Proceedings of the 2001 Earthquake Engineering Symposium for ...
Proceedings of the 2001 Earthquake Engineering Symposium for ... Proceedings of the 2001 Earthquake Engineering Symposium for ...
The next step was to take the blueprints to the building and sketch all of the components of the LSA building. We would typically do the building one floor at a time, in order to keep correlating information together with the sketches of the equipment. Some floors also required access to restricted areas, because of the presence of animal testing, and therefore we would do these floors all at once so that we would only need to obtain access a limited number of times. While we were sketching the placement of all of the nonstructural components in each lab, we would also take photographs of each of the labs in order to visually relate the blueprints to what the lab looked like in reality. This would aid the engineers in reading the blueprints we constructed. FIGURE 3. Sketching the Equipment in a Restricted Clean Room. 62
RM. 1C RM. 1B RM. 6A RM. 1D RM. 6B RM. 6 RM. 1A RM. 8A RM. 4 RM. 1 RM. 1E RM. 1G RM. 1F RM. 10 RM. 8B RM. 8 RM. 3 RM. 8C RM. 12 RM. 14A RM. 14B RM. 12A RM. 14 RM. 14C RM. 14E RM. 14D RM. 20B RM. 20C RM. 20A RM. 20 RM. 20D RM. 20E RM. 20F RM. 26C RM. 26B RM. 26A RM. 26 RM. 26E RM. 26F RM. 30B RM. 30A RM. 30C RM. 30 RM. 29 RM. 30D RM. 30E RM. 30F RM. 32C RM. 32B RM. 32A RM. 32 RM. 32D RM. 32E RM. 32F RM. 34B RM. 34C RM. 34A RM. 34 RM. 36 RM. 34E RM. 34D RM. 38 RM. 34EA RM. 39 RM. 44 RM. 40 RM. 41 RM. 43 RM. 45 RM. 48 RM. 49 RM. 47 Once the sketching was all finished, we would transfer all of the information from paper to computer. The data regarding the different types of machinery was transferred into an Excel ® spreadsheet. The information gathered for this database included the equipment name, model number, dimensions, approximate weight, and location. The sketches were transferred onto the blueprints again using AutoCAD ® . The different types of nonstructural components in the labs were divided up into three categories: furniture, equipment, and shelving. These categories were represented with three different colors of the blueprints to make the drawing easier to read and easier to identify specific components out of the database. Basement DATE JUN. 11. 2001 FIGURE 4. Blueprint of Basement Floor with Nonstructural Components. 63
- Page 20 and 21: stability of the bearing was consid
- Page 22 and 23: Section Five - References Naeim, F.
- Page 24 and 25: Appendix A 16
- Page 26 and 27: Appendix C 18
- Page 28 and 29: Start Time Date Time Bearing # Test
- Page 30 and 31: Start time Cycle/% Date Time Bearin
- Page 32: Start time Cycle/% Date Time Bearin
- Page 35 and 36: Start time Cycle/% Date Time Bearin
- Page 37 and 38: Start time Cycle/% Date Time Bearin
- Page 41 and 42: Pipeline Response to Ground Oscilla
- Page 43 and 44: Problems arise at the interface bet
- Page 45 and 46: Zeghal and Elgamal (1994) performed
- Page 47 and 48: The inelastic model was also analyz
- Page 49 and 50: where l is the length from zero to
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 5: a) Basin Schematic, and b
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 6: Stress-Strain Relationshi
- Page 55 and 56: cohesive versus cohesionless soil,
- Page 57 and 58: gamma = 0.03. As the graph shows, t
- Page 59 and 60: Differences in the closed form solu
- Page 61: Acknowledgements This paper present
- Page 64 and 65: ABSTRACT A common misconception reg
- Page 66 and 67: In order to narrow the scope of thi
- Page 68 and 69: FIGURE 1. Typical Electron Microsco
- Page 72 and 73: RM. 26C A B G C D H E F C F G H A B
- Page 75 and 76: A Model for the Long-Term Deformati
- Page 77 and 78: proposed for driving the deformatio
- Page 79 and 80: oriented the deep fault in our mode
- Page 81 and 82: 3.0 Results and Interpretations 3.1
- Page 83 and 84: Some questions do arise concerning
- Page 85 and 86: calculations are listed in Figs. 10
- Page 87 and 88: Table 2. Fault configurations for e
- Page 89 and 90: 38 ° 93 ° W 92 ° W 91 ° W 90 °
- Page 91 and 92: (cm) Fig. 2 Relative vertical displ
- Page 93 and 94: (cm) Model A (cm) Model C Fig. 4 Re
- Page 95 and 96: (cm) Model E (cm) Model F Fig. 6 Re
- Page 97 and 98: Relative Displacement (cm) 4500 400
- Page 99 and 100: 100 90 80 thrust (500 yr) thrust (1
- Page 101 and 102: References Adams, J., 1980, Active
- Page 103 and 104: Diagonal Tension in Unreinforced Ma
- Page 105 and 106: Project Scope MAEC ST-11 tests a la
- Page 107 and 108: etween surface area of masonry unit
- Page 109 and 110: coefficient was used as a quantitat
- Page 111 and 112: Appendix A Table 1 Masonry Shear Te
- Page 113: References 1. Moon, F., Yi, T., Leo
- Page 116 and 117: Table of Contents i. Abstract ii. I
- Page 118 and 119: Introduction One of the major issue
RM. 1C<br />
RM. 1B<br />
RM. 6A<br />
RM. 1D<br />
RM. 6B<br />
RM. 6<br />
RM. 1A<br />
RM. 8A<br />
RM. 4<br />
RM. 1<br />
RM. 1E<br />
RM. 1G<br />
RM. 1F<br />
RM. 10<br />
RM. 8B<br />
RM. 8<br />
RM. 3<br />
RM. 8C<br />
RM. 12<br />
RM. 14A<br />
RM. 14B<br />
RM. 12A<br />
RM. 14<br />
RM. 14C<br />
RM. 14E<br />
RM. 14D<br />
RM. 20B<br />
RM. 20C<br />
RM. 20A<br />
RM. 20<br />
RM. 20D<br />
RM. 20E<br />
RM. 20F<br />
RM. 26C<br />
RM. 26B<br />
RM. 26A<br />
RM. 26<br />
RM. 26E<br />
RM. 26F<br />
RM. 30B<br />
RM. 30A<br />
RM. 30C<br />
RM. 30<br />
RM. 29<br />
RM. 30D<br />
RM. 30E<br />
RM. 30F<br />
RM. 32C<br />
RM. 32B<br />
RM. 32A<br />
RM. 32<br />
RM. 32D<br />
RM. 32E<br />
RM. 32F<br />
RM. 34B<br />
RM. 34C<br />
RM. 34A<br />
RM. 34<br />
RM. 36<br />
RM. 34E<br />
RM. 34D<br />
RM. 38<br />
RM. 34EA<br />
RM. 39<br />
RM. 44<br />
RM. 40<br />
RM. 41<br />
RM. 43<br />
RM. 45<br />
RM. 48<br />
RM. 49<br />
RM. 47<br />
Once <strong>the</strong> sketching was all finished, we would transfer all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation from<br />
paper to computer. The data regarding <strong>the</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> machinery was transferred<br />
into an Excel ® spreadsheet. The in<strong>for</strong>mation ga<strong>the</strong>red <strong>for</strong> this database included <strong>the</strong><br />
equipment name, model number, dimensions, approximate weight, and location. The<br />
sketches were transferred onto <strong>the</strong> blueprints again using AutoCAD ® . The different types<br />
<strong>of</strong> nonstructural components in <strong>the</strong> labs were divided up into three categories: furniture,<br />
equipment, and shelving. These categories were represented with three different colors<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blueprints to make <strong>the</strong> drawing easier to read and easier to identify specific<br />
components out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> database.<br />
Basement<br />
DATE<br />
JUN. 11. <strong>2001</strong><br />
FIGURE 4. Blueprint <strong>of</strong> Basement Floor with Nonstructural Components.<br />
63
Change language