07.06.2014 Views

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-2- Introduction<br />

force to fight two separate Major Regional Contingencies (MRCs). 3 This planning was<br />

explicit in the 1995 National Military Strategy of the United States:<br />

“US forces will be sized and structured to achieve decisive victory in two nearly<br />

simultaneous major regional conflicts and to conduct combat operations<br />

characterized by rapid response and a high probability of success.”<br />

- 1995 National Military Strategy of the United States 4<br />

The Base Force, which was proposed in the 1992 Joint Military Net Assessment<br />

(JMNA), defined this two-war force sizing heuristic. Figure I shows that the Base Force<br />

could only fight two simultaneous wars (Global War) by deploying all forces at once.<br />

Figure I—Two MRCs Requires Deploying All Forces for the Duration of the War 5<br />

This two-war force sizing heuristic created a base force that could only fight two<br />

major wars by deploying all units for the duration of those wars. This force did not have the<br />

____________<br />

3 Larson et al (2001). The term used to describe these large regional conflicts evolved throughout the 1990s.<br />

The George H.W. Bush administration began by calling them Major Regional Contingencies (MRCs). The<br />

Bottom-Up Review changed the term to Major Regional Conflicts (MRCs). The 1997 Quadrennial Defense<br />

Review changed the term once again to Major Theater Wars (MTWs). [Troxell (1997), p. 40]<br />

4 Shalikashvili (1995), p. 17<br />

5 Powell (1992a). Extracted from Larson et al (2001), p. 13.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!