Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
-338- A Historical Analysis of Cadre have a negative impact on the state of the reserves after the war. Crossland and Currie note that “the Army Reserve ended the 1960’s in disrepair and disarray …. Reservists were characterized as summer soldiers—draft-dodgers in the eyes of some Regulars.” 232 To address the problems with the reserves, the Army adopted the Total Force Policy following the Vietnam War. The Total Force Policy was a “major transformation” where the Army Reserve would be “an essential partner in the Total Army.” 233 The decision to increase reliance on the reserves renewed the debate about cadre units. 8.1—A NEW CADRE DEBATE In June 1972, General William C. Westmoreland wrote that “only Regular Army forces in being can achieve the levels of readiness required.” 234 Crossland and Currie write that Westmoreland recommended that “the Regular Army be considered a cadre that could be expanded rapidly in an emergency.” 235 According to Westmoreland, this Army would “serve as a hedge against the high risk associated with the heavy reliance on the Reserve Components.” 236 This was the first time that a cadre force had been explicitly recommended since the early twentieth century. Crossland and Currie argue that “the expansible army of John C. Calhoun had been rejected in 1916 and 1920 when the Army took firm steps toward ____________ 232 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 211 233 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 212. Prior to the total force policy there had been little integration of active Army and the Army Reserve units. Crossland and Currie describe the situation in 1967: “the Army had not converted the Army Reserve units to the more modern Tables of Organization and Equipment then in the active Army … Active Army and Army Reserve units were no longer compatible. They were not organized and equipped in such a manner as to allow rapid integration into the active Army upon mobilization.” [Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 176] 234 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 216. Westmoreland’s own words in a letter to President Nixon dated June 30, 1972. 235 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 216 236 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 216. Westmoreland’s own words in a letter to President Nixon dated June 30, 1972.
-339- A Historical Analysis of Cadre establishing a federal reserve force as a means of expanding the active establishment, but the cadre concept still seemed to enjoy some popularity.” 237 Westmoreland’s recommendations were for the most part disregarded, but they show that the cadre idea remained in the minds of military professionals. 238 In an August 1972 article in Army magazine, General Hamilton H. Howze proposed what he called a “cadre system” for the reserves. 239 This cadre system was different from those of Calhoun and Upton. Howze proposed that reserve divisions maintain all their parttime personnel but replace their leadership with Regular Army personnel. Rather than arguing for skeletonized units led by Regular Army personnel in replacement of reserve units, Howze proposed integrating Active Component personnel into Reserve Component units to increase the readiness of reserve units. Howze was not alone in making this proposal, Colonel David R. Hampton wrote a similar proposal in 1973. 240 The proposals of Westmoreland, Howze, and Hampton showed that the cadre idea had not disappeared all together. However, these proposals were given little attention by those making military policy at the time. The general acceptance of the Uptonian doctrine that had existed in the War Department in the early 20 th century seemed to have disappeared in the Department of Defense of the 1970s. ____________ 237 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 216 238 It is also likely that Upton’s history of the Army was part of the curriculum when Westmoreland attended West Point from 1932-1936. 239 Howze (1972) 240 Hampton (1973)
- Page 304 and 305: -288- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 306 and 307: -290- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 308 and 309: -292- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 310 and 311: -294- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 312 and 313: -296- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 314 and 315: -298- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 316 and 317: -300- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 318 and 319: -302- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 320 and 321: -304- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 322 and 323: -306- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 324 and 325: -308- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 326 and 327: -310- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 328 and 329: -312- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 330 and 331: -314- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 332 and 333: -316- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 334 and 335: -318- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 336 and 337: -320- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 338 and 339: -322- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 340 and 341: -324- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 342 and 343: -326- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 344 and 345: -328- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 346 and 347: -330- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 348 and 349: -332- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 350 and 351: -334- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 352 and 353: -336- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 356 and 357: -340- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 358 and 359: -342- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 360 and 361: -344- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 362 and 363: -346- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 364 and 365: -348- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 366 and 367: -350- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 368 and 369: -352- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 370 and 371: -354- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 372 and 373: -356- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 374 and 375: -358- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 376 and 377: -360- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 378 and 379: -362- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 380 and 381: -364- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 382 and 383: -366- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 384 and 385: -368- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 386 and 387: -370- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 388 and 389: -372- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 390 and 391: -374- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 393 and 394: -377- Conclusion Conclusion This di
- Page 395 and 396: -379- Bibliography Bibliography Ada
- Page 397 and 398: -381- Bibliography Carter, William
- Page 399 and 400: -383- Bibliography Department of De
- Page 401 and 402: -385- Bibliography Garamone, Jim,
- Page 403 and 404: -387- Bibliography Howze, Hamilton
-339- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />
establishing a federal reserve force as a means of expanding the active establishment, but the<br />
cadre concept still seemed to enjoy some popularity.” 237 Westmoreland’s recommendations<br />
were for the most part disregarded, but they show that the cadre idea remained in the minds<br />
of military professionals. 238<br />
In an August 1972 article in <strong>Army</strong> magazine, General Hamilton H. Howze proposed<br />
what he called a “cadre system” for the reserves. 239 This cadre system was different from<br />
those of Calhoun and Upton. Howze proposed that reserve divisions maintain all their parttime<br />
personnel but replace their leadership with Regular <strong>Army</strong> personnel. Rather than<br />
arguing for skeletonized units led by Regular <strong>Army</strong> personnel in replacement of reserve<br />
units, Howze proposed integrating Active Component personnel into Reserve Component<br />
units to increase the readiness of reserve units. Howze was not alone in making this<br />
proposal, Colonel David R. Hampton wrote a similar proposal in 1973. 240<br />
The proposals of Westmoreland, Howze, and Hampton showed that the cadre idea<br />
had not disappeared all together. However, these proposals were given little attention by<br />
those making military policy at the time. The general acceptance of the Uptonian doctrine<br />
that had existed in the War Department in the early 20 th century seemed to have disappeared<br />
in the Department of Defense of the 1970s.<br />
____________<br />
237 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 216<br />
238 It is also likely that Upton’s history of the <strong>Army</strong> was part of the curriculum when Westmoreland attended<br />
West Point from 1932-1936.<br />
239 Howze (1972)<br />
240 Hampton (1973)