15.06.2014 Views

issue 1 - Roland Berger

issue 1 - Roland Berger

issue 1 - Roland Berger

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

p business culture<br />

constantinos markides<br />

“ Despite the potential conflicts, opposing business models<br />

can be combined to counter strategic innovations.”<br />

Constantinos Markides<br />

pressure by Southwest Airlines, which was<br />

playing a totally different game—the game<br />

of low cost, point-to-point, direct flights. In<br />

response, Continental created a new subsidiary,<br />

Continental Lite, which ultimately<br />

PORTER IS MISTAKEN—STRATEGIC<br />

INNOVATORS NEED TO BE IN TWO<br />

PLACES AT THE SAME TIME<br />

failed, since the internal conflicts could not<br />

be resolved. What are these conflicts that<br />

Porter talks about? One such conflict is the<br />

risk of mutual cannibalization between parent<br />

and subsidiary. There are problems of<br />

overlapping distribution. And there are organizational<br />

conflicts. Established companies<br />

have a culture and structure that have<br />

been built up over a long period of time. But<br />

companies that implement strategic innovations<br />

need an entirely different type of corporate<br />

culture and organization.<br />

My own position is that Porter is wrong in<br />

advising companies not to play two different<br />

games. I agree with him that playing<br />

two games is very difficult given all these<br />

conflicts. But it is not impossible. Companies<br />

have four strategies available using<br />

two business models—one conventional,<br />

one unconventional (see matrix p. 53).<br />

Separation is the preferred strategy when<br />

the new market is not only strategically<br />

different from the existing business but also<br />

when the two markets face serious tradeoffs<br />

and conflicts. The Swiss food company<br />

Nestlé experienced this first scenario when<br />

it set up a separate unit called Nespresso in<br />

the early 1990s. Nespresso, an exclusive<br />

brand for young urban professionals,<br />

actually had an adverse impact on its traditional<br />

instant coffee sales. For this reason,<br />

Nestlé moved the new unit to a different<br />

town, assigning it full autonomy. Nespresso<br />

is now one of the most profitable units<br />

within Nestlé.<br />

Separation is unnecessary if the new market<br />

is very similar to the existing business<br />

area and holds little prospect of conflict. In<br />

this second category, it is better to integrate<br />

business models into the existing structure.<br />

Merrill Lynch, for example, created an<br />

online-trading niche within its existing<br />

business. Old and new customers alike<br />

could make their own decisions about the<br />

type of advice and trading they wanted.<br />

A third scenario emerges when the new<br />

market is strategically similar to the existing<br />

business but the two face serious conflicts.<br />

In such a case it might be better to<br />

keep the concepts separate for a period of<br />

time and then slowly merge them. When<br />

the Danish bank Lan & Spar decided to set<br />

CONSTANTINOS MARKIDES is a management<br />

professor at the London Business School (LBS). Born<br />

in Cyprus, Markides studied economics at Boston University<br />

and received an MBA and doctorate degree<br />

(DBA) from Harvard. Before teaching at LBS, he<br />

worked for the Cyprus Development Bank and Harvard<br />

Business School. Markides has published numerous<br />

articles in major magazines, including the Harvard<br />

Business Review and the Sloan Management Review.<br />

up a direct bank alongside its branch<br />

network, it kept the two concepts separate<br />

for three years before merging them into<br />

one. It then carefully completed the<br />

transition.<br />

The challenge the firm faces here is to keep<br />

the new business model protected from the<br />

mindsets and policies of the existing business,<br />

while at the same time exploiting<br />

synergies between the two businesses and<br />

preparing them for the eventual marriage.<br />

The fourth scenario arises when the new<br />

market is fundamentally different from the<br />

existing business but the two do not conflict<br />

seriously. In such a case, it might be better<br />

to first build the new business inside the<br />

organization so as to leverage the firm’s<br />

existing assets and experience and learn<br />

about the dynamics of the new market, then<br />

separate it into an independent unit.<br />

This is exactly how Tesco, the UK’s biggest<br />

supermarket chain, approached its online<br />

spinoff, Tesco.com. The company started a<br />

home delivery service in the mid-1990s<br />

under the name Tesco Direct. The first<br />

trials involved making small deliveries to<br />

pensioners. Later, customers ordered from<br />

a paper catalog, then from a CD-ROM, and<br />

eventually through the company’s<br />

Web site. By 2001, Tesco Direct was reorganized<br />

as a full subsidiary of Tesco and was<br />

renamed Tesco.com—the first step in the divorce<br />

proceedings. In 2003, Tesco’s executive<br />

board announced that Tesco.com would<br />

be spun off. The online arm had become<br />

a different business and had to be given<br />

the freedom and autonomy to develop as<br />

it saw fit.<br />

The decision about when to separate and<br />

when to keep a strategic innovation inside<br />

the organization is obviously important,<br />

but it is equally important to appreciate<br />

that this is only part of the solution. Having<br />

decided which of these strategies a firm<br />

will adopt, the key question that must be<br />

addressed is this: “How can I manage the<br />

52<br />

think: act

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!