Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
-62- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre cost of an RC unit drops below eight percent of an AC unit, then trading RC units for cadre units increases costs. However, it is unlikely that the cost of an RC unit is as low as eight percent since the relative cost of an RC unit calculated from only basic pay differences is 16 percent of an AC BCT. 73 Over a range of estimates for the cost of an RC BCT, trading RC BCTs for cadre BCTs significantly reduces annual costs. However, the peacetime cost of RC and cadre BCTs are only one piece of analyzing this tradeoff. The other piece is calculating the number of units needed to sustain one deployed unit from each force. This is calculated based on the rotation guidance, which we discuss in the next chapter. ____________ 73 Klerman et al (2008)
-63- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre 5. WILLINGNESS TO STRESS THE AC WHILE CADRE UNITS MOBILIZE The analyses in Chapter Two assume that the DoD would be willing to allow some AC units to break rotation guidance while cadre units mobilize. The willingness of the DoD to place stress on the AC while cadre units mobilize affects the attractiveness of a cadre augmented force. The less willing the DoD is to let some AC units break rotation guidance, the more reserve units needed in the force. This reduces the cost savings from a cadre augmented force. It is unclear how willing the DoD will be to deploy AC units with less than two years at home in the future. This chapter calculates the cost savings from a cadre augmented force for different assumptions about the willingness of the DoD to allow some AC units to break rotation guidance. We begin by assuming that the DoD does not allow any unit to break rotation guidance and then relax this assumption incrementally. 5.1—STRICT ADHERENCE TO ROTATION GUIDANCE We start this analysis by calculating the cost savings from a cadre augmented force when all units are required to strictly adhere to rotation guidance. This assumption creates a worst-case scenario for a cadre augmented force because it requires the largest number of RC units in peacetime. We assume that the force is built ex-ante so that no unit will break rotation guidance in wartime. In order to perform this analysis, we must choose one of the cadre augmented forces analyzed in Chapter Two to use as an example. In this section, and those that follow, we will analyze the CadreMix force. 74 The qualitative results for the other cadre augmented forces examined in Chapter Two will be similar. The CadreMix force has 35 AC BCTs and 16 cadre ____________ 74 The CadreMix force was designed to sustain the same rotation as the 2011 force (19 BCTs).
- Page 27: -11- Introduction forces. This is i
- Page 30 and 31: -14- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 32 and 33: -16- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 34 and 35: -18- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 37 and 38: -21- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 39 and 40: -23- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 41 and 42: -25- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 43 and 44: -27- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 45 and 46: -29- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 47 and 48: -31- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 49 and 50: -33- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 51 and 52: -35- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 53 and 54: -37- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 55 and 56: -39- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 57 and 58: -41- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 59 and 60: -43- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 61 and 62: -45- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 63 and 64: -47- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 65 and 66: -49- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 67 and 68: -51- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 69 and 70: -53- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 71 and 72: -55- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 73 and 74: -57- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 75 and 76: -59- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 77: -61- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 81 and 82: -65- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 83 and 84: -67- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 85 and 86: -69- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 87 and 88: -71- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 89 and 90: -73- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 91 and 92: -75- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 93 and 94: -77- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 95 and 96: -79- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 97 and 98: -81- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 99 and 100: -83- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 101 and 102: -85- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 103 and 104: -87- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 105 and 106: -89- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 107 and 108: -91- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 109 and 110: -93- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 111 and 112: -95- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 113 and 114: -97- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 115 and 116: -99- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 117 and 118: -101- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 119 and 120: -103- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 121 and 122: -105- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 123 and 124: -107- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 125 and 126: -109- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 127 and 128: -111- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
-63- A Budgetary Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />
5. WILLINGNESS TO STRESS THE AC WHILE CADRE UNITS MOBILIZE<br />
The analyses in Chapter Two assume that the DoD would be willing to allow some<br />
AC units to break rotation guidance while cadre units mobilize. The willingness of the DoD<br />
to place stress on the AC while cadre units mobilize affects the attractiveness of a cadre<br />
augmented force. The less willing the DoD is to let some AC units break rotation guidance,<br />
the more reserve units needed in the force. This reduces the cost savings from a cadre<br />
augmented force. It is unclear how willing the DoD will be to deploy AC units with less than<br />
two years at home in the future. This chapter calculates the cost savings from a cadre<br />
augmented force for different assumptions about the willingness of the DoD to allow some<br />
AC units to break rotation guidance. We begin by assuming that the DoD does not allow<br />
any unit to break rotation guidance and then relax this assumption incrementally.<br />
5.1—STRICT ADHERENCE TO ROTATION GUIDANCE<br />
We start this analysis by calculating the cost savings from a cadre augmented force<br />
when all units are required to strictly adhere to rotation guidance. This assumption creates a<br />
worst-case scenario for a cadre augmented force because it requires the largest number of<br />
RC units in peacetime. We assume that the force is built ex-ante so that no unit will break<br />
rotation guidance in wartime.<br />
In order to perform this analysis, we must choose one of the cadre augmented forces<br />
analyzed in Chapter Two to use as an example. In this section, and those that follow, we will<br />
analyze the <strong>Cadre</strong>Mix force. 74 The qualitative results for the other cadre augmented forces<br />
examined in Chapter Two will be similar. The <strong>Cadre</strong>Mix force has 35 AC BCTs and 16 cadre<br />
____________<br />
74 The <strong>Cadre</strong>Mix force was designed to sustain the same rotation as the 2011 force (19 BCTs).