07.06.2014 Views

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-267- A Historical Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Since its creation, the United States <strong>Army</strong> has nearly always framed force structure<br />

decisions as a tradeoff between active and reserve forces. Active and reserve forces have<br />

been referred to in many ways throughout history. In this paper, we refer to active forces as<br />

either the Regular <strong>Army</strong> or the Active Component (AC). We refer to the reserves as either<br />

the militia or the Reserve Component (RC). 1 The key differences between active and reserve<br />

forces are: (1) reserve forces are part-time while active forces are full-time, (2) reserve forces<br />

are less expensive than active forces, and (3) reserve forces have fewer training opportunities<br />

than active forces. 2 Active forces train full-time and can be ready to deploy within days or<br />

weeks. Reserve forces train part-time and can be ready to deploy within months. The<br />

readiness of a force is determined by two main factors: the number of personnel assigned to<br />

a unit and the number of training opportunities available. Reserve forces have a lower level<br />

of readiness than active forces because they have fewer training opportunities.<br />

Active and reserve forces are two points on a readiness continuum. There are a<br />

myriad of alternative forces, at different levels of readiness, which the <strong>Army</strong> could also<br />

choose. <strong>Cadre</strong> forces are one of these alternatives. <strong>Cadre</strong> forces have a lower level of<br />

readiness than active forces because they retain fewer personnel in peacetime than they<br />

would deploy with in wartime. <strong>Cadre</strong> units retain only leaders during peacetime and are<br />

brought to full strength only in wartime. <strong>Cadre</strong> forces are not new to American military<br />

planning. They have been proposed periodically throughout the history of the United States<br />

____________<br />

1 Prior to the passage of the Dick Act of 1903, reserve forces were called the militia. After 1903, reserve forces<br />

were generally referred to as the National Guard. The Reserve Forces Act of 1955 created the <strong>Army</strong> Reserve.<br />

As is common today, we use the term Reserve Component (RC) to refer to both the National Guard and <strong>Army</strong><br />

Reserve.<br />

2 See Klerman (2008) for a more detailed discussion of the distinguishing characteristics of reserve forces.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!