07.06.2014 Views

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-1- Introduction<br />

Introduction<br />

This dissertation considers whether integrating a new type of unit into the U.S. <strong>Army</strong><br />

could reduce costs without significantly increasing military risk. A new type of unit is now<br />

worth considering because the Department of Defense (DoD) recently changed its force<br />

planning guidance. The DoD shifted its focus from planning primarily for wars fought<br />

without rotation to planning for wars fought with rotation. In a force designed for use with<br />

rotation, some units are not needed as quickly as they were in a force designed for use<br />

without rotation. These units could be maintained at a lower level of readiness in peacetime<br />

and still be ready to deploy in the timeframe implied by rotation. 1 Maintaining these units at<br />

a lower level of readiness will reduce costs because there is a tradeoff between the peacetime<br />

cost and readiness of a unit. This paper explores whether integrating cadre units into the total<br />

force could reduce costs without significantly increasing military risk. <strong>Cadre</strong> units retain only<br />

leaders during peacetime and are brought to full strength only in wartime. The following<br />

sections discuss the implications of the recent shift in DoD planning and introduce a role for<br />

cadre units.<br />

I—A SHIFT TO PLANNING FOR ROTATION<br />

Since the end of World War II, the U.S. military has planned primarily to fight two<br />

major wars simultaneously. 2 During the Cold War, this meant planning for a global war<br />

fought in more than one theater. After the end of the Cold War, the DoD began sizing the<br />

____________<br />

1 Throughout this dissertation, we define readiness as what Betts (1995) defines as operational readiness: “how<br />

soon an existing unit can reach peak capability for combat.” [Betts (1995), p. 40]<br />

2 Hoehn and Ochmanek (2008) wrote: “Since 1950, when President Truman decided to fight to preserve the<br />

independence of South Korea, the United States has made it a policy to field sufficient military forces to deter<br />

— and defeat — large-scale aggression in two distinct parts of the globe more or less simultaneously.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!