Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation

07.06.2014 Views

-143- An Operational Analysis of Cadre TABLES Table 2.1—Officer Promotion Rates and Intervals....................................................................157 Table 2.2—Percentage of Officers Retained in Cadre Units Planning for Increased Wartime Promotions................................................................................................................................158 Table 2.3—Enlisted Promotion Rates and Intervals..................................................................159 Table 2.4— Percentage of Enlisted Personnel Retained in Cadre Units Planning for Increased Wartime Promotions..............................................................................................160 Table 2.5—Alternative Cadre Personnel Structures and Costs.................................................165 Table 3.1 —Costs of Different Cadre Structures and Organizations ......................................186 Table 3.2—Cadre Leaders Relative to Total Army.....................................................................190 Table 5.1—Wartime Personnel Needed to Fill Out Cadre Units for Differing Cadre Unit Structures and Mobilization Rates .........................................................................................207 Table 6.1—Peacetime Cadre Alternatives....................................................................................227 Table 6.2—Wartime Cadre Concerns...........................................................................................228 Table B.1—Cost of “Reserve” Forces in Bailey (1991) Relative to AC BCT.........................238 Table B.2—Cadre Unit Enlisted Relative Cost under Different Compensation Models .......242

-143- An Operational Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />

TABLES<br />

Table 2.1—Officer Promotion Rates and Intervals....................................................................157<br />

Table 2.2—Percentage of Officers Retained in <strong>Cadre</strong> Units Planning for Increased Wartime<br />

Promotions................................................................................................................................158<br />

Table 2.3—Enlisted Promotion Rates and Intervals..................................................................159<br />

Table 2.4— Percentage of Enlisted Personnel Retained in <strong>Cadre</strong> Units Planning for<br />

Increased Wartime Promotions..............................................................................................160<br />

Table 2.5—Alternative <strong>Cadre</strong> Personnel Structures and Costs.................................................165<br />

Table 3.1 —Costs of Different <strong>Cadre</strong> Structures and Organizations ......................................186<br />

Table 3.2—<strong>Cadre</strong> Leaders Relative to Total <strong>Army</strong>.....................................................................190<br />

Table 5.1—Wartime Personnel Needed to Fill Out <strong>Cadre</strong> Units for Differing <strong>Cadre</strong> Unit<br />

Structures and Mobilization Rates .........................................................................................207<br />

Table 6.1—Peacetime <strong>Cadre</strong> Alternatives....................................................................................227<br />

Table 6.2—Wartime <strong>Cadre</strong> Concerns...........................................................................................228<br />

Table B.1—Cost of “Reserve” Forces in Bailey (1991) Relative to AC BCT.........................238<br />

Table B.2—<strong>Cadre</strong> Unit Enlisted Relative Cost under Different Compensation Models .......242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!