Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

07.06.2014 Views

-282- A Historical Analysis of Cadre militia until passage of the Dick Act in 1903. 32 Because the Militia Act perpetuated many of the systemic problems with the militia, they would remain issues in the wars of the nineteenth century. 2.1.3—The War of 1812 “By now it was evident that the militia could contribute little in a sudden emergency. The states had neglected to train and make ready the battalions and divisions enrolled under the act of 1792, and a Congressional enactment of 1803 requiring them to make periodic reports on the condition of their militias failed to prod them enough. So Jefferson recommended, and on April 12, 1808, Congress authorized, a virtual tripling of the Regular establishment, to nearly 10,000 men.” 33 In 1808, with the threat of war with England increasing, President Thomas Jefferson decided that a larger Regular Army was necessary to defend the United States. Weigley argues that Jefferson took this action because he believed the militia would not be ready in a sudden emergency. 34 However, when the war began in 1812, the size of the army was significantly smaller than authorized, with only 6,744 men. 35 The demands of the War of 1812 required once again calling on the militia. This brought two issues to the forefront. First, it led to a debate about whether states had the right to ignore requests from the federal government to furnish troops. Second, the war highlighted the problem of using the militia outside of the United States. Cadre proponents later emphasized both of these issues. On April 10, 1812, the states of Massachusetts and Connecticut were called upon to furnish 100,000 militiamen. The governors of these two states refused to provide troops ____________ 32 See Chapter Three of this paper for further discussion of the Dick Act. 33 Weigley (1984), p. 109. See footnote below for the relative size of the military at this time. 34 Weigley (1984), p. 109 35 Millis (1956), p. 67. 6,744 troops was equivalent to 87 troops on active duty per 100,000 residents, significantly higher than the average peacetime size of the army over during the nineteenth century (64 troops per 100,000 residents). However, this was significantly less than the 10,000 troops (130 troops per 100,000 residents) Jefferson had asked for in 1808. During the war of 1812, the number of personnel on active duty grew as large as 38,186 in 1814 (466 troops per 100,000 residents). [U.S. Census Bureau (1975), p. 1140-1143 and U.S. Census Bureau (2002), p. A-1]

-283- A Historical Analysis of Cadre because they had decided that none of the three exigencies described in the Constitution for calling out the militia existed. 36 The Constitution stipulated that Congress could “provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.” 37 The governors claimed that because the Constitution did not specify who determines whether the exigencies exist that this power “is vested in the commanders in chief of the militia of the several States.” 38 By relying on the states to voluntarily provide manpower, the militia laws restricted the actions of the federal government in fighting the war of 1812. Cadre proponents who desired a more centralized system would emphasize this concern. The second issue brought to the forefront in the war of 1812 was the inability to use the militia outside of the United States. Many men in the militia refused to fight in campaigns that moved into Canada because they felt they were not obliged to serve outside of the United States. 39 This occurred because the Constitution provided little guidance regarding the use of the militia outside of the United States. The militiamen argued: “troops could be summoned only to ‘repel invasion, not to invade another territory.’ 40 Millis (1954) argues that: “many of the western militiamen were happy, as they approached the border, to discover in the Constitution a sound legal reason why they should avoid the perils and ardors of going any farther.” 41 The inability to use the militia outside of the United States was a key argument for cadre proponents. Since cadre units would be controlled by the federal ____________ 36 Upton (1904), p. 96. In addition, the governor of Vermont refused to provide troops except to defend Vermont from attack. [Wood(1916), p. 132] 37 U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 15. 38 Upton (1904), p. 96 39 Upton (1904), p. 99 40 Millis (1956), p. 69 41 Millis (1956), p. 69

-282- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />

militia until passage of the Dick Act in 1903. 32 Because the Militia Act perpetuated many of<br />

the systemic problems with the militia, they would remain issues in the wars of the<br />

nineteenth century.<br />

2.1.3—The War of 1812<br />

“By now it was evident that the militia could contribute little in a sudden emergency.<br />

The states had neglected to train and make ready the battalions and divisions<br />

enrolled under the act of 1792, and a Congressional enactment of 1803 requiring<br />

them to make periodic reports on the condition of their militias failed to prod them<br />

enough. So Jefferson recommended, and on April 12, 1808, Congress authorized, a<br />

virtual tripling of the Regular establishment, to nearly 10,000 men.” 33<br />

In 1808, with the threat of war with England increasing, President Thomas Jefferson<br />

decided that a larger Regular <strong>Army</strong> was necessary to defend the United States. Weigley<br />

argues that Jefferson took this action because he believed the militia would not be ready in a<br />

sudden emergency. 34 However, when the war began in 1812, the size of the army was<br />

significantly smaller than authorized, with only 6,744 men. 35 The demands of the War of<br />

1812 required once again calling on the militia. This brought two issues to the forefront.<br />

First, it led to a debate about whether states had the right to ignore requests from the federal<br />

government to furnish troops. Second, the war highlighted the problem of using the militia<br />

outside of the United States. <strong>Cadre</strong> proponents later emphasized both of these issues.<br />

On April 10, 1812, the states of Massachusetts and Connecticut were called upon to<br />

furnish 100,000 militiamen. The governors of these two states refused to provide troops<br />

____________<br />

32 See Chapter Three of this paper for further discussion of the Dick Act.<br />

33 Weigley (1984), p. 109. See footnote below for the relative size of the military at this time.<br />

34 Weigley (1984), p. 109<br />

35 Millis (1956), p. 67. 6,744 troops was equivalent to 87 troops on active duty per 100,000 residents,<br />

significantly higher than the average peacetime size of the army over during the nineteenth century (64 troops<br />

per 100,000 residents). However, this was significantly less than the 10,000 troops (130 troops per 100,000<br />

residents) Jefferson had asked for in 1808. During the war of 1812, the number of personnel on active duty<br />

grew as large as 38,186 in 1814 (466 troops per 100,000 residents). [U.S. Census Bureau (1975), p. 1140-1143<br />

and U.S. Census Bureau (2002), p. A-1]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!