07.06.2014 Views

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-28- A Budgetary Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />

1.3.1—Frequency of War<br />

The difference between wartime and peacetime in the analyses in this paper is the<br />

need for “reserve” units (RC, cadre). The frequency of war measures the percentage of time<br />

that RC and cadre units are needed. We distinguish here between need and mobilization<br />

because RC and cadre units are not mobilized for all years of a war. <strong>Cadre</strong> units mobilize in<br />

wartime following a delay, after which they are mobilized for the remainder of the war. RC<br />

units only mobilize one year in six during wartime. Estimating how frequently reserve forces<br />

would be needed requires thinking carefully about when RC and cadre units would be<br />

mobilized. In this paper, we assume that these units are mobilized only if the requirement<br />

for deployed forces surges for a sustained period of time above the level at which the AC<br />

can sustain when rotated at 1:2. 11 If the requirement surges only for a short period (less than<br />

one year), AC units in the ARFORGEN “ready” pool can surge to meet the requirement<br />

without the need to mobilize reserve units. However, if the requirement stays at a higher<br />

level beyond one year, RC and cadre units would be needed and mobilized. It is likely that<br />

cadre units will be mobilized for some wars in which they are not deployed and that cadre<br />

units will not be immediately demobilized at the end of each war. While our baseline<br />

frequency of war estimate includes both short and long wars, our analysis does not include<br />

costs for demobilization and therefore overestimates the cost savings from a cadre<br />

augmented force. 12<br />

____________<br />

11 For instance, a force with 48 AC BCTs can sustain 16 deployed BCTs at 1:2. If the requirement for deployed<br />

forces surged above 16 BCTs for more than one year then RC and cadre BCTs would be mobilized.<br />

12 Paper II finds that the cost of separation bonuses could reduce the cost savings from a cadre augmented<br />

force by 15 percent. The cost savings could be reduced even further if the demobilization process takes many<br />

years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!