15.06.2014 Views

2005, Justin Jennings, Kathy L. Antrobus, Sam J. Atencio, Erin ...

2005, Justin Jennings, Kathy L. Antrobus, Sam J. Atencio, Erin ...

2005, Justin Jennings, Kathy L. Antrobus, Sam J. Atencio, Erin ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

280 F current anthropology Volume 46, Number 2, April <strong>2005</strong><br />

Fig. 2. The operational chain for making barley and emmer wheat beer.<br />

saccharification in the warm water (<strong>Sam</strong>uel 2000:551–<br />

53).<br />

The mixture was rinsed with water and passed through<br />

a sieve. The dregs that were caught in the sieve were<br />

then squeezed to remove any remaining liquid. Water<br />

was sometimes added to the liquid in the jar at this point<br />

both to increase the quantity of beer brewed and to reduce<br />

its strength. Fermentation was initiated through<br />

the yeasts in the unwashed jar or by the addition of beer<br />

from the last brew or ingredients such as fruits that contained<br />

a natural yeast bloom (<strong>Sam</strong>uel 2000:555; Geller<br />

1992b:21). Although yeast cells have been identified in<br />

ancient residues, the specific varieties of yeast used remain<br />

unknown (Hornsey 2003:71). In a few cases, large<br />

colonies of bacteria have also been found in residues.<br />

This discovery suggests possible parallel lactic acid fermentation<br />

in some cases (present-day lambic and gueuze<br />

beers go through an analogous process) (Hornsey 2003:<br />

71; <strong>Sam</strong>uel 2000:547). Having fermented for a few days,<br />

the beer was decanted into jars and sealed for storage or<br />

transport (<strong>Sam</strong>uel 2000:555–56). While jars were used in<br />

Egypt for fermentation, Mesopotamians may have used<br />

an apparatus that allowed the wort (the heated, saccharified<br />

malt) to trickle into a collector vat for fermentation<br />

(Hornsey 2003:90–91)<br />

<strong>Sam</strong>uel’s reconstruction differs from other accounts in<br />

two critical ways. In most accounts, malted flour is<br />

mixed with flour and yeast and lightly baked. The bread,<br />

used instead of the malt in <strong>Sam</strong>uel’s reconstruction, was<br />

either used directly after baking, dried for a few days, or<br />

baked again for long-term storage (Darby, Ghalioungui,<br />

and Grivetti 1977:538; Katz and Maytag 1991:27). In all<br />

cases, the operational chain dovetailed with <strong>Sam</strong>uel’s<br />

reconstruction after the bread was broken up, mixed<br />

with water, and passed through a sieve (Darby et al 1977:<br />

541; Lutz 1922:79; Montet 1958:87; <strong>Sam</strong>uel 1996:3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!