Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
-252- An Operational Analysis of Cadre C.1.2—Calculating Effects of Increasing Promotion Rates In Chapter Two of this paper, we use the output from the Markov Promotion Model to calculate the number of officers per BCT that could be procured during wartime by increasing promotion rates and/or decreasing promotion intervals. To do this, we first use the Markov Promotion Model to calculate the force distribution after four periods under a base promotion policy (R 1 ). 177 Then, we calculate the force distribution after n periods under a wartime promotion policy (R 2 ). We subtract the results of the base policy from the increased policy (R 2 -R 1 ) to determine the increase in officers/NCOs in each grade. However, not all officers/NCOs are assigned to BCTs; many are assigned to non-combat units (Combat Support [CS], Combat Service Support [CSS], or Echelon above Division [EAD]) or to the institutional army (Table of Distribution and Allowances [TDA] units). To calculate the number of extra officers/NCOs that would be available for BCTs, we calculated the ratio of officers/NCOs in BCTs to total officers/NCOs and multiplied the total increase in officers/NCOs by this fraction for each grade. 178 We then calculated the percentage of officers/NCOs that could be procured by increasing promotions by dividing the number of officers available for BCTs in each grade by the number of officers needed for the 6, 9, and 18 BCT expansions and the CadreMix force. These results allowed us to determine the size of a peacetime cadre unit that would rely on increased promotion rates to procure officers/NCOs during wartime. ____________ 177 Chapter Two discusses how we determined the details of the base and wartime promotion policies. 178 We calculated the number of officers/NCOs in BCTs using the infantry BCT design shown in Appendix A and assuming that there are 42 BCTs with structures similar to an infantry BCT. See Section C.2 for more details on this calculation.
-253- An Operational Analysis of Cadre C.1.3—Model Limitations Promotion of officers/NCOs lends itself well to a Markov process because individuals transition from one period to the next at regular time intervals. The promotion process can be modeled with uniform, fixed time periods and well-defined states that are mutually exclusive and closed. However, there are a few assumptions required to model promotions that may limit the realism of the model. First, the model assumes that soldiers face promotion after set intervals (the minimum time in service requirement) and are either promoted or separated at this point. In reality, soldiers not promoted initially have another chance to be promoted before they are separated. The simple Markov model used here does not capture this reality. 179 Secondly, the model assumes that separations due to lack of promotion are the only way that individuals leave the force. A more realistic model would include retention rates at each transition. However, this would lead to a much more complex transition matrix and would add little value if we assume that retention rates remain the same under different promotion policies as discussed earlier. Lastly, we assume that the probabilities in each row of the transition matrix are fixed over time. In reality, these rates change from year-to-year and would depend on promotion rates from previous years. However, to a first order, the Markov process is an appropriate model to determine the effect of changes in promotion policies on the number of officers/NCOs required in peacetime cadre units. ____________ 179 A more complex Markov model with more states would be capable of capturing this reality. However, this would require estimating both initial and secondary promotion rates. Because we did not have access to this data, we were unable to model this aspect of the promotion system.
- Page 217 and 218: -201- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 219 and 220: -203- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 221 and 222: -205- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 223 and 224: -207- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 225 and 226: -209- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 227 and 228: -211- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 229 and 230: -213- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 231 and 232: -215- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 233 and 234: -217- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 235 and 236: -219- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 237 and 238: -221- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 239 and 240: -223- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 241 and 242: -225- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 243 and 244: -227- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 245 and 246: -229- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 247 and 248: -231- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 249 and 250: -233- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 251 and 252: -235- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 253 and 254: -237- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 255 and 256: -239- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 257 and 258: -241- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 259 and 260: -243- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 261 and 262: -245- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 263 and 264: -247- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 265 and 266: -249- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 267: -251- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 271 and 272: -255- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 273: -257- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 276 and 277: -260- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 278 and 279: -262- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 281: -265- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 284 and 285: -268- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 286 and 287: -270- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 288 and 289: -272- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 290 and 291: -274- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 292 and 293: -276- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 294 and 295: -278- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 296 and 297: -280- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 298 and 299: -282- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 300 and 301: -284- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 302 and 303: -286- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 304 and 305: -288- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 306 and 307: -290- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 308 and 309: -292- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 310 and 311: -294- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 312 and 313: -296- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 314 and 315: -298- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
- Page 316 and 317: -300- A Historical Analysis of Cadr
-253- An Operational Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />
C.1.3—Model Limitations<br />
Promotion of officers/NCOs lends itself well to a Markov process because<br />
individuals transition from one period to the next at regular time intervals. The promotion<br />
process can be modeled with uniform, fixed time periods and well-defined states that are<br />
mutually exclusive and closed. However, there are a few assumptions required to model<br />
promotions that may limit the realism of the model. First, the model assumes that soldiers<br />
face promotion after set intervals (the minimum time in service requirement) and are either<br />
promoted or separated at this point. In reality, soldiers not promoted initially have another<br />
chance to be promoted before they are separated. The simple Markov model used here does<br />
not capture this reality. 179 Secondly, the model assumes that separations due to lack of<br />
promotion are the only way that individuals leave the force. A more realistic model would<br />
include retention rates at each transition. However, this would lead to a much more complex<br />
transition matrix and would add little value if we assume that retention rates remain the same<br />
under different promotion policies as discussed earlier. Lastly, we assume that the<br />
probabilities in each row of the transition matrix are fixed over time. In reality, these rates<br />
change from year-to-year and would depend on promotion rates from previous years.<br />
However, to a first order, the Markov process is an appropriate model to determine the<br />
effect of changes in promotion policies on the number of officers/NCOs required in<br />
peacetime cadre units.<br />
____________<br />
179 A more complex Markov model with more states would be capable of capturing this reality. However, this<br />
would require estimating both initial and secondary promotion rates. Because we did not have access to this<br />
data, we were unable to model this aspect of the promotion system.