08.06.2014 Views

Portraits of the spiritual Seeing in Mark's Gospel. Origen ... - Redalyc

Portraits of the spiritual Seeing in Mark's Gospel. Origen ... - Redalyc

Portraits of the spiritual Seeing in Mark's Gospel. Origen ... - Redalyc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jesus and <strong>the</strong> Demons:...<br />

335<br />

heal<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y describe <strong>the</strong> re-establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ideal state <strong>of</strong><br />

communication and functionality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> social community and with<br />

<strong>the</strong> personal God <strong>of</strong> Jesus. O<strong>the</strong>r episodes <strong>of</strong> heal<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>the</strong> ones<br />

characterized by <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> demons: <strong>the</strong> paralytic man <strong>in</strong> Mark<br />

2:1-5 and <strong>the</strong> anonymous woman with hemorrhages <strong>in</strong> Mark 5:31-<br />

32. In both cases <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> heal<strong>in</strong>g also beg<strong>in</strong>s with Jesus’ see<strong>in</strong>g<br />

which implies more than just a physical perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reality <strong>in</strong><br />

front <strong>of</strong> him.<br />

d) Jesus’ see<strong>in</strong>g and a didactic dimension: <strong>the</strong> pedagogical aspect <strong>of</strong> Jesus’<br />

see<strong>in</strong>g is manifested explicitly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> episode <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poor widow <strong>in</strong><br />

Mark 12:41-44. The narrative does not describe a context <strong>of</strong> exorcism<br />

or heal<strong>in</strong>g. Jesus simply observes «how» <strong>the</strong> people were putt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g. His persistent and <strong>spiritual</strong> contemplation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human<br />

condition motivates him to impart an <strong>in</strong>struction to his closest<br />

friends, <strong>the</strong> disciples (12:43 a ). The purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> didactic communication<br />

described <strong>in</strong> a direct style discourse <strong>of</strong> 12:43 b -44, is to<br />

educate <strong>the</strong> disciples to «see» as God «sees», this means to grow <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> capacity to perceive <strong>the</strong> reality with <strong>the</strong> <strong>spiritual</strong> eyes <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

discover what is hidden to <strong>the</strong> human sight, because man looks to<br />

<strong>the</strong> outward appearance <strong>of</strong> every situation, but Jesus, which is <strong>the</strong><br />

evident pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> God’s see<strong>in</strong>g, perceives <strong>the</strong> soul and heart. This attitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> Jesus echoes <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>of</strong> Yhwh to Samuel dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

moment <strong>of</strong> choos<strong>in</strong>g David, when <strong>the</strong> Lord said to Samuel, «do not<br />

look at his appearance or at <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> his stature, because I have<br />

rejected him; for God sees not as man sees, for man looks at <strong>the</strong> outward<br />

appearance, but <strong>the</strong> Lord looks at <strong>the</strong> heart» (1Sam 16:7).<br />

e) Pragmatic dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> texts: <strong>the</strong> pericopes studied under <strong>the</strong> perspective<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>spiritual</strong> senses manifested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Origen</strong>,<br />

Bonaventure and Ignatius <strong>of</strong> Loyola, lead us to read Mark’s <strong>Gospel</strong><br />

from a pragmatic approach, which is an extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> semantic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> episodes. The pragmatic read<strong>in</strong>g leads us to <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text, this means, for what were <strong>the</strong>se narrations<br />

written for? What is <strong>the</strong> importance for <strong>the</strong> modern reader? What do<br />

<strong>the</strong> episodes ask <strong>the</strong> reader to do? 65<br />

65<br />

Cf. B. Schlieben-Lange, L<strong>in</strong>guistische Pragamatik (UTB 198; Stuttgart 1979) 97.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!