12.06.2014 Views

It's My Space, Not Yours - Research Institute for Fragrance Materials

It's My Space, Not Yours - Research Institute for Fragrance Materials

It's My Space, Not Yours - Research Institute for Fragrance Materials

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It’s <strong>My</strong> <strong>Space</strong>, <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Yours</strong>:<br />

Popular <strong>My</strong>ths, Scientific Realities &<br />

Public Perception<br />

Ladd W. Smith, PhD, Dipl. ABT, Fellow ATS, CAE<br />

President<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Fragrance</strong> <strong>Materials</strong>, Inc<br />

Scent World 2011<br />

December 8, 2011


Things you’ve heard<br />

• What is that?<br />

• Oh, that’s nice<br />

• Hmmm …<br />

• Yuck!<br />

• Let me tell you what I think about what<br />

you are doing<br />

• I don’t care … I already know<br />

• <strong>My</strong> perception outweighs your facts and<br />

logic<br />

• You’re just interested in selling product


Beholder’s perception<br />

An open mind is the best<br />

way to look at the world.


Little disagreement …


One solution …


Another solution …


Disagreement ...


Disagreement?


Pleasure vs. pollution?


What is “scent?”<br />

wikipedia<br />

• An odor is caused by one or more volatilized<br />

chemical compounds, generally at a very low<br />

concentration, that humans or other animals<br />

perceive by the sense of olfaction<br />

• Odors are also commonly called scents, which can<br />

refer to both pleasant and unpleasant odors<br />

• The terms fragrance, scent, and aroma are used<br />

primarily by the food and cosmetic industry to<br />

describe a pleasant odor, and are sometimes used<br />

to refer to perfumes<br />

• In contrast, malodor, stench, reek, and stink are<br />

used specifically to describe unpleasant odors


Blogs, Sept 2011<br />

• <strong>Fragrance</strong> is a very personal choice, I<br />

cannot see any way that someone else<br />

can tell me what I will or will not like.<br />

• Agreed. In my house my wife does have<br />

great influence on what fragrance I use<br />

based on her likes/dislikes. She respects<br />

my opinion as well when it comes to her<br />

choice of fragrances <strong>for</strong> her use.


Neural mechanism supports<br />

survival in an uncertain world<br />

Wednesday, June 10, 2009 - 12:44 in Psychology & Sociology<br />

• A new study uncovers a pivotal role <strong>for</strong> the<br />

human frontal lobe in the promotion of<br />

behavioral flexibility during voluntary<br />

choice. The work, published by Cell Press in<br />

the June 11th issue of the journal Neuron,<br />

presents a critical new neural mechanism<br />

that supports the decision to adapt or<br />

maintain behavior when change is not<br />

explicitly instructed by the external<br />

environment.


More about choice …<br />

Frontiers <strong>Research</strong> Topic on The Neurobiology of Choice<br />

Julia Trommershaeuser , , 2011, Center <strong>for</strong> Neural Science, New York Univ<br />

“<strong>Research</strong> on economic decision-making seeks to<br />

understand how subjects choose between plans of<br />

action (lotteries, gambles, prospects) that have<br />

economic consequences. The key difficulty in<br />

making such decisions is that typically no plan of<br />

action available to the decision-maker guarantees a<br />

specific outcome, rather, consequences are risky or<br />

uncertain. … Moreover, researchers across all these<br />

fields are, in parallel, studying how decisions are<br />

guided by learning and how the computations<br />

relevant to decisions and choices are represented<br />

neurally.”


Can you tolerate this?


Frustration …


Confined space or worse?


Involuntary “exposure”


Headache is common complaint …


The brain is complicated


Still a lot we don’t know


People influence what we<br />

perceive and believe


Clinical research<br />

• Dr. Pamela Dalton, Monell, 1996<br />

• “The influence of cognitive bias on the<br />

perceived odor, irritation and health<br />

symptoms from chemical exposure”<br />

• The results provide strong evidence<br />

that both the perceived odor and<br />

cognitive expectations about a chemical<br />

can significantly affect how individuals<br />

respond to it.


Positive or negative …


OMG, “XYZ” is a VOC!


So is silage


So is body odor


So is an onion


Guilt by association …<br />

• I smell something<br />

• I have a “problem” (irritation, sensitivity,<br />

headache, rash, etc)<br />

• There<strong>for</strong>e, the smell (your product)<br />

caused my problem


An “argument”<br />

Dartmouth Writing Program<br />

A good argument will have, at the very least:<br />

• a thesis that declares the writer's position on<br />

the problem at hand<br />

• an acknowledgment of the opposition that nods<br />

to, or quibbles with other points of view<br />

• a set of clearly defined premises that illustrate<br />

the argument's line of reasoning<br />

• evidence that validates the argument's<br />

premises<br />

• a conclusion that convinces the reader that the<br />

argument has been soundly and persuasively<br />

made


Is the argument logical?<br />

A syllogism is made up of three statements<br />

• the major premise, or general<br />

observation<br />

• the minor premise, or particular<br />

observation<br />

• the conclusion, which is something that<br />

one might rightly deduce from the<br />

premises given


One syllogism<br />

• All scientists are brilliant<br />

• I am a scientist<br />

• There<strong>for</strong>e, I am brilliant<br />

But, the first statement, the major<br />

premise, is not true.


Another syllogism<br />

• Everyone who has taken the preparatory<br />

course has passed the exam<br />

• John Q. has taken the course<br />

• There<strong>for</strong>e, John Q. will pass the exam<br />

The major premise is true.<br />

Could John be the first exception?


Validating the argument<br />

• Have you suppressed any facts?<br />

• Have you manipulated any facts?<br />

• Do you have enough evidence?<br />

• Do you have too much evidence?<br />

• Is your evidence current, reputable?


Respiratory research objective<br />

To understand the physiological effects<br />

of exposure to fragrance materials upon<br />

inhalation from a consumer product,<br />

when that product is used as intended


Cilia and mucociliary<br />

escalator<br />

Oropharynx<br />

to main<br />

bronchi<br />

Airways<br />

Alveolarcapillary<br />

membrane<br />

CONFIDENTIAL MS IFRA NA 11.2011


Program structure<br />

EXPOSURE<br />

BIOAVAILABILITY<br />

WHERE DOES THE<br />

MATERIAL GO UPON<br />

INHALATION?<br />

PROTEIN<br />

REACTIVITY<br />

IMMUNE SYSTEM<br />

STIMULATION<br />

CLINICAL<br />

RESPONSE<br />

WHAT DOES THE MATERIAL<br />

DO IN THE RESPIRATORY<br />

SYSTEM?<br />

WHAT EFFECT DOES THE<br />

MATERIAL INTERACTION<br />

WITH THE AIRWAY HAVE?


2-Box model scenario


Air dispersion model output<br />

Concentration (mg/m 3 )<br />

Peak Air Concentration in<br />

Room of Interest (bathroom,<br />

bedroom, living room, etc.)<br />

Peak Air Concentration in the<br />

Rest of the House<br />

Risk Assessment Tool<br />

<strong>for</strong> Application to:<br />

• Fine <strong>Fragrance</strong> Spray<br />

• Aerosol Air Care<br />

• Scented Candles<br />

• Incense<br />

• Reed Diffusers<br />

• Heated Oil Plug-In<br />

Time (min)


Alternate 2-box scenario<br />

(Nearfield/Farfield analysis)


Upper airway deposition model


In Vivo corroboration<br />

• OECD 412-based pilot in vivo inhalation<br />

study completed successfully<br />

– Laboratories competent and produced<br />

reproducible, reliable data <strong>for</strong> all endpoints<br />

evaluated<br />

• <strong>Materials</strong> identified <strong>for</strong> 2011-2012 testing<br />

– <strong>Materials</strong> procured and on site<br />

– Studies underway<br />

– Dosimetry Subgroup reviews all data and dose<br />

recommendations


Cellular cytokine profiling<br />

• Triple co-culture air-liquid system<br />

• <strong>Materials</strong> can be delivered as an<br />

aerosol, gas, or insoluble particulate<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms at a set flow rate and<br />

concentration (identify dose/unit area)<br />

• Cross-talk between cell types can be<br />

studied without overt destruction of<br />

cellular structures<br />

• Cytokine profiles to be evaluated by<br />

multi-analyte flow cytometry and ELISA<br />

targeting distinction in cytokine<br />

expression patterns between respiratory<br />

irritants and respiratory sensitizers


Dendritic cells identified<br />

(CD86/DAPI)


Macrophages identified<br />

(CD14/DAPI)


Type II epithelial cells identified<br />

(SP-C/DAPI)


Cytokines of interest<br />

• Successful pilot study<br />

– Macrophage Inflammatory Protein (MIP)-2<br />

– RANTES<br />

– Interferon (IFN)-γ<br />

– Interleukin (IL)-1β<br />

– IL-4<br />

– Intracellular Adhesion Molecule (ICAM)-1<br />

– IL-5<br />

– IL-10<br />

– IL-13<br />

– Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α<br />

– Trans<strong>for</strong>ming Growth Factor (TGF)-β<br />

– Macrophage Chemotactic Protein (MCP)-1


Lady gaga to rock out Times<br />

Square on News Year’s Eve


Who is this, a scientist?


Point …<br />

The incoming president of the American<br />

College of Asthma Allergy and Immunology<br />

(ACAAI) - Dr. Stanley Fineman - gave a talk at<br />

the ACAAI’s recent annual meeting<br />

implicating use of air fresheners in the<br />

increasing rates of asthma and allergies. The<br />

ACAAI issued a press release on Dr.<br />

Fineman’s talk, which has been picked up by<br />

several media outlets, including msnbc.com<br />

and USA Today, among others.


Counterpoint …<br />

Consumers can be assured that the<br />

fragranced air fresheners they use in their<br />

homes are safe … There is no definitive<br />

scientific evidence, clinical or otherwise,<br />

to prove that fragrance materials cause<br />

asthma, nasal congestion, sneezing, or<br />

runny nose … it is irresponsible to assign<br />

blame to popular consumer products<br />

without supporting scientific evidence.


Counterpoint …<br />

The safety of fragrances marketed today is<br />

based on clinically proven, scientific<br />

studies reviewed by an independent panel<br />

of experts, published in the highest level,<br />

peer-reviewed, scientific journals available<br />

to anyone … The fragrance industry<br />

welcomes scientific dialogue, but insists<br />

on real science and fact-based consumer<br />

education and medical advice.


Industry guidance


“Maximum impact<br />

with minimum downside”


Also: Maximum impact<br />

with minimum downside<br />

Don't Be Victimized By Variable Annuities<br />

www.expertlaw.com/library/finance/variable<br />

_annuities.html<br />

Cached - Similar<br />

<strong>Not</strong> helpful? You can block<br />

www.expertlaw.com results when you're<br />

signed in to search.www.expertlaw.com<br />

Block all www.expertlaw.com results


Scent intensity … 1<br />

Crater Lake Company<br />

We have added a Very Strong option in our scent intensity<br />

menu, but feel that in most cases, selecting the Medium to<br />

Strong intensity is adequate. With that said, if you choose to<br />

have your products very strongly scented, please be advised<br />

that:<br />

• A. By doing so may cause skin irritation. In almost ALL cases,<br />

we find that the Medium to Strong scent intensity option is<br />

adequate. By choosing the Very Strong scent intensity, you<br />

acknowledge that you are aware of the possible skin<br />

irritations that this may cause.<br />

• B. We do not recommend Very Strong scent intensities <strong>for</strong><br />

spice and citrus based fragrances as this may cause an<br />

irritation. Keep in mind that these scents are naturally strong<br />

to begin with and recommend a medium intensity <strong>for</strong><br />

fragrances in the spice and citrus family.


Scent intensity … 2<br />

Crater Lake Company<br />

• C. Some scents are naturally light regardless of the<br />

proportion of fragrance oil we use in the product.<br />

Choosing Very Strong <strong>for</strong> naturally light scents does<br />

not make the fragrance any more apparent than<br />

choosing the recommended medium to strong scent<br />

intensity. This may also compromise the product's<br />

stability as the oils and butter ratios are pretty closely<br />

calibrated.<br />

• D. Choosing the Very Strong scent intensity option<br />

may change the viscosity of our shower gels and<br />

shampoos. Depending on the fragrance oil, it may<br />

cause the base to become either more fluid or thick.


Scent intensity … 3<br />

• E. We reserve the right to decrease the scent<br />

intensity requested if we believe it is in your best<br />

interest. Since we have a good knowledge of the<br />

scents we carry and their characteristics, there may<br />

be times where I’ll make a judgment call on a<br />

particular scent. If I do, I will try to contact you first<br />

and consult with you regarding the matter.


Scent intensity … 4<br />

Crater Lake Company<br />

All intensity levels are within safe usage guidelines, however<br />

scent intensity is not an exact science. Within the<br />

recommended guidelines, there are no fixed percentages of<br />

fragrance oil usage. Asking us to super-scent something<br />

doesn't mean we pour half the bottle of fragrance oil into<br />

the base! Scent intensity <strong>for</strong>mulation takes the fragrance oil's<br />

natural characteristics to determine the correct percentage<br />

amount to use in the specific product to ensure that its<br />

integrity and stability is not compromised. For example, a 2%<br />

fragrance oil load using a vanilla-based scent may be<br />

characterized as being Light, whereas the same percentage<br />

load using a spice-based scent may be deemed Strong.


Intensity, compound ratios,<br />

snapdragons, honeybees<br />

Wright, Lutmerding, Dudareva, Smith, 2005<br />

Floral scent is used by pollinators during<br />

<strong>for</strong>aging to identify and discriminate among<br />

flowers … The ability to discriminate among<br />

scents may depend on both scent intensity<br />

and the ratios of the concentrations of the<br />

volatile compounds of a complex mixture<br />

rather than on the presence of a few<br />

compounds … The ability of honeybees to<br />

discriminate among the scents of different<br />

cultivars was a function of the intensity of the<br />

floral scent.


Emily, at a conference …<br />

“Also, we spoke about your research and<br />

you were laughing at my fear of<br />

fragrances. I would love to understand<br />

more about what you do and if it means<br />

it’s safe to buy febreeze (sic)!”


“You can check out any time you<br />

like, but you can never leave”


Dear Emily … 1<br />

• The article, in the link below, notes the difference<br />

between irritants and allergens and in<strong>for</strong>ms people<br />

that the allergy-like symptoms they may be<br />

experiencing may not be an allergy at all. One item of<br />

interest is that the first irritant noted on the list is<br />

“perfumes and other substances with strong odors.”<br />

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/painter/2010-<br />

08-23-yourhealth23_ST_N.htm<br />

• Here is a good, unbiased website that you may want<br />

to consult <strong>for</strong> general science issues.<br />

http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/<br />

• This one tends to look at scientific “crises,” and tries<br />

to provide perspective. http://www.acsh.org/


Dear Emily … 2<br />

• Here is one about “chemicals.” Many people don’t realize<br />

that everything is a chemical, even a rock. The “cool<br />

science” and “everyday chemistry” tabs are<br />

instructive. http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content<br />

• This one looks at natural vs. synthetic. It is easy to find<br />

statements about the relative safety of “natural” products,<br />

but remember that Mother Nature built her plants and<br />

animals to survive. So they have innate protection<br />

mechanisms. Some are mechanical things like prickles,<br />

while some are chemical toxins. I can tell you I have a<br />

healthy respect <strong>for</strong> bees, since I am allergic to them and<br />

have had a few “too close” calls at the ER.<br />

http://drholly.typepad.com/natural_vs_synthetic/


Dear Emily … 3<br />

• You and your family should not be afraid of<br />

exposure to chemicals, natural or synthetic, any<br />

more than you should be afraid of crossing the<br />

street – because you can exercise judgment in<br />

what you do.<br />

• You mentioned Febreze, so I found this<br />

citation. You can find others easily by searching,<br />

or you can call the manufacturer directly – in<br />

this case it is Procter & Gamble.<br />

http://www.gooddogmagazine.com/how_safe_i<br />

s_febreze.htm


There is still a lot we don’t know

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!