Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
-336- A Historical Analysis of Cadre
-337- A Historical Analysis of Cadre 8. CADRE IN THE POST-VIETNAM ERA Cadre forces were proposed after the Vietnam War due to renewed doubts about the readiness of the reserves. The Vietnam War was the first major war where U.S. reserve forces did not provide a significant portion of the manpower. 228 This was due to a choice made by President Lyndon Johnson not to call upon the reserves. Instead, the government relied mainly on conscripts. Weigley argues that this represented a shift back to Uptonian contempt towards the citizen soldiers: “there is at least a suggestion of a neo-Uptonian outlook in the Defense Department’s reluctance to call upon citizen reserves for the war in Vietnam.” 229 However, there is very little evidence that Uptonian logic had any effect on Johnson’s decision not to call on the reserves. Crossland and Currie argue that: “the best historical judgment of the decision not to employ Reserve component units … in Vietnam is that Johnson had made an almost purely political decision.” 230 Crossland and Currie go on to argue that the main “political” factor driving Johnson’s decision was that activating the reserves would signal to Congress and the public that the country was at war, something he wanted to avoid. 231 Although it appears that Weigley might have been incorrect in attributing this decision to resurgence of Uptonian contempt for the National Guard, this decision did ____________ 228 For the first three years of the Vietnam War Lyndon Johnson refused to mobilize the reserves (either National Guard or Army Reserve). In 1968, Johnson finally mobilized some Army Reserve units but they were only a small fraction, less than five percent, of the total army force involved in Vietnam. [Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 208] 229 Weigley (1984), p. 556 230 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 195 231 “Lyndon Johnson was gradually involving the United States in a land war in Asia, yet he was disguising his every move … There was ‘general satisfaction’ in Congress, reported E.W. Kenworthy for the New York Times, ‘that the President had decided to increase the draft and postpone a decision on calling up reserve units.’ The President had become ‘increasingly sensitive,’ reported the Times, ‘to the possible political effects of a reserve call-up.’ … Calling up the Reserve Components, stated one study of this period, would not have been consistent with Johnson’s attempts to portray Vietnam as ‘a limited war of short duration which could be fought with little domestic dislocation.” [Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 195]
- Page 302 and 303: -286- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 304 and 305: -288- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 306 and 307: -290- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 308 and 309: -292- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 310 and 311: -294- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 312 and 313: -296- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 314 and 315: -298- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 316 and 317: -300- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 318 and 319: -302- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 320 and 321: -304- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 322 and 323: -306- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 324 and 325: -308- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 326 and 327: -310- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 328 and 329: -312- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 330 and 331: -314- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 332 and 333: -316- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 334 and 335: -318- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 336 and 337: -320- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 338 and 339: -322- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 340 and 341: -324- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 342 and 343: -326- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 344 and 345: -328- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 346 and 347: -330- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 348 and 349: -332- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 350 and 351: -334- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 354 and 355: -338- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 356 and 357: -340- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 358 and 359: -342- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 360 and 361: -344- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 362 and 363: -346- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 364 and 365: -348- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 366 and 367: -350- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 368 and 369: -352- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 370 and 371: -354- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 372 and 373: -356- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 374 and 375: -358- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 376 and 377: -360- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 378 and 379: -362- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 380 and 381: -364- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 382 and 383: -366- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 384 and 385: -368- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 386 and 387: -370- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 388 and 389: -372- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 390 and 391: -374- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 393 and 394: -377- Conclusion Conclusion This di
- Page 395 and 396: -379- Bibliography Bibliography Ada
- Page 397 and 398: -381- Bibliography Carter, William
- Page 399 and 400: -383- Bibliography Department of De
- Page 401 and 402: -385- Bibliography Garamone, Jim,
-336- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong>