Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF

Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF

revit.nweurope.org
from revit.nweurope.org More from this publisher
10.06.2014 Views

The result of the appraisal using the GPR tool is displayed in a simple and graphic manner by the allocation of stars (a maximum of five stars is possible) as well as a graphic overview for the six areas of appraisal. A generally comprehensible and clear appraisal of the examined buildings is thus achieved. The GPR program is based on Dutch legal and technical specifications and building standards. The application in Germany thus requires the program to be assessed, adapted and possibly extensively restructured. As well as the legal and technical specifications, the German standards for building extensions should particularly be taken into consideration here. Further control mechanisms would also appear to make sense in order to examine the entered data during the course of an official appraisal and to verify the realised standards. Besides the legal specifications, the program uses stored reference projects to check the entered values. During the trial run it seemed that only two reference objects were stored for each type of building (residential, office and school building). The type and number of these objects cannot be influenced. For an application in Germany, the planners would therefore recommend saving German reference objects and extending the number of objects. Assessment of Different Buildings The restriction of the GPR tool to monofunctional buildings (residential, office and school buildings) greatly limits the applicability of the program or results in distorted definitions when buildings with mixed uses are adapted to the predetermined matrix. The program assumes uniform building heights and types of roof. If there are differing heights for one building (as for ‘Haus am Platz’) or different types of roof (e.g. gable roof and flat roof extension), approximations have to be carried out that influence the result. The consumption values of a building are only requested and optimised by means of the quality of materials, construction principles, standards for building extensions (e.g. shower instead of bath tub) and in part by consumer behaviour. Invoices demonstrating electricity and water consumption, which would be requested again in a second entry session after a certain trial period, are lacking. The appraisal regarding sustainability is therefore only possible in a limited way and depends on the information given by the product manufacturers. The ‘quality of living conditions’ entry section concentrates on the building properties. Quality characteristics for the vicinity – such as infrastructure facilities, green spaces, building orientation – are not included in the appraisal. 35

The assessment by the test team concluded that GPR does not cover all the aspects of the superior Conclusion environmental profile used in Tilburg. However, the from the constructional characteristics and equipment Trial Run standards of a building can be examined clearly and uniformly with the program whether or not they conform to the environmental profile. This can be done at the beginning of the planning phase so that it is possible to incorporate the requirements of the environmental profile in the planning and construction process of a building visibly as well as at an early stage and at all levels. The program developer states that GPR is integrated in the approval process in many Dutch municipalities so that no further examinations or evidence in the covered topics are required for the process of approval and authorisation to build. The program thus allows the examination method to be simplified and offers a concise external presentation with the ‘star categories’. In Germany, the examination of a large part of the information requested by GPR is carried out in the approval process and acceptance procedure of construction work on the basis of laws and ordinances, the stipulations of the development plan and local building regulations. The data needed are available in Germany in a similar manner, but not systematically acquired and registered. Energy-saving certificates pursuant to EnEV, for example, are to be issued within building permits; consumption data are recorded in the special planning stages (electrical, heating, sanitary); and the quality of material is regulated by standards and quality marks. These data would have to be combined if the GPR tool were to be used in Germany. The data could also be collected within a superior environmental profile. A simplified qualification or appraisal would then be possible using a uniform data sheet. The special qualities of the GPR tool lie in its ease of use and the concise presentation of the appraisal results. This could involve a prominent external presentation (‘effectiveness in advertising’), helping to achieve superior environmental standards in the public domain and make them relevant for business (a five-star building sells better than a one-star building). For an application in Germany, however, the stipulations and standards should be adapted as well as the software extended to appraise buildings with mixed uses and more complex geometries (different types of roof, differing heights of a building). A comparison with alternative solutions [e.g. Passive House Planning Package (Passivhaus-Projektierungspaket, Darmstadt)] should be made within an economic, technical and financial review. Modern Offices in Stuttgart 36

The <strong>as</strong>sessment by the test team concluded that GPR<br />

does not cover all the <strong>as</strong>pects of the superior<br />

Conclusion<br />

environmental profile used <strong>in</strong> Tilburg. However, the<br />

from the<br />

constructional characteristics and equipment<br />

Trial Run<br />

standards of a build<strong>in</strong>g can be exam<strong>in</strong>ed clearly and<br />

uniformly with the program whether or not they<br />

conform to the environmental profile. This can be done<br />

at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the plann<strong>in</strong>g ph<strong>as</strong>e so that it is possible to <strong>in</strong>corporate<br />

the requirements of the environmental profile <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

construction process of a build<strong>in</strong>g visibly <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> at an early stage and at<br />

all levels. The program developer states that GPR is <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong> the<br />

approval process <strong>in</strong> many Dutch municipalities so that no further<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ations or evidence <strong>in</strong> the covered topics are required for the<br />

process of approval and authorisation to build. The program thus allows<br />

the exam<strong>in</strong>ation method to be simplified and offers a concise external<br />

presentation with the ‘star categories’.<br />

In Germany, the exam<strong>in</strong>ation of a large part of the <strong>in</strong>formation requested<br />

by GPR is carried out <strong>in</strong> the approval process and acceptance procedure of<br />

construction work on the b<strong>as</strong>is of laws and ord<strong>in</strong>ances, the stipulations of<br />

the development plan and local build<strong>in</strong>g regulations. The data needed are<br />

available <strong>in</strong> Germany <strong>in</strong> a similar manner, but not systematically acquired<br />

and registered. Energy-sav<strong>in</strong>g certificates pursuant to EnEV, for example,<br />

are to be issued with<strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g permits; consumption data are recorded <strong>in</strong><br />

the special plann<strong>in</strong>g stages (electrical, heat<strong>in</strong>g, sanitary); and the quality of<br />

material is regulated by standards and quality marks. These data would<br />

have to be comb<strong>in</strong>ed if the GPR tool were to be used <strong>in</strong> Germany. The data<br />

could also be collected with<strong>in</strong> a superior environmental profile. A simplified<br />

qualification or appraisal would then be possible us<strong>in</strong>g a uniform data sheet.<br />

The special qualities of the GPR tool lie <strong>in</strong> its e<strong>as</strong>e of use and the concise<br />

presentation of the appraisal results. This could <strong>in</strong>volve a prom<strong>in</strong>ent external<br />

presentation (‘effectiveness <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g’), help<strong>in</strong>g to achieve superior<br />

environmental standards <strong>in</strong> the public doma<strong>in</strong> and make them relevant for<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess (a five-star build<strong>in</strong>g sells better than a one-star build<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

For an application <strong>in</strong> Germany, however, the stipulations and standards<br />

should be adapted <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> the software extended to appraise build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

with mixed uses and more complex geometries (different types of roof,<br />

differ<strong>in</strong>g heights of a build<strong>in</strong>g). A comparison with alternative solutions [e.g.<br />

P<strong>as</strong>sive House Plann<strong>in</strong>g Package (P<strong>as</strong>sivhaus-Projektierungspaket,<br />

Darmstadt)] should be made with<strong>in</strong> an economic, technical and f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

review.<br />

Modern Offices <strong>in</strong> Stuttgart<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!