The development of Local Healthwatch in Kent Part one: key findings
The development of Local Healthwatch in Kent Part one: key findings
The development of Local Healthwatch in Kent Part one: key findings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Stage Three: Deliver<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terviews and focus groups<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g August and September 2011 the Centre for Public Scrut<strong>in</strong>y ran a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews with 18 <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />
This was followed up by a series <strong>of</strong> four themed focus groups on the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
perspectives:<br />
• Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Commission<strong>in</strong>g Groups<br />
• Members <strong>of</strong> the public not part <strong>of</strong> LINks<br />
• Community and voluntary sector<br />
• Gypsy and Traveller community <strong>in</strong> <strong>Kent</strong><br />
Outputs from these pieces <strong>of</strong> work were written up and used to <strong>in</strong>form further<br />
engagement with stakeholders as <strong>key</strong> themes emerged.<br />
Stage Four: Reflect<strong>in</strong>g on f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs through<br />
a participatory workshop<br />
<strong>The</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>in</strong>terviews and focus groups was used to design a<br />
<strong>one</strong>-day workshop for stakeholders to explore <strong>key</strong> themes from the work<br />
so far and to prioritise issues for the future <strong>development</strong> <strong>of</strong> K LHW. Over 40<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals attended the workshop represent<strong>in</strong>g a wide variety <strong>of</strong> groups, roles<br />
and agencies.<br />
<strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> the workshop was to beg<strong>in</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>tly design<strong>in</strong>g<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> K LHW. <strong>The</strong> day was called ‘Every Decision About Me, with Me’<br />
illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the appreciative approach used. Four sessions focused on <strong>key</strong><br />
themes which had emerged from the <strong>in</strong>terviews and focus groups.<br />
<strong>Part</strong>icipants were <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>in</strong>vited to ensure there was a mix <strong>of</strong> people<br />
who would relate to K LHW from all perspectives. For example there were<br />
people from user groups, carers, people who might be part <strong>of</strong> K LHW,<br />
council <strong>of</strong>ficers and politicians who might be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> commission<strong>in</strong>g or<br />
sitt<strong>in</strong>g on boards where K LHW will participate and others. Each workshop<br />
provided an opportunity for dialogue. Us<strong>in</strong>g pre-drafted future or aspiration<br />
statements, participants developed a shared sense <strong>of</strong> how they wanted K<br />
LHW to operate. Some participants suggested areas they felt needed to be<br />
developed <strong>in</strong> order to create the agreed future. Other participants jo<strong>in</strong>ed them<br />
<strong>in</strong> breakout groups to do some detailed work on the identified area. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
were written up and <strong>key</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts fed back.<br />
10<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>development</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Healthwatch</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Kent</strong>: assess<strong>in</strong>g read<strong>in</strong>ess for <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Healthwatch</strong>