IWMP-1 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

IWMP-1 (Kadegi) 

Detail Project Report 

2009-10 

IWMP-1 

Kadegi 

District Watershed Development Unit- Porbandar 1


Contents 

Chapter – 1 Project Background 

Table no.1: Basic project information ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 

Table no.2: Weightage of the project ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 

Table no.3: Watershed information .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area ....................................................................................................................... 13 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ............................................................................................................................ 10 

Chapter – 2 Project Implementing Agency 

Table no. 6: PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 

Chapter – 3 Basic information of the project area 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ........................................................................................................................................................................... 24 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ................................................................................................................................................ 25 

Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................ 25 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 



Table no. 14: Land ownership details....................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 

Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28 

Table no. 16: Irrigation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 

Table no. 17: Crop details: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 

Table no. 18: Livestock .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 

Table no. 19: Drinking water ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 34 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ...................................................................................................................................................... 35 

Table no. 21: Demographic information ................................................................................................................................................................................. 39 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 

Table no. 23: Migration details .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 

Table no. 24: Poverty ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 

Table no. 27: Income ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 45 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ............................................................................................................................................................................... 45 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)....................................................................................................................................... 46 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects* ............................................................................................................. 47 

Chapter – 4 Watershed Activities 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details .......................................................................................................................................................................... 43 

Table no. 32: SHG detail .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 70 



Table no. 33: UG detail .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 70 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................ 74 

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................... 86 

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ................................ 89 

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......... 95 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .................................................................... 99 

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target....................................................................................................... 102 

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ..................................................................................................................... 102 

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works .................................................................................. 97 

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities.................................................................................................................................................................. 108 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ............................................................................................................................ 103 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 114 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: .................................................................................................................................................................................... 115 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ..................................................................................................................... 115 

Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget ............................................................................................................................................................... 118 

Chapter – 5 Budget 

Table no. 48: Budget at a glance ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 119 

Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ........................................................................................................................ 120 

Table no. 50: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects* .............................................................................................................................. 121 

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area: ......................................................................................................................................................................... 121 



Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ................................................................................................................................... 124 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ....................................................................... 125 

Chapter – 6 Out comes 

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water* ............................................................................................................................................................................... 126 

Table no. 55: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas ................................................................................................................ 127 

Table no. 56: Area under horticulture ................................................................................................................................................................................... 128 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................................................................. 128 

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas * ................................................................................................................................................ 129 

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages ......................................................................................................................................................................... 130 

Chapter – 7 Quality and Sustainability Issues 

Chapter – 8 Maps 





1.1 Project Background 

(IWMP-1) Kadegi project is located in Kutiyana Taluka, Porbandar District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of 6 

micro-watersheds with 5G1B1b1a, 5G1A6a2e, 5G1C1b1b, 5G1A5b1a, 5G1A6a2e, 5G1A6a2e being their respective codes. The 

total project area of the watershed is about 5853.11 Ha, of which has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated 

Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10. 

The watershed includes three Villages Mer, Patel ,SC & Bharmin are the primary inhabitants of the village. The livelihood 

of these people is primarily based on rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, goat and sheep rearing. 

The Project area falls under the IWDP according to DoLR Classification. It is a very poor and desolate village on the 

border of Porbandar. The Kadegi Project was heavily Every year Flood. This has resulted in Productivity of Agriculture Land 

was too low camper another villages of Kutiyana Block. 

Sl 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Name of 

the project 


Name 

Junej 

Bhadula 

Bhogsar 

JAMRA 

KADEGI 

Kotda 

Villages 

Census 

code 

(00798000) 

(00797900) 

(00797000) 

(00797500) 

(00798200) 

(00796400) 

Table no.1: Basic project information 

Gram 

Panchayats 

Junej 

Bhadula 

Bhogsar 

JAMRA 

KADEGI 

Kotda 

Taluka 

KUTIYANA 

District 

Area of the 

project 

PORBANDAR 496.6 






Area 

proposed 

to be 

treated 

496.6 

936.60 

453.40 

1460.40 

849.8 

854.27 

Total 

project 

cost 

5959200 

11239200 

5440800 

17524800 

19821600 

16387200 

PIA 

DWDU 

PORBANDAR 

DWDU 

PORBANDAR 

DWDU 

PORBANDAR 

DWDU 

PORBANDAR 

DWDU 

PORBANDAR 

DWDU 

PORBANDAR 



Figure 1, Geographical Location of Kadegi 

Porbandar District 

Kadegi Project 



1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme 

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual 

wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in 

the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, 

Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Kadegi Watershed project as 

given in table no. 2. 

The total number of families under BPL is 390, which is less than 20 per cent of the total households of the village. Hence a score of 3 is 

allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is about 9.39 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 3 was allotted. Rainfed 

agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 62 per cent of 

the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5, 

3 and 10 are allotted respectively. 

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under IWDP block. Drinking water 

is problematic in the village. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent salinity and ingress of salt from Saliny Water. The soil is very 

permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Kadagi watershed falls in 

continuity with other watersheds namely Kasabad, Mahiyari. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration four micro-watersheds 

covering a total area of 5051.07 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 104 All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 104 to the 

watershed (reference Table 2.1 below 

Project 

name 

Kadegi 

Project 

type 


Area proposed to be treated 

Table no.2: Weightage of the project 

Weightage 

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii 

10.0 3 5 3 3 15 15 5 15 15 10 5 NA 



Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed 

Sr. 

No. 

Criteria 

Maximum 

Score 

Ranges & Scores 

i 

Poverty index (% of poor to 

population 

10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % 

(2.5) 

ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40% (10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20% 

(3) 

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are 

significantly lower than 

minimum wages (5) 

Actual wages are 

equal to or 

higher than 

minimum wages 

(0) 

iv 

% of small and marginal 

farmers 

10 More than 80% (10) 50 to 80% (5) Less than 50 % 

(3) 

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) 

vi Moisture index / DPAP / 15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP -33.3 to -66.6 0 to -33.2 (0) 



DDP Block Block (10) DPAP Block Non DPAP / DDP 

Block 

vii 

Area under rain – fed 

agriculture 

15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90% (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70% 

(Reject) 

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic 

village (7.5) 

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20% (15) Medium – 10 to 

20% (10) 

Partially covered 

(5) 

Low-less than 

10% of TGA (5) 

Fully covered 

(0) 

x 

Productivity potential of the 

15 Lands with low 

Lands with 

Lands with high 

land 

production & where 

moderate 

production & 

productivity can be 

production & 

where 

significantly enhanced 

where 

productivity can 

with reasonable efforts 

productivity can 

be marginally 

(15) 

be enhanced 

enhanced with 

with reasonable 

reasonable 

efforts (10) 

efforts (5) 



xi 

Contiguity to another 

10 Contiguous to 

Contiguity within 

Neither 

watershed that has already 

previously treated 

the 

contiguous to 

been developed/treated 

watershed & contiguity 

microwatersheds 

previously 

within the 

in the project but 

treated 

microwatersheds in the 

non contiguous 

watershed nor 

project (10) 

to previously 

contiguity within 

treated 

the 

watershed (5) 


in the project (0) 

xii 

Cluster approach in the 

15 Above 6 micro- 

4 to 6 

2 to 4 

plains (more than one 

watersheds in cluster 



contiguous micro- 

(15) 

in cluster (10) 


watersheds in the project ) 

xiii 

Cluster approach in the hills 

15 Above 5 micro- 

3 to 5 

2 to 3 

(more than one contiguous 

watersheds in cluster 



micro-watersheds in the 

(15) 



project ) 


Kedegi Project 

IWMP-I 


Total 150 150 90 41 2.5 

Project type: Hilly/desert/Other 

Table no.3: Watershed information 

Name of Project 

No. Of watersheds to 

Watershed 

Name of the Village 

Watershed code 

be treated 

regime/type/order 

Junej 

Junej 1 5G1B1b1a Mini Watershed 

Bhadula Bhadula 1 5G1A6a2e Mini Watershed 

Bhogsar Bhogsar 1 5G1C1b1b Mini Watershed 

Jamra Jamra 1 5G1A5b1a Mini Watershed 

Name of the Village 

Kadegi Kadegi 1 5G1A6a2e Mini Watershed 

Kotada Kotada 1 5G1A6a2e Mini Watershed 

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Kadegi Project 

This village being very back ward, has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These 

programmes are Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Total Sanitation Campaign 

(TSC), Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) and Sakhi Mandal Besides, previously. 

i. MGNREGS: Construction of, murram road 58, Deepning of pond 7, Land Development 15 and 3 construction of lack has 

been taken-up under MGNREGA. 

ii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 1067 individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. 

iii. Indira Awas Yojana: (Total 492 house have been constructed in the Kadegi Project under various Awas Yojana in 

which under Indira Awas Yojana= 177, Earth Quake covered 315 beneficiaries . 



iv. Sakhi Mandal Yojna– 47 Mandals are linked with bank and given loan of Rs.47000 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: 

Sl 

no 

Name of the 

programme/scheme 

Sponsoring 

agency 

Objectives of the 

programme/scheme 

Year of commencement 

Villages 

covered 

Estimated 

number of 

beneficiaries 

1 WASMO DWSSB WASMO 2007-08-09 6 1451 

2 MGNREGS 

Rural 

Department 

Employment 2009 6 3285 


IAY 

3 

Department 

Housing 2005-08-09 6 177 

4 TSC 


Department 

Sanitation 2004-05 still 6 1067 



Figure 2, Geographical Condition of the project 





2.1. Project Implementing Agency 

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management 

Agency (GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. 

The PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, 

autonomous organizations under State/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate 

Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for Mahiyari watershed Project is Chief Conservator of Forest (Social 

Forest), Porbandar. 

2.2 About Social Forest Department, Porbandar 

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: 

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Porbandar is a district level nodal agency and was established on 1 August 

,2009 to oversee the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is 

the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Manager (deputation from 

Gujarat Forest Department), a technical expert and a multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization 

expert and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant. The objectives of the 

DWDU, Porbandar are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and 

related developmental activities in the district as per guidelines. The DWDU, Porbanar also works as a PIA for two IWMP 

projects. 



2.2.2 Programmes/projects of DWDU, Porbandar: 

At present 3 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Porbandar district . The entry point 

activities of all the Three IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Porbandar Forest 

Division is PIA for 1 projects (IWMP- 2) and DWDU itself is PIA for rest of the two projects (IWMP-1 & 3). 

Apart from the 3 IWMP projects, DWDU Porbandar is involved in a total of 94 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP); 

51 projects are completed and 43 projects are still running in the district. The DWDU, Porbandar is also monitoring a central 

government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells” in the district. 

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: 

Strength: 

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team 

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency. 

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, North Gujarat University and NGOs for 

capacity building and technical guidance 

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar, 

(5) District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee 



Weakness: 

(1) No permanent office building. 

(2) No Vehicle 

(3) Not any Technical Expert person in any Project of Watershed in Porbandar. 

Opportunities: 

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration 

and convergence of programmes 

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP 

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS 

Threats: 

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact 

(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning 

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people 

(4) Low literacy rate in the project area. 

(5) Because of flood prone area flood water remains for longer revised, farmer can’t take any monsoon Crop. 

(6) Soil is saline. 



Table no. 6: PIA: 

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodel Agency (Society) 

(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Porbandar 

1 KADEGI 

(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager, DWDU, Porbandar 

(iv) Telephone (0286) 2213736 

(v) Fax (0286) 2213735 

(vi) E-mail pordwdu gmail.com 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 

Sl 

no 

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned 

Monthly 

remuneration 

1 J. H. Trivedi 51 M Project Manager GAS 28 Years 

Project 

Management 

50000 

2 Arti N. Vyas 30 F MDT (CM) BA CRD 8 Years 

Community 

Mobilization 

10000 

3 Bhgwatiben M. Tilavat 30 F MDT (A/c) M.Com 1 Year Accounting 12000 

4 Nishith M Purohit 30 M Sys. Analyst B.I.T. & C.A 4 Years System Analyst 8000 

5 Hiriben C. Gareja 30 F Executive Asst. M.A. B. Ed 2 Years 5000 

6 Sarikhda Varun 25 M WDT (Surveyer) ITI Surveyer 3 Year Surveyer 8000 

7 Pranay J Raval 27 M WDT (Engg.) Dip. Civil.engg. 5 Years Civil Engineer 8000 

Community 

8 Reema S. Mehta 20 F WDT (C M) BRS 11 months 

8000 

Mobilization 

Kumarkhaniya 

Agricultural 

9 

40 M WDT (Agri) BRS ( B.Ed.) 6 Years 

8000 

Vitthalbhai B 

Development 

10 Sandip Adodariya 24 M WDT (A\C) M.Com 0 Accounting 8000 





3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology 

3.1.1 Land use pattern: 

The net geographical area of Kadegi watershed is about 5853.11 ha out of which has no forest area. The About 70% of land is 

under agriculture which is completely rain-fed; mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 13.69% of the total land is classified under 

wasteland of which 2.84 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly. The watershed consists of thorny species of 

Ground Nuts which was mainly broadcasted to stop the spread of desert. 

S. No. 

Names of 

villages 

Geographical 

Area of the 

village 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: 

Forest 

Area 

Land under 

agricultural 

use 

Rainfed 

area 

Cultivable 

Wasteland 

Permanent 

pastu-res 

Noncultivable 

1 Junej 496.6 - 347.7 347.7 53.9 - 14.1 

2 Bhadula 936.6 - 690.2 690.2 102.5 - 16.5 

3 Bhogsar 453.4 - 392 392 40.2 - 21.2 

4 Jamra 1460.4 - 1287.8 1287.8 165.7 - 7 

5 Kadegi 1651.8 - 1100.6 1100.6 289.8 - 70.4 

6 Kotda 1365.6 - 676.2 676.2 201.8 - 14.5 



3.1.2 Soil and topography: Kadegi watershed project (IMWP) falls under Saurashtra South Zone. The soil is mainly sandy 

loamy and saline. The soil is Sticky Black to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep 

about 22 to 73 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low 

nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The soil falls in Undulated to Flat. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-1% 

slop. 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: 

S. No. 

Name of the Agro-climatic 

zone covers project area 

Area in ha 

Names of the 

villages 

a)Type 

Major soil types 

b) Area in ha 

Topo-graphy 

1 

496.6 Junej 

496.6 

2 936.6 Bhadula Sticky Black/ 936.6 

3 

Saurashtra South Zone – 7 

Sandy long – 

453.4 Bhogsar 

Saline 

453.4 

4 1460.4 Jamra 1460.4 

5 1651.8 Kadegi 1651.8 

6 1365.6 Kotda 1365.6 

# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope 

Moderate 

Undulated to 

flat 



Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: 

Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 Junej Every Year 3-4 Years 

2 Bhadula Every Year 3-4 Years 

3 Bhogsar Every Year 3-4 Years 

4 Jamra Every Year 3-4 Years 

5 Kadegi Every Year 3-4 Years 

6 Kotda Every Year 3-4 Years 

11. Edaphic Factors 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion 

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) 

Water erosion 

a Sheet 4708.672 

b Rill 697.517 

c Gully 406.946 

d 

Run off 

(mm/ year) 

Ravenous 

Sub-Total 5813.135 

Wind erosion 5813.135 NA 

Total 

Average soil loss 

(Tonnes/ ha/ year) 



Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH 

Junej 

Bhadula 

Bhogsar 

Jamra 

Kadegi 

Kotda 

Type of Salinity 

(Inherent/Ingress) 

Ingrees 

Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions 

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons 

Junej 

All most all the land area 

Kharo river is Nearest Villages Runoff 

water washout the soil 

Bhadula 


Kharo river is Nearest Villages Runoff 


Bhogsar 


Bhadar river is Nearest Villages Runoff 


Jamra 


Kharo River is Water and Nearest 

Villages Runoff water washout the soil 

Kadegi 


Kharo River is Water and Nearest 

Villages Runoff water washout the soil 

Kotda 


Milsar, Bhadar, Lakendri and Dudhi 

rivers are Nearest Villages Runoff water 

washout the soil 



The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon Flood every years. The average rainfall of this area is 

about 833 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 84 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution is 

leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams, rivulets and depressed area saline. 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: 

Name of project 

Average rainfall- last 5 

years 

Average temperature 

Summer 

Winter 

IWMP-1 833 

Max Min Max Min 

42 35 40 39 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams 

IWMP-1 43 meters 0-1 % Kharo River 

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: 

Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as well as for 

drinking purpose. The average land holding is ranging from 1 to 4 ha. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the 

farmers to take one Crop in all seasons. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated 

by the farmers are Ground nuts and Jowar (Sorghum). Some of the farmers take up rain-fed castor crop if rainfall is good. The 

land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop of wheat 

and Chana in the residual moisture. 



Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

Sl 

Total owned land 

Village 

no 

Gen OBC SC ST 

1 Junej 

2 Bhadula 297.9915 598.1670 24.2294 - 

3 Bhogsar 

4 Jamra 40.5063 814.80548 - - 

5 Kadegi 30.2181 1060.5197 39.8232 - 

6 Kotda 

HHs giving 

land on lease 

HHs taking 

land on lease 



Figure 3, Bio Physical Survey of the project 



Table no. 15: Agriculture 

Sl no Village Net sown area (in ha) 

One time Two times Three times 

1 Junej 335.8 NA NA 

2 Bhadula 670.2 NA NA 

3 Bhogsar 330.6 NA NA 

4 Jamra 1115.1 951.78 NA 

5 Kadegi 1056.78 NA NA 

6 Kotda 658.2 NA NA 



Table no. 16: Irrigation 

Sl 

no 

Village 

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well 

Availability 

Gross Availability 

Gross Availability Net 

Net area 

Net area 

months 

area months 

area months area 

Gross 

area 

1 Junej NA NA NA 6 month NA NA NA NA NA 

2 Bhadula NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

3 Bhogsar NA NA NA 3-6 5 5 0-3 5 5 

4 Jamra NA NA NA 3-6 75 75 - - - 

5 Kadegi NA NA NA 6 - - - - - 

6 Kotda NA NA NA 3-6 75 75 NA NA NA 



Table no. 17: Crop details 

Sl 

no 

Village 

Kharif (Monsoon) 

Ground Nut Crop 2 Crop 3 

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity 

1 Jamra 618.66 123731 200 - - - - - - 

2 Kadegi 686.91 137382 200 - - - - - - 

3 Junej 235.06 70518 300 - - - - - - 

4 Bhadula 459.14 410497.5 875 - - - - - - 

5 Bhogsar 231.42 57855 250 - - - - - - 

6 Kotda 460.74 129007 280 - - - - - - 



Sl 

no 

Village 

Rabi (Winter) 

Juwar Channa Crop 3 

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity 

1 Jamra 519.20 62304 120 230.25 29932 130 - - - 

2 Kadegi 430.25 47327.5 110 267.30 32076 120 - - - 

3 Junej 153.80 19225 125 135.20 18252 135 - - - 

4 Bhadula 315.20 36248 115 165.33 20666 125 - - - 

5 Bhogsar 163.15 22025 135 125.23 14401 115 - - - 

6 Kotda 380.25 53235 140 156.20 19525 125 - - - 



3.1.4 Livestock: 

The village has 266 cows, 1732 buffaloes, 1006 bullocks, 1526 goat . Majority of rabari community depends on goat and sheep 

rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and 

pasture availability for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and 

sheep. Milk production is so low in the village. 

Table no. 18: Livestock 

Sl 

Total Milk 

Village Buffalo Cow 

no 

(Buffalo+Cow) 

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others 

No milk No Milk No Milk 

1 Junej 235 1420/DAY 25 90/DAY 1510/DAY 350 350/DAY 350 210 0 4 

2 Bhadula 175 1750/DAY 10 55/DAY 1805/DAY 5 4/DAY 00 100 0 11 

3 Bhogsar 100 1500/DAY 40 400/DAY 1900/DAY 25 23.5/DAY 60 80 0 3 

4 Jamra 200 2850/DAY 25 250/DAY 3100/DAY 100 91/DAY - 140 0 3 

5 Kadegi 230 1700/DAY 60 250/DAY 1950/DAY 525 25/DAY 500 110 0 15 

6 Kotda 792 6336/DAY 106 530/DAY 6866/DAY 524 511/DAY 860 366 0 29 

Total 1732 15556/DAY 266 1575/DAY 17131/DAY 1526 1004.5/DAY 1770 1006 0 65 



Table no. 19: Drinking water 

Sl 

no 

1 Junej 

2 Bhadula 

Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water 

25-30 mt Bore Water Pipe Line 

From Paswari 


From Paswari 

Availability in 

months 

Quality 

9 Month Not Good 


3 Bhogsar 

4 Jamra 

5 Kadegi 

6 Kotda 


From Paswari 


From Paswari 


From Paswari 


From Paswari 







S. 

N 

o. 

1 

Names 

of 

project 

IWMP- 

Name 


Village 

1 Junej 

CPR 

Particulars 

Wasteland/ 

degraded land 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources 

Total Area (ha) 

Area owned/ In possession of 

Govt. 

Any other 

(specif 

Pvt. persons 

PRI (Pl. 

y 

Specify) 

deptt.) 

Area available for treatment (ha) 

Pvt. 

person 

s 

Govt. 

(specif 

y 

deptt.) 

279.7 53.9 279.7 53.9 

Pastures 14.1 14.1 

Village 

Tanks 

Community 

Buildings 

Ponds/ 

Temples/ Places of 

worship 

2 

1 

4 

PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. 

Specify) 



2 


1 

Bhadula 

3 Bhogsar 

Wasteland/ 

degraded land 

Pastures 

690.2 16.5 690.2 16.5 

Village Ponds/ 

Tanks 

2 

Community 

Buildings 

1 


worship 

3 

Wasteland/ 

degraded land 

330.6 40.2 330.6 40.2 



Tanks 

4 

Community 

Buildings 

1 


worship 

3 

102. 

5 

102. 

5 



4 


1 

JAMRA 

Wasteland/ 

degraded land 

1115.1 165.7 1115.1 165.7 

Pastures 7 7 


Tanks 

2 

Community 

Buildings 

1 


worship 

7 

Wasteland/ 

degraded land 

740.4 289.8 740.4 289.8 


5 

KADEGI 

Village 

Tanks 

Ponds/ 

1 

Community 

Buildings 

1 


worship 

9 



Wasteland/ 

degraded land 

459.9 201.8 459.9 201.8 


6 


1 

Kotda 

Village 

Tanks 

Community 

Buildings 

Ponds/ 

7 

1 


worship 

10 



3.2. Socio-Economic Profile 

3.2.1 Demographic Status: 

Kadegi watershed project has a total of 2129 households with a population of 8369 (as per base-line survey) out of which 4461 

are male and 3908 female .The sex ratio is 877 female to 1000 male. There are 390 BPL families. The average family size is 5. 

The literacy rate is average i.e. 51.04 per cent; male literacy rate is 59.41 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy 

rate is 41.14 per cent (of total female population). It is noticeable that only 15 Percent persons have reached up to ninth 

standard. The major castes in the village are Patel. Mer(OBC), Gen and Schedule Tribe . Majority of population is involved in 

agriculture and animal husbandry. 

Table no. 21: Demographic information 

Sl no Village Population SC ST 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 

1 Junej 560 299 261 67 38 29 11.96 0 0 0 0 

2 Bhadula 698 366 332 88 43 45 12.60 0 0 0 0 

3 Bhogsar 485 252 233 55 29 26 11 0 0 0 0 

4 Jamra 1191 637 554 128 62 66 11 7 3 4 0.06 

5 Kadegi 2227 1142 1085 75 39 36 3.40 0 0 0 0 

6 Kotda 3208 1765 1443 205 105 100 06 0 0 0 0 

Total 8369 4461 3908 618 316 302 9.33 7 3 4 0.06 



Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sl no 

Village 

Literacy Literacy % Literacy % 

Total % Male % Female % above age 14 below age 14 

1 Junej 326 58.21 207 69.23 119 45.60 40.75 17.46 

2 Bhadula 413 59.17 252 68.85 161 48.49 41.42 17.75 

3 Bhogsar 256 53 160 63 96 41 37.1 15.9 

4 Jamra 579 49 351 55 228 41 34.3 14.7 

5 Kadegi 1009 45.86 621 54.37 388 35.76 32.10 13.76 

6 Kotda 1310 41 806 46 504 35 28.7 12.3 

Total 3893 51.04 2397 59.41 1496 41.14 35.73 15.31 

Migration Pattern: People migrate during summer season to different parts of the District like Jungadh and Rajkot as daily 

wagers, agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant force 

these people to migrate to other places 



Table no. 23: Migration details 

Migration 

Sl 

Total 

Village 

no 

population Total Male Female 

1 Junej 560 58 42 16 Na 3-6 YES 

Migration by months 

Income 

More 

Up to 3 

than 6 

months 

months 

Main reason during 

for migration migration 

/ month 

2200 

2 Bhadula 698 140 84 56 Na months YES 

Lake of 

2250 

3 Bhogsar 485 65 45 20 Na YES 

Employment 

2350 

4 Jamra 1191 250 180 70 Na NO 2350 

5 Kadegi 2227 245 174 71 Na NO 2200 

6 Kotda 3208 550 335 215 Na YES 2850 



Table no. 24: Poverty 

Sl no Village 

Total 

BPL 

% of BPL 

% of land less 

Total Land less HH 

Household 0-16 16-20 Total HH 

HH 

1 Junej 154 5 6 11 7.14 24 15.58% 

1 Bhadula 190 4 33 37 19.47 37 19.47% 

1 Bhogsar 167 43 21 64 38.32 25 14.80% 

1 JAMRA 275 116 82 198 72% 9 3.28% 

1 KADEGI 525 3 38 41 7.80% 39 7.42% 

1 Kotda 733 17 22 39 5.32 90 12.28% 

Infrastructure facilities: 

Kadegi watershed is well connected with Kutiyana Taluka with pucca roads. The village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram Yojana of 

the State Government. Nearly 99 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. Kadegi Projecthas a primary school 

with all facilities. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to Kutiyana 30 kilometres away. This also contributes to 

lower education level of the people. The village do not have a Primary Health Centre for which villagers have to go to Kutiyana which is 30 Km. 

away. The village comes under not Group Panchayat.. 



Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

Pucca Schools 

Distance 

Milk 

Other 

road 

Post 

from 

Milk 

Sl 

Colleges 

Banks 

collection 

cooperatives Any other 

Village to the 

Office 

nearest 

cooperative 

no 

LP UP HS (Number) 

(Number) 

centre 

/ CBIs institution 

village 

(Distance) 

market 

(Number) 

(Number) 

(Number) 

(Y/N) 

yard 

1 Junej Y LP up 0 2 km 0 30 KM 1 1 0 0 

2 Bhadula Y LP 0 0 0 28 KM 1 1 0 0 

3 Bhogsar Y LP 0 7 0 15 KM 1 1 0 0 

4 Jamra Y LP UP 0 0 0 22 KM 1 1 0 0 

5 Kadegi Y LP UP 0 0 0 32 KM 1 1 0 0 

6 Kotda Y LP 0 0 0 9 KM 1 1 0 0 



Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets 

HHs HHs with phones HHs with vehicle 

HHs 

HHs 

HHs with HHs 

Sl 

HHs with with 

with 

Village 

Land 

2- 4- with TV 

Drinking with 

no 

electricity safety 

Mobile 

cooking 

line 

wheeler wheeler set 

water freedge 

latrines 

gas 

1 Junej 154 115 0 118 67 6 128 19 154 12 

2 Bhadula 175 135 30 175 56 2 95 15 190 15 

3 Bhogsar 167 120 2 125 39 3 112 11 167 10 

4 Jamra 275 98 40 215 157 20 145 17 275 19 

5 Kadegi 498 211 15 491 155 19 145 87 450 29 

6 Kotda 733 733 115 690 432 50 358 55 729 115 



3.3. Livelihood pattern: 

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers in 

Kutiya , & Junagadh District and as agriculture labour in other parts of the District. 

Table no. 27: Income 

Sl no Village Agriculture 

Animal 

husbandry 

Casual labour Others Total 

1 Junej 7738000 171000 777000 0 8686000 

2 Bhadula 7422000 479000 809500 30000 8740500 

3 Bhogsar 4550000 173000 765000 0 5488000 

4 Jamra 3650000 369000 709000 75000 4638600 

5 Kadegi 14134000 798000 2537800 163200 17633000 

6 Kotda 19029000 2109700 6675000 45000 27858700 

Total 56523000 4099700 12273300 313200 73044800 



Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 

Animal 

Sl 

Total 

Agriculture Casual 

Village 

Agriculture husbandry 

Services Handicraft Others 

no 

workforce 

+ AH labour 

(AH) 

1 Junej 364 200 73 55 47 18 0 25 

2 Bhadula 454 

3 Bhogsar 315 

4 Jamra 774 

5 Kadegi 1448 

6 Kotda 2085 

250 91 68 59 23 0 32 

173 63 47 41 16 0 22 

426 155 116 101 39 0 54 

796 290 217 188 72 0 101 

1147 417 313 271 104 0 146 

Total 5440 2992 1088 816 707 272 0 381 



3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: 

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output 

per hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total 

cultivated area under that crop.” 

Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for Kadegi Project), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For 

Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (IWDP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Porbandar). The results indicate that Kadegi 

Project has very low productivity compared to world, India, Gujarat and Porbandar. The productivity is low not only because 

that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of irrigation, salty 

water and scarcity of rain. 

The Kadegi Project comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they 

generally grow high value crops like Ground nut, Juwar etc. In case of low rainfall they can’t take any crops. So we can say that 

monsoon decides cropping patterns of Kadegi Project. 

The world productivity of Ground nuts is 665.80 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 7.3 lakh hectares with a production of 8.0 

lakh tonnes and productivity of 1,094 kg/ha. Gujarat alone produces about 80% of the total castor of our country from 50% of 

the area with a record productivity of about 1950 kg/ha. Porbanar district has very good productivity 1300 kg /ha. The Kadegi 

Projectarea has only 400 kg/ha productivity. It is very low compare to district, State, India and world. 



2500 

G roundnut P roduc tivity (kg /ha/year) 

2000 

1950 

1300 

1500 

1000 

500 

665.8 

1094 

400 

0 

World India G ujarat P orbandar K adeg i 

Figer No. 4 Comparative Groundnut Producitivity 

Pearl millet is the fourth most important grain crop next to rice,wheat and sorghum.The crop is cultivaed for grain as well 

as fodder in the semi arid tropical regions. Pearl millet traditionally is an indispensable component of dry-land farming system. 

In world pearl millet productivity is 984 kg/ha and India has 1094 kg/ha of Bajara productivity and Gujarat is far better than 

world and India. The productivity of pearl millet is 3800 kg/ha for Porbanar, whereas for Kadegi porject, it is only 500 kg/ha. 



2000 

P earl millet produc tivity (kg /ha/year) 

1,950 

1,800 

1500 

1000 

984 

1,094 

500 

500 

0 


Figer No. 5 Comparative Pearal Millet Producitivity 

Rapeseed (mustard) is the second most important oilseed crop after groundnut,contributing nearly 25-30% of the total oilseed 

production in the country.The world productivity of Rapeseed-mustard is 829 kg/ha.We can see that Kadegi Projecthas very 

low productivity in comparison to Porbanar,Gujarat,India and world 



The world and India productivity of cumin are 550 kg,400 kg per hectare respectively. Gujarat is a major cumin producing state 

in India with the productivity of 472 kg/ha.Cumin productivity of Porbanar is 300 kg/ha and Kadegi village has very poor 

productivity with 225 Kg/ha. 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

0 

C umin produc tivity (kg /ha/year) 

550 

472 

400 

300 

225 


Figer No. 6 Comparative Cumin Producitivity 



The Kadegi Project area has low productivity because of the following reasons: 

i) Full dependence on monsoon: 

Kadegi Project is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 

100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon 

determines the success or failure of agriculture production. The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and 

inadequate. 

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area: 

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. 

Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time. and the salinity also decrees his fertility. 

iii) Traditional farming methods: 

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as 

multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these 

factors contribute to low productivity. 



iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery: 

Even today a large number of farmers in Junej use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed 

drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices. 

v) Lack of finances for farmers: 

In Junej most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and 

other inputs. 

vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: 

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to 

higher land productivity. In Junej, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most 

useful in irrigated condition. But in Junej 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Junej mostly farmers use nitrogenous 

fertilizers, especially urea, it can’t decrees salinity. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality 

of land. 



vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing: 

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells 

to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is 

farmers don’t have proper storage facilities. 





Watershed Activities 

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid 

tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low 

literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific 

approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next 

generation watershed development. 

4.1. Scientific Planning: 

i) Cluster Approach 

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Kadegi 

Projectconsists of four micro- watersheds namely 5G1B1b1a as their respective codes. Further Junej watershed project is in 

continuation with other watershed projects. 

ii) Base line Survey 

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a 

benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey 

was undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati – 

cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every 

household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST 



population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the 

cattle and various schemes running and their benefits 

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, 

well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. 

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards 

the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous 

Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, 

implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA 

techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social 

orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated 

questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for 

afforestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers 



iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning 

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. 

a) Prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geomorphological, 

Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These 

were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 

b) Planning 

A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope 

percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning 

System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to 

create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil 

and water conservation structures. 

c) Hydrological modelling 

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This 

model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to 

remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam. 



S. 

No. 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 

Scientific criteria/ inputs used 

Whether scientific criteria 

was used 

(A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

Yes 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the 

name of the Institute 

Baseline survey 

Yes 

Hydro-geological survey 

Yes 

Contour mapping 

Yes 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

Yes 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

Online IT connectivity between 

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes 

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes 

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes 



Availability of GIS layers 

1. Cadastral map Yes 

2. Village boundaries Yes 

3. Drainage Yes 

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 

5. Land use Yes 

6. Ground water status Yes 

7. Watershed boundaries Yes 

8. Activity Yes 

Crop simulation models # 

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium 

spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# 

Weather Station 

(B) Inputs 

1. Bio-pesticides No 

2. Organic manures No 

3. Vermicompost Yes 

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 

5. Water saving devices Yes 

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 

7. Bio-fencing Yes 

District Watershed Development Unit- Porbandar 59 

Yes 

No 

No


8. Nutrient budgeting No 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No 

Any other (please specify) 



Figer No. 7 Focuas Group Discussion 



Fig.-8. Focus group discussion 



4.2. Institution building 

i) Watershed Committee (WC) 

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the 

village. This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of 

the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in 

Junej village. Since the watershed has only one village so no separate watershed sub-committee was formed in the village. 

Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT. 


Bhogsa 

r 

Waters 

hed 

Commi 

ttee 

Under 

Progre 

ss 

Bhadula Watershed Committee 

Under Progress 


Table No. 31 Committee Details 

Sl. 

No. 

Names 

of WCs 

Date of 

Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Designatio 

n 

President 

Name 

Bhalodiya Kumandas B. 

M/ 

F 

M 

SC ST SF 

M 

F 

√ 

L 

F 

Land 

-less 

UG 

√ 

SH 

G 

GP 

Any 

othe 

r 

Educational 

qualification 

√ 10 

Function 

/s 

assigned 

# 

Secretary 

Bhalodiya Sureshbhai B. 

M √ √ 

12 

Member/ 

Secretary 

Member 

Vyas Arti N. F √ CRD 

Seradiya Viotthalbhai S. 

M 

√ 

√ 

10 

(Member 

Rabara Ranchodbhai J. 

M 

√ 

√ 

8 

1 

(Member) 

(Member 

(Member) 

(Member) 

Kher Hardasbhai P. 

Bhoraniya Hardasbhai 

K.) 

Keshwala Bachubhai 

Masri 

M 

M 

M 

Maru Hardasbhai T. M √ √ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

6 

12 

7 

10 

(Member) 

Vaghela Mansukhbhai S.. M √ √ 

√ 

0 

(Member) 

(Member) 

Koradiya Kaushalyaben 

K. 

Kher Valiben C. M √ 

F 

√ 

√ 

√ 

10 

0 

2 

(President) 

(Secretary) 

Bhogesara Hajabhai K.. 

Bhogesara Hirben H. 

M 

F 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 12 

7 


Jamra Watershed Committee 



(Member/ 

Secretary) 

Member 


Bhogesara Nagajan U. M 

√ 

√ 

8 

(Member) 

Bhogesara Motiben A.. 

F 

√ 

√ 

5 

(Member) 

Bhogesara Puriben K. 

F 

√ 

√ 

3 

(Member) 

Bhogesara Karsanbhai R. 

M 

√ 

√ 

5 

(Member) 

Bhogesara Nagabhai R. 

M 

√ 

√ 

5 

(Member) 

Bhogesara Lilabhai A. 

M 

√ 

√ 

3 

(Member) 

Chavda Govindbhai S. M √ √ 

√ 

4 

(Member) 

Chavda Labhuben G. F √ √ 

√ 

2 

(Member) 

Jivtiben Keshubhai F √ 

√ 

7 

(President) 

Karangiya Vejiben P. 

M 

√ 

√ 

√ 5 

(Secretary) 

Karangiya Hardasbhai N. 

M √ √ 

12 

3 

(Member/ 

Secretary) 

Member 


√ 

√ 

Karangiya Nanduben M. F 

5 

(Member) 

Karangiya Manjuben V.. 

F 

√ 

√ 

7 

(Member) 

Vala Pala V. 

M 

√ 

√ 

4 

(Member) 

Vadoliya Sarmanbhai B. 

M 

√ 

√ 

7 


Kadegi Watershed Committee 



(Member) 

Vadoliya Nathabhai U. 

M 

√ 

√ 

6 

(Member) 

Karangiya Maniben B. 

F 

√ 

√ 

2 

(Member) 

Karangiya Mulubhai L. 

M 

√ 

√ 

5 

(Member) 

Vadoliya Sajanben K. 

F 

√ 

√ 

0 

(Member) 

Sisodiya Masribhai K. M √ 

√ 

5 

(President) 

Kadegiya Keshubhai A. 

M 

√ 

√ 

√ 12 

(Secretary) 

Kadegiya Sanganbhai 

M √ √ 

7 

(Member/ 

Secretary) 

Member 


√ 

√ 

Kadegiya Jivabhai R. M 

6 

(Member) 

Chauhan Rajsibhai M. M √ √ 

√ 

5 

4 

(Member) 

Jadeja Chana A. 

M 

√ 

√ 

8 

(Member) 

Kodiyatar Gogadhbhai M. M √ √ 

√ 

0 

(Member) 

Chauhan Manjuben M. F √ √ 

√ 

0 

(Member) 

Solanki Kamlaben J. F √ √ 

√ 

5 

(Member) 

Kadegiya Hiriben G. 

F 

√ 

√ 

0 

(Member) 

Kadegiya Satiben S. 

F 

√ 

√ 

0 


Junej 

Wate 

rshed 

Com 

mitte 

Unde e 

r 

Progr 

ess 

Kotda Watershed Committee 



(Member) 

Kadegiya Ramdebhai D.. M √ 

√ 

5 

(President) 

Modha Bhimabhai S. 

M 

√ 

√ 

√ 8 

(Secretary) 

Odedara Ramdebhai D. 

M √ √ 

10 

(Member/ 

Secretary) 

Member 


Odedra Alabhai M. 

M 

√ 

√ 

2 

(Member) 

Parmar Karshanbhai L. 

M 

√ 

√ 

4 

(Member) 

Modha Valiben B. 

F 

√ 

√ 

0 

5 

(Member) Parmar Gauri K. 

√ 

F 

(Member) 

(Member) 

Chauhan Jivat D. M √ √ 

√ 

√ 

√ 9 

0 

(Member) 

Odedara Jayshreeben N. 

F 

√ 

√ 

√ 9 

(Member) 

Rabari Devabhai V. M √ √ 

√ 

4 

(Member) 

Timaniya Lakhmanbhai J. M √ √ 

√ 

4 

(Member) 

Bambhaniya Kishorbhai 

D. 

M 

√ 

√ 

10 

6 

(President 

) 

Modha Vikrambhai V. 

M 

√ 

√ 

√ 10 



(Secretary 

) 

(Member/ 

Secretary) 

Modhvadiya Leenaben 

J. 

F 

√ 


Member Modha Motiben A. F 

(Member) Vadher Nathiben K. F 

(Member) Gosai Manglaben M. F 

(Member) 

Modhvadiya Shantiben 

P. 

(Member) Modha Dudabhai A.. M 

(Member) Parmar Nebhabhai H. M 

(Member) Modha Lakhabhai R. M 

(Member) Pandya Dhirajlal M. M 

(Member) Vadher Dilipbhai A. M √ 

F 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

√ 

7 

7 

2 

7 

6 

9 

1 

10 

10 

8 

ii )Self Help Group 

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help 

group initiative especially for women/men help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor 

women. 



Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which 

came up with the following observations: 

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution. 

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders 

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people 

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking. 

With a detailed discussion with some of the local working in the area like Sakhi Mandal, it was planned to have some capacity 

building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women 

empowerment. 



Table no. 32: SHG detail 

No. of SC/ST in each No. of BPL in each 

Total no. of registered SHGs 

No. of members 


category 

category 

the With With 

With 

Village. only only 

both 

Men Women 

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i) Landless 9 9 5 5 9 0 9 

Junej 1 1 0 2 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 2 11 13 3 3 0 8 8 

(iii) MF 

Total 

1 1 2 11 11 22 5 3 8 9 8 15 

Bhadula 1 0 0 1 

(i) Landless 

(ii) SF 11 11 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 

Total 11 11 



Bhogsar 2 2 0 4 

(i) Landless 18 8 26 11 11 

(ii) SF 4 14 18 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 

Total 2 2 0 4 22 22 44 11 11 

Jamra 1 1 0 2 

(i) Landless 5 6 11 

(ii) SF 6 5 11 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 

Total 11 11 22 

Kadegi 2 2 1 5 

(i) Landless 11 11 22 1 1 2 

(ii) SF 22 11 33 17 3 20 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 

Total 2 2 1 5 33 22 55 18 4 22 



Kotda 3 2 0 5 

(i) Landless 22 24 35 11 24 35 11 0 11 

(ii) SF 11 0 11 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 

Total 3 2 0 5 33 24 57 11 24 35 11 0 11 



User Group: 

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user 

group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group 

would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. 

Table no. 33: UG detail 

S. No. 

Total 

Total no. of UGs 

No. of members 

No. of SC/ST in each No. of BPL in each 

category 

category 

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i)Landless 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 



Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Amount 

S. No. Names of Villages earmarked for 

EPA 

Entry Point Activities planned Estimated cost Expected outcome 

1 Junej 2.38 

Storage Room in Smasan,with new 

smashan 

Roof Water Harvesting Structer (2, in 

School & Agnwadi) 

2.30 Village settlement 

0.60 Drinking water facility 

New construction of havada 0.90 

Drinking water facility 

for animals 

2 Bhadula 4.49 

Repairing of Community well 0.52 Drinking water facility 

Roof Water Harvesting Structer (2, in 

School & Agnwadi, 

0.60 Drinking water facility 

Community roof water harvesting 0.60 Drinking water facility 

R.O. filter 0.20 Drinking water facility 



3 BHOGSAR 2.17 

Wire Fancing With Gate in GP, Agnwadi 0.37 

R.O. filter in school 0.20 

Roof Water Harvesting Structure in School & 

Agnwadi 0.60 

Village 

settlement 

Drinking 

water facility 

Drinking 


4 Jamra 7.01 

Recharging of Pond 1.09 

Village 

settlement 

wire fencing with Gate in Samsan with 

Village 

0.60 

Gardening 

settlement 

Repairing Community Hall with Roof Water 

Village 

0.82 

Harvesting Structer 

settlement 

Roof Water Harvesting Structer in School & 

Drinking 

0.60 

Agnwadi 


Snanghat 1.51 

Drinking 


Hume Pipe Culvert 1.68 Drinking 



5 Kadegi 4.08 

R.O. Plant 0.20 

Havada With Slab 0.86 

wire fencing with gate in Samsan with Toilet 

Block 

1.45 

Roof Water Harvesting Structure in School & 

Agnwadi 

0.60 

R.O. filter (1) 0.20 

Hume Pipe Culvert 0.71 

Pond Recharging line 0.52 


Drinking 


Drinking 


for animal 

Village 

settlement 

Drinking 


Drinking 


Better road 

connectivity 

Village 

settlement 

6 Kotda 4.10 

Repairing of pump house 0.60 Water facility 

Repairing of community open well 0.40 Safe Water 



facility 

Stand Post ( water tap–7 nozzle) 0.20 Water facility 

R.O. filter (1) 0.20 

Drinking 


New Havada With Slab 0.86 

Drinking 


Wire Fancing With Gate & Gardening at 

aanganwadi,pump room 

Community Pond Wire Fencing and Bio 

Fencing 

0.87 

1.00 

Village 

settlement 

Village 

settlement 

Total 24.23 - 24.78 



Fig-9 Proposed sites for entry point activities 



(A) New Construction of Havada with slab at village:- Bhadula, Ta-kutiyana,. 

I t e m Description No Length Width Depth Qty. T. Qty. Unit Rate Amount 

1 Excavation for Foundation 

including 

dewatering & depositing the 

excavated 

material as and where directed 

with 

lead of 100 mt and all lift etc. 

comp. 

a) Loose or Soft Soil 

b) Dense or Hard Soil 

2 

2 

1 

9.00 

6.54 

4.45 

0.23 

0.23 

2.46 

0.23 

0.23 

0.60 

0.95 

0.69 

6.58 

c) Hard Murrum 

8.23 CMT 70.00 576.10 

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 13 Sr. No. 

3 

P & L C.C.-1:3:6 and curing comp 

2 

9.00 

2.50 

0.15 

6.75 

10.09 CMT 1758.00 17738.22 

2 

.(A) Foundation & plinth 

2 

2.00 

2.50 

0.15 

1.50 



S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 16 Sr. 

No.3 

1 

1 

4.00 

4.00 

2.00 

2.00 

0.15 

0.08 

1.20 

0.64 

U.C.R. masonry with hard stone of 

approved quality in foundation & 

plinth in C.M. 1:6 incl. 

levelling up etc. comp. (i) C.M. 1:6 


1 

3 

1 4.46 2.46 0.45 4.94 4.94 CMT 1473.00 7276.62 

4 

Filling available excavated earth in 

trenches plinth, sides of foundation 

etc. comp. 


6 

2 

2 

8.54 

2.00 

2.27 

2.27 

0.15 

0.15 

5.82 

1.36 

7.18 CMT 29.90 214.68 



5 

White stone bela masonary block 

in course 

in super structure in C.M. 1:6 etc. 

comp. 

0.38 

2.74 

0.96 


11 

0.23 

0.15 

0.23 

0.23 

2.74 

1.00 

0.38 

1.84 

4.00 

0.23 

1.00 

0.71 

1.54 

0.23 

0.76 

0.27 

1.54 

0.23 

0.45 

1.86 

9.00 

0.23 

0.45 

1.35 

6.54 

0.23 

0.45 

0.92 

4.46 

0.23 

0.45 

0.41 

2.00 

8.71 CMT 2530.00 22036.30 

6 

P & L C.C. 1:2:4 & curing comp. for 

chejja, 

lintel, beam, Slab etc 


11[B] 

2 

2 

1 

2 

4.46 

2.00 

4.46 

4.91 

0.23 

0.23 

2.46 

0.45 

0.23 

0.23 

0.13 

0.13 

0.47 

0.21 

1.43 

0.57 

3.02 CMT 2524.00 7622.48 

2 

2.91 

0.45 

0.13 

0.34 



7 Cold twised steel rein forcement 

for RCC 

work incl. bending, etc comp 


14(A) 

6 

60 

6 

34 

4.46 

0.92 

2.46 

0.92 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

26.76 

55.20 

14.76 

31.28 

23.82 

21.53 

13.14 

12.20 

36 

3.81 

0.00 

137.16 

85.0392 

23 

5.81 

0.00 

133.63 

52.1157 207.83 KG 50.00 10391.50 

8 

2 

3.70 

0.00 

2.23 

16.50 

2 

1.70 

0.00 

2.23 

7.58 

1 

1.70 

0.00 

2.23 

3.79 

8 

0.38 

0.00 

2.74 

8.32 

8 

0.23 

0.00 

2.74 

5.04 

8 

0.38 

0.00 

1.74 

5.29 

2 

3.70 

0.00 

0.69 

5.11 

2 

1.70 

0.00 

0.69 

2.35 

Cold twised steel rein forcement 

for RCC 

work incl. bending, etc comp. 


14(A) 

2 

2 

1 

2 

5.36 

2.46 

4.00 

4.46 

0.00 

0.00 

2.00 

0.00 

1.03 

1.03 

0.00 

1.13 

11.04 

5.07 

8.00 

9.04 

91.65 CMT 152.00 13930.80 



2 2.00 0.00 1.13 4.52 

9 P & L C.C. 1:2:4 laid in one layer 

finished 

with a floating coat of a neat 

cement 

(B) 50 mm thick 


15(B) 1 

3.54 

1.54 

0.00 

5.45 

1 

4.00 

2.00 

0.00 

8.00 13.45 SMT 167.00 2246.15 

10 White Washing with lime two coat 

to give 

an even shade etc comp. 


1 

8 

8 

8 

2 

0.38 

0.23 

0.38 

3.70 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

2.74 

2.74 

1.74 

0.69 

8.32 

5.04 

5.29 

5.11 

2 

1.70 

0.00 

0.69 

2.35 

2 

5.36 

0.00 

1.03 

11.04 

2 

2.46 

0.00 

1.03 

5.07 

1 

4.00 

2.00 

0.00 

8.00 

2 

4.46 

0.00 

1.13 

9.04 

2 

2.00 

0.00 

1.13 

4.52 63.78 SMT 3.60 229.61 



11 Providing cement Vata (10 cm x 10 

cm size) 

quater round in cement mortam 

1:1 incl. 

neat cemet finishing. watering etc. 

comp. 


15 

2 

2 

2 

4.00 

2.00 

3.31 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

8.00 

4.00 

6.62 

24.78 RMT 15.80 391.524 

4 

1.54 

0.00 

0.00 

6.16 

12 P & F polythelene pipe to wall 

celling & floor 

6.0 kgf/cm4 working pressure low 

density. 

(E) 50mm dia 


4(E) 

2.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 RMT 109.00 436 

13 

P & F polythelene pipe to wall 

celling & floor 


density. 

2 

1 22.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 22.00 RMT 109.00 2398 



(E) 50mm dia 


4(E) 

Total Net 

Rs. :: >> 85487.98 

Say Net 

Rs. :: >> 85490.00 





(B) New Construction of Wood Storage Room at smashan at village:- Junej,Ta-Kutiyana, 

I. 

No. 


1 Excavation for Foundation including 

dewatering & depositing the 

excavated 

material as and where directed with 

a lead of 100 mt and all lift etc. comp. 

a) Loose or Soft Soil 

b) Dense or Hard Soil 

c) Hard Murrum 

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 13 Sr. No. 3 2 

6.37 

0.60 

1.22 

9.33 

6.95 

CMT 

57.00 

396.10 

2 

5.17 

0.60 

1.22 

7.57 

6.95 

CMT 

70.00 

486.44 

2 

2.31 

0.45 

0.23 

0.48 

3.47 

CMT 

114.00 

396.10 

2 S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 16 Sr. No. 3 

P & L C.C.-1:3:6 and curing comp. 

(A) Foundation & plinth 

2 

2 

2 

6.37 

5.17 

2.31 

0.60 

0.60 

0.46 

0.15 

0.15 

0.15 

1.15 

0.93 

0.32 4.70 

CMT 1758.00 8258.82 



1 5.54 5.54 0.08 2.30 

3 U.C.R. masonry with hard stone of 

approved 

quality in foundation & plinth in C.M. 

1:6 incl. 

levelling up etc. comp. (i) C.M. 1:6 


6.37 

0.45 

1.52 

8.71 

2 

5.17 

0.45 

1.52 

7.07 15.79 CMT 1473.00 23253.84 

P & L C.C. 1:3:6 & curing comp. incl. 

cost 

of form work in (A) walls caps/coping 


6.37 

0.45 

0.15 

0.86 

4 

2 

5.17 

0.45 

0.15 

0.70 1.56 CMT 2256.00 3514.62 



5 

Filling available excavated earth in 

trenches 

plinth, sides of foundation etc. comp. 

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 14 Sr. No. 6 1 5.54 5.54 0.30 9.21 9.21 CMT 29.90 275.30 

6 White stone bela masonary block in 

course 

in super structure in C.M. 1:6 etc. 

comp. 

4 

4 

4 

0.46 

0.23 

0.46 

0.23 

0.23 

0.23 

3.20 

3.20 

3.20 

1.35 

0.68 

1.35 

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 29 Sr. No. 11 

2 

6.00 

0.23 

0.60 

1.66 

2 

5.54 

0.23 

0.60 

1.53 

2 

2.31 

0.45 

0.15 

0.31 

2 

2.31 

0.23 

0.15 

0.16 7.04 CMT 2530.00 17815.96 

7 P & L C.C. 1:2:4 & curing comp. for 

chejja 

, 

lintel, beam, Slab etc. 


11[B] 

2 

2 

1 

4 

6.37 

5.17 

6.00 

6.46 

0.23 

0.23 

6.00 

0.45 

0.45 

0.45 

0.14 

0.14 

1.32 

1.07 

5.04 

1.63 9.06 CMT 2524.00 22859.11 



8 Cold twised steel rein forcement for 

RCC 

work incl. bending, etc comp. 


14(A) 

4 

160 

42 

42 

6.00 

0.38 

6 

6 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

24.00 

60.80 

252.00 

252.00 

14.88 

23.71 

156.24 

156.24 

168 

0.45 

0.00 

75.60 

46.872 

16 

6.46 

0.00 

103.36 

40.3104 438.25 KG 50.00 21912.72 

9 Providing 15 mm thick cement 

plaster for 

interior plastering finished even & 

smooth 

in c.m.-1:3 


2(i) 

8 

4 

1 

8 

3.20 

3.20 

5.54 

2.31 

0.23 

0.45 

5.54 

0.23 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.89 

5.76 

30.69 

4.25 

4 

5.54 

0.30 

0.00 

6.65 53.24 SMT 85.00 4525.23 



10 20 mm thick sandfaced cement 

plaster on 

walls consisting of 12mm thick 

backing coat 

4 

4 

8 

6.37 

6.00 

0.45 

0.45 

0.15 

3.20 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

11.47 

3.60 

11.52 

of c.m. 1:3 & 8mm thick finishing coat 


8 

4 

0.23 

0.45 

3.20 

3.20 

0.00 

0.00 

5.89 

5.76 

c.m. 1:1 

4 

1.00 

6.46 

0.00 

25.84 


9(i) 

4 

2 

6.00 

6.00 

0.30 

1.45 

0.00 

0.00 

7.20 

17.40 

2 

5.54 

1.45 

0.00 

16.07 104.74 SMT 152.00 15920.48 

11 P & L C.C. 1:2:4 laid in one layer 

finished 

with a floating coat of a neat cement 

(B) 50 mm thick 


15(B) 

1 5.54 5.54 0.00 30.69 30.69 SMT 167.00 5125.50 



Providing cement Vata (10 cm x 10 

cm size) 

quater round in cement mortam 1:1 

incl 

neat cemet finishing. watering etc. 

comp. 

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 57 Sr. No. 15 

22.16 RMT 15.80 350.128 

12 

4 5.54 0.00 0.00 22.16 

13 P & F polythelene pipe to wall celling 

& floor 


density. 

E) 50mm dia 


4(E) 

2 2.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 RMT 109.00 436 

Total Net Rs. 

:: >> 

Say Net Rs. :: 

>> 

125526.34 

125525/- 





Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Identifying 

Initiation of 

Hydrogeological 

(please Cost (Rs. in 

Any other Estimated 

S. Name of 

Capacity IEC Baseline 

technical 

village level 

No. villages 

building activities survey 

support 

institution 

survey 

specify) lakh) 

agencies 

1 Junej 0.6 1.47 0.6 0.17 0.07 0.6 0.07 3.58 

2 Bhadula 0.11 0.27 0.11 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.01 0.67 

3 Bhogsar 0.53 1.35 0.53 0.16 0.09 0.53 0.07 3.26 

4 Jamra 1.72 4.38 1.72 0.54 0.23 1.72 0.2 10.51 

5 Kadegi 1.97 4.96 1.97 0.59 0.26 1.97 0.17 11.89 

6 Kotda 1.64 4.06 1.64 0.49 0.22 1.64 0.14 9.83 



Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Proposed target 

Sl. 

No. 

Village 

name 

Type of structures 

Augmentation/ repair of 

Construction of new structures Total target 

existing structures 

Area to 

Area to 

Area to 

Storage 

Storage 

Storage 

be 

Estimated be 

Estimated be 

Estimated 

No. capacity 

No. capacity 

capacity 

irrigated 

cost irrigated 

cost irrigated 

cost 

cmt 

cmt 

cmt 

(ha) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

Junej 

(i) New pond - - - - 1 75 14175 8.93 75 14175 8.93 

(ii) Recharging of 

2 54 10170 6.41 1 10 1800 1.13 64 11970 7.54 

Pond 

(iii) Causeway - - - - 4 33 - 3.94 33 - 3.94 

(iv) New Pond 1 38 7075 5.38 38 7075 5.38 

Total 2 54 10170 6.41 7 156 23050 19.38 210 33220 25.79 



BHADULA (i) Deepening of 

Pond 

1 61 11520 7.26 1 75 14175 8.93 136 25695 16.19 

(ii) Check Dam - - - - 2 86 456000 10.32 86 456000 10.32 

(iii) H.P. Culvert 1 13 - 1.50 13 - 1.68 

Total 1 61 11520 7.26 4 174 470175 20.75 235 481695 28.19 

Bhogsar (i) Deepening of 

Pond 

1 158 30000 18.90 - - - - 158 30000 18.90 

(ii) Earthen bund 1 34 6400 4.03 44 8140 4.03 

Total 1 158 30000 18.90 1 34 6400 4.03 202 38140 22.93 



JAMARA 

(i) New Pond 1 61 11520 7.26 3 183 34560 21.78 244 46080 29.04 

(ii) Check Dam - - - - 2 43.02 228000 10.32 43.02 228000 10.32 

(iii) earthen bund 1 12.99 2475 1.56 12.99 2475 1.56 

Total 1 61 11520 7.26 6 239.01 265035 33.66 300.01 276555 40.92 

KADEGI 

(i) New Pond 3 129.34 24338 15.52 1 236.25 45000 28.35 365.59 474338 43.87 

(ii) Earthen bund 1 4.33 825 0.52 - - - - 4.33 825 0.52 

(iii) Cause Way - - - - 1 5.90 - 0.71 5.90 - 0.71 

(iv)Check Dam - - - - 1 43.02 228000 5.16 43.02 228000 5.16 

Total 4 133.67 25163 16.04 3 312.17 273000 34.22 418.84 703163 50.26 



KOTADA 

(i) New Pond 3 323.27 61575 38.79 0 0 0 0 323.27 61575 38.79 

(ii) Cause Way - - - - 4 41.63 - 5.00 41.63 - 5.00 

Total 7 364.90 61575 43.79 0 0 0 0 364.90 61575 43.79 



EXCAVATION OF NEW POND, AT –JAMRA, TA- KUTIYANA,. 

I. 

No. 


1 Excavation for foundation to all soil 

incliding dewatering and disposing 

excavated stuff materials as and 

where directed within a lead of 

100.00mts. and lift up to 0.00 mts 

to 1.50 mts 

(Loose or Soft Soil) 

1 

4608 

CMT 

47.00 

216576 

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 13 Sr. No. 1( A ) 

1 

4608 

CMT 

60.00 

276480 

1 180.00 32.00 2.00 

1 

2304 

CMT 

101.00 

232704 

Excavation in Loose or Soft Soil 40% of 

Total 4608 

Excavation in Dense or Hard Soil 40% of 

Total 4608 

Excavation in Hard -Murrum 20% of 

Total 2304 

Total Net 

725760 



EXCAVATION OF PAAT VARU POND, AT –KOTDA, TA- KUTIYANA,. 

I. No. I t e m Description No Length Width Depth Qty. T. Qty. Unit Rate Amount 

Rs. 

1 Excavation for foundation to all soil 

incliding dewatering and disposing 

excavated stuff materials as and 

where directed within a lead of 

100.00mts. and lift up to 0.00 mts. 

to 1.50 mts 

(Loose or Soft Soil) 

1 

12000 

CMT 

47.00 

564000 

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 13 Sr. No. 1( A ) 

1 

12000 

CMT 

60.00 

720000 

1 125.00 160.00 1.50 

1 

6000 

CMT 

101.00 

606000 

Excavation in Loose or Soft Soil 40% of 

Total 12000 

Excavation in Dense or Hard Soil 40% of 

Total 12000 

Excavation in Hard -Murrum 20% of 

Total 6000 



Total Net 

Rs. 

1890000 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 

S. No. 

Major activities of the SHGs 


Average annual income from 

Villages 

Name of activity 

No. of SHGs involved 

activity per SHG (Rs. in Lakhs) 

Ground Nuts Processing 1 2.50 

1 Junej 

Mandap service 1 1.75 

Chiko plantatio 1 0.75 

2 Bhadula 

Papad Manufactring 1 0.50 

Handicraft 2 0.75 

3 Bhogsar Santing 1 0.50 

4 Jamra 

Handicraft 2 0.75 



5 Kadegi 

Animal Husbandary 2 2.50 

Paper Making Items 1 0.75 

6 Kotda 

Santing 1 0.50 

Decoration 1 0.55 



Papad manufacturing 1 0.25 

Chitafal plantation 

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target 

Drainage 

Nonconventional 

(please Estimated 

Any other Total 

Name of Ridge area 

Nursery Land Crop Pasture Fishery 

S. 

line 

villages treatment 

raising development demonstrations development development 

No. 

treatment 

energy specify) cost (Rs. 

(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) In lakhs) 

1 Junej 4 3.94 3 7.53 - - 2 14.31 1 0.15 1 4.00 - - - 0.00 - - 29.79 

2 Bhadula 2 10.32 1 4.00 1 3.00 4 20.75 5 0.75 2 8.00 - - 5 1.60 30 10.77 59.20 

3 Bhogsar - - 1 4.03 - - 1 18.90 2 0.30 1 4.00 - - - - - - 27.23 

4 Jamra 2 10.32 1 1.56 1 3.00 4 29.04 10 1.50 3 8.60 5 1.60 75 32.00 87.62 

5 Kadegi 2 8.87 1 0.52 4 43.87 5 0.15 1 2.00 30 10.77 63.03 

6 Kotda 4 5.00 1 3.00 3 38.79 5 0.15 1 4.00 30 10.77 60.79 



Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* 

Type of treatment 

Type of land 

Executing 

agency 

Target 

S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

Name of structures 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Communit 

y 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

No. of 

units 

(No./ 

cu.m./ 

rmt) 

Estimated cost 

(Rs. in lakh) 

M W O 

T 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completio 

n 

(mm/yyyy 

) 

1 Junej 

(i) Pond 

L C DWDU 1 8.93 May- 2012 

(ii ) Canal D C DWDU 3 7.54 

June- 

2012 

Total 

(iii) Causeway 

D C DWDU 4 3.94 Jan.-2013 

2 BHADULA (i) Pond 

L C DWDU 1 7.26 May- 2012 



(ii) Check Dam 

D C DWDU 1 5.16 Jan.-2013 

(iii) Snanghat L C DWDU 1 1.50 

Total 

3 Bhogsar 

(i) Pond 

L C DWDU 1 

18.9 

0 

May- 2012 

(ii) Canal 

Any others (pl. specify) 

D C DWDU 2 5.12 Jan.-2013 

Total 

4 jamara 

(i) Pond 

L C DWDU 1 7.26 May- 2012 

D C DWDU 1 1.68 Jan.-2013 

(ii) Cause way 

(iii) Snanghat L C DWDU 1 1.50 

Total 

5 kadegi 

(i) Pond 

(ii) Canal 

L C DWDU 4 May- 2012 

D C DWDU 1 

May- 



2012 


(iv) Check Dam 


D C DWDU 1 Jan.-2013 

L C DWDU 1 Jan.-2013 

Total 

6 kotada 

(i) Pond 

L C DWDU 3 

38.7 

9 

May- 2012 



D C DWDU 4 5.00 Jan.-2013 

Total 

- 



Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works 

Type of treatment 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

S. 

No. 


village 


structure/ 

work 

(i) 

Ridge 

area 

(R) 

(ii) 

Drainage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Area 

(ha) 

No. of 

plants 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Bhadula 

Afforestation L C SHG 10 16000 4,04320 Dec 2012 

Sitaphal 

Plantatio 

L C UGS 2 500 1,25,000 Dec 2012 

Horticulture L P SHG 5 2000 1,50,000 Dec 2012 

Bhogsar Afforestation L C DWDU 5 312 90,000 Dec 2012 

Pasture 


L C SHG 1 Ha. 26000 March 2013 

Fruit tree 

plantation 

L P Prirvte 

1.5 

Ha. 

60,000 March 2012 



Jamra Afforestation L C DWDU 5 312 90,000 March 2013 

Pasture 


L C SHG 1 Ha. 26000 March 2013 

Fruit tree 

plantation 

L P Prirvte 

1.5 

Ha. 

60,000 Dec 2012 

kadegi Afforestation L C DWDU 5 312 90,000 Dec 2012 

Pasture 


L C SHG 1 Ha. 26000 March 2013 

Fruit tree 

plantation 

L P Prirvte 

1.5 

Ha. 

60,000 March 2012 

Kotada Afforestation L C DWDU 10 625 4,04320 May- 2012 

Pasture 


L C SHG 1 Ha. 26000 Dec 2013 

Fruit tree 

plantation 

L P Prirvte 

1.5 

Ha. 

60,000 Dec 2012 



S. 

No. 

Name of village 

1 Juenj 

Name of activity 

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities 

(i) Private 


(ii) Community 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Executing 

agency 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others (pl. 

specify) 

Estimated 

cost 

(Rs. in lakh) 

Target 

Expected 

month & year 

of completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

Production System & Micro 

Enterprise 

Crop demonstration Plot P Individual 0.50 Aug 2013 

Veterinary Kit (50) P Individual 0.45 March 2012 

Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.25 Aug 2013 

Haybird Seeds Districbution P SHG Individual 0.80 March 2012 

Kitchen Gardening 57nos. X900 P 

Individual 

Individual 

0.51 March 2012 

Tailoring Machine P Individual 0.35 March 2013 

Dairy development C SHG 1.35 Aug 2013 

Livelly Hood Activity 

Nursery Rising C SHG 0.40 Aug 2013 

Vermi Compost net house unit 

C SHG 0.50 

Animal Husbandary (Bafflow 

Unit) SHG 5.40 Aug 2013 

Ground Nuts Processing 

Chiko plantation 

SHG 2.40 Aug 2013 

C UG 0.75 Aug 2013 



2 Bhadula 

Total 13.71 


Enterprise 

Crop demonstration Plot P Individual 1.50 March 2012 

Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.50 

Aug 2013 

Kitchen Gardening 89 nos. X900 P Individual 0.80 March 2012 


Mandap Services P SHG 1.50 March 2013 

Canting service C SHG 1.00 Aug 2013 

Dairy development C SHG 1.50 

March 2012 

Leafplate & Cup Making Machine 

SHG Revolving Fund 

Veterinary Kits ( 110) 

SHG 2.80 

Aug 2013 

SHG 0.10 March 2012 

Individual 1.00 March 2012 

Livelly Hood Activity March 2013 

Nursery Rising 

C SHG 0.90 Aug 2013 


C SHG 0.90 


Unit) SHG 5.40 


March 2012 

Aug 2013 


Sitaphal plantatio C UG 1.25 March 2012 

Papad Making C SHG 0.50 March 2013 

Roof Water Harvesting Structure C SHG 1.80 Aug 2013 



3 

Chaff cutter 50 nos. X 2000 

Total 

UG 1.00 Aug 2012 


Enterprise 

Crop demonstration Plot P Individual 0.55 March 2012 

25.85 

Veterinary Kit (50) 0.45 Aug 2013 

Bhogsar 

Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.50 March 2012 

Haybird Seeds Districbution P 0.80 March 2012 

Kitchen Gardening 57nos. X900 P Individual 0.51 March 2013 

Tailoring Machine P Individual 0.35 Aug 2013 


March 2012 

Canting Material C SHG 0.93 

Aug 2013 



C SHG 0.40 March 2012 




Unit) SHG 5.40 Aug 2013 

Chiko plantatio C UG 0.77 March 2012 

Total 

12.51 

4 Jamra 


Enterprise 



Crop demonstration Plot P Individual 1.68 

Veterinary Kit (90) 0.82 

March 2012 

March 2012 


Haybird Seeds Districbution P 1.10 Aug 2013 

Kitchen Gardening 125 nos. X900 P Individual 1.13 

March 2012 

Tailoring Machine P Individual 1.50 

Aug 2013 

Decoration P SHG 1.50 March 2012 

Santing C SHG 1.00 March 2012 

Dairy development C SHG 1.60 March 2013 

Leafplate & Cup Making Machine SHG 3.25 Aug 2013 

Lift Irrigation Equipment SHG 0.75 March 2012 

Farm Bunding 

P Individual 1.00 March 2012 

De-worming 

P Individual 1.19 March 2012 



C SHG 1.00 Aug 2013 


C SHG 2.00 



March 2012 

Aug 2013 

Chiko plantatio C UG 0.90 March 2012 


Roof Water Harvesting Structure C SHG 1.21 March 2013 


UG 1.02 Aug 2013 



5 

Kadegi 

Floor Mil 

Snake Preparation 

Individual Bio – Gas 

Total 

P 

P 

P 



Individual 4.00 Aug 2013 


Enterprise 


Veterianary Kit (50) P Individual 0.45 

40.31 March 2012 

March 2012 

March 2012 


Kitchen Gardening 89 nos. X900 P Individual 0.80 Aug 2013 

Tailoring Machine P Individual 1.00 

March 2012 

Mandap Services P SHG 1.00 

Aug 2013 

Santing C SHG 0.50 March 2012 

Dairy development C SHG 1.30 March 2012 

Leafplate & Cup Making Machine SHG 2.80 March 2013 

Livelly Hood Activity Aug 2013 






Unit) SHG 5.40 March 2012 



Lamon Plantion (2 Hect.) C UG 2.70 Aug 2013 



6 Kotda 

Papad Making C SHG 0.25 

SHG Revolving Fund C SHG 0.50 


Total 

March 2012 

Aug 2013 

UG 1.00 March 2012 


Enterprise 


23.45 March 2012 

Aug 2013 


Haybird Seeds Districbution P 0.80 March 2012 

Kitchen Gardening 89 nos. X900 P Individual 0.80 March 2012 


Decoration P SHG 1.00 Aug 2013 

Canting Matrial C SHG 0.50 

March 2012 


Aug 2013 

Leafplate & Cup Making Machine SHG 2.80 March 2012 

Veterinary Kit (50) C 0.45 March 2012 



C SHG 0.90 Aug 2013 





Aug 2013 

Animal Camp / AI/ Exposure (9) 


Sitaphal plantation C UG 1.25 March 2012 





UG 1.02 Aug 2013 

Total 

23.58 

S. No. Name(s) of the 

villages 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 

CPR particulars Activity proposed Target 

Target area under the activity 

(ha) 

Estimated expenditure 

(Rs.) 

Expected no. of 

beneficiaries 

1 Junej 

West Land 

Pasture 

1 Ha. 0.26 SHG 


Pond 78 Ha. 8.93 Total Villegers 

2 Bhadula 

3 Bhogsar 

4 Jamra 

5 Kadegi 

West Land Afforatration 10 Ha. 4.04 SHG/UG 

Sitaphal Plantation 2 Ha. 1.25 SHG 

Pond 78 8.93 Total Villegers 

West Land Afforatration 5 Ha. 0.90 SHG 

Pasture 

1 Ha. 0.26 SHG 


Pond 157.50 18.90 Total Villergers 


Pasture 

1 Ha. 0.26 SHG\UG 


Pond 60.50 7.26 Total Villergers 


Pasture 

1 Ha. 0.26 SHG\UG 


Pond 236.25 Ha. 28.35 Total Villergers 



6 Kotda 

West Land Afforatration 10 Ha. 4.04 SHG\UG 

Pasture 

1 Ha. 0.26 SHG\UG 


Pond 323.25 Ha. 38.79 Total Villgers 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: 

S. No. 

Name of the 

Training 

Institute 

Full Address with 

contact no., website 

& e-mail 

1 KVK PORBNDAR 

2 

Junagadh 

Agriculture 

University 

Junagadh 

3 BISAG Gandhinagar 

Type of 

Institute# 

Research 

Institution 

University 

Space 

Application 

Area(s) of 

specialization$ 

Agriculture, 

Animal 

Husbandry, 

Horticulture 

Agriculture, 

Animal 

Husbandry, 

Horticulture 

Remote 

Sensing & 

GIS 

Accredita-tion 

details 

Reference Year 

Trainings 

No. of trainings 

assigned 

No. of trainees 

to be trained 

GOI 2011-2014 4 600 

GOI 2011-14 2 130 

GOG 2010-2015 3 6 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: 

S. No. 


Project 

1 Kadegi 

Total no. of No. of persons to be 

Project Stakeholders 

No. of training programmes Estimated cost 

persons 

trained 

PIA 6 6 2 0.48 

WDTs 5 5 2 0.38 

UGs 746 55 8 12.17 

SHGs 297 297 5 10.52 

WCs 78 78 5 1.40 

GPs 72 72 2 1.44 



Community 132 132 5 3.92 

Total 30.31 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: 

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) 

1 KitchenCraning Horticulture Department 0.90 

2 Pepet Show DWDU, Porbandar 1.00 

3 Slogan, DWDU, Porbandar 1.50 

4 Others Community Groups DWDU, Porbandar 3.00 

5 Banner, Hording, Pamphlet DWDU, Porbandar 2.00 

Outcome 

(may quantify, wherever possible) 

SHG can do without investment 

activates 

Awareness for the impotent of 

Watershed Projects 





Table no. 47: Village Wise- Activity wise Budget 

Activity 

Sl 

Watershed Livelihood Production 

Village 

Institution 

no 

EPA 

DPR development for asset system and 

and CB 

Work less Microenterprises 

Consolidation 

1 Junej 2.38 2.98 0.59 29.79 5.96. 7.74 2.97 

2 Bhadula 4.49 5.61 1.12 56.20 11.23 14.61 5.62 

3 Bhogsar 2.18 2.72 0.54 27.21 5.44 7.07 2.72 

4 Jamra 7.01 8.76 1.75 87.62 17.52 22.78 8.76 

5 Kadegi 4.08 5.10 1.02 50.99 10.20 13.24 5.10 

6 Kotda 4.10 5.12 1.02 51.26 10.25 13.33 5.13 



Table no. 48: Budget at a Glance 

No Village Project 

area (Ha) 

Total Fund 

In Lakhs 

Administr 

ative 

costs 

Monitorin 

g 

Evaluatio 

n 

Entry 

Point 

activity 

Institutio 

n and 

C apacity 

Building 

Detailed 

Project 

Report 

Watersh 

ed 

Develop 

ment 

Works 

Livelihoo 

d 

activities 

for asset 

less 

Productio 

n 

systems 

and 

microenterpris 

es 

C onsolid 

ation 

phase 

10% 1% 1% 4% 5% 1% 50% 10% 13% 5% 100% 

1 J unej 496.6 59.59 5.96 0.60 0.60 2.38 2.98 0.60 29.80 5.96 7.75 2.98 59.59 

2 Bhadula 936.6 11.24 1.12 0.11 0.11 0.45 0.56 0.11 5.62 1.12 1.46 0.56 11.24 

3 Bhogsar 453.4 54.41 5.44 0.54 0.54 2.18 2.72 0.54 27.20 5.44 7.07 2.72 54.41 

4 J amra 1460.4 175.25 17.52 1.75 1.75 7.01 8.76 1.75 87.62 17.52 22.78 8.76 175.25 

5 Kadegi 1651.8 198.22 19.82 1.98 1.98 7.93 9.91 1.98 99.11 19.82 25.77 9.91 198.22 

6 Kotda 1365.6 163.87 16.39 1.64 1.64 6.55 8.19 1.64 81.94 16.39 21.30 8.19 163.87 

Total 



Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 

S. No. 


Departments with 

Schemes 

converging with 

IWMP 

Fund made 

available to IWMP 

due to 

convergence (Rs. 

in lakh) 

Was this fund 

included in 

Rs.12,000/ 

15,000 per ha. 

Yes 

No 

Name of activity/task/structure 

undertaken with converged funds 

(a) Structures 

(b) livelihoods 

(c ) Any other (pl. specify) 

Reference no. of 

activity/ task/ 

structure in DPR 

Level at which 

decision for 

convergence was 

taken 

1 MGNREGAS 18.00 NO Structure 3 District 

2 SGSY 7.50 No SHG Activites 3 District 

3 DIC 1.25 No. Livelihoods 2 District 

4 WASMO 12.00 Yes Structure 250 State 

5 Forest Department 6.10 No Structure 600 Rmt. District 





6.1 Expected Outcomes 

6.1.1 Employment 

Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal 

husbandry and casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can 

take only a single crop, which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very 

difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, 

either in the village itself or outside it. 

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be 

created by engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond, 

plantation, etc. Self employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood 

activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development. 



Table no. 51: Employment in Project area: 

Names 

Wage employment 

Self employment 

S. 


No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries 

NO. 

Villages SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 

1 Junej 5130 - 19980 3420 28530 

57 - 222 38 317 5 - 30 12 47 

2 Bhadula 6120 - 27180 2250 35550 

3 Bhogsar 3600 - 19440 1620 24660 

4 Jamra 5130 - 53190 2250 60570 

5 Kadegi 8730 - 99720 4950 113400 

6 Kotda 15750 - 140310 7200 163260 

68 - 302 25 395 8 - 26 15 59 

40 - 216 18 274 8 - 20 13 41 

57 - 591 25 673 10 - 74 17 101 

97 - 1108 55 1260 7 - 166 15 188 

175 - 1559 80 1814 25 - 179 67 271 



6.1.2. Migration 

Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well off farmers bring fodder from Kadegi 

(approximately 100kms away) collectively; but the resource poor cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal 

husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for 

wage labour. 

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area. 

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area 

No. of persons migrating 

No. of days per year of migration 

Sl. No. 

Names of villages 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project 

Expected post 

project 

1 Junej 58 11 90 20 

2 Bhadula 140 28 90 35 

3 Bhogsar 65 13 90 22 

4 Jamra 250 50 90 40 

5 Kadegi 245 49 90 38 

6 Kotda 550 95 90 55 



6.1.3 Ground water table 

Rainfall has been average but every year water logging & salinity problem has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has 

depleted over the years. Presently it stands at 25 m. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in 

increasing water table depth from 25-30 m in the pre-project level to 10-15 m in the post project period. & water quality will be good as well as 

pre – project time 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level 

Expected Increase/decrease 

(Post- Project) 

1 Junej 

Depend upon 

Monsoon 

Depend upon 

2 Bhadula 

Monsoon 

3 Bhogsar 

4 Jamra 

Depend upon 

Monsoon 

Depend upon 

Monsoon 

25-30 mt 

(water Quality not good) 

10-15 mt 

5 Kadegi 

Depend upon 

Monsoon 

6 Kotda 

Depend upon 

Monsoon 



6.1.4 Drinking water 

The villages has not own dirinking water source they have to depend upon other village known as Paswari. This village’s 

water quality too bad that why many people suffer form various problems like kidny stone, joint pain & many sline water’s 

related problems 

As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve. 

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water 

S. 

No. 


Villages 

1 Junej 

2 Bhadula 

3 Bhogsar 

4 Jamra 

5 Kadegi 

6 Kotda 

Availability of drinking water 

(no. of months in a year) 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project 

9 M onths 12 Months 

Quality of drinking water 

Saline with 

high TDS 

Expected Postproject 

Potable 

Comments 



6.1.5 Crops 

Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Kadegi Project. The surface water is scanty due 

to average or high rainfall and ground water is saline, which is unfit for crop production. 

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned earthen 

bunds would prevent the saline water from the Sea of Arb sagar to mix with the sweet rain water and also help percolate sweet 

water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and 

increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken. 

Table no. 55: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas 

Pre-project 

Expected Post-project 

Name of Project 

Name of crops 

Area 

(ha) 

Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. 

Area 

(ha) 

Average Yield per ha 

(qtl) 

Kharif 

Ground Nut 2691.93 235.2505 270.5380 

Kadegi 

Rabi 

Juwar 1961.85 122.5193 142.1224 

Chana 1079.51 124.9196 146.1560 

Zaid - - 

Project total 5733.29 482.6894 558.8164 



Table no. 56: Area under horticulture 

Area under horticulture proposed to be covered 

through IWMP 

1 Junej 0 3 

2 Bhadula 0 2 

3 Bhogsar 0 5 

4 Jamra 0 5 

5 Kadegi 0 3 

6 Kotda 0 8 

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) 

6.1.6 Vegetative cover 

There is negligible area under tree cover. The villages has no forest area . It is planned that 30 ha land to be covered under new 

plantation. 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover 

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed 

1 Junej 0 5/28 

2 Bhadula 0 5/25 

3 Bhogsar 0 5/32 

4 Jamra 0 5/29 

5 Kadegi 0 5/35 

6 Kotda 0 5/40 



6.1.7 Livestock 

The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The 

interventions like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related 

activities would spur up the dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial 

increase in livestock population and yield from them. 

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in 

kgs. and income in Rs.) 


Pre-Project 

Expected Post-project 

S. No. 

Type of Animal 

Remarks 

Village 

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income 

Milch-animals 3524 18135 3074775 4125 25987 4085369 

Draught Purpose 

1006 614955 1154 623455 

Kadegi 

animals 

1 

Animals for other 

1835 409970 2090 469360 

purpose 



Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages 

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.) 

Backward linkages 

Seed certification 

Seed supply system 1 1 

Fertilizer supply system 

Pesticide supply system 

Credit institutions Bank -1 Bank - 2 

Water supply Depend upon other villages Own System 

Extension services KVK KVK 

Nurseries Not available 6 Nurseries 

Tools/machinery suppliers 

Price Support system 

Labour 

Any other (please specify) 

Forward linkages 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 

Storage (including cold storage) 

Road network 

Transport facilities 

Markets / Mandis 

Agro and other Industries 

Milk and other collection centres Milk Collection Centre -1 1 

Labour 

Any other (please specify) Vermi compost—6 6 



Logical Framework Analysis 

Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact 

Village 

Institution 

Formation 

Formation of Watershed 

Committee, User Group 

One Watershed 

Committee each village 

Project can be 

implemented and managed in 

a democratic and 

participatory way ensuring 

equity. 

Unity and prosperity in 

the village management 

Number of User group 

depending on the coverage of 

particular intervention 

People’s Participation 

and positive perception 

towards the programme 

Strengthening 

Village 

Institutions 

Organize training and awareness 

programme for Village institutions 

awareness camps to be 

organized. 

Quality of 

management of common 

resources improved. 

Unity and prosperity in 

the village management. 

Capacity building workshops 

and exposure visits User Group and 

Watershed Committee 

trainings and exposure 

visits UGs and WCs to be held 

Quality of distribution 

of benefits between people 

improved. 

People’s Participation 

and positive perception 

towards the programme 

Increased awareness 



Failitating and monitoring the 

functioning of UGs and WCs 

Capacity building 

workshops to be organized 

amongst women about 

village resources. 

Strengthen linkages between 

UGs and WCs and Pandhayat 

Institutions. 

1 Federation of UGs 

and WC to be formed. 

Women participation 

enhanced in decision – 

making of GVCs. 

Involvement of youth 

and children in village 

development increased. 

Gender sensitization of UGs and 

WCs to increase inclusiveness of samuh 

decision making. 

Sensitize village Communities to 

involve children and youth in 

development. 



Fund 

Management 

Improve management and 

utilization of UGs and WCs. 

UGs and WCs operating 

bank account and managing 

resources on their own 

Purpose, frequency 

and volume of use of the fund 

enhanced. 

Prepare communities to explore 

other sources of income for UGs and 

WCs. 

Volume of funds 

generated for UGs and WCs 

from other sources of income 

increased. 

Impart trainings, conduct 

meetings and organize exposure visits 

for communities, village volunteers and 

staff to effectively plan, execute and 

monitor activies 

Income generation 

intervention promoted 

Identification and promotion of 

non timber forest produce based 

income generatation activities 

Rainfed Area 


Treatment of land through 

improved soil and moisture 

conservation practices on watershed 

basis 

Land to be brought 

under improved soil moisture 

conservation practices 

Improved productivity 

of treated land 

Increase in proportion 

of households having more 

security of food 



Promotion of good agricultural 

practices horticulture, improved crop 

and vegetable 

Good agricultural 

practices to be promoted 

Increased availability 

of water in wells 

Promotion of organic farming 

practices 

Organic farming to be 

promoted 

Increase in annual 

agriculture production 

Increase in 

contribution of agricultural 

income to the household 

income. 

Farmers adopt organic 

farming practices 

Fodder banks to be 

established 

Fodder security of 

farmers enhanced. 

Agriculture based 

livelihood income generation 

activities to be promoted 



Formation of Fodder banks to 

increase fodder security and promote 

dairy development among communities 

Water harvesting 

structures to be constructed 

Increase availability of 

water for 9 to 12 month 

Identification and promotion of 

agriproduce based income generation 

activities like grading, processing and 

packaging. 

Drip Irrigation facilities 

to be distributed among 

farmers 

Increased availability 

of water for livestock 

Promotion of better Irrigation 

practices like drip irrigation 

Impart training, conduct 

meetings and organize exposure visits 

of communities, village volunteers and 

staff to effectively plan, execute and 

monitor activities. 

Approx 12000 person 

days of employment to be 

generated 

Trainings, exposure 

visits and meetings to be 

organized for communities, 

village volunteers and staff 

Availability of 

irrigation water established 

Farmers take two 

crops in a year. 

Increase in 

agricultural productivity of 

land 



Availability of drinking 

water enhanced 

Women’s 

Socio politica 

l and 

economic 

empowerment 

Formation & Strengthening of 

women’s SHG Groups 

Women’s SHG Groups 

to be formed 

Enhanced capacities of 

leaders of women’s groups in 

taking initiatives to solve 

problems at different levels. 

Position of women in 

household, community, 

society (Politically, socially 

and economically) as 

perceived by women and 

community at large 

Capacity building of womenfolk 

Capacity building of SHG leaders 

and accountants 

Linking SHGs with external 

financial 

Federation of Women’s 

SHGs to be formed 

Training to be 

conducted for preparation of 

woollen products from sheep 

and goats 

Improved access to 

credit for livelihood 

purposes. 

Performance 

enhancement of SHGs in 

terms of participation, 

decision making leadership 

and fund management 

Equality & Equity in 

gender relations at home 

(decision making, 

expenditure, children’ 

education, health) 

Increased household 

income. 





7 Quality and Sustainability Issues 

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. 

The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows 

the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one 

particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. 

Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of 

the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made 

available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated 

areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would 

also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the 

user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would 

serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project. 



Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the 

ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. 

Also, any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by 

means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitudelongitude 

information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central 

server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. 

Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated 

over frequent periods of time. 

7.2 Plans for Project management: 

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation 

and the village level institutes. In Kansabad project, watershed committee, various user groups and SHGs have been formulated 

for post project operation and maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and 

sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with 



various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling 

up the successful experience during project. 

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: 

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of 

it will comes mainly fund the following: 

7.4 User Charges: 

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules 

formed during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The 

secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.

IWMP-1 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?