07.06.2014 Views

BOROUGH OF RAMSEY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September ...

BOROUGH OF RAMSEY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September ...

BOROUGH OF RAMSEY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

We are required by the NJ DEP to test 16 locations scattered throughout the Borough of<br />

Ramsey on a monthly basis to test tap water at those locations to determine the presence<br />

or absence of bacteria. Tests were done according to that routine on Thursday,<br />

<strong>September</strong> 8 th . It takes 24 hours to get the results of water tests back because the<br />

laboratory must incubate the test samples over a 24 hour period to conform with DEP<br />

protocols. The results came back on Friday afternoon that of the 16 samples, 3 came<br />

back positive for the presence of bacteria. When that happens, DEP protocol once again<br />

requires the laboratory to determine the nature of the bacteria contamination. The<br />

laboratory immediately did a test to determine whether or not more serious strains of<br />

bacteria known as e coli bacteria and also known as fecal coliform bacteria were present<br />

in those samples and they immediately ruled out the presence of those two more serious<br />

forms of bacteria. The bacteria that was detected is known as coliform bacteria, again I<br />

emphasize not fecal coliform and not e coli bacteria. When those two more serious<br />

strains of bacteria are ruled out by the laboratory, the protocol from DEP requires that we<br />

go through a second confirming test and that is exactly what happened. Before the DEP<br />

will issue a violation notice and require notices to be sent to water customers, this second<br />

test must be accomplished. New samples were taken on Friday and sent to the<br />

laboratory. Because of the weekend, we did not the results back until Monday afternoon.<br />

When we got the results back confirming the presence of the coliform bacteria, not the<br />

other two strains, we immediately put the wheels in motion to notify as many people as<br />

possible in as quick a manner as possible. This information output to the public went on.<br />

We fielded hundreds of phone calls over the next two days; I think satisfying every<br />

inquirer about the nature of the problem, giving as much information as we knew. We<br />

still do not know the cause for this contamination although we have some areas that we<br />

are pursuing . I don’t want to speculate and get into what those areas are until we have<br />

more information. The steps we immediately began to take when the confirmation came<br />

through were to increase the level of chlorination in the water system and our water<br />

department I must commend for all of the long hours that they have been putting in, their<br />

extraordinary efforts, their depth of knowledge of our water superintendent, Bill Horton,<br />

and our assistant superintendent, Mark Madsen. They have been really going beyond the<br />

call of duty to try to help solve this problem, working to all hours. That first night after<br />

the notice went out, Bill Horton did not get to sleep until 3:00 a.m. and he was up at 7:00<br />

a.m. and back at the DPW. Same story with all of the other workers in that department.<br />

Once the Mayor and the Borough Administrator became aware of the problem on<br />

Monday afternoon when the second sample came back positive, we were notified , we<br />

had a meeting and we decided what action to take to get the public notified and we of<br />

course began those corrective measures as quickly as possible. New samples were taken,<br />

and sent to the lab again. On Tuesday, they came back positive. Now I must emphasize<br />

that the problem appeared to be localized in the downtown area as I said 13 of the<br />

samples were negative for the presence, 3 were positive. On Tuesday, when we got the<br />

second set of samples back positive, I directed the water superintendent instead of taking<br />

one set of water samples and sending them to one laboratory, I directed that he take two<br />

separate sets of water samples from each of those 16 outlets and take a set of samples and<br />

send them to one laboratory, the same laboratory that had detected the positives in 3<br />

locations and take the second set as a precaution to guard against perhaps a laboratory<br />

error and send them to a second laboratory so that we could have perhaps a confirmation<br />

by two independent research sources. Today, we got the results back from those Tuesday<br />

tests. The laboratory that we had been using previously that detected 3 positives<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!