10.06.2014 Views

Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF

Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF

Ensuring Sustainability in Brownfield Revitalisation as PDF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Step 3<br />

Selection of susta<strong>in</strong>able development <strong>in</strong>dicators and targets<br />

Evaluate, ref<strong>in</strong>e, select and agree<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators, targets and me<strong>as</strong>ures<br />

Each project should have an agreed set of susta<strong>in</strong>able development<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators and targets. These can be chosen by us<strong>in</strong>g a number of methods<br />

to agree the targets and me<strong>as</strong>ures appropriate for the site, but <strong>as</strong> a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum the team should:<br />

■ consider how the project/strategy contributes to each objective, and<br />

reach a consensus<br />

■ identify ‘key issues’ and suggest solutions<br />

■ use the follow<strong>in</strong>g scale when consider<strong>in</strong>g the compatibility of the<br />

proposed activity with the objectives:<br />

U Underm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g - significantly underm<strong>in</strong>es the objective<br />

P Poor - does not fully explore the potential to contribute to the<br />

objective<br />

N Neutral - does not contribute to the objective<br />

F Fair - makes some direct or significant <strong>in</strong>direct contribution<br />

Indicators and Targets - Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

G Good - makes a significant positive contribution<br />

E Excellent - makes a close to optimal contribution to the objective<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g the methodology of susta<strong>in</strong>ability me<strong>as</strong>urement, two examples<br />

are cited:<br />

1. Methodology for <strong>Susta<strong>in</strong>ability</strong> Integration and Appraisal developed<br />

by the Welsh Development Agency (WDA). The process of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong> this document is <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>as</strong> a more<br />

positive and realistic approach. This means:<br />

‘f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g ways of pursu<strong>in</strong>g each objective with the m<strong>in</strong>imum of harm<br />

to others, and where choices between objectives are <strong>in</strong>evitable, to<br />

be explicit and democratic about the choices’<br />

Data Collection<br />

The process can also be def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>as</strong> ‘Conflict M<strong>in</strong>imisation’ – f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

solutions which reduce (but not necessarily fully overcome)<br />

conflicts between different objectives. When key conflicts are<br />

identified, these are treated <strong>as</strong> a ‘Crunch Issue’, and ways of<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g or resolv<strong>in</strong>g them are searched for and agreed.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!