07.06.2014 Views

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-300- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />

3.1—THE SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR<br />

The impetus for resurrecting the debate about cadre forces was the Spanish-<br />

American War. When the battleship Maine exploded in Havana harbor, there were a total of<br />

28,747 officers and men in the United States Regular <strong>Army</strong>. 96 This army was not large<br />

enough to fight the Spanish who had nearly 80,000 soldiers in Cuba. 97 In response, Congress<br />

authorized the president to increase the size of the army by mobilizing the militia in the<br />

Volunteer Act of 1898. 98 The Volunteer Act addressed two of the problems with the militia<br />

by enlisting militiamen as individuals rather than units so they could be used overseas and by<br />

specifying two-year enlistments. However, many of the militia policies criticized by Emory<br />

Upton remained in place.<br />

The Spanish-American War highlighted two major problems with the militia. First,<br />

many militia units refused to “volunteer” for service. This was exemplified by the 7 th<br />

Regiment of New York, which refused to “merge its identity in a Federal army run by ‘West<br />

Point martinets.’” 99 The second issue was the condition of those militia units that did<br />

volunteer. Millis argues that “they were untrained, ill-equipped, sometimes without proper<br />

clothing and even without shoes; none had modern weapons and they were wretchedly<br />

deficient in the simplest skills of military life” and equally important “their officers were<br />

seldom competent.” 100 Only two regiments from the militia ever saw significant action in the<br />

____________<br />

96 This was equivalent to 39 troops on active duty per 100,000 residents. This was significantly lower than the<br />

average peacetime size of the army during the 19 th century (64 troops per 100,000 residents). [U.S. Census<br />

Bureau (1975), p. 1140-1143 and U.S. Census Bureau (2002), p. A-1]<br />

97 Weigley (1984), p. 295<br />

98 United States Congress (1898)<br />

99 Millis (1956), p. 174<br />

100 Millis (1956), p. 174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!