11.06.2014 Views

The full programme book (PDF) - Royal Geographical Society

The full programme book (PDF) - Royal Geographical Society

The full programme book (PDF) - Royal Geographical Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T2<br />

Palynostratigraphic alignment chronology versus independent dating methods.<br />

14<br />

C, OSL and tephra: an example from Lake Fimon, northern Italy<br />

S. E. Lowick 1 *, M. Hardiman 2,3 , S. P.E. Blockley 2 , B. Giaccio 4 F. Preusser 5 , P. Reimer 6 , C.<br />

S. Lane 7<br />

1 Institute of Geological Sciences and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of<br />

Bern, Switzerland<br />

2 Centre for Quaternary Research, Department of Geography, <strong>Royal</strong> Holloway, University of London,<br />

Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom<br />

3 Department of Geography, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth<br />

4 Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria, CNR, Via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Rome, Italy<br />

5 Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden<br />

6 Centre for Climate, the Environment & Chronology, School of Geography, Archaeology and<br />

Palaeoecology, Queen’s University Belfast, United Kingdom<br />

7 Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins<br />

Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY<br />

Independent dating evidence is presented for a lacustrine record for which an age-depth<br />

model had already been derived primarily through the interpretation of a pollen signal. For<br />

the upper part of the core, quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages support<br />

radiocarbon ages that were previously considered to suffer an underestimation due to<br />

contamination, and both methods imply a younger chronology than does the pollen. <strong>The</strong><br />

successful identification of the Campanian Ignimbrite as a cryptotephra within the core<br />

also validates this younger chronology for the upper part of the core, as well as extending<br />

the known geographical distribution of this tephra layer within Italy. Further down the core,<br />

the OSL ages continue to be younger then the pollen chronology, and underestimate a<br />

pollen assemblage correlated to the Eemian (Marine Isotope Age 5e) by ~ 20 ka. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

new results pose problems for both the pollen interpretation and the OSL in the upper and<br />

lower part of the core respectively. For the upper core, the three independent dating<br />

methods suggest that care should always be taken when building chronologies from proxy<br />

records via alignment techniques, particularly when correlations are made to records<br />

which have themselves been tuned to a target record or global signal (i.e. double tuning).<br />

In the lower part of the core, the OSL quartz signal suggests an underestimation around<br />

the age range that has already been shown to be problematic by some other studies,<br />

although no indication of a problem has so far been found with the Fimon quartz. No<br />

definitive chronology is offered here for Lake Fimon, although multiple lines of dating<br />

evidence show that there is sufficient reason to seriously consider it within MIS 3. This<br />

data is presented to encourage debate and further investigation of such issues. <strong>The</strong><br />

Quaternary dating community should always have all age information available, even<br />

when significant temporal offsets are apparent between various lines of evidence, to be: 1)<br />

better informed when they face similar dilemmas in the future, and 2) allow multiple<br />

working hypotheses to be considered.<br />

Keywords: independent dating; proxy records; tuning; luminescence; radiocarbon;<br />

cryptotephra

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!