal Agency
1 IWMP-9
Name of Organization
Designation and Address
DWDU, Junagadh
Project Manager.DWDU, junagadh
Telephone 0285-2635974
Fax 0285-2635974
E-mail
jundwdu@gmail.com
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 24 -

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level
Sr.N o
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experien
ce
Job assigned
Monthly
remuneration
1 B.T .Chaddasaniya 42 F Project Manager GFS 18 Project Management 50000
2 Mr. hemant gar 29 F Technical expert B.tec 2 Monitoring 25000
3 Ms.tvinkalben der 29 M Technical expert PGDRM 3 Monitoring 25000
3 Ms.minaben bharathi 29 F MDT (Engg.) Diploma(Civil) 5.5 Year Engineering works 15000
4 Mr. S.V.Bharda 25 M MDT(Agri.) M.R.S. (Agro.) 2 Agriculture 9000
5 Ms.hemaxiben garala 23 F MDT( CM) M.Sc (Home Sc) 2 Community 9000
6 Ms. K A Dhanesha 26 F MDT(Accountant)M M.Com 3 Accounts 8000
7 Mr kavshik dhorajiya 20 M MDT(Surveyor) Diploma(Civil) 2 Surveying 7000
8 Mr. P B Vataliya 29 M MDT(DEO) B.Com.(D.C.S.) 10 Data Entry 6000
9 Ms. pintuben vadariya 32 F WDT (Engg.) Diploma(Civil) 5 Engineering works 12000
10 Mr .piyush zala 23 M WDT ( Agri.) B.R.S 3.5 Agriculture 8000
11 Ms .diptiben sojitra 24 F WDT (CM) M.Sc (H.S) 5 Community 8000
12 Mr. Rajeshbhai dabhi 23 M WDT(Accounts) B.Com. 3 Accounts 7000
13 Mr vishal . B 23 M WDT(Surveyor) I.T.I Surveyer 0.0 Surveying 6000
14Mr Mr punit . j 22 M WDT(DEO) M.Com. (D.C.S.) 3 months Data Entry 5000
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 25 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 26 -

3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology
3.1.1 Land use pattern:
The net geographical area of the five cluster villages is 4980.9 hectares out of which 2.10 hectares is forest area. About 4287.2 ha of land is
under agriculture which is mostly rain fed. Both Kharif and Rabi crops are taken in the cluster. of the total available land 383.70 ha is cultivable and
307.90 ha is uncultivable. The watershed consists Pipal, Banyan,Babul and other shrubs spread across the region.
Table no. 8: Land use pattern
Sr.
No
Name of
the
Project
Name of
watershed
Project
Name of village
Geographical
Area of
Village (ha)
Forest
Area
Land under
agricultural
Rainfed
area
Permanent
pastures
Cultivated
Wasteland
Non culti
1 KESHOD 9 Agatrai 1804.30 43.00 1482.90 1309.30 0.00 135.30 143.20
Badodar 1069.30 0.00 936.40 685.10 0.00 59.50 73.40
Dervan 608.60 0.00 504.60 433.30 0.00 45.40 58.60
Handla 903.60 9.10 810.40 717.20 0.00 59.50 24.70
Magharwada 802.70 0.00 663.30 538.20 0.00 95.60 43.90
Madhda 478.90 0.00 267.60 166.70 0.00 36.90 11.40
Manekwada 1103.70 70.60 631.20 546.60 0.00 232.30 54.30
Pasvaliya 228.00 0.00 324.50 311.50 0.00 34.90 31.60
Total 7954.4 122.7 6564.5 5600 0.000 773.5 493.9
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 27 -

3.1.2 Soil and topography: Nearly 95 % of the geographical are is comprised of shallow to medium black soil having
depth upto 0.6-0.75 mt top soil and 5% is red soil. The soil is slightly reddish to very brown in surface colour. By large soils are
well drained with moderate water holding capacity. From sustainable development perspectives, what is alarming is the
steady decline in the soil quality due to sheet erosion. There has a considerable reduction in the application of farm yard manure
resulting in reduced in moisture retention capacity and porosity in the soils. Generally the organic carbon content too is low.
Lack of water conservation measures at the field and at the community level has led to the acceleration of environmental
degradation. The farmers generally depend on internal resources (seeds etc) as inputs for the next season. The topography of the
area is moderate ranging from 0-10 % slop
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography
S. No.
Name of the Agro-climatic
zone covers project area
Area in ha Name of village Major soil types Topography
a)Type
b] Area in ha
1
1804.30 Agatrai
2 1069.30 Badodar
3 608.60 Dervan
4 SAURASTRA 903.60 Handla
5 802.70 Magharwada
7 478.90 Madhda
8 1103.70 Manekwada
9 228.00 Pasvaliya
BLACK SOIL
FLAT
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 28 -

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition
Sr.No
Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Agatrai Nil Nil
2 Badodar Nil Nil
3 Dervan Nil Nil
4 Handla Nil Nil
5 Magharwada Nil Nil
7 Madhda Nil Nil
8 Manekwada Nil Nil
9 Pasvaliya Nil Nil
Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion
Cause
Type of erosion
Area affected (ha)
Run off (mm/
year)
Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/
year)
Water erosion
A Sheet 5568.08 475 1392.02
B Rill 1590.88 525 397.72
C Gully 795.44 500 198.86
Total 7954.4 1988.6
Wind erosion
Total 7954.4 1988.6
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 29 -

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alcalinity (Salinity ingress)
Name of the Villages Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity(Inherent/Ingress)
Agatrai - - -
Badodar - - -
Dervan - - -
Handla - - -
Magharwada - - -
Madhda - - -
Manekwada - - -
Pasvaliya - - -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 30 -

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions
Sr.No. Year Rainfall (in mm) Temperature (°C)
1 2004 980 39 9
2 2005 1063 35 16
3 2006 912 36 17
4 2007 1543 38 15
5 2008 1100 41 13
6 2009 1048 45 9
The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every three to four years. The average rainfall of
this area is about 1270 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 155 mm within span of a day.
Max.
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief
Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams
Agatrai 5-6 5-6% -
Badodar 5-6 5-6% -
Dervan 7-8 7-8% -
Handla 4-5 4-5% -
Magharwada 5-6 5-6% -
Madhda 6-7 6-7% -
Manekwada 5-6 5-6% -
Pasvaliya 4-5 4-5% -
Min.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 31 -

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture:
Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking
purpose. The average land holding is about 5 ha. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Groundnut and Wheat. Some of the farmers take up
rain-faid tuver and Sugarcane crop if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help
them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or cumin in the residual moisture.
Table no. 14: Land ownership details
Sr.No
Village
Total owned land
total Gen OBC SC ST
1 Agatrai 615 320 280 15 0
2 Badodar 366 102 206 79 0
3 Dervan 86 16 60 10 0
4 Handla 260 80 150 30 0
5 Magharwada 256 50 156 50 0
6 Madhda 237 64 157 37 0
7 Manekwada 602 202 450 50 0
8 Pasvaliya 72 12 30 30 0
Total 2494 846 1489 301 0
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 32 -

Table no. 15: Agriculture
Sr.No Village Net sown area (ha)
One time Two times Three times
1 Agatrai 1900.00 135.80 675.00
2 Badodar 150.30 130.60 60.00
3 Dervan 364.60 247.15 97.10
4 Handla 346.16 97.00 19.00
5 Magharwada 1700.00 784.80 346.00
6 Madhda 254.60 175.15 45.10
7 Manekwada 149.16 60.00 8.00
8 Pasvaliya 106.30 168.60 40.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 33 -

Table no. 16: Irrigation
SR. No.
Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well/Tube well
Availability months Net area Gross area Availability months
Net
area
Gross area Availability months Net area Gross area
1 Agatrai - - 12 20 - 10 10 -
2 Badodar - - 10 12 - 10 8 -
3 Dervan - - 10 12 - 12 8 -
4 Handla - - 12 15 - 12 10 -
5 Magharwada - - 8 15 - 10 8 -
6 Jonpur - - 8 12 - 12 8 -
7 Madhda - - 10 15 - 12 10 -
8 Manekwada - - 8 10 - 12 10 -
9 Pasvaliya - - 8 10 - 10 8 -
-
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 34 -

Table no. 17: Crop details
Sr.No Village
Kharif (Monsoon)
Crop 1 Groundnut Kg/Ha Crop 2 Castor Crop 3 Cotton Kg/Ha
Area(Ha) Production(kg) Productivity Area(Ha) Production(kg) Productivity Area(Ha) Production(kg) Productivity
1 Agatray 849.64 784750 1580.11 10.24 973200 87226.15 1.28 2400 1875
2 Badodar 64.84 39200 1517.02 14.40 110300 7659.72 - - -
3 Dervan 69.16 124140 1318.39 4.32 324000 75000 - - -
4 Handala 257.04 120120 921.16 - - - - - -
5 Jonpur 348.64 784750 1580.11 10.24 893200 93226.15 3.56 5600 3200
6 Madhada 4984 39200 1517.02 34.40 190300 8759.72 - - -
7 Magharvada 8716 124140 1318.39 9.32 564000 94000 - - -
8 Manekvada 357.04 120120 921.16 - - - - - -
9 Pasvadiya 25.84 39200 1517.02 34.40 320300 7659.72 - - -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 35 -

Sr.No Village
Rabi (Winter)
Crop 1 Wheat kg/ha
Crop
2
Dhaana
kg/ha
Crop
3
Jeera
Area Production(kg) Productivity Area Production(kg) Productivity Area Production Productivity
1 Agatray 309.48 1112600 3596.22 18.56 131700 9895.90 1.28 2900 2265.62
2 Badodar 30.16 94800 3143.23 1.60 1000 625 0.96 2000 2083.33
3 Dervan 94.68 273750 2891.31 - - - - - -
4 Handala 55.60 126800 2280.57 21.68 23200 1070.11 - - -
5 Jonpur 309.48 3562600 5996.22 18.56 261700 7095.90 12.28 3400 6465.62
6 Madhada 30.16 87800 6543.23 1.60 2000 625 0.96 6000 6983.33
7 Magharvada 94.68 343750 4591.31 - - - - - -
8 Manekvada 55.60 646800 2680.57 21.68 28200 2470.11 - - -
9 Pasvadiya
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 36 -

Sr.
No
Village
Summer
Crop 1 Til kg/ha Crop 2 Bajri kg/ha Crop 3 Jeera
Area
Production(k
g)
Productivity Area Production(g) Productivity Area Productin Productiviy
1 Agatray 309.48 5612600 530.32 19.92 564000 15763.05 0.16 50.00 312.50
2 Badodar
30.16 94800 1250.00 161.7
6
2317710 6291.48 22.56 19350.0
0
857.71
3 Dervan 94.68 57750 750.00 33.76 128800.00 3815.16 3.12 2860.00 548.66
4 Handala 55.60 126800 0.00 19.12 46000.00 2510.00 0.48 300.00 658.00
5 Jonpur 309.48 1112600 530.32 19.92 314000 15763.05 0.16 50.00 312.50
6 Madhada
30.16 94800 1250.00 161.7
6
1017710 6291.48 22.56 19350.0
0
857.71
7 Magharvada 94.68 283750 750.00 33.76 128800.00 3815.16 3.12 2860.00 916.66
8 Manekvada 55.60 346800 0.00 19.12 84000.00 2510.00 0.48 300.00 625.00
9 Pasvadiya 55.60 246800 0.00 19.12 87000.00 3510.00 0.56 400.00 457.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 37 -

3.1.4 Livestock:
The village has 298 cows, 659buffaloes, 445 bullocks, 113 goats and 123 sheep and other 393. Majority of rabari community depends on goat
and sheep rearing for their livelihood and other community depends on animal husbandry. Cows and buffaloes are local breed. Lack of rain and
surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. So Milk production is low and there is no dairy cooperative in the
village.
Table no. 18: Livestock
Sr.
No
Village Buffalo Cow
Total Milk
(Buffalo+C
ow]
Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others
No Milk No Milk No Milk
1 Agatray 579 3474 663 3978 7452 248 744 67 - - 25
2 Badodar 456 3192 323 1938 5130 - 250 - - 23
3 Dervan 213 1491 810 5670 7161 155 620 3 - - -
4 Handala 452 2712 270 1890 4602 104 432 - - - 14
5 Jonpur 326 2282 201 1206 3488 134 402 - - - -
6 Madhada 141 846 449 2694 7028 9 38 - - - 36
7 Magharvada 601 4207 340 2040 6247 160 640 - - - 15
8 Manekvada 408 2856 1326 9282 12138 84 336 791 - - 127
9 Pasvadiya 115 690 66 462 1152 5 23 - - - 21
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 38 -

Table no. 19: Drinking water
Sr.No Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality
1 Agatray 25 well 8 -
2
Badodar
22 Pipe connection 9 Beater
3 Dervan 25 well - Beater
4 Handala 20 Pipe connection 12 Good
5 Jonpur 21 Pipe connection 12 Good
6 Madhada 18 Pipe connection 12 Good
7 Magharvada 20 Pipe connection 12 Good
8 Manekvada 22 Pipe connection 12 Good
9 Pasvadiya 24 Pipe connection 12 Good
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 39 -

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources
Total Area (ha)
Area owned/ In possession of
Area available for treatment (ha)
SR.
No.
Names of
the project
CPR Particulars
Pvt.
persons
Govt.
(specify
PRI
Any other
(Pl. Specify)
Pvt.
persons
Govt.
(specify
PRI
Any other
(Pl. Specify)
deptt.)
deptt.)
IWMP-9
kESHOD
Wasteland/ degraded land - 662.58 - - - - - -
Pastures - - 690.15 - - - 150.00 -
Orchards - - - - - - - -
Village Woodlot - - - - - - - -
Forest - - - - - - - -
Village Ponds/ Tanks - 49.59 - - - - - -
Community Buildings - - - - - - - -
Weekly Markets - - - - - - - -
Permanent markets - - - - - - - -
Temples/ Places of worship - - - - - - - -
Others (Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -
-
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 40 -

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile
3.2.1 Demographic Status:
IWMP-9 kESHOD Cluster watershed project has a total of 1306 households with a population of 6705 (as per base-line survey) out of them 3488
are male and 3217 female .The sex ratio is 914 female per 1000 male. There are 505 BPL families. The average family size is 5. The literacy rate is
32.50 per cent with 36.23 per cent male literacy rate (of total male population) and 29.20 per cent female literacy rate (of total female population).
The major castes in the village are Koli, Patel, Prajapati, Darbar, Ahir, Brahmin, Bavaji, Rabari, Schedule Caste and Ismaily communities. Majority of
population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.
Table no. 21: Demographic information
Sr.N
o
Village Population SC ST
Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %
1 Agatray 5099 2655 2444 827 427 400 18 - - - -
2 Badodar 2186 1022 1164 258 127 131 24 - - - -
3 Dervan 580 312 267 75 37 38 11 - - - -
4 Handala 1492 778 714 219 117 102 26 - - - -
5 Madhada 749 398 351 150 82 68 16 - - - -
6 Magharvada 1837 226 202 0 0 0 13 - - - -
7 Manekvada 3418 1754 1664 382 197 185 27 - - - -
8 Pasvadiya 350 175 175 74 43 31 13 - - - -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 41 -

Table no. 22: Lietracy rank
Sr.No Village Literacy Literacy % above
age 14
Total % Male % Female %
Literacy %
below age 14
1 Agatray 61.33 47 70.09 54 51.80 48 - -
2 Badodar 47.94 58 57.17 26 42.84 68 - -
3 Dervan 64.83 64 75.72 35 52.06 59 - -
4 Handala 69.44 49 78.53 64 59.52 57 - -
5 Jonpur 57.38 68 66.05 58 48.13 62 - -
6 Madhada 53.43 59 64.82 54 40.74 53 - -
7 Magharvada 62.44 47 70.85 56 53.00 61 - -
8 Manekvada 59.82 49 68.87 45 50.30 54 - -
9 Pasvadiya 62.57 65 69.14 65 56.00 63 - -
3.2.2 Migration Pattern:
People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Surat, Junagadh, Amreli and Suarashtra as daily wagers, agricultural
labours, construction workers and diamond polishing. Lack of fodder and grazing land for smaller ruminant is also one of the reasons for the
migration.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 42 -

Table no. 23: Migration details
Sr.No Village Total
population
Migration
Total Male Female Up to 3
months
Migration by months
3-6 months More than 6
months
Main reason
for migration
Income during
migration /
month
1 Agatray 5099 255 100 155 - - - - -
2 Badodar 2186 109 50 59 - - -
3 Dervan 580 29 15 10 - - -
4 Handala 1492 75 40 35 - - -
5 Madhada 749 58 38 20 - - -
6 Magharvada 1837 35 20 15 - - -
7 Manekvada 3418 92 50 42 - - -
8 Pasvadiya 350 15 10 5 - - -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 43 -

Table no. 24: Poverty
Sr.No Village Total Household BPL %ofBPLHH Total Land less HH % of land less HH
0-16 16-20 Total
1 Agatray 1067 42 182 224 39 39 -
2 Badodar 429 21 85 106 46 46 -
3 Dervan 350 25 41 66 30 30 -
4 Handala 330 1 13 14 10 10 -
5 Jonpur 250 24 18 42 24 24 -
6 Madhada 200 4 12 16 27 27 -
7 Magharvada 629 28 84 112 23 23 -
8 Manekvada 800 38 92 130 13 13 -
9 Pasvadiya 60 4 5 9 21 21 -
3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities:
IWMP-9 watershed area is well connected with kESHOD Taluka with pucca roads. The village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram
Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 75 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. IWMP-II Talala Cluster project
area has a primary school with all facilities like personal computers. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to Talala
village which is about 7 to 18 kilometers away. This also contributes to lower education level of the people.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 44 -

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure
Sr.N
o
Village
Pucca
road to
the
village
(Y/N)
Schools
LP UP HS
Colleges
(Number
)
Post Office
(Distance
in kms)
Banks
(Number
)
Distance
from
nearest
market
yard
Milk
collection
centre
(Number)
Milk
cooperative
(Number)
Other
cooperativ
es /CBIs
(Number)
Any other
institutio
n
1 Agatray Y 4 1 1 0 0km 1 4 KM 1 1 - -
2 Badodar Y 3 1 1 0 0km 0 12 KM 1 1 - -
3 Dervan Y 2 1 0 0 3km 0 11 KM 1 1 - -
4 Handala Y 2 1 0 0 11km 0 11 KM 1 1 - -
5 Jonpur Y 2 1 0 0 0km 0 15 KM 1 1 - -
6 Madhada Y 2 1 0 0 2km 0 17 KM 1 1 - -
7 Magharvada Y 2 1 0 0 0km 0 9 KM 1 1 - -
8 Manekvada Y 3 1 1 0 0km 0 9 KM 1 1 - -
9 Pasvadiya Y 1 0 1 0 3km 0 8 KM 1 1 - -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 45 -

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets
Sr.N
o
Village HHs with
electricity
HHs with
safety
latrines
HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with
TV set
Landline Mobile 2 -wheeler 4-
wheeler
HHs with
cooking
gas
HHs with
Drinking
water
HHs
with
freedge
1 Agatray 615 615 15 412 68 12 321 54 600 5
2 Badodar 366 366 6 203 69 4 102 45 302 9
3 Dervan 86 86 4 54 65 2 57 12 80 14
4 Handala 260 260 7 204 67 3 68 36 58 16
5 Madhada 237 237 7 206 36 4 56 23 34 18
6 Magharvada 602 602 9 147 28 5 23 4 200 9
7 Manekvada 72 72 8 60 26 7 16 6 546 12
8 Pasvadiya 70 70 12 30 16 2 10 8 80 14
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 46 -

3.2 Livelihood pattern :
Table no. 27: Per Year Income
Sr.No Village Agriculture ( in Rs.) Animal husbandry
( in Rs.)
Casual labour
( in Rs.)
Others(Services
& Business) ( in
Total( in Rs.)
1 Agatray 25.53 58.60 98.47 23.29 25.18
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Badodar
Dervan
Handala
Jonpur
Madhada
Magharvada
Manekvada
Pasvadiya
20.06 22.75 19.64 80.00 11.50
64.30 14.90 64.20 24.00 55.10
61.08 10.30 43.00 23.00 45.00
34.53 64.60 37.47 20.29 24.18
24.06 24.75 20.64 40.00 41.50
67.30 16.90 31.20 24.00 68.10
57.08 2030 12.00 57.00 65.00
26.53 12.60 7.47 10.29 8.18
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 47 -

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR
Sr.No
Village
Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2
Benefit type
2
% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income
Total
income
1 Agatray - - - - - - -
2 Badodar - - - - - - -
3 Dervan
4 Handala
5
Jonpur
6 Madhada
-
-
-
-
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
7
Magharvada
-
- - - - - -
8
Manekvada
-
- - - - - -
9
Pasvadiya
-
- - - - - -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 48 -

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)
Sr.No
Village
Total
workforce
Agriculture
Animal
husbandry
(AH)
Agriculture
+ AH
Agriculture/
Casual
labour
Services
Handicraft/
Business
Others
1 Agatray
615 315 6 315 150 56 24 56
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Badodar
Dervan
Handala
Madhada
Magharvada
Manekvada
Pasvadiya
366 166 23 166 59 8 0 12
86
46 6 46 20 6 3 12
260 160 4 68 23 7 1 46
237 137 4 50 50 9 12 47
234 245 21 54 87 26 4 78
435 235 14 235 56 47 5 58
70
40 10 23 12 6 2 16
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 49 -

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World:
“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of
land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”
Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for IWMP-9 kESHOD Cluster), Some data collect for Krushi university junagadh. The results
indicate that IWMP-9 kESHOD Cluster has very low productivity compared to world, India, Gujarat and Junagadh. The productivity is low not only
because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of irrigation, and irregularly of
rain.
The Junagadh area comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow high
value crops like Groundnut, wheat, Cotton and Vegetable’s etc. In case of low rainfall they go for black gram, sorghum and sesame. So we can say that
monsoon decides cropping patterns of IWMP-II Talala Cluster area.
Comparative Productivity of Groundnut, IWMP-9
The world productivity of Groundnuts is 1550 Kg/ha. In India. It is grown in about 65.90 lakh ha. With a production of 96.15 lakh tones and
productivity of 1459 kg./ha. Gujarat alone produced about 25% of the total Groundnut of our country from 50% of the area with a record productivity
of about 1776 kg/ha. Junagadh district has very good productivity 1806 kg /ha. The IWMP-II Talala Cluster project area has only 1420 kg/ha
productivity. It is very low compare to district, State, India and world.
Comparative Productivity of Wheat, IWMP-9
The world productivity of Wheat is 2760 Kg/ha. in India. It is g rown in about 2,80,40,000 ha. With a production of 7,85,68,000 lakh
tones and productivity of 2802 kg. /ha. In Gujarat productivity of wheat about 3013 kg/ha. Junagadh district has very good productivity 4225 kg
/ha. The IWMP-II Talala Cluster project area has only 3282 kg/ha productivity. It is very high compare to State, India and world, but it is lower than
the district level.
The IWMP-9 kESHOD Cluster project area
The IWMP-9 kESHOD Cluster project area has low productivity because of the following reasons:
i. Totally dependence on monsoon:
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 50 -

IWMP-9 kESHOD area is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 100%
of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of
agriculture production.
ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:
Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many times they
don’t get fertilizer at the right time.
iii) Traditional farming methods:
Traditional farming methods lead low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as
multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low
productivity.
iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery:
Even today large number of farmers in IWMP-II Talala Cluster project area use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate
machinery like seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.
v) Lack of finances for farmers:
In IWMP-II talala project area most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds,
machinery and other inputs.
vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:
Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land
productivity. In IWMP-II Talala Cluster project area, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful
in irrigated condition. But in IWMP-II Talala Cluster project area 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In IWMP-II Talala Cluster project a rea
mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.
vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:
5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders at
the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 51 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 52 -

Watershed Activities
As a strategy Watershed management has been adopted by Government of India , especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These
regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of
migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The
common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
4.1. Scientific Planning:
i) Cluster Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The IWMP-II Talala Cluster
Project consists of 11 micro- watersheds namely 5G1D3a2P,5G1D3a2n,5G1D3a2I,5G1D3a3a,5G1D3a2m, 5G1D3a2p,5G1D3a2n,
5G1D3b24,5G1D3b25,5G1D3a3F,5G1D3a3F as their respective codes. Further IWMP-II Talala Cluster watershed project is in continuation with other
watershed projects namely Chitravad, Chitrod, Bhalchhel and Hiranvel Projects this gives an element of continuation of the programme.
ii) Base line Survey
To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any
intervention during and posts implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved household
census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from WDT Staff. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which
was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave the details of the demographic profile of the village, the litreacy
percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the
cattle and various schemes running and their benefits. Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the
village. It included the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the
field.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 53 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 54 -

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the program me.
This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while
planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a
complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to
understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the
complicated questionnaires.
• Social Map:
Social Map is different from other regular maps in significant ways. For one, it is made by local people and not by experts. For another, it is not
drawn to scale. It depicts what the local people believe to be relevant and important for them.
The chief feature of a social map is that it is a big help in developing a broad understanding of the various facets of social reality, viz., social
stratification, demographics, settlement patterns, social infrastructure, etc.
The map neatly depicts the lanes, sub-lanes, school, railway track, temple, post-office, well, community hall, etc. in the village. In addition, using
different symbols, it provides house hold-wise details on the educational status of children both by age and by gender.
• Resource Map :
Resource map is one of the most commonly used PRA methods next to social map. While the social map focuses on habitation, community
facilities, roads, temples, etc., the resource map focuses on the natural resources in the locality and depicts land, rivers, fields, vegetation, etc. A
resource map may cover habitation as well.
A resource map in PRA is not drawn to scale. It is not done by the local people. The local people are considered to have an in depth knowledge of
the surroundings where they have survived for a long time.
o
o
o
Topography, terrain and slops
Forest, vegetation and tree species
Land and land use, command area, tenure, boundaries and ownership
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 55 -

o
o
Water, water bodies, irrigation sources, rivers and drainage
Agricultural development, cropping pattern, productivity, etc.
Resource maps have been found specially useful because they provide a focused spatial structure for discussion and analysis. They help to create
a common understanding amongst the participants as well as a baseline for monitoring and evaluation.
The mapping was followed by a detailed discussion on the present status of natural resources in the village, in which the problems and impact of
the structures were brought up.
The resource map helped them realize that the mismanagement of natural resources and the neglect of traditional water harvesting structures
had led to a perennial drought like situation in their village.
• Daily Activity Chart:
Daily activity schedule also referred to as daily schedule, daily activity profile, daily routine and 24-hour method, is a popular PRA method
used to explore the activities of an individual, group or community, on a daily basis. This method forms part of the family of temporal PRA methods.
In seasonal diagrams the temporal analysis is done on a seasonal or monthly basis, while in daily activity schedule the basis of temporal
analysis is hours or periods of the day. It depicts not only the various activities but also the duration of those activities. Its visual nature makes it an
attractive method.
Daily activity schedule has been used to:
o
o
o
Enhance an understanding of who does what, when and for how long, in the community.
Increase gender sensation, and create an awareness about who is responsible for what activities in the community and why
Finalise timings of interventions, e.g., training classes, ltr.acy classes, on-formal education, etc. for the target group, based on their
convenience and availability of leisure.
Preference Chart :
Preference chart during by village people they have ranked their preference for a number of different income generating activities.
Preference chart is detailed what is requirement of village people. the village people identified their own, criteria including the amount of time
required by the activity and the level of profit possible.
Growth the village people skill.
• What activity gives the maximum income in short production time?
• How many required material and man power.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 56 -

iv)
Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning
Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.
a) Prioritization
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil,
BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage according to
the DOLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.
b) Planning
An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil
Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each
and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a
scale of 1:5000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures.
c) Hydrological modeling
Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and Flow accumulation. This model overlaid
over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which
generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 57 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 58 -

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects
S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used
(A) Planning
Cluster approach
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the
Institute
Baseline survey
Hydro-geological survey
Contour mapping
Participatory Net Planning (PNP)
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover
Ridge to Valley treatment
Online IT connectivity between
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes
(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes
Availability of GIS layers
1. Cadastral map Yes
2. Village boundaries Yes
3. Drainage Yes
4. Soil (Soil nutrient status)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 59 -

5. Land use Yes
6. Ground water status Yes
7. Watershed boundaries Yes
8. Activity Yes
Crop simulation models #
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil
nutrient analysis
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#
Weather Station
(B) Inputs
1. Bio-pesticides
2. Organic manures Yes
3. Vermicompost Yes
4. Bio-fertilizer Yes
5. Water saving devices
6. Mechanized tools/ implements
7. Bio-fencing Yes
8. Nutrient budgeting
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers
Any other (please specify)
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 60 -

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area
Sr. No.
Name of the PRA
Activity / FGD
Date
Number of
people
present
Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation
1
Transect walk and
Social mapping
Agatray
30/09/2011 106
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm land,Improper
Crop Rotation, Less cultivation of vegetables, Low milk production and rearing of non
descript breeds, Migration, Drinking Water
2
Transect walk and
Social mapping
Badodar
29/09/2011 59
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm land,Improper
Crop Rotation, Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds, Migration,
Drinking Water
3
Transect walk and
Social mapping
Dervan
03/10/2011 61
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm land,Improper
Crop Rotation, Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds, Migration,
Drinking Water
4
Transect walk and
Social mapping
Handala
27/09/2011 49
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm land,Improper
Crop Rotation, Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds, Migration,
Drinking Water
5
Jo Transect walk
and Social mapping
npur
05/10/2011 51
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm land,Improper
Crop Rotation, Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds, Migration,
Drinking Water
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 61 -

6
Transect walk and
Social mapping
Madhada
13/10/2011 43
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm land,Improper
Crop Rotation, Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds, Migration,
Drinking Water
7
Transect walk and
Social mapping
Magharvada
2/1/2012 61
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm
land,Improper Crop Rotation, Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds,
Migration, Drinking Water
8
Transect walk and
Social mapping
Manekvada
26/09/2011 67
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm
land,Improper Crop Rotation, Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds,
Migration, Drinking Water
9
Transect walk and
Social mapping
Pasvadiya
04/10/2011 31
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity,Soil Erosion from farm
land,Improper Crop Rotation, Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds,
Migration, Drinking Water
Total 528
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 62 -

Lessons learnt and Problem Analysis
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 63 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 64 -

4.2 Institution building
1. 4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC)
It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This
committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the
secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in IWMP- 2 talala project area. Since the watershed has only
one village so no separate watershed sub-committee was formed in the village. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by
WDT.
The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 65 -

Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details For Agatray
Date of
Sl.
N
o.
Names of
WC
Registrat
ion as a
Society
(dd/mm
Name
Designation
M
/F
SC ST SF MF LF
UG SHG GP
Landless
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
/ yyyy)
1
Khambhala Devabhai R. President - - Y B,E
2 Hingora Bhikhubhai K. Secretary - - A
3 Chatrada Kanchanben D. Member - - Y A
4 Gohel Bharatibem L. Member Y - Y H
5 Maradiya Manjuben D. Member Y - Y B
6
Watershed Under
committee progress
Pramar Anjanaben B. Member - Y Y H
7 Solki Nirmalaben D. Member - - Y G
8 Maradiya Vallbhabhai D. W D T - - B,E
9 Maradiya Jasuben C. Member - - Y C,F
10 Medhanathi Tarungiri K. Member Y - Y Y E,D
11 Zala Piyush S. Member - - Y I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 66 -

Table no. 32.2: Watershed Committee details For Badodar
Sl.
No.
Names of
WCs
Date of
Registration as a
Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Name
Designation M/F SC SF MF LF
UG SHG GP
Any
other
Landless
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1
Sutar Anilbhai
A.
President Y Y B,E
2
Maida
Gigabhai K.
Secretary Y A
3
Maida
Kanabhai P.
Member Y Y A
4
Radhod
Sumitraben
M.
Member
Y
H
5
Makavana
Manojbhai M.
Member
Y Y B
6
Water shed
committee
Under progress
Madhak
ashokbhai B.
Member
Y Y H
7
Mehta
Manishaben
D.
Member
Y
G
8
Makvana
Varshaben S.
WDT
B,E
9
Memdani
Rasidaben K.
Member
Y
C,F
10
Madhak
Varshaben V.
Member
Y
E,D
11
Sojitra
Diptiben D.
Member
Y
I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 67 -

Table no. 32.3: Watershed Committee details For Deravan
Sl.
No
.
Names of
WCs
Date of
Registrat
ion as a
Society
(dd/mm
/ yyyy)
Name
Designation
M/
F
SC SF MF LF
Land
-less
UG
SH
G
GP
Any
other
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1
Bakotra Karasanbhai D. President M Y Y B,E
2 Bakotra Rameshbhai N Secretary M A
3
bakotra Najabhai M.
Member M Y Y Y A
4 Bakotra Dilipbhai V. Member F Y Y Y H
5
6
Water shed
committee
Under
progress
Dhula Kanabhai P.
Bakotra Rasilaben D.
Member
Member
M
F
Y Y
Y
Y B
H
7 Bakotra Amarben V. Member M Y Y G
8 Dhula Raideben A. W D T M - - B,E
9 Bakotra Shobhanaben R. Member M Y Y C,F
10 Bakotra Jayaben M. Member M Y Y E,D
11 Sojitra Diptiben D. Member F Y Y I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 68 -

Table no.32.4: Watershed Committee details For Handala
Sl.
N
o.
Names of
WCs
Date of
Registrat
ion as a
Society
(dd/mm
/ yyyy)
Name
Designation M/F SC SF MF LF
Land
-less
UG
SH
G
GP
Any
other
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1
Boricha Devabhai K. President M Y B,E
2 Boricha Dilipbhai J. Secretary M A
3 Baretha Bavabhai M. Member F Y Y H
4 Bhit Rambhai J. Member F Y Y B
5 Karetha Mendbhai D. Member M Y Y H
Water shed Under
6 Zala Manjuben T. Member F Y G
committee progress
7 Zala Jagrutiben H. Member M Y C,F
8 Devdiya Muktaben B. WDT F B,E
9 Tharasenda Ramaben B. Member M Y E,D
10 Jadvbhai Naranbhai V. Member M Y I,G
11 Sojitra Diptiben D Member M Y I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 69 -

TABLE NO. 32.5: WATERSHED COMMITTEE DETAILS JONPUR
Sl.
No.
Names of
WCs
Date of Registration
as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Name
Designation M/F SC SF MF LF
UG SHG GP
Any
other
Landless
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1
2
3
4
Jiladiya
Devdanbhai
M.
Vadasariya
Amirbhai H.
Solki Somabhai
P.
Jiladiya
Purbaibhai N.
President M Y Y B,E
Secretary M A
Member M Y A
Member F Y Y H
5 Solki Jiviben j. Member M Y B
6
7
8
9
10
Water shed
committee
Under progress
Jariya
rajiyaben A.
Dal Somiben
D.
Rada
Merambhai L.
Solki Kantaben
N.
Makvana
Laxmanbhai A
Member F Y Y H
Member F Y Y G
WDT M B,E
Member M Y C,F
Member F Y E,D
11 Member M Y I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 70 -

TABLE NO. 32.6: WATERSHED COMMITTEE DETAILS MADHADA
Sl.
No.
Names of
WCs
Date of
Registration as a
Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Name
Designati
on
M/F SC
SF MF LF
UG SHG GP
Any
other
Landless
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1
Bandhiya
Bhimasibhai J.
President M Y Y B,E
2 Rathod Ajaybhai G. Secretary M A
3 Hojada Jitubhai k. Member M Y A
4 Mod Keshubhai J. Member F Y Y H
5
Rathod Hamirbhai
P.
Member M Y B
6
Water shed
committee
Under progress
Jogiya
Jyoshanaben L.
Member F Y Y H
7 Jogal Rekhaben k. Member F Y Y G
8 Gal Ramiben D. WDT M B,E
9
Dve
Krushnkantbhai C.
Member M Y C,F
10
Pithiya
v.
Hansaben
Member F Y E,D
11 Zala Piyush S. Member M Y I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 71 -

TABLE NO. 32.7: WATERSHED COMMITTEE DETAILS MAGHARVADA
Sl.
No.
Names of
WCs
Date of Registration as
a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Name
Designation M/F SC SF MF LF
Landless
UG SHG GP
Any
other
Educa-tional
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1
Jlu
A.
Bhartbhai
President M Y Y B,E
2 Jalu Sagarbhai Secretary M A
3
Herbha
Kuvarben V.
Member M Y A
4
Herabha
Rajbeben J.
Member F Y Y H
5
Dhula
Vanitaben V .
Member M Y B
6
Water shed
committee
Under progress
Dhula
Punjaben V.
Member F Y Y H
7
chohan
Chetanbhai N.
Member F Y Y G
8
Dangar
Dineshbhai H.
WDT M B,E
9
Bharaaathi
Manisha J.
Member M Y C,F
10
Bharthi
Mitalben M.
Member F Y E,D
11
Sojitra
Diptiben D
Member M Y I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 72 -

TABLE NO. 32.8: WATERSHED COMMITTEE DETAILS MANEKVADA
Sl.
No.
Names of
WCs
Date of Registration
as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Name
Designation M/F SC SF MF LF
UG SHG GP
Any
other
Landless
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1
Chavda
Raydhanbhai M.
President M Y Y B,E
2
Kuvadiya
Rambhai P.
Secretary M A
3
Oledara
Nathabhai A.
Member M Y A
4
Makavana
Bodhabhai K.
Member F Y Y H
5
6
Water shed
committee
Under progress
Muchhadiya
Maiyabhai R.
Muchhadiya
Devabhai M.
Member M Y B
Member F Y Y H
7
Makavana
Pravinaben B.
Member F Y Y G
8
Kangad
Hirabaiben B.
WDT M B,E
9
Myatra
Ramaben B.
Member M Y C,F
10
Kuvadiya
Hansaben J
Member F Y E,D
11 Pintuben Member M Y I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 73 -

Table no. 32.9: Watershed Committee details Pasvadiya
Sl.
No.
Names of
WCs
Date of Registration as
a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Name
Designation M/F SC SF MF LF
Landless
UG SHG GP
Any
other
Educa-tional
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1
Rayjada
R.
Kiritsih
President M Y Y B,E
2
3
Raijada
SiDharajsih R.
Ravaliya Kajlben
U.
Secretary M A
Member M Y A
4 Dinani Asaraf H. Member F Y Y H
5
Gohel Manjuben
R.
Member M Y B
6
Pasavadiya
Under progress
Dhebar
Kuvarben K.
Member F Y Y H
7
Ravaliya
Maideben D.
Member F Y Y G
8
Ravaliya Ukabhai
R.
WDT M B,E
9
Rayjada
Dilipbhai D.
Member M Y C,F
10
Vadasriya
Bahadurbhai M.
Member F Y E,D
11 Zala Piyush S. Member M Y I,G
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 74 -

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments
E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed
I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).
4.2.2 Self Help Group
Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self-help group initiatives for
Mel and women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self-help groups include landless and poor men and women.
Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the men and women, which came up
with the following observations:
a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.
b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders
c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people
d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.
It was planned to have some capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which
will promote men and women empowerment.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 75 -

Table no. 33 : SHG details
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members
S.
No. Name of village With only With only With
Men
Women both
No. of SC/ST in each
category
No. of BPL in each
category
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
(i) Landless 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
Agatray
1 0 0 1
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 17 5 22 17 5 22 0 0 0
2
Magharvada
3 0 1 4
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
0 2 0 2
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 22 0 22 0 0 0
Pasvadiya
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
Badodar
1 1 0 2
(i) Landless 11 11 22 0 0 0 0 1 1
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 76 -

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 11 0 11 11 0 11 0 0 0
5
Dervan
1 0 0 1
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 33 22 55 32 14 46 1 8 9
6
1 0 4 5
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Handala
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7
Jonpur
1 1 0 2
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 11 11 22 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
8
Madhada
0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 77 -

(i) Landless 19 8 27 2 0 2 3 0 3
9
40 1 0 5
(ii) SF 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 9 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Manekvada
(iv) LF 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
4.2.3 USER GROUP:
User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the program on a long term basis. The user group collects
user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.
It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community Spirit.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 78 -

able no. 34 : UG detail
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members
S.
No. Name of village With only With only With
Men
Women both
No. of SC/ST in each
category
No. of BPL in each
category
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
(i) Landless 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
Agatray
1 0 0 1
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 17 5 22 17 5 22 0 0 0
2
Magharvada
3 0 1 4
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
0 2 0 2
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 22 0 22 0 0 0
Pasvadiya
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Badodar 1 1 0 2 (i) Landless 11 11 22 0 0 0 0 1 1
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 79 -

(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 11 0 11 11 0 11 0 0 0
5
Dervan
1 0 0 1
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 33 22 55 32 14 46 1 8 9
6
1 0 4 5
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Handala
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7
Jonpur
1 1 0 2
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 11 11 22 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Madhada 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 80 -

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(i) Landless 19 8 27 2 0 2 3 0 3
9
40 1 0 5
(ii) SF 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 9 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Manekvada
(iv) LF 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMp- 9 Keshod Cluster project area
4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)
EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally,
certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed
Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 24,10,536 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity,
which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was
conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should
be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 81 -

Table No. 35.1: Some of the major activities proposed in Agatray are
Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked for
EPA
Estimated Cost
( In lakhs)
Renovetion of protection wall 8.66 1.89
Agatray
New protection wall
2.00
Total 8.66 3.89
Table No. 35.2: Some of the major activities proposed in Magharvada are:
Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked for
EPA
Estimated Cost
( In lakhs)
Tar Fencing Around Cemetry 3.70 0.75
Magharvada
Causway cum checkdam
2.95
Total 3.70 3.70
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 82 -

Table No. 35.3: Some of the major activities proposed in Pasvadiya are:
Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked
for EPA
Estimated Cost
( In lakhs)
Pasvadiya
Renovation of cemetry 1.09 0.30
Pipe line in village 0.50
Total 1.09 0.80
Table No. 35.4: Some of the major activities proposed in Badodar are:
Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked for
EPA
Estimated Cost
( In lakhs)
Badodar
1)Renovation of old well 5.13 0.55
2)Causway cum checkdam 4.58
Total 5.13 5.13
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 83 -

Table No. 35.5: Some of the major activities proposed in Dervan are:
Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked
for EPA
Estimated Cost
( In lakhs)
Deravan
Over Head tan 2.35 2.35
Total 2.35 2.35
Table No. 35.6: Some of the major activities proposed in Handala are:
Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked
for EPA
Estimated Cost
( In lakhs)
Handala
Causway cum checkdam 4.36 4.36
Total 4.36 4.36
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 84 -

Table No. 35.7: Some of the major activities proposed in Madhda are:
Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked
for EPA
Estimated Cost
( In lakhs)
Mdhada
Causway cum checkdam
2.30
2.30
Total 2.30 2.30
Table No. 35.8: Some of the major activities proposed in Manekvada are:
Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked
for EPA
Estimated Cost
( In lakhs)
Manekvada
Dranage line 4.35 4.35
Total
4.35
4.35
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 85 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 86 -

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:
Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach should
be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work.
Ridge Area Treatment Plans:
It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in IWMP-
II Talala Cluster watershed. For the ridge area treatment of IWMP-II Talala Cluster watershed following structure are been Proposed after interaction
between the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest.
Stone Bandingand with tree Plantation
1. 2. Grass seeding
Stone Bunding
A bund constructed out of stone along the contour or across the stream is called as stone wall. It is adopted where the water velocity is high and
where basically stone of radius 100-150 mm is available. It helps in:
• Control of erosion by reducing the slope of the cultivated land
• Increasing the infiltration of rainwater
Main advantages as compared to the normal contour banding in IWMP-9 Keshod Cluster Project are:
• IWMP-II has much steeper slopes
• The region has shallow soil depth.
• It is a more permanent structure if well maintained
• It is self – stabilizing
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 87 -

Slope treatment:
The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This generally includes water
conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labour intensive, will involve more of manual labour; so, funds from National Rural
Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken.
Following structures are been proposed in these areas
a. Earthen Bund
b. Waste Weir
c. Afforestation
Table no.36.1: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works-Agatray
Type of treatment
Type of land
Executing
agency
Target
SR.
No.
Name
of the
Village
Name
of
Activity
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line (D)
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Com
munity
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)Others
(pvt.
Person)
(iv)WC
No. of
units
(No./
cum./
rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
M W O T
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
Land
leveling
Farm
bund
- - L P - - Other 50 ha - - - 10.00 -
- - L P - - Other 8500Rmt - - - 17.00 -
TOTAL 27.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 88 -

Table no.36.2: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works-Badodar
Type of treatment
Type of land
Executing
agency
Target
SR.
No.
Name
of the
Village
Name
of
Activity
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line (D)
(iii)Land
dev. (L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)
Others
(privete
person)
(iv)WC
No. of
units
(No./
cum./rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
M W O T
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
1 Badodar Farm
bund
Land
leveling
- - L P - - Other 4200 rmt - - - 8.00 -
- - L P - - Other 25 ha - - - 5.00 -
TOTAL 13.00
Table no.36.3 Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works-Dervan
Type of treatment
Type of land
Executing
agency
Target
SR.
No.
Name
of the
Village
Name
of
Activity
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line
(D)
(iii)
Landdev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)Others
(privete
person)
(iv)WC
No. of
Units
(No./
cum./
rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
M W O T
Expected
month
& year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
1 Dervan Farm
bund
- - L P - - Other 400
rmt
- - - 8.00 -
TOTAL 8.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 89 -

Table no 36.4: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works-Handala
SR.
No.
Name
of the
Village
Name
of
Activity
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line (D)
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)Others
(privete
person)
(iv)WC
Target
No. of
Units
(No./cum.
/rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
M W O T
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
1 Handala Waste
weir
pond
Land
leveling
Farm
bund
- - L P - - Other 1 - - - 3.00 -
- - L P - - Other 125.00ha - - - 5.00 -
- - L P - - Other 5555rmt - - - 11.00
TOTAL 10.87
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 90 -

Table no 36.5: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works-Madhada
SR.
No.
Name of
the
Village
Name
of
Activity
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line (D)
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)Others
(privete
person)
(iv)WC
Target
No. of
Units
(No./cum.
/rmt)
Estimated
cost (Rs. in
lakh)
M W O T
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
1 Madhada - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL -
Table no 36.6 Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works-Magharvada
SR.
No.
Name of
the Village
Name
of
Activity
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line (D)
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)Others
(privete
person)
(iv)WC
Target
No. of
Units
(No./cum.
/rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
M W O T
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
1 Magharvada Waste
weir
pond
- - L P - - Other 81 - - - 2.00
TOTAL 2.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 91 -

Table no 36.7: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works-Manekvada
SR.
No.
Name of
the Village
Manekvada
Name
of
Activity
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line (D)
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)Others
(privete
person)
(iv)WC
Target
No. of
Units
(No./cum.
/rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
M W O T
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
Land
leveling
- - L P - - Other 83 ha - - - 10.00 -
Farm
bund
- - L P - - Other 45000rmt - - - 9.16
TOTAL 19.16
Table no 36.8: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works-Pasvadiya
SR.
No.
Name of
the
Village
Name
of
Activity
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line (D)
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)Others
(privete
person)
(iv)WC
Target
No. of
Units
(No./cum.
/rmt)
Estimated
cost (Rs. in
lakh)
M W O T
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
1 Pasvadiya - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 92 -

Table no. 36.6: Technical Details of Farm Bund
SR. No. Particulars Value Unit
1 Bund Length 20.00 M.
2 Proposed Area(area of farm) 250.00 Ha.
3 Total Bund Length For Proposed Area 7000.00 M.
4 Top Width 0.50 M.
5 Side Slope 1:1
6 Height 1.00 M.
7 Base Width 1.50 M.
8 Cross-Section of Farm bund 1.00 SqM.
Table no 36.7: Quantity Excavation for Farm bund
SR.
No.
Description Unit Quantity
1 Earth Work
Construction of Farm bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking of clods, separating leaves and
small stones, dressing and compaction with sheep foot roller of hand rammer, upto 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead.
Cum 6825
2 Vegetative Work
Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge M 5975
3 Supply of Stylo/ Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/m in (single line) Kg 28.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 93 -

Table no.37.1: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas- Agatray (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
SR.
No.
name of
the
Village
Type
structures
of
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures
Construction of new structures
Total target
No. Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
Estimated
cost
No. Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(ltr.)
Estimated
cost
1 Agatray Check Dam 0 0 0 0 2 8 6400 7.00 8 6400 7.00
Renovation of
Check dam
Village Pond
Repair
Cause way cum
Check Dam
3 12 9600 5.00 0 0 0 0 12 9600 5.00
1 10 75000 30.00 0 0 0 0 10 75000 30.00
0 0 0 0 10 30 96000 35.00 30 96000 35.00
TOTAL 77.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 94 -

Table no.37.2: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas-Badodar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
SR.
No.
name
of the
Village
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures
Proposed target
Construction of new structures
Total target
No.
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
Estimated
cost
No.
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
1 Badodar Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 8 6400 7.00 8 6400 7.00
Cause way
cum check
dam
Renovation
of Check
dam
0 0 0 0 7 35 24500 31.00 35 245000 31.00
1 4 3200 2.00 0 0 0 0 4 3200 2.00
New Pond 0 0 0 0 1 5 15000 7.10 5 15000 7.10
Renovation
of Pond
1 4 7148 3.7 0 0 0 0 4 7148 3.70
TOTAL 50.8
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 95 -

Table no.37.3 Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas-Dervan (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
SR.
No.
name
of the
Village
Type of
structures
No.
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
No.
Proposed target
Construction of new structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
1 Dervan Check Dam 0 0 0 0 1 4 3200 4.00 4 3200 4.00
Renovation
of dam
Causeway
Causeway
cum check
dam
Renovation
of Pond
1 3 2500 1.50 0 0 0 0 3 2500 1.50
0 0 0 0 1 4 3000 3.50 4 3000 3.50
1 5 12000 11.80 0 0 0 0 5 12000 11.80
TOTAL 20.8
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 96 -

Table no.37.4 Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas-Handala (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
name
of the
Village
Type of
structures
No.
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
No.
Construction of new structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
1 Handala Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 4 3200 2.00 4 3200 2.00
Renovation of
Check dam
Cause way cum
check dam
Village pon
Repair
1 5 4000 3.50 0 0 0 0 5 4000 3.50
0 0 0 0 6 24 20000 22.00 24 20000 22.00
1 3 5000 1.00 0 0 0 0 3 5000 1.00
Village pond 0 0 0 0 2 8 24000 6.10 5 24000 6.10
TOTAL 34.60
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 97 -

Table no.37.7 Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas-Madhada (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
name of
the
Village
Type of
structures
No.
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
No.
Construction of new structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
1 Madhada Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 8 6400 7.00 8 6400 7.00
Cause way
cum check
dam
0 0 0 0 7 21 21000 22.00 21 21000 22.00
TOTAL 29.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 98 -

Table no.37.8 Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas-Magharvada (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
name of
the Village
Type of
structures
No.
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
No.
Construction of new structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Renovation
of Check
dam
2 8 6400 3.00 0 0 0 0 8 6400 3.00
1 Magharvada Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 10 8000 8.00 10 8000 8.00
Cause way
cum check
dam
Village pon
Repair
0 0 0 0 2 6 6400 8.00 6 6400 8.00
1 6 15000 10.00 0 0 0 0 6 15000 10.00
Village pond 0 0 0 0 1 6 15000 10.00 6 15000 10.00
TOTAL 39.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 99 -

Table no.37.8 Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas-Manekvada (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
name of
the Village
Type of
structures
No.
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
No.
Construction of new structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
1 Manekvada Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 5 4000 4.00 5 4000 4.00
Cause way
cum check
dam Repair
Cause way
cum check
dam
Village pon
Repair
3 12 9600 6.00 0 0 0 0 12 9600 6.00
0 0 0 0 4 12 12000 15.00 12 12000 15.00
1 10 20000 15.00 0 0 0 0 10 20000 15.00
TOTAL 40.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 100 -

Table no.37.9 Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas-Pasavadiya(all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
name of
the
Village
Type of
structures
No.
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
No.
Construction of new structures
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Storage
capacity
(Ltr.)
Estimated
cost
1 Pasavadiya Check dam 0 0 0 0 3 12 9600 6.5 12 9600 6.5
Cause way
cum check
dam
Village pon
Repair
Renovation
of Check dam
0 0 0 0 3 9 8000 6.00 9 8000 6.00
1 4 4500 0.77 0 0 0 0 4 4500 0.77
1 3 1500 1.50 0 0 0 0 3 1500 1.5
TOTAL 14.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 101 -

Table no.37.5: Technical Details of Check Dam
SR. No Particulars Value Unit
1 Type of Check Dam CC 1:3:6
2 Length 15 M.
3 Height above the river Bed 2 M.
4 Foundation Depth 1.75 M.
5 Top width 0.60 M.
6 Bottom width 1.00 M.
7 Apron width 3.00 M.
8 Storage Capacity 2250000 lit.
9 Catchment area 0.80 Sq.Km
10 Discharge 12.00 Cmec
11 Type of river Bank Hard strata
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 102 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 103 -

Design of cheak dam:
1. Catchment area=0.5 km 2
2. HFL = 2.50m
3. Length = 15m
4. Height = 1.50m
Calculation:
V = 2R 2/3 2S 1/2 Where: N = Mining’s constant = 0.03
= 23.5 2/3 20.01 ½ R = Height of Flood = 2.5
= 11.41 m/sec S = Slope = 100:1
= 37.46 Feet/sec
Q = 0.8 2 a 2 A 6 Where: a = Constant = 29.0402
= 0.8 229.0402 2 0.5 0.9232 b = Constant = 0.9232
= 12.25 cusec A = Catchment area
Length of check dam = 15 m
Top width = 0.552 X
Top Up Height
=0.552 X 2.5
= 0.87 m
= 0.90 m
Bottom width =
Top Up Height
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 104 -

Masonary Density
= 1.72 m
= 1.80 m
Slope start in upstream = 2 2 top width 2
Masonary Density
= 2 2 0.87 2 1.61
= 2.80 m
Upstream slope’s end height = 3.1 2top width 2 Masonary Density
= 3.1 2 0.87 2 2.60
= 3.1 2 .87 2 1.61
= 4.34 m
Upstream projection = Top Width /16
= 0.87/16
= 0.054 m
Discharge passing through the weir:
Q = C 2 L 2 h 3/2 Where: C = Constant = 3.10
= 3.10 2 15 21 3/2 L = Length = 15 m
= 23.25 H = 1 m Head over crest
Which h is greater than SPF 12.25 Ltr..
Hence O.K.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 105 -

Table no.38.1: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas – Agatray (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
Name of
the
Project
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of existing
recharging structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
Construction of new recharging
structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Estimated
cost
Afforestation - - - IN FARMAR 50 5.00 50 5.00
Total for the Project 5.00
Table no.38.2: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas - Badodar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
Name of
the
Project
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of
existing recharging structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Construction of new recharging
structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Estimated
cost
1 Badodar Afforestation - IN FARMAR 27 3.00 27 3.00
Total 3.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 106 -

Table no.38.3: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas – handala (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
Name of
the
Project
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of existing
recharging structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
Construction of new recharging
structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Estimated
cost
1 handala Afforestation - IN FARMAR
Total for the Project 5.07
Table no.38.4: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas – Pasvaliya (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
Name of the
Project
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of existing
recharging structures
Construction of new recharging
structures
Total target
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
1 Pasvaliya - - - - - - - -
Total for the Project
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 107 -

Table no.38.5: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas – Deravan (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
Name of
the
Project
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of existing
recharging structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
Construction of new recharging
structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Estimated
cost
1 Deravan Afforestation - - - IN FARMAR 21 2.00 21 2.00
Total for the Project 2.00
Table no.38.6: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas – Manekvada (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
Name of the
Project
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of existing
recharging structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Construction of new recharging
structures
No.
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Estimated
cost
1 Manekvada Afforestation - IN FARMAR 48 5.00 48 5.00
Total for the Project 5.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 108 -

Table no.38.7: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas – Madharavada (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
Name of the
Project
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of
existing recharging structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Construction of new recharging
structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Estimated
cost
1 Madharavada Afforestation - - - IN FARMAR 32 3.00 32 3.00
Total for the Project 3.00
Table no.38.8: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas – madhada (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
SR.
No.
Name of
the Project
Type of
structures
Augmentation/ repair of existing
recharging structures
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
Construction of new recharging
structures
No.
Area to
be
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Total target
Estimated
cost
1 madhada Afforestation - - - IN FARMAR 9 0.70 9 0.70
Total for the Project 0.70
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 109 -

Table no.39: Details of allied / other activities
Table 39.1 :Details of allied /other activities - Handala
Sr. No
Names of
Villages
Activity to be Carried
out
Unit/
Quantity
Total
Cost (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund
from
IWMP
(Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
Convergence
(Rs. Lakhs)
livelyhood -Micro enterprise Other Activities(19%)
Convergence Scheme
2% Other Activities
1 Handala
Other Activities
Agriculture Development
Dairy Development
Furniture 2.17 1 2.17 0
Sub Total 2.17
Multicrop Thracer
Machine
8% Micro enterprise
2.00 1 2.00 0
Groundnut expellr
machine 4.00 1 4.00 0
Seed Bank 1.17 1 1.17 0
Animal Nutrition
selling unit 1.50 1 1.50 0
Sub Total 8.67
9% livelyhood
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 110 -

Agriculture Development
Dairy Development
Hortryculture
Plantetion
Vermi compost
unit
1.26 55 1.26 0
2.60 13 2.00 0
Orgenic Farming 2.00 4 Ha 2.00 0
Ground nut
,Wheat ,cottan
demo in orgenic
farming
Fooder Bank
0.60 1 0.60 0
1.50 1 1.5
Veterinary Camp 1.80 6 1.80 0
Sub Total 9.76
Total 20.60 20.60
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 111 -

Table 39.2 :Details of allied /other activities – Badodar
Sr.
No
Names of Villages Activity to be Carried out Unit/ Quantity Total Cost (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
IWMP (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
Convergence (Rs.
Lakhs)
Convergence Scheme
Other Activities
2% Other Activities
Senting 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
cloth store 1.17 1 1.17 0
Sub Total 2.17
8% Micro enterprise
Multicrop Thracer
Machine
2.00 1 2.00 0
2 Badodar
Agriculture Development
Seed Bank 1.00 1 1.00 0
Groundnut expellr
machine 4.00 1 4.00 0
Dairy unit 1.40 1 1.40
Dairy Development
Agriculture Development
Animal Nutrition selling
unit 1.86 1 1.86 0
Sub Total 8.40
9% livelyhood
Fooder Bank 2.58 1 2.58 0
Hortryculture Plantetion
1.77 60 1.77 0
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 112 -

Vermi compost unit
Orgenic Farming
2.80 14 2.80 0
2.00 4 Ha 2.00 0
Ground nut ,Wheat
,cottan demo in orgenic
farming
0.60 1 0.60 0
Dairy Development
Veterinary Camp
1.80 6 1.80 0
Sub Total 11.55
Total 20.60 20.60
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 113 -

Table 39.3 :Details of allied /other activities -Handala
Sr. No Names of Villages Activity to be Carried out Unit/ Quantity Total Cost
(Rs. Lakhs)
Fund from
IWMP (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
Convergence (Rs.
Lakhs)
Convergence
Scheme
2% Other Activities
Other Activities
Mandap sarvis 1.60 1 1.6 0
kentin in fast food
1.00 1 1.00 0
8% Micro enterprise
Agro Processing Unit
Orgenic Agro Shop
Groundnut expellr
machine
2.50 1 2.50 0
4.00 1 4.00 0
3 Handala
Multicrop Thracer
Machine
1.86 1 1.86 0
Dairy Development
Agriculture Development
Animal Nutrition
selling unit
Hortryculture
Plantetion
9% livelyhood
2.25 1 2.25 0
2.00 80 2 0
Fooder Bank 2.50 1 2.50 0
Vermi compost unit
4.00 20 4.00 0
Orgenic Farming 1.50 5 Ha 1.50 0
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 114 -

Ground nut ,Wheat
,cottan demo in
orgenic farming
0.35 1 0.35 0
Dairy Development Veterinary Camp 1.60 6 1.6 0
25.16 25.16
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 115 -

Table 39.4:Details of allied /other activities -dervan
Sr. No
Names of
Villages
Activity to be Carried out Unit/ Quantity Total Cost
(Rs. Lakhs)
Fund from
IWMP (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
Convergence (Rs.
Lakhs)
Convergence
Scheme
2% Other Activities
Other Activities Senting 1.46 1 1.46 0
8% Micro enterprise
Agriculture Development
Fooder Bank 1.50 1 1.50 0
Groundnut . Wheat
Seed Bank 2.35 1 2.35 0
Dairy Development
Animal Nutrition
selling unit
2.00 1 2.00 0
9% livelyhood
4 Deravan
Hortryculture
Plantetion
1.00 40 1 0
Vermi compost unit
2.00 10 2.00 0
Agriculture Development
Orgenic Farming 1.37 3 Ha 1.37 0
Dairy Development
Ground nut ,Wheat
,cottan,Onion demo in
orgenic farming
Veterinary Camp
0.60 1 0.60 0
1.60 6 1.6 0
13.88 13.88
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 116 -

Table 39.5 :Details of allied /other activities -Magharvada
Sr. No Names of Villages Activity to be Carried out Unit/ Quantity Total Cost
(Rs. Lakhs)
Fund from
IWMP (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
Convergence (Rs.
Lakhs)
Convergence
Scheme
2% Other Activities
Other Activities Senting 1.93 1 1.93 0
Agriculture Development
Groundnut expellr
machine
Multicrop Thracer
Machine
8% Micro enterprise
4.00 1 4.00 0
1.70 1 1.70 0
5 Magharvada
Dairy Development
Animal Nutrition
selling unit
Fooder Bank
9% livelyhood
2.00 1 2.00 0
2.50 1 2.50 0
Agriculture Development
Vermi compost unit
4.00 20 4.00 0
Ground nut ,Wheat
,cottan demo in
orgenic farming
0.60 1 0.60 0
Dairy Development
Veterinary Camp
1.60 6 1.6 0
18.3 18.3
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 117 -

Table 39.6 :Details of allied /other activities -Madhada
Sr. No Names of Villages Activity to be Carried out Unit/ Quantity Total Cost (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
IWMP (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
Convergence (Rs.
Lakhs)
Convergence
Scheme
2% Other Activities
Other Activities silai Machin 1.15 1 1.15 0
Agriculture Development
8% Micro enterprise
Fooder Bank 2.10 1 2.10 0
Animal Nutrition
selling unit
9% livelyhood
2.50 1 2.50 0
6 Madhada
Orgenic Farming 1.00 1.00
Agriculture Development
Vermi compost unit
Ground nut ,Wheat
,cottan demo in orgenic
farming
2.00 10 2.00 0
0.60 1 0.60 0
Dairy Development Veterinary Camp 1.57 6 1.57 0
10.92 10.92
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 118 -

Table 39.7 :Details of allied /other activities -Agatarai
Sr. No
Names of
Villages
Activity to be Carried out Unit/ Quantity Total Cost (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
IWMP (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
Convergence (Rs.
Lakhs)
Convergence Scheme
2% Other Activities
Other Activities
water pauch Plant
2.80 1 2.80 0
kentin in fast food
1.53 1 1.53 0
8% Micro enterprise
Nursari 3.00 1 3.00
7 Agatarai
Agriculture Development
Dal Meking Unit 2 1 2 0
Wheat Grevity Unit 4 1 4 0
Dairy Development
Groundnut expellr machine
Multicrop Thracer Machine
Animal Nutrition selling unit
4.00 1 4.00 0
1.86 1 1.86 0
2.46 1 2.46 0
9% livelyhood
Agriculture Development
Hortryculture Plantetion
3.00 110 3 0
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 119 -

Fooder Bank
2.80 1 2.80 0
Vermi compost unit
6.00 30 6.00 0
Orgenic Farming 2.90 7 Ha 2.90 0
Ground nut ,Wheat ,cottan
demo in orgenic farming
0.60 1 0.60 0
Dairy Development Veterinary Camp 4.19 6 4.19 0
Total 41.14 41.14
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 120 -

Table 39.7 :Details of allied /other activities -Manekvada
Sr. No Names of Villages Activity to be Carried out Unit/ Quantity Total Cost
(Rs. Lakhs)
Fund from
IWMP (Rs.
Lakhs)
Fund from
Convergence (Rs.
Lakhs)
Convergence Scheme
2% Other Activities
Other Activities
Mandap sarvis
1.60 1 1.6 0
kentin in fast food
1.00 1 1.00 0
8% Micro enterprise
Orgenic Agro Shop
2.50 1 2.50 0
4 Manekvada
Agro Processing Unit
Groundnut expellr
machine
Multicrop Thracer
Machine
4.00 1 4.00 0
1.86 1 1.86 0
Dairy Development
Animal Nutrition
selling unit
2.25 1 2.25 0
9% livelyhood
Hortryculture
Plantetion
2.00 80 2 0
Agriculture Development
2.50 1 2.50 0
Fooder Bank
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 121 -

Vermi compost unit
4.00 20 4.00 0
Orgenic Farming 1.50 5 Ha 1.50 0
Ground nut ,Wheat
,cottan demo in
orgenic farming
0.35 1 0.35 0
Dairy Development Veterinary Camp 1.60 6 1.6 0
25.16 25.16
Production System : Vermi Compost Unit
One of the important subsidiary occupations of the villagers is animal husbandry. At present, the animal waste is not used by the villagers as
agricultural input. If the farmers start realizing the benefits of compost and vermicompost in particular, the productivity of their land can increase
manifold. As part of direct livelihood support, the villagers (mainly land less) are going to receive cows, buffaloes and small ruminants. These animals
in turn are going to produce more waste, which can be used to prepare vermicompost.
The SHG members, with the help of hired manpower, can collect animal-dung. They would process this dung to prepare vermi compost and sell
it to the farmers in the village or outside, as per demand.
The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers of 1.5 m wide
and 0.9 m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m3 of bed volume. The beds are
maintained at about 42–45 % moisture content and a temperature of 25 - 30o C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious
eaters consume the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are
rich manure for the plants.
About The Worms
Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The worms
feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermicomposting units are ideally suited to locations / units with
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 122 -

generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks lays one egg capsule
(containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under optimum
growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make 'worm meal'
which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed.
Use
Vermi compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer; so, by the use of vermicompost we can reduce use of chemical
fertilizer. Vermicompost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to
increase in water and nutrient holding capacities of soil.
Components of a commercial unit
Sheds
For the Vermi Compost unit high temperature is needed. It can be made by the use of concrete pillars. While designing the sheds adequate room has to
be left around the beds for easy movement of the labourers attending to the filling and harvesting the beds.
Vermi-beds
Scientific bed side is 75 cm - 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage of excess water. The whole bed area should be above the
ground. The bed should have a uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The
proper bed width should not be more that 1.5 easy access to the centre of the bed.
Land
For one Vermi compost unit near about 125 square meter of land will be required. It should have at least 2-3 sheds each of about 180-200 sq.ft. It
should have a good watering arrangement and other equipments as required because moisture is very essential for vermicompost production.
Seed Stock
This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m 3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year.
Fencing
The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length of the periphery
of the farm.
Water Supply System
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 123 -

50% moisture content has to be maintained all the time. Water for the purpose would come from a well nearby.
Machinery
Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, putting shredded raw material to the vermi-sheds, loading,
unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary implements and the machinery
have to be included in the project cost.
Estimate for a vermicompost unit:
• Requirement of nitrogen for 1 hectare sorghum fodder production=90 kg.
• 1.6% N available in vermin compost.
• 90 kg N fulfill by the use of 90/1.6*100= 5625 kg vermicompost (5.5 ton).
• Need of vermicompost to fulfill the requirement of nitrogen for 15 hectare 5.5*15 =82.5 (80 ton).
• 45 kg phosphorus required for 1 hectare sorghum fodder production.
• Requirement of phosphorus for 15 hectare fodder production 15*45=675 kg.
• Supply of phosphorus through vermin compost 0.7/100*80000=560 kg.
• Remaining requirement of phosphorus 675-560=115 kg.
• Remaining dose of phosphorus will be supplied by rock phosphate.
One compost cycle need 45 days so we need 8 cycles for 80 ton vermin compost production.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 124 -

Table No. 39.5 Model for A Vermi-compost Unit
Sr. No Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)
1 Wooden bellies (3 m long) 25 50 1250
2 Wooden (4 m long) 25 60 1500
3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 30 3750
4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies & mats 20 Kg 60 1200
5 Labour charges for erection of sheds 20 110 2200
6 Shovels,spades, crowbars, iron baskets, 2500
7 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) 1 2000 2000
8 Cow dung 10 ton 800 8000
9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 30 kg 80 2400
10 Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms 20 bed 250 5000
11 Miscellaneous
12 Training cost – 5000 5000
Total cost of one Unit - 34,800
Net Cost 35,000
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 125 -

Table No. 39.6 Returns from Vermicompost
Benefits
1. Sale of vermin compost of 80 tones @ Rs.3500/- per ton 80*3500=2,80,000 Rs
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas
SR.
No.
Name of the
Villages
Major activities of the SHGs
Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG
1 handala Furniture 1 2.17
Multicrop Thracer Machine 1 2.00
Groundnut expellr machine 1 4.00
Seed Bank 1 1.17
Animal Nutrition selling unit 1 1.50
TOTAL 5 10.84
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 126 -

2 pasavadiya Multicrop Thracer Machine 1 1.99
Seed Bank 1 1.00
TOTAL 2 2.99
3 Badodar Multicrop Thracer Machine 1 2.00
Seed Bank 1 1.00
Groundnut expellr machine 1 4.00
Dairy unit 1 1.40
Animal Nutrition selling unit 1 1.86
TOTAL 5 10.26
4 Manekvada Orgenic Agro Shop 1 2.50
Groundnut expellr machine 1 4.00
Multicrop Thracer Machine 1 1.86
Animal Nutrition selling unit
1 2.25
TOTAL 4 10.61
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 127 -

5 Deravan Fooder Bank 1 1.50
Groundnut . Wheat Seed Bank 1 2.35
Animal Nutrition selling unit 1 2.00
Senting 1 1.46
TOTAL 4 7.31
6 Magharvada Senting 1 1.93
Groundnut expellr machine 1 4.00
Multicrop Thracer Machine 1 1.70
Animal Nutrition selling unit 1 2.00
TOTAL 4 9.63
7 Madhada silai Machin 1 1.15
Fooder Bank 1 2.10
Animal Nutrition selling unit 1 2.50
TOTAL 3 5.75
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 128 -

8 Agatarai water pauch Plant 1 2.80
kentin in fast food 1 1.53
Nursari 1 3.00
Dal Meking Unit 1 2
Wheat Grevity Unit 1 4
Groundnut expellr machine 1 4.00
Multicrop Thracer Machine 1 1.86
TOTAL 7 19.19
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 129 -

Table no. 41 : Linkages developed at village level – Vermi Compost
Sr. No. Village Name of activity
Forward/Backward
linkage
Linkage with (Rs.)
Outcome
1 Vermi Compost Wooden bellies (3 m long)
Wooden (4 m long)
Weighing scale (100 kg
capacity)
Worms @ 3 kg per ton
Shade mats for covering the
roof
Binding wire for tying
wooden ballies & mats
Formation of verming bed
with agro-waste, cow dung
and worms
Wooden Bellies-1250/-
Wooden-1500 /-
Shed Mats (Roof)-3750/-
Binding Wire-1200/-
Labour Charges-2200/-
Instruments-2500/-
Weighing Scale-2000/-
Cow Dung-8000/-
Worms-2400/-
Formation of Beds-5000/-
Training Cost-5000/-
Sale of Vermi Compost of 80
tons @ Rs. 3500/- per ton =
Rs. 2,80,000/-
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 130 -

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works
Type of treatment
Type of land
Executing
agency
Target
SR.
No.
Name of
the
Villages
Name of
structure/
work
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainage
line (D)
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
Area
(ha)
No.
of
plant
s
Estimat
ed cost
(Rs. in
lakh)
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/
yyyy)
1 Bdodar Horticulture
Plantation
L P UG 6 1.77
pastures Dev R L C O Other/UG 20 5.00
Afforstation R L C O Other/UG In
Farmar
3.00
2 handala Horticulture
Plantation
L C UG 1 1.26
Afforestation R L C O Other/UG 5 2.00
pastures Dev R L C O Other/UG 20 5.12
Crop
Demonstrati
on Plot
L P UG 3 0.60
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 131 -

3 Pasvaliya pastures Dev R L C O Other/UG 1 1.00
Crop
Demonstrati
on Plot
L P UG 2 0.36
4 Deravan Afforestation R L C O Other/UG 1 2.00
Horticulture
Plantation
Crop
Demonstrati
on Plot
L P O UG 1 1.00
L P C O UG 4.4 0.60
pastures Dev R L C O Other/UG 5.00
5 Manekvada Afforestation R L C O Other/UG 5.00
Horticulture
Plantation
L P O UG 1 2.00
Crop
Demonstrati
on Plot
L P O UG 1 0.60
pastures Dev R L C O Other/UG 30 10.00
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 132 -

6 Madharava
da
Afforestation R L C O Other/UG 3.00
Crop
Demonstrati
on Plot
L P O UG 0.60
pastures Dev R L C O Other/UG 10.00
7 Agatray Afforestation L P O UG 5.00
Horticulture
Plantation
Crop
Demonstrati
on Plot
R L C O Other/UG 3.00
L P O UG 0.60
pastures Dev R L C O Other/UG 12.00
8 madhada Afforestation L C O Other/UG 0.70
Crop
Demonstrati
on Plot
L C O Other/UG 0.60
pastures Dev R L C O Other/UG 1.3
Total 83.11
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 133 -

Table No. 42.1: Technical Details of Afforestation Activities
Particulars
Crop Name
Value
Ailanthus
Unit
Plant To Plant Spacing 10.00 M
Row to Row Spacing 10.00 M
Pit Length 0.6 M
Pit Width 0.6 M
Pit Depth 0.6 M
No. of Plants 5445 Nos.
Plantation Area 5.0 Ha.
No. of Plants per has 1089 Nos.
Gap Filling 20 %
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 134 -

Table No.42.2: Cost Estimation for Afforestation activity(per ha)
SR.
No.
Description
No.
Length
(m.)
Width
(m)
Depth
(m.)
Unit Quantity Rate Amount
1 Digging of pits for plants in hard soil 1089 0.60 0.60 0.60 M 3 86.4 50 0.11
2 Plants samplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area,
sampling not less than 30 cm. height
3 Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site up
to 15Km
1089 - - - Nos. 1089 30 0.32
1089 - - - Nos. 1089 2 0.02
4 Loading and unloading of plants 1089 - - - Nos. 1089 2 0.02
5 Rehandling of plants from camp site to actual planting
site upto 200m.
1089 - - - Nos. 1089 1 0.01
6 Cost of fertilizer& insecticides incl. application 1089 - - - Nos. 1089 28 0.30
7 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year) 1089 - - - Nos. 1089 25 0.27
Total 1.07
4.4. Capacity Building:
Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and
experience needed to solve problems and implement change.
There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the
conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to
human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve
participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 135 -

Scope of capacity building at IWMP-9 Keshod
• Scientific Approach for agro productivity Training
• SHG Training
• Training for youth (Ex. Stitching, beauty parlour, computer)
• Training for Orchestra, Motor Rewinding & Farsan
• Boutique, Bandhani, Block Printing Visit & Training
• Seasonal Activities Training for Sauce, jam, Pickle, Jelly, Aamchur, Mukhvas
• Vermi Compost, Floriculture, Horticulture Plantation Training
• Animal Husbandary Training
• Poultry Farm & Honey Bee Farm Training
• Drip Irrigation Training
• Green House Training & Exposure
• Income Generation Activities
• Stitching
• Handicraft
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas
Target
SR.
No.
Name of the
Project
CPR
particulars
Activity proposed
Target area under the
activity (ha)
Estimated
expenditure
(In Lakh Rs.)
Expected no. of
beneficiaries
1
IWMP-9 Keshod
Private
Horticulture
Plantation
34 9.03 300 Persons
pastures lend pastures Dev 167 49.42 -
2 pastures lend Afforestation 64 20.70 -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 136 -

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution
SR. No. Organization Training Modules
1 KrishiVigyan Kendra, junagadh Betaer Farming Practices
2 Krushi University Junagadh Agriculture-Soil Conservation
3 Ami textile diening processing unit, Jetpur Community based activity/Microenterprise planning
4 VRTI, Kutch Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry livelihoods
5 BISAG, Gandhinagar GIS in planning
6 BIAF SHG Training
Early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration and communication in capacity building is also important from the point viewpoint of “leveling the
playing field” in anticipation of disputes that may arise. Filling strategic skills/capacity gaps supports integrated water resources management,
facilitates dispute resolution, and builds practical understanding of the scope of sustainable natural resource development challenges and
opportunities.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 137 -

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan
SR.
No.
Name of the
Project
Project
Stakeholders
Total no. of
persons
No. of persons to be
trained
No. of training
programs
Estimated
cost (In Lakh
Rs.)
1 IWMP-9 PIA 10 10 2 2.00
WDTs 7 7 3 3.20
UGs 215 150 6 8.24
SHGs 210 190 9 12.00
WCs 48 48 5 9.00
Community 200 200 3 8.47
Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities
SR. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.)
Outcome (may quantify, wherever
possible)
1 Street Plays Local Drama Groups 29000
2 Video Shows IWMP-9 27000
3 Pamphlets and posters IWMP-9 35000
4 Banners, Hoardings IWMP-9 40000
Awareness for the importance
of watershed project.
5 FGD IWMP-9 16000
6 Wall Painting IWMP-9 60000
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 138 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 139 -

Budgeting-The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various components as detailed in the common guidelines and done
accordingly in table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds.
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project (In Lakh Rs.)
SR.
No.
Budget component Agatray Badodar Dervan Handala Jonpur
NET PROJECT COST
Madhda Magharvad Manekvada Pasavadiya
1 Administrative costs 2165160 1283160 730320 1084320 963240 1146360 574680 1324440 273600
2 Monitoring 216516 128316 73032 108432 96324 114636 57468 132444 27360
3 Evaluation 216516 128316 73032 108432 96324 114636 57468 132444 27360
PREPARATORY PHASE
4 Entry Point activity 866064 513264 292128 433728 385296 458544 229872 529776 109440
5 Institution and Capacity
Building
1082580 641580 365160 542160 481620 573180 287340 662220 136800
6 Detailed Project Report 216516 128316 73032 108432 96324 114636 57468 132444 27360
WATERSHED WORK PHASE
7 Watershed Development
Works
8 Livelihood Related
Interventions
12124896 7185696 4089792 6072192 5394144 6419616 3218208 7416864 1532160
4113804 2438004 1387608 2060208 1830156 2178084 1091892 2516436 519840
9 Consolidation phase 649548 384948 219096 325296 288972 343908 172404 397332 82080
TOTAL 21651600 12831600 7303200 10843200 9632400 11463600 5746800 13244400 2736000
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 140 -

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (In Lakh Rs.)
Sr.
No.
Villages
EPA
Institution
and
Capacity
Building
DPR
Watershed
development
Work
Livelihood
Related
Intervention
Consolidation
1 Agatray 866064 1082580 216516 12124896 4113804 649548
2 Badodar 513264 641580 128316 7185696 2438004 384948
3 Dervan 292128 365160 73032 4089792 1387608 219096
4 Handala 433728 542160 108432 6072192 2060208 325296
5 Jonpur 385296 481620 96324 5394144 1830156 288972
6 Madhada 458544 573180 114636 6419616 2178084 343908
7 Magharvada 229872 287340 57468 3218208 1091892 172404
8 Manekvada 529776 662220 132444 7416864 2516436 397332
9 Pasvadiya 109440 136800 27360 1532160 519840 82080
Total 3818112 4772640 954528 53453568 18136032 2863584
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 141 -

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement
SR. No Name of the Villages Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement
1 Agatray 21651600 21651600 21651600
2 Badodar 12831600 12831600 12831600
3 Dervan 7303200 7303200 7303200
4 Handala 10843200 10843200 10843200
5 Jonpur 9632400 9632400 9632400
6 Madhada 11463600 11463600 11463600
7 Magharvada 5746800 5746800 5746800
8 Manekvada 13244400 13244400 13244400
9 Pasvadiya 2736000 2736000 2736000
Total 95452800 95452800 95452800
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 142 -

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes
SR.
No.
Name of
the
Villages
Phase/
Type of
work
Activity to be
carried out
Estimate
Cost (Rs.
in lakh)
Fund made
available to
IWMP due
to
convergence
(Rs. in lakh)
Convergence
Cost (Rs. in
lakh)
Scheme
with which
convergence
took place
Reference no.
of activity/
task/structure
in DPR
Level at
which
decision for
convergence
was taken
1 - - - - - - - - -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 143 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 144 -

Table no. 51 : Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects
Sr.
No.
Name of
Private Sector
Partner
Agency
Type of agreement signed
a) MoU b) Contract
c) Any other
(pl. specify)
Financial contribution
IWMP
Private
sector
Partnership
Interventions
Expected
Outcomes
Comments
- - - - - - -
6.1 Expected Outcomes
6.1.1 Employment
Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal husbandry and
casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop, which keeps them
partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged
fulltime. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.
The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self-employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by engaging
people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, Check dam, village pond, plantation, etc. Self-employment would
be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise
development.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 145 -

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area
Sl.
NO.
Names of
the
Villages
Wage employment
Self-employment
No. of man-days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries
SC ST OBC Others Women Total SC ST OBC Others Women Total SC ST Others OBC Women Total
1 Agatray 213 4 539 749 1530 3245 100 28 161 77 306 672 10 12 35 15 90 162
2 Badodar 63 0 289 246 668 1366 18 0 86 34 68 206 12 0 33 10 20 75
3 Dervan 43 2 301 406 601 1253 12 2 45 30 60 154 15 0 5 25 30 75
4 Handala 6 0 30 284 418 841 6 0 30 115 83 165 0 0 0 15 13 28
5 Madhada 63 0 289 446 668 1366 18 0 86 34 68 124 12 0 33 10 20 75
6 Magharvada 87 2 301 306 601 1253 12 2 45 30 60 149 15 0 5 25 30 75
7 Manekvada 6 0 30 284 418 641 6 0 30 122 83 234 0 0 0 15 13 28
8 Pasvadiya 4 0 30 41 49 469 6 0 30 245 83 156 0 0 0 8 7 16
6.1.2. Migration
Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well-off farmers bring fodder from Junagadh (approximately 42
kms away) collectively; but the resource poor cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment
for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour. Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned
above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 146 -

Table no. 53: Seasonal migration from Project area
SR. No.
Names of the villages
No. of persons migrating
No. of days per year of migration
Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project
1 Agatray 255 55 90-240 30
2 Badodar 109 42 90-260 30
3 Dervan 29 15 90-120 30
4 Handala 75 21 90-240 30
5 Madhada 58 13 90-260 30
6 Magharvada 35 20 90-120 30
7 Manekvada 92 20 90-240 30
8 Pasvadiya 15 10 90-260 30
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 147 -

6.1.3 Ground water table
Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over the years.
Presently it stands at 28 m.
Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water table depth from 28 m in the pre-project
level to 25 m in the post project period.
Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)
SR. No. Name of the Project Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease(Post- Project)
Open wells 25 22
1 IWMP-9
Bore wells 30 24
Others (specify) 35 27
6.1.4 Drinking water
The village has wells and tube well on which they depend for their drinking water, but their ground water table is to Profound Many an effort at
finding sweet water at different other places in the same village has failed. IWMP-II construction many check dam and farm bund to try ground water
depth increased.
As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 148 -

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water
SR.
No.
Names of the
Villages
Availability of drinking water
(no. of months in a year)
Quality of drinking water
Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project
Comments
1 Agatray 8 10 Normal TDS Portable
2 Badodar 9 11 Normal TDS Portable
3 Dervan 8 11 Normal TDS Portable
4 Handala 7 10 Normal TDS Portable
5 Jonpur 7 10 Normal TDS Portable
6 Madhada 8 11 Normal TDS Portable
7 Magharvada 9 11 Normal TDS Portable
8 Manekvada 7 10 Normal TDS Portable
9 Pasvadiya 8 11 Normal TDS Portable
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 149 -

6.1.5 Crops
Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in IWMP-II. The surface water is scanty due to low rainfall and ground water is
saline, which is unfit for crop production.
All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned earthen bunds check dam,
farm bund, is storage the sweet rain water and also help percolate sweet water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in
additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of
crops can be taken
Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area
Sr. No.
Name of the
Project
Name of crops
Area (ha)
Pre-project
Average Yield
(Kg.) per ha.
Expected Post-project
Area (ha)
Average Yield
per ha (Kg.)
IWMP-9
Kharif
1 Groundnut 747.04 1429.00 15 1600
2 Sugarcane 79.92 67392.67 85 70000
Rabi
3 Wheat 489.92 3282.00 495 3400
4 Tuver 41.89 3726.00 45 3800
5 Bajari 2.24 2187.50 10 2300
Summer
6 Zaid 16.64 4901.00 20 4950
7 Mango 234.56 6431.23 260 6500
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 150 -

6.1.6 Horticulture
Table no. 57: Area under horticulture
SR.
No.
Name of the
Project
Existing area under horticulture
(ha)
Area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP
ha
1 IWMP-9 400.00 450.00
6.1.7 Vegetative cover
There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area of 850.40 ha which consists of only Sag, Seasam.
Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover
SR. No. Name of the Project Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed
1 IWMP-9 570 ha 610 ha
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 151 -

6.1.8 Livestock
IWMP-II Talala has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, and sheep. The interventions like
provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy
development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.
Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in ltrs,for solids please mention in kgs, & income in Rs.)
SR. No. Name of the Project Type of Animal
Pre-Project
Expected Post-project
No. Yield/Lit. Income No. Yield/Lit. Income
Remarks
1 IWMP-9 Keshod Cow (Milk: Rs/lit.) - - - 800 12 40
Buffalo (Milk: Rs/lit.) - - - 1259 13 35
Draught Purpose animal - - -
Goat (Meat: Rs/kg.) - - - 806 3 13 -
Sheep (Meat: Rs/kg.) - - - 200 4 15 -
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 152 -

6.1.9 Linkages
The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system may fail to deliver the desired results.
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages
SR. No. Name of the Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)
1 IWMP-9 Keshod Backward linkages - - -
Seed certification - - -
Seed supply system - 1 1
Fertilizer supply system 1 - 1
Pesticide supply system 1 - 1
Credit institutions - - -
Water supply - - -
Extension services - - -
Price Support system - - -
Labor - - -
Any other (please specify) - - -
Forward linkages
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 153 -

Harvesting/threshing machinery 12 - 12
Flour mill unit 3 - 3
Handicraft unit (Embroidery Unit) - - -
Vegetable shop - - -
Soda Processing unit - - -
Agro and other Industries - Seed Bank 1
Milk and other collection centers 1 Dairy Unit 1
Mandap Service 2 - 2
Sewing Machine Unit - 1 1
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 154 -

6.1.10. Logical Framework Analysis
Components Activities Output Effect Impact
Village Institution
Formation
§ Formation of Watershed
Committee, User Group
§ One Watershed
Committee per each
village.
§ Number of User group
depending on the
coverage of particular
intervention
§ Project can be
implemented and managed
in a democratic and
participatory way ensuring
equity.
§ Unity and prosperity in the
village management.
§ People's Participation and
positive perception towards
the program
Strengthening
Village Institutions
§ Organize training and
awareness program for Village
institutions
§ Awareness camps to be
organized.
§ Quality of management of
common resources
improved.
§ Capacity building workshops
and exposure visits User Group
and Watershed Committee
§ Facilitating and monitoring the
functioning of UGs and WCs
§ Strengthen linkages between
UGs and WCs and Panchayat
Institutions.
§ Gender sensitization of UGs and
WCs to increase inclusiveness of
Group decision-making.
§ Trainings and exposure
visits UGs and WCs to be
held
§ Capacity building
workshops to be
organized
§ 1 Federations of UGs
and WC to be formed.
§ Quality of distribution of
benefits between people
improved.
§ Increased awareness
amongst women about
village resources.
§ Women participation in
micro enterprise
§ Involvement of youth and
children in village
development increased.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 155 -

§ Sensitize village communities to
involve children and youth in
development.
Fund Management § Improve management and
utilization of UGs and WCs.
§ Prepare communities to explore
other sources of income for UGs
and WCs.
§ UGs and WCs operating
bank account and
managing resources on
their own
§ Purpose, frequency and
volume of use of the fund
enhanced.
§ Volume of funds
generated for UGs and WCs
from other sources of
income increased.
Ecological
Restoration
§ Protection, treatment and
regeneration of common and
private
lands
§ Common and private
lands to be brought under
new plantations and agrohorty-forestry
like Amla,
Mango.
§ Fodder availability from
common and private lands
increased
§ Better Ecological order in the
area
§ Protection, treatment and
regeneration of forest lands
§ Plantation of fruits and forest
species
§ Forest lands to be
brought under new
plantations
and
protection
§ Trainings, exposure
visits and meetings to be
organized
for
communities and staff
§ Accessibility to common
and forest lands increased
with removal of
encroachments and
resolution of conflicts.
§ Increase in the proportion of
households having more
security of fodder
§ Reduction in drudgery of
fodder and fuel collection,
especially women
§ Impart trainings, conduct
meetings and organize exposure
visits for communities, village
§ Income generation
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 156 -

volunteers and staff to effectively
plan, execute and monitor
activities
intervention promoted.
§ Identification and promotion of
non-timber forest produce based
income generation activities
Rainfaid
Development
Area
§ Treatment of land through
improved soil and moisture
conservation practices on
watershed basis
§ Promotion of good agricultural
practices- horticulture, improved
crop and vegetable
§ Promotion of organic farming
practices
§ Land to be brought
under improved soil
moisture conservation
practices.
§ Good agricultural
practices to be promoted.
§ Organic farming to be
promoted.
§ Fodder banks to be
established.
§ Improved productivity of
treated
land.
§ Increased availability of
water in wells .
§ Increase in annual
agriculture production.
§ Farmers adopt organic
farming
practices.
§ Increase in proportion of
households having more
security of food
§ Increase in contribution of
agricultural income to the
household income
§ Formation of Fodder banks to
increase fodder security and
promote dairy development
among communities
§ Identification and promotion of
agri-produce based income
generation activities like grading,
processing and packaging.
§ Promotion of better Irrigation
practices like drip irrigation
§ Agriculture based
livelihood income
generation activities to be
promoted.
§ Water harvesting
structures to be
constructed.
§ Drip Irrigation facilities
to be distributed among
farmers.
§ Fodder security of farmers
enhanced.
§ Increase availability of
water for 9 to 12 months.
§ Increased availability of
water for livestock.
§ Availability of irrigation
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 157 -

water established.
§ Impart trainings, conduct
meetings and organize exposure
visits of communities, village
volunteers and staff to effectively
plan, execute and monitor
activities
§ Approx 15000 person
days of employment to be
generated.
§ Trainings, exposure
visits and meetings to be
organized
for
communities, village
volunteers and staff.
§ Farmers take three crops
in a year.
§ Increase in agricultural
productivity of land
§ Availability of drinking
water enhanced
Women’s Sociopolitical
and
economic
empowerment
§ Formation & Strengthening of
women’s SHG groups
§ Women’s SHG groups to
be
formed.
§ Enhanced capacities of
leaders of women's group in
taking initiatives to solve
problems at different levels.
§ Position of women in
household, community, society
(politically, socially and
economically) as perceived by
women and community at
large
§ Capacity building of womenfolk
§ Capacity building of SHG leaders
and accountants
§ Federation of Women’s
SHGs to be formed.
§ Trainings to be
conducted for preparation
of Animal husbandry.
§ Improved access to credit
for livelihood purposes.
§ Increased household
income.
§ Performance enhancement of
SHGs in terms of participation,
decision-making, leadership
and fund management.
§ Equality & Equity in gender
relations at home (decision
making,
expenditure,
children’s education, health)
§ Linking SHGs with external
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 158 -

financial institutions
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 159 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 160 -

Quality and Sustainability Issues
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation
A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system
would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all
of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use
classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield
etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the
DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical
works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various
years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan
corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the
project.
Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff
alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in
charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the
following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude – longitude information of various treatment areas during the
DPR. The probable sites are then transferred on to the entral server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is
reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by
means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.
7.2 Plans for Project management:
The Project management of any watershed program is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and the village level
institutes .In IWMP-II Talala Cluster, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance
of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A
proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during
post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 161 -

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:
The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes
mainly fund the following:
7.4 User Charges:
Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the
formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC)
shall maintain the records of the following.
IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 162 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 163 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 164 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 165 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 166 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 167 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 168 -

IWMP-9 KESHOD PIA DWDU JUNAGADH - 169 -