Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
-320- A Historical Analysis of Cadre reliance of the country was to be placed forthrightly upon citizen soldiers.” 170 Recognizing that these forces alone would not be large enough to fight another World War, the NDA of 1920 created another force called the Organized Reserves. The NDA of 1920 called for Organized Reserve units that would be manned in peacetime with officers from the Officers’ Reserve Corps (ORC) and enlisted personnel from the Enlisted Reserve Corps (ERC). Officers in the ORC were commissioned through either the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) or the Citizens Military Training Camps (CMTCs). 171 The ERC was a federal reserve of enlisted personnel established by the NDA of 1920. 172 The NDA of 1920 divided the nation into nine corps areas as shown in Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1—Nine Corps Areas Outlined in National Defense Act of 1920 173 Each Corps Area was to contain one Regular Army division, two infantry divisions of the National Guard, and three infantry divisions of the Organized Reserves. 174 The Organized ____________ 170 Weigley (1984), p. 399 171 The CMTCs “had grown out of the pre-World War I ‘Plattsburg idea’ promoted by Army Chief of Staff Leonard Wood” where men volunteered to attend military training camps in the summertime in exchange for commissions.” [Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 39] 172 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 35 173 Kreidberg and Henry (1955), p. 386
-321- A Historical Analysis of Cadre Reserves contained the largest number of units but were the least expensive force to maintain. The Organized Reserves were inexpensive for two reasons. First, the officers in the ORC did not train regularly and were not paid for inactive duty drills. 175 Second, the ERC was non-existent. Weigley writes that the “Enlisted Reserve Corps … was practically nonexistent because there were no means of recruiting it.” 176 In 1920, the ORC ended the year with 68,232 officers while the number of enlisted personnel in the ERC was significantly less than 10,000. 177 Though Congress envisioned the Organized Reserves as a reserve of non-training units with a full complement of officers and enlisted personnel, what they got instead was a cadre force with a large number of reserve officers and very few enlisted personnel. This cadre force was different from those proposed in the past. Instead of an all-cadre force as proposed by Calhoun and Upton, the Organized Reserves were a component of a cadre augmented force with a mobilization order of: (1) Regular Army, (2) National Guard, and (3) Organized Reserves. 5.2—A CADRE REGULAR ARMY Weigley argues that soon after passing the National Defense Act of 1920 “the goals … broke down because Congress and the executive gave them lip service but little practical 174 Palmer (1941), p. 175 175 “Members of the ORC could not count on two weeks of active duty each year, as could members of the National Guard, and there was no pay at all for inactive duty drills… The ‘average’ reservists had a 1 in 4 chance of getting active duty training in a given year.” [Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 45] 176 Weigley (1984), p. 401. In their history of the Army Reserve, Crossland and Currie do not discuss the Enlisted Reserve Corps because of its small size. They wrote: “Because of the small inter-war size of the Enlisted Reserve Corps, this chapter (on the interwar period) is restricted almost totally to the Officer’s Reserve Corps.” [Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 34].] 177 “The Enlisted Reserve Corps, created by the National Defense Act of 1920, was of very minor importance between World Wars I and II. It consisted of only 6000 men in 1928, and by 1936 its ranks numbered less than 4000.” [Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 35-36]
- Page 286 and 287: -270- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 288 and 289: -272- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 290 and 291: -274- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 292 and 293: -276- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 294 and 295: -278- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 296 and 297: -280- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 298 and 299: -282- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 300 and 301: -284- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 302 and 303: -286- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 304 and 305: -288- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 306 and 307: -290- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 308 and 309: -292- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 310 and 311: -294- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 312 and 313: -296- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 314 and 315: -298- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 316 and 317: -300- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 318 and 319: -302- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 320 and 321: -304- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 322 and 323: -306- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 324 and 325: -308- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 326 and 327: -310- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 328 and 329: -312- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 330 and 331: -314- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 332 and 333: -316- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 334 and 335: -318- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 338 and 339: -322- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 340 and 341: -324- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 342 and 343: -326- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 344 and 345: -328- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 346 and 347: -330- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 348 and 349: -332- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 350 and 351: -334- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 352 and 353: -336- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 354 and 355: -338- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 356 and 357: -340- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 358 and 359: -342- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 360 and 361: -344- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 362 and 363: -346- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 364 and 365: -348- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 366 and 367: -350- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 368 and 369: -352- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 370 and 371: -354- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 372 and 373: -356- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 374 and 375: -358- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 376 and 377: -360- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 378 and 379: -362- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 380 and 381: -364- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 382 and 383: -366- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 384 and 385: -368- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
-320- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />
reliance of the country was to be placed forthrightly upon citizen soldiers.” 170 Recognizing<br />
that these forces alone would not be large enough to fight another World War, the NDA of<br />
1920 created another force called the Organized Reserves.<br />
The NDA of 1920 called for Organized Reserve units that would be manned in<br />
peacetime with officers from the Officers’ Reserve Corps (ORC) and enlisted personnel<br />
from the Enlisted Reserve Corps (ERC). Officers in the ORC were commissioned through<br />
either the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) or the Citizens Military Training Camps<br />
(CMTCs). 171 The ERC was a federal reserve of enlisted personnel established by the NDA<br />
of 1920. 172<br />
The NDA of 1920 divided the nation into nine corps areas as shown in Figure 5.1.<br />
Figure 5.1—Nine Corps Areas Outlined in National Defense Act of 1920 173<br />
Each Corps Area was to contain one Regular <strong>Army</strong> division, two infantry divisions of the<br />
National Guard, and three infantry divisions of the Organized Reserves. 174 The Organized<br />
____________<br />
170 Weigley (1984), p. 399<br />
171 The CMTCs “had grown out of the pre-World War I ‘Plattsburg idea’ promoted by <strong>Army</strong> Chief of Staff<br />
Leonard Wood” where men volunteered to attend military training camps in the summertime in exchange for<br />
commissions.” [Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 39]<br />
172 Crossland and Currie (1984), p. 35<br />
173 Kreidberg and Henry (1955), p. 386