Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation Considering a Cadre Augmented Army - RAND Corporation
-136- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre possible reasons for this. The first reason is that two long wars can occur with very little time in between in the RAND SLAM program while all units are assumed to be fully rested at the beginning of a war in the LWAM model. Back-to-back wars would place a significant amount of stress on the AC because cadre units would need to be remobilized 146 and many RC units would also be inaccessible for deployment at the beginning of the second war. The second possible reason is that there are differences in the assignment algorithms between SLAM and the LWAM. Once a unit is deployed in the LWAM model, it is deployed for as long as the maximum deployment specified for that force. A unit deployed in the SLAM model can be deployed for any period of time depending on the number of look-ahead periods and the assignment rule. 147 In the LWAM, this means that once a unit is deployed at the beginning of a war, it is deployed for as long as possible after which a replacement unit is deployed. In the SLAM model, some of the units deployed at the beginning of a long war are only deployed for short tours because the SLAM model “thinks” that the war will not last very long. This leads to increased stress on the AC because those units deployed for short tours at the beginning of the war will be called upon for redeployment sooner than they would have been if they had been deployed for the maximum deployment length. This section has compared the analyses performed in Chapter Two with the LWAM with similar analyses carried out with the RAND SLAM program. We find that the cost results are almost identical. However, we also find that the SLAM model calculates a much higher level of stress on the AC than the LWAM. This may be due to both the stochastic nature of the SLAM model and differences in the force assignment algorithms. ____________ 146 Once cadre units are demobilized in the SLAM model, they require the full 36 months to be remobilized. This is an unrealistic assumption, but is required for modeling purposes. 147 See Appendix D of Klerman et al (2008) for a discussion of SLAM assignment rules.
-137- An Operational Analysis of Cadre Paper Two—An Operational Analysis of Cadre
- Page 101 and 102: -85- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 103 and 104: -87- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 105 and 106: -89- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 107 and 108: -91- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 109 and 110: -93- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 111 and 112: -95- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 113 and 114: -97- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 115 and 116: -99- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 117 and 118: -101- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 119 and 120: -103- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 121 and 122: -105- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 123 and 124: -107- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 125 and 126: -109- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 127 and 128: -111- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 129 and 130: -113- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 131 and 132: -115- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 133 and 134: -117- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 135 and 136: -119- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 137 and 138: -121- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 139 and 140: -123- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 141 and 142: -125- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 143 and 144: -127- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 145 and 146: -129- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 147 and 148: -131- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 149 and 150: -133- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 151: -135- A Budgetary Analysis of Cadre
- Page 155 and 156: -139- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 157: -141- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 161 and 162: -145- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 163 and 164: -147- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 165 and 166: -149- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 167 and 168: -151- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 169 and 170: -153- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 171 and 172: -155- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 173 and 174: -157- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 175 and 176: -159- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 177 and 178: -161- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 179 and 180: -163- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 181 and 182: -165- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 183 and 184: -167- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 185 and 186: -169- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 187 and 188: -171- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 189 and 190: -173- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 191 and 192: -175- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 193 and 194: -177- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 195 and 196: -179- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 197 and 198: -181- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 199 and 200: -183- An Operational Analysis of Ca
- Page 201 and 202: -185- An Operational Analysis of Ca
-136- A Budgetary Analysis of <strong>Cadre</strong><br />
possible reasons for this. The first reason is that two long wars can occur with very little time<br />
in between in the <strong>RAND</strong> SLAM program while all units are assumed to be fully rested at the<br />
beginning of a war in the LWAM model. Back-to-back wars would place a significant<br />
amount of stress on the AC because cadre units would need to be remobilized 146 and many<br />
RC units would also be inaccessible for deployment at the beginning of the second war. The<br />
second possible reason is that there are differences in the assignment algorithms between<br />
SLAM and the LWAM. Once a unit is deployed in the LWAM model, it is deployed for as<br />
long as the maximum deployment specified for that force. A unit deployed in the SLAM<br />
model can be deployed for any period of time depending on the number of look-ahead<br />
periods and the assignment rule. 147 In the LWAM, this means that once a unit is deployed at<br />
the beginning of a war, it is deployed for as long as possible after which a replacement unit is<br />
deployed. In the SLAM model, some of the units deployed at the beginning of a long war are<br />
only deployed for short tours because the SLAM model “thinks” that the war will not last<br />
very long. This leads to increased stress on the AC because those units deployed for short<br />
tours at the beginning of the war will be called upon for redeployment sooner than they<br />
would have been if they had been deployed for the maximum deployment length.<br />
This section has compared the analyses performed in Chapter Two with the LWAM<br />
with similar analyses carried out with the <strong>RAND</strong> SLAM program. We find that the cost<br />
results are almost identical. However, we also find that the SLAM model calculates a much<br />
higher level of stress on the AC than the LWAM. This may be due to both the stochastic<br />
nature of the SLAM model and differences in the force assignment algorithms.<br />
____________<br />
146 Once cadre units are demobilized in the SLAM model, they require the full 36 months to be remobilized.<br />
This is an unrealistic assumption, but is required for modeling purposes.<br />
147 See Appendix D of Klerman et al (2008) for a discussion of SLAM assignment rules.