Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF
Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF
Step 3 Selection of sustainable development indicators and targets Evaluate, refine, select and agree indicators, targets and measures Each project should have an agreed set of sustainable development indicators and targets. These can be chosen by using a number of methods to agree the targets and measures appropriate for the site, but as a minimum the team should: ■ consider how the project/strategy contributes to each objective, and reach a consensus ■ identify ‘key issues’ and suggest solutions ■ use the following scale when considering the compatibility of the proposed activity with the objectives: U Undermining - significantly undermines the objective P Poor - does not fully explore the potential to contribute to the objective N Neutral - does not contribute to the objective F Fair - makes some direct or significant indirect contribution Indicators and Targets - Monitoring G Good - makes a significant positive contribution E Excellent - makes a close to optimal contribution to the objective Regarding the methodology of sustainability measurement, two examples are cited: 1. Methodology for Sustainability Integration and Appraisal developed by the Welsh Development Agency (WDA). The process of sustainable integration in this document is introduced as a more positive and realistic approach. This means: ‘finding ways of pursuing each objective with the minimum of harm to others, and where choices between objectives are inevitable, to be explicit and democratic about the choices’ Data Collection The process can also be defined as ‘Conflict Minimisation’ – finding solutions which reduce (but not necessarily fully overcome) conflicts between different objectives. When key conflicts are identified, these are treated as a ‘Crunch Issue’, and ways of reducing or resolving them are searched for and agreed. 8
2. An alternative option to the methodology provided by the WDA is the tool for sustainability assessment developed by the RESCUE project team. The purpose of the RESCUE - ‘Sustainability Assessment Tool’ (SAT) is to provide a methodology that considers sustainability criteria from a local and regional context perspective, together with conflicting priorities to assess future brownfield regeneration projects in terms of site-/local-specific sustainability. This approach provides support for funding and/or permission decisions. A full description of the SAT is available at: www.rescue-europe.com The process of agreeing on the sustainable objectives of a site has to be based on agreements achieved through discussion between institutional and non-institutional stakeholders affected by the project. The depth of participatory approach depends in reality on conditions such as owner attitude, scale of project and quality and level of local governance culture. Public Meeting-Medway To be sure that stakeholders’ participation will bring desired outcomes, the process has to be professionally designed and integrated with other project activities from the earliest stages and adjusted to local conditions. To design and implement a process of stakeholder engagement it is advised to use professional guides and manuals providing a theoretical overview of the topic together with practical indications regarding optimal project-specific conditions, methods and tools. For example, ‘Stakeholder Engagement - A Toolkit’, prepared by the REVIT project. This process of agreeing the sustainable objectives of a site may require a revision to the original objectives, and in some cases altering or changing the vision for the site. The proposed process allows for cycles of changes to take place on an iterative basis. Once the objectives have been agreed then the appropriate tools and targets, indicators and measuring techniques can be selected. This in turn leads to a management plan to control this process throughout the duration of the project, reporting variances to agreed tolerances, verifying compliance and reporting results. Finally, an audit process will ensure that the results are verifiable and the sustainable benefits of the project are credible, as well as ensuring that the project plan’s aims and objectives have been met. Produce a Statement of Targets and Measures Step 4 A sustainable development management plan with a monitoring and reporting framework should be created, based on the selected and agreed indicators, targets and measures. Produce a Sustainable Development Management Plan + Monitoring and Reporting Process 9
- Page 1 and 2: WORKING TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE AND
- Page 3 and 4: Further Information Information flo
- Page 5 and 6: Dredging - Medway of indicators tha
- Page 7 and 8: The Sustainability Evaluation Proce
- Page 9: Step 1 Define the Vision Define the
- Page 13 and 14: Checklist to Identify Stage of Proj
- Page 15 and 16: The Municipality of Tilburg has to
- Page 17 and 18: An essential aspect for the success
- Page 19 and 20: Determining Environmental Goals Fac
- Page 21 and 22: Examples of environmental performan
- Page 23 and 24: Living and working environment The
- Page 25 and 26: Gemeentelijke Praktijk Richtlijn -
- Page 27 and 28: Sometimes during the process it wil
- Page 29 and 30: GPR Software Trial - Stuttgart The
- Page 31 and 32: Aims of the GPR Trial Run in Stuttg
- Page 33 and 34: Materials The building construction
- Page 35 and 36: Application and User- Friendliness
- Page 37 and 38: 5.5 Health Individual topics: - Sou
- Page 39 and 40: The assessment by the test team con
- Page 41 and 42: These objectives provide the basis
- Page 43 and 44: workshop was signed by the mayor in
- Page 45 and 46: In urban development, indicators ar
- Page 47: Partner Details: Landeshaupstadt St
2. An alternative option to the methodology provided by the WDA is the<br />
tool for susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>as</strong>sessment developed by the RESCUE project<br />
team. The purpose of the RESCUE - ‘<strong>Susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> Assessment Tool’<br />
(SAT) is to provide a methodology that considers susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
criteria from a local and regional context perspective, together with<br />
conflict<strong>in</strong>g priorities to <strong>as</strong>sess future brownfield regeneration<br />
projects <strong>in</strong> terms of site-/local-specific susta<strong>in</strong>ability. This approach<br />
provides support for fund<strong>in</strong>g and/or permission decisions. A full<br />
description of the SAT is available at: www.rescue-europe.com<br />
The process of agree<strong>in</strong>g on the susta<strong>in</strong>able objectives of a site h<strong>as</strong> to be<br />
b<strong>as</strong>ed on agreements achieved through discussion between <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />
and non-<strong>in</strong>stitutional stakeholders affected by the project. The depth of<br />
participatory approach depends <strong>in</strong> reality on conditions such <strong>as</strong> owner<br />
attitude, scale of project and quality and level of local governance culture.<br />
Public Meet<strong>in</strong>g-Medway<br />
To be sure that stakeholders’ participation will br<strong>in</strong>g desired outcomes, the<br />
process h<strong>as</strong> to be professionally designed and <strong>in</strong>tegrated with other<br />
project activities from the earliest stages and adjusted to local conditions.<br />
To design and implement a process of stakeholder engagement it is<br />
advised to use professional guides and manuals provid<strong>in</strong>g a theoretical<br />
overview of the topic together with practical <strong>in</strong>dications regard<strong>in</strong>g optimal<br />
project-specific conditions, methods and tools. For example, ‘Stakeholder<br />
Engagement - A Toolkit’, prepared by the REVIT project.<br />
This process of agree<strong>in</strong>g the susta<strong>in</strong>able objectives of a site may require a<br />
revision to the orig<strong>in</strong>al objectives, and <strong>in</strong> some c<strong>as</strong>es alter<strong>in</strong>g or chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the vision for the site. The proposed process allows for cycles of changes<br />
to take place on an iterative b<strong>as</strong>is. Once the objectives have been agreed<br />
then the appropriate tools and targets, <strong>in</strong>dicators and me<strong>as</strong>ur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
techniques can be selected. This <strong>in</strong> turn leads to a management plan to<br />
control this process throughout the duration of the project, report<strong>in</strong>g<br />
variances to agreed tolerances, verify<strong>in</strong>g compliance and report<strong>in</strong>g results.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, an audit process will ensure that the results are verifiable and the<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able benefits of the project are credible, <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> ensur<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the project plan’s aims and objectives have been met.<br />
Produce a Statement of<br />
Targets and Me<strong>as</strong>ures<br />
Step 4<br />
A susta<strong>in</strong>able development management plan with a monitor<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g framework should be created, b<strong>as</strong>ed on the selected and agreed<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicators, targets and me<strong>as</strong>ures.<br />
Produce a Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development Management<br />
Plan + Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Report<strong>in</strong>g Process<br />
9