07.06.2014 Views

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-303- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />

The Dick Act attempted to remedy many of Upton’s concerns about the militia by<br />

providing for an adequately trained and equipped force. However, many of Upton’s<br />

concerns were not addressed in the first draft of this law, most noticeably: short-enlistments<br />

and the ability to use the militia outside of the continental United States. In 1908, the Dick<br />

Act was revised to remedy these two issues. The restriction on federal service was changed<br />

from nine months “to cover the period of enlistment” and “the restriction limiting service of<br />

the Militia to the continental United States was removed.” 111 Furthermore, the Act of 1908<br />

required that in order to be classified as a National Guard “all state forces must have the<br />

same organization, armament, and discipline as the Regular <strong>Army</strong>.” 112<br />

Of all of the problems with the militia raised by cadre proponents, the Dick Act<br />

addressed all but two of them. The remaining issues were the quality of militia officers and<br />

the voluntary nature of the states provision of troops. The Dick Act indirectly addressed<br />

concerns about the quality of militia officers by allowing them to attend Regular <strong>Army</strong><br />

schools and required that their units be disciplined to the standard of Regular <strong>Army</strong> units.<br />

The Dick Act did not address the ability of states to refuse to provide troops. Before the<br />

Dick Act was passed, there was no debate about the relative cost-effectiveness of increasing<br />

the readiness of the reserves versus maintaining a cadre force. Congress decided to<br />

strengthen the National Guard rather than change to a cadre system based more on their<br />

support for the National Guard than on a cost-effectiveness analysis. As discussed earlier,<br />

the militia (National Guard) had significant lobbying power in Congress because they were<br />

____________<br />

111 Kreidberg and Henry (1955), p. 180. In 1912, the law allowing the use of the militia outside the U.S. was<br />

ruled unconstitutional.<br />

112 Kreidberg and Henry (1955), p. 180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!