Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

-368- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong> This paper has discussed the history of previous cadre proposal. This history is important for two reasons. First, it distinguishes the cadre forces analyzed in this dissertation from those that have been rejected in the past. Second, it shows that there are some similarities between the cadre forces analyzed in this dissertation and past proposals. 10.1—DIFFERENCES In this paper, we have seen that cadre units are not a new idea but a concept that have been part of American military policy from the very beginning. However, many of these cadre proposals never gained wide support. It is important to understand the differences between previous cadre proposals and the cadre forces analyzed in this dissertation so as not to immediately dismiss the possibility of cadre forces because they have failed to be adopted in the past. The first distinguishing feature of the cadre forces analyzed in this dissertation is that they are not justified by a mistrust of the militia. The cadre proposals of Calhoun and Upton were based on a mistrust of the militia. In this dissertation, cadre units are proposed as an additional component of the total force and not as a replacement for the National Guard. The argument for integrating cadre units is based on the desire to minimize costs given a required level of readiness and says nothing about the readiness of the National Guard. It is important to make this distinction because cadre forces are often associated with a mistrust of the militia, and this dissertation does not argue that the National Guard is ineffective. The second important difference is that the cadre forces analyzed in this dissertation are cadre augmented forces while the cadre forces proposed by Calhoun and Upton were all cadre forces. Calhoun and Upton proposed cadre units as the nation’s primary fighting force.
-369- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong> In a globalized world with the threat of short-warning military scenarios, an all cadre force is no longer feasible. Due to this fact, the United States maintains a large standing army reinforced by the National Guard. The cadre forces proposed in this dissertation would be the third component of the total force, providing a cost-effective way to maintain the capability to fight long wars with rotation. The third important distinction is between high- and low-readiness cadre forces. All cadre forces proposed in the past were conceived of as high-readiness cadre forces. From the cadre forces of Calhoun and Upton to the cadre forces proposed in the Cold War drawdown, all of these forces were expected to be ready to deploy as quickly as possible. The cadre forces of Calhoun and Upton would be the nation’s primary fighting force, and therefore, would need to be ready to deploy in a matter of months. The cadre units proposed in the Cold War drawdown were expected to be ready to deploy in about a year. The cadre units proposed in this dissertation may have over three years before the first unit is needed, due to the nature of rotation. 346 This distinction is important because many of those who rejected cadre proposals in the past based on concerns about readiness may wish to consider cadre in the rotational context described in this dissertation. A final important distinction to keep in mind is that previous cadre proposals did not discuss using volunteers to fill out cadre units in wartime. The proposals of Calhoun and Upton provided little to no discussion of how cadre units would be filled out. The post- World War II Organized Reserves assumed that units would be brought to full-strength through wartime conscription. The cadre proposals in the Cold War drawdown assumed that personnel in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) would be used to fill out cadre units. This ____________ 346 See Paper I for an analysis of the tradeoffs between cost savings from a cadre augmented force and readiness.
Page 1 and 2:
THE ARTS CHILD POLICY CIVIL JUSTICE
Page 3 and 4:
Considering a Cadre Augmented Army
Page 5:
- iii - PREFACE This dissertation e
Page 9 and 10:
- vii - SUMMARY This dissertation c
Page 11:
- ix - the similarities and differe
Page 15 and 16:
- xiii - ACRONYMS Symbol AC AIT ARF
Page 17 and 18:
-1- Introduction Introduction This
Page 19 and 20:
-3- Introduction ability to rotate
Page 21 and 22:
-5- Introduction In a force designe
Page 23 and 24:
-7- Introduction increasing militar
Page 25 and 26:
-9- Introduction peacetime have bee
Page 27:
-11- Introduction forces. This is i
Page 30 and 31:
-14- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
-137- An Operational Analysis of Ca
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273:
Page 276 and 277:
-260- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
Page 278 and 279:
Page 281:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335: -318- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
Page 393 and 394: -377- Conclusion Conclusion This di
Page 395 and 396: -379- Bibliography Bibliography Ada
Page 397 and 398: -381- Bibliography Carter, William
Page 399 and 400: -383- Bibliography Department of De
Page 401 and 402: -385- Bibliography Garamone, Jim,
Page 403 and 404: -387- Bibliography Howze, Hamilton
Page 405 and 406: -389- Bibliography Michie, Peter Sm
Page 407 and 408: -391- Bibliography Stewart, Richard
Page 409: -393- Bibliography Vick, Alan, Davi
show all

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?