07.06.2014 Views

Housing after the recovery - REALTORS® Association of Maui, Inc.

Housing after the recovery - REALTORS® Association of Maui, Inc.

Housing after the recovery - REALTORS® Association of Maui, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>after</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>recovery</strong><br />

Prepared for <strong>the</strong><br />

Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong><br />

July 16, 2010<br />

by Paul H. Brewbaker, Ph.D.<br />

Principal, TZ Economics<br />

Special mahalo to<br />

Terry Tolman!


The business cycle<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

1


Real activity (U.S. GDP) in levels<br />

“Average” recession<br />

Previous 7 U.S. recessions<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> real GDP: peak quarter = 1.0<br />

1.050<br />

1.025<br />

1.000<br />

0.975<br />

2007Q4<br />

(December)—<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial NBER<br />

“peak”<br />

2001 dot.com recession<br />

Real GDP and FRB forecasts<br />

Peak quarter<br />

2008<br />

Q2<br />

2009<br />

Q2<br />

The Great Recession<br />

F (2010q3)<br />

F (2010q2)<br />

2010q1 released 6/25<br />

Recession<br />

Recovery<br />

Expansion<br />

0.950<br />

-6 -3 0 3 6 9<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Robert Hall, Stanford University and Chair, NBER Dating Committee; Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Analysis, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce; chart by TZE includes June 25, 2010 release for 2010q1 (revised)<br />

2


Real GDP growth rate (U.S., decomposed)<br />

6<br />

P<br />

T<br />

Quarterly percent changes at annual rates<br />

3<br />

0<br />

-3<br />

-6<br />

-9<br />

-12<br />

Real GDP growth rate<br />

Inventory change<br />

Consumption<br />

Capital formation<br />

Government<br />

Net exports<br />

NBER recession<br />

dates shaded<br />

(presumed)<br />

Brewbaker<br />

recession<br />

call (box)<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

A consumption<br />

break “activated”<br />

<strong>the</strong> recession, and<br />

consumption has<br />

led <strong>the</strong> <strong>recovery</strong><br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: BEA, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (June 25, 2010); graphic and calculations by TZE<br />

3


Recent U.S. real GDP forecasts<br />

8<br />

P<br />

T<br />

Quarterly annualized growth in percent<br />

4<br />

0<br />

-4<br />

-8<br />

Crisis<br />

Lehman<br />

Top 5<br />

Bottom 5<br />

NABE forcast May 24<br />

Actual posted Jun 25<br />

U.S. real economic<br />

growth forecasts<br />

are around <strong>the</strong><br />

long-term potential<br />

trend growth rate,<br />

following <strong>the</strong> deep<br />

2008-09 recession<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

06 07 08 09 10 11<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source:<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic Analysis, National <strong>Association</strong> for Business Economics; revised 2010Q1 data released<br />

June 25, 2010<br />

4


Federal Reserve real GDP growth forecasts<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source:<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> June 22-23, 2010 meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Open Market Committee<br />

(http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/fomcminutes20100623.pdf)<br />

5


Federal Reserve economic forecasts<br />

As close to longrun<br />

policy targets<br />

as you will get<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source:<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> June 22-23, 2010 meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Open Market Committee<br />

(http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/fomcminutes20100623.pdf)<br />

6


Obama Administration end-2009 economic forecast<br />

Note: based on data<br />

avilable as <strong>of</strong> November<br />

18, 2009. Interest rate on<br />

91-day Treasury bills is<br />

measured on a secondary<br />

market discount basis.<br />

The figures do not reflect<br />

<strong>the</strong> upcoming BLS<br />

benchmark revision,<br />

which was expected to<br />

reduce 2008 and 2009 job<br />

growth by a cumulative<br />

824,000 jobs.<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Council <strong>of</strong> Economic Advisers, Economic Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> President (February 2010), Table 2-3<br />

(http://www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/2010/2010_erp.pdf)<br />

7


“…at <strong>the</strong> current pace <strong>the</strong> economy will have recovered<br />

by <strong>the</strong> third quarter <strong>of</strong> 2010, next quarter!”<br />

Advertiser, , who wrote <strong>the</strong> headline?<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Honolulu Advertiser archives,<br />

http://<strong>the</strong>.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2010/May/02/op/hawaii5020305.html<br />

8


The <strong>recovery</strong><br />

is almost over!<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: National <strong>Association</strong> for Business Economics<br />

Public version available at http://nabe.com/publib/macsum.html<br />

9


“…<strong>the</strong> economic <strong>recovery</strong> is proceeding…”<br />

FOMC 6/23/10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Federal Reserve Board,<br />

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20100623a.htm<br />

10


U.S. potential real GDP growth rate calculation<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Council <strong>of</strong> Economic Advisers, Economic Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> President (February 2010), Box 2-1<br />

(http://www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/2010/2010_erp.pdf)<br />

11


Double dip is an ice cream serving<br />

Short-term performance:<br />

• Oahu > Hawaii (state) > U.S. <strong>recovery</strong> > Neighbor Islands<br />

• “National average” <strong>recovery</strong> is almost over: real GDP expansion<br />

• Oahu’s unemployment rate (5.5%) almost “full employment” in <strong>the</strong> U.S.*<br />

Long-term performance:<br />

• State projects 1.6 percent real Hawaii personal income growth 2010-35<br />

• U.S. productivity growth is ≥ 2 percent annually<br />

• Labor force growth is ≈ 1 percent annually<br />

• Potential annual real GDP growth should be ≤ 3 percent (less ≈ 0.5%)<br />

Expectations and policy may be shooting too low<br />

*Google “NAIRU” (non-accelerating inflation rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment) which many conjecture is in <strong>the</strong> neighborhood <strong>of</strong> 5.5 percent. The<br />

Federal Reserve publishes “Longer run” estimates interpreted by many as guiding monetary policy ranging from about 5 to 6 percent.<br />

Oahu’s May 2010 unemployment rate was, by TZE calculation, a seasonally-adjusted 5.4 percent.<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, series “are nei<strong>the</strong>r targets nor goals”;<br />

http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/info/economic/data_reports/2035LongRangeSeries/LRFreport_2035series_revised_Aug09.pdf<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

12


Some Hawaii macroeconomic metrics<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

13


Hawaii payroll employment and change<br />

640<br />

620<br />

Thousands, s.a. (log scale)<br />

4<br />

Thousands, s.a.<br />

600<br />

580<br />

0<br />

560<br />

-4<br />

540<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

-8<br />

520<br />

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 90 95 00 05 10<br />

Total payroll employment, s.a. . (jobs) Monthly employment change (jobs)<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DLIR, DBEDT; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

14


Hawaii payroll employment change<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

4<br />

.4<br />

Thousands, s.a.<br />

0<br />

-4<br />

.0<br />

-.4<br />

Millions, s.a.<br />

-8<br />

US (right scale)<br />

Hawaii (left)<br />

-.8<br />

00 02 04 06 08 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: U.S. BLS (via FRB St. Louis), Hawaii DLIR, DBEDT; seasonal adjustment <strong>of</strong> Hawaii data by TZE<br />

15


Unemployment rates show relative performance<br />

10<br />

8<br />

Neighbor Islands<br />

Statewide<br />

Oahu<br />

1. Three recessions, 90’s<br />

Japan Bubble long, 2001<br />

dot.com bubble mild,<br />

2008-09 Great<br />

Recession severe<br />

Percent, s.a.<br />

6<br />

4<br />

9/11<br />

SARS<br />

2. Neighbor islands led<br />

<strong>recovery</strong> in late-1990s,<br />

lag <strong>recovery</strong> in 2010<br />

3. Oahu low structural<br />

unemployment rate over<br />

<strong>the</strong> business cycle<br />

2<br />

4. Also notable: Neighbor<br />

Island match with Oahu<br />

unemployment rate,<br />

1999-2006 (a first!)<br />

Gulf<br />

0<br />

90 95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DLIR, DBEDT; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

16


Honolulu inflation vs. unemployment trade-<strong>of</strong>f<br />

Inflation rate (%)<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

1991(H1)<br />

2006(H2)<br />

Semiannual<br />

Honolulu data<br />

1984-2009<br />

2009(H2)<br />

Intensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great Recession is<br />

reflected in <strong>the</strong> rapid transition from<br />

“boom” to “bust”—three years in <strong>the</strong><br />

recent cycle to cover <strong>the</strong> ground that<br />

took seven years to traverse during<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1990s. Honolulu inflation should<br />

converge to just above <strong>the</strong> U.S. core<br />

inflation expectation <strong>of</strong> 2 percent,<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

1998(H2)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Unemployment rate (%)<br />

Source: Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Labor; seasonal adjustment, regression by TZE<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

17


Hawaii forecasts: real personal income growth<br />

6<br />

Quarterly percent change, y-o-y<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

Forecast<br />

02 04 06 08 10 12<br />

Source:<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic Analysis; TZ Economics (forecast)<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

18


<strong>Maui</strong> jobs data<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

19


<strong>Maui</strong> payroll employment<br />

Thousands, s.a. (log scale)<br />

10.5<br />

10.0<br />

9.5<br />

9.0<br />

8.5<br />

8.0<br />

7.5<br />

Private (right scale)<br />

Public (left scale)<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

9/11<br />

Aloha/ATA<br />

shutdown<br />

68<br />

64<br />

60<br />

56<br />

52<br />

48<br />

Thousands, s.a. (log scale)<br />

7.0<br />

98 00 02 04 06 08 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DLIR, DBEDT; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

20


<strong>Maui</strong> employment: cycles and shocks<br />

Percent, s.a. (level scale)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Payroll employment (right)<br />

Unemployment rate (left)<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

Iniki<br />

9/11<br />

Aloha/ATA<br />

shutdown<br />

76<br />

72<br />

68<br />

64<br />

60<br />

56<br />

52<br />

48<br />

Thousands, s.a. (log scale)<br />

0<br />

90 95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DLIR, DBEDT; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

21


<strong>Housing</strong> markets<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

22


Case-Shiller<br />

SF same home price indexes:<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2000s house price bubble<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

Index, January 2000 = 100, s.a. (log scale)<br />

200<br />

100<br />

Denver<br />

Phoenix<br />

Las Vegas<br />

Los Angeles<br />

San Diego<br />

San Francisco<br />

50<br />

00 02 04 06 08 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Standard & Poor’s (http://www.standardandpoors.com/indices/sp-case-shiller-home-priceindices/en/us/?indexId=spusa-cashpidff--p-us----)<br />

23


Case-Shiller<br />

SF same home price indexes:<br />

extreme bubbliciousness<br />

Index, January 2000 = 100, s.a. (log scale)<br />

200<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Las Vegas<br />

Phoenix<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Standard & Poor’s (http://www.standardandpoors.com/indices/sp-case-shiller-home-priceindices/en/us/?indexId=spusa-cashpidff--p-us----)<br />

24


Long-run median SF pricing trends look log-linear<br />

linear<br />

Thousand dollars, s.a. (log scale)<br />

800<br />

400<br />

200<br />

ln (P Oahu<br />

) =4.7456 + 0.0120(T)<br />

(0.0558) (0.0006)<br />

(where T = quarters, 1983.1-2010.1)<br />

<strong>Maui</strong><br />

100<br />

Kauai<br />

Orange Co., CA<br />

Oahu<br />

50<br />

75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10<br />

4.9% (Oahu)<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: National <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> Realtors, Honolulu Board <strong>of</strong> Realtors, Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong>, Hawaii Information<br />

Service (Kauai); all calculations and seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

25


Median single-family home prices:<br />

bottomed out, except on <strong>Maui</strong><br />

800<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

Quarterly, thousand $, s.a.<br />

400<br />

Oahu<br />

<strong>Maui</strong><br />

Orange Co., CA<br />

San Diego, CA<br />

Overshoot?<br />

200<br />

98 00 02 04 06 08 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Sources: Honolulu Board <strong>of</strong> Realtors; Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong>, Hawaii Information Service, UHERO, National<br />

<strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> Realtors; seasonal adjustment calculations by TZE<br />

26


<strong>Maui</strong> quarterly existing home sales<br />

1000<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

Units, s.a. (log scale)<br />

100<br />

Single-family<br />

Condominium<br />

10<br />

80 85 90 95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong>; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

27


<strong>Maui</strong> quarterly existing home sales<br />

800<br />

Units, s.a. (log scale)<br />

400<br />

200<br />

Single-family<br />

Condominium<br />

Lehman<br />

100<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

05 06 07 08 09 10 11<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong>; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

28


<strong>Maui</strong> existing home sale mean prices<br />

Thousand dollars, s.a. (log scale)<br />

800<br />

400<br />

200<br />

Single-family<br />

Condominium<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

100<br />

80 85 90 95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong>; seasonal adjustment, HP filter trend calculation by TZE<br />

29


<strong>Maui</strong> existing home sale mean prices<br />

Thousand dollars, s.a. (log scale)<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

Lehman<br />

Single-family<br />

Condominium<br />

05 06 07 08 09 10 11<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong>; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

30


<strong>Maui</strong> existing home sale median prices<br />

800<br />

Single-family<br />

Condominium<br />

Thousand dollars, s.a. (log scale)<br />

400<br />

200<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

Lehman<br />

465k<br />

430k<br />

98 00 02 04 06 08 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong>; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

31


<strong>Maui</strong> SF median home price higher-order moments<br />

Kurtosis (right scale)<br />

Standard dev./mean (x100)<br />

Skewness (left scale)<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

90 95 00 05 10<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Realtors <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maui</strong>; moment calculations by TZE<br />

32


Summarizing housing market outcomes<br />

• Hawaii proved to be less <strong>of</strong> “bubblicious” housing markets, although<br />

<strong>Maui</strong> experience is more similar to California than Oahu<br />

• “Overshoot” <strong>of</strong> house price declines <strong>after</strong> Lehman resulted in modest<br />

bounce in winter/spring 2009—stabilization anticipated for some time<br />

• Sales volumes, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, have clearly rebounded and probably<br />

have begun a long period <strong>of</strong> growth through <strong>the</strong> mid-teens (2008-<br />

20teens) similar to to 1998-2005 experience<br />

• Notable anomaly, near equivalence <strong>of</strong> single-family and condominium<br />

prices towards end <strong>of</strong> 2007, appears to have partly unwound<br />

• Higher-order moments <strong>of</strong> underlying home price distribution are not<br />

definitive, but suggestive regarding whe<strong>the</strong>r valuation turning point has<br />

commenced—best guess is fairly stable valuations through 2012 as<br />

bottom-fishing absorbs distressed properties<br />

• <strong>Maui</strong> does not seem to have an inventory overhang like most distressed<br />

mainland markets, and home production is way too low for glut<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

33


<strong>Housing</strong> construction<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

34


Hawaii new housing units / existing inventory: (∆K(<br />

t / K t )<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> existing housing stock<br />

.08<br />

.07<br />

.06<br />

.05<br />

.04<br />

.03<br />

.02<br />

.01<br />

2.5% pop. gr.<br />

Production has fallen because <strong>of</strong> regulatory<br />

restriction from two to three times <strong>the</strong> population<br />

growth rate to a pace that doesn’t t even endow <strong>the</strong><br />

newborn with <strong>the</strong> existing per capita housing stock<br />

1.5% pop. gr.<br />

1.0% pop. gr.<br />

.00<br />

60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Sources: County Building Departments; Bank <strong>of</strong> Hawaii; U.S. Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census; Hawaii DBEDT; TZE<br />

35


Oahu and Neighbor Island private building permits<br />

320<br />

Monthly, million 2009$, s.a., log scale<br />

160<br />

80<br />

40<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

20<br />

90 95 00 05 10<br />

Oahu<br />

Neighbor Isle<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, County Building Departments, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census; seasonal adjustment, deflation, and<br />

Hodrick-Prescott filter trend-fitting by TZE<br />

36


Oahu and Neighbor Island new housing units authorized<br />

Oahu ( >1980)<br />

Neighbor Isle<br />

Quarterly, units, s.a., log scale<br />

1000<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

100<br />

75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, County Building Departments; seasonal adjustment and H-P filter trend-fitting by TZE<br />

37


<strong>Maui</strong> new housing units authorized<br />

Quarterly, units, s.a., log scale<br />

1000<br />

100<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, County Building Departments; seasonal adjustment and H-P filter trend-fitting by TZE<br />

38


Total Hawaii real contracting (through 2009)<br />

8<br />

Monthly, billion 2009$, s.a., (log scale)<br />

4<br />

2<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

80 85 90 95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DoTax, U.S. Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census; deflation using Census cost index, seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

39


Tourist arrivals<br />

• Supply reduction from airline shutdowns (Aloha, ATA; March/April 2008)<br />

preceded consumption and investor pullback before and <strong>after</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

collapse <strong>of</strong> Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs (September 2008)<br />

• Domestic arrivals stayed at bottom <strong>of</strong> March-September 2008 drop<br />

through spring 2008; international arrivals bounced back from <strong>the</strong> H2N1-<br />

A shock (spring 2009)<br />

• <strong>Maui</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Neighbor islands were exposed to greater losses from <strong>the</strong><br />

airline shutdowns than Oahu<br />

• <strong>Maui</strong> less dependent on international arrivals than Oahu, so its exposure<br />

to domestic arrivals declines cannot be “diversified away”<br />

• Hotels now starting to stabilize as room rates have dropped enough to<br />

start rebuilding occupancy, especially on <strong>Maui</strong><br />

• Lift commitments for summer 2010—<strong>after</strong> seasonal adjustment—point to<br />

incipient <strong>recovery</strong> in seasonally-adjusted volumes in second half 2010<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

40


Hawaii total visitor arrivals<br />

650<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

Monthly in thousands, s.a., log scale<br />

600<br />

550<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

Aloha/ATA<br />

shutdowns<br />

90 95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, Hawaii Tourism Authority; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

41


Hawaii visitor arrivals by origin<br />

Thousands, s.a., (log scale)<br />

Thousands, s.a., (log scale)<br />

480<br />

220<br />

200<br />

440<br />

Lehman<br />

180<br />

160<br />

400<br />

140<br />

Aloha/ATA<br />

shutdowns<br />

120<br />

SARS<br />

360<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

04 05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

100<br />

9/11<br />

H1N1<br />

02 04 06 08 10<br />

Domestic<br />

International<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, Hawaii Tourism Authority; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

42


Total arrivals on <strong>Maui</strong>, Kauai: bigger hits than 9/11<br />

<strong>Maui</strong> (right scale)<br />

Kauai (left)<br />

240<br />

220<br />

Monthly in thousands,<br />

s.a., log scale<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

Aloha/ATA<br />

shutdown<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

Monthly in thousands,<br />

s.a., log scale<br />

60<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, Hawaii Tourism Authority; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

43


<strong>Maui</strong> monthly visitor arrivals through May 2010<br />

Domestic (right scale)<br />

International (left)<br />

200<br />

180<br />

Monthly in thousands, s.a., log scale<br />

80<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Y2K<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

Aloha/ATA<br />

shutdowns<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

9/11<br />

SARS<br />

H1N1-A<br />

00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, Hawaii Tourism Authority; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

44


Hotels<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

45


Hawaii hotel performance clawing its way back<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> capacity, s.a.<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

Real room rate (right scale)<br />

Occupancy (left scale)<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

2009$ per night, s.a., log scale<br />

65<br />

60<br />

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hospitality Advisors LLC; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

46


Oahu hotel performance indicators<br />

Occupancy (%, right scale)<br />

Room rate (2009$, left)<br />

90<br />

2009$ per night, s.a., log scale<br />

180<br />

170<br />

160<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> capacity, s.a.<br />

95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hospitality Advisors LLC, UHERO; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

47


Neighbor Island hotel occupancy<br />

80<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> capacity, s.a.<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

<strong>Maui</strong><br />

Kauai<br />

Hawaii<br />

95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hospitality Advisors LLC, UHERO; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

48


Neighbor Island real average hotel room rates<br />

280<br />

2009$ per night, s.a., log scale<br />

240<br />

200<br />

160<br />

<strong>Maui</strong><br />

Kauai<br />

Big Island<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

95 00 05 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hospitality Advisors LLC, UHERO; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

49


Lift<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

50


Actual scheduled seats flown to Hawaii<br />

Thousands, s.a., (log scale)<br />

250<br />

240<br />

230<br />

220<br />

210<br />

200<br />

190<br />

Domestic (right)<br />

International (left)<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

Crisis<br />

Lehman<br />

04 05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

680<br />

640<br />

600<br />

560<br />

520<br />

480<br />

Thousands, s.a., (log scale)<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, Hawaii Tourism Authority; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

51


Rolling monthly estimates <strong>of</strong> quarter-ahead ahead lift<br />

Millions, s.a., (log scale)<br />

.76<br />

.72<br />

.68<br />

.64<br />

.60<br />

Domestic (right)<br />

International (left)<br />

Crisis<br />

Lehman<br />

2.0<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

1.6<br />

1.5<br />

Millions, s.a., (log scale)<br />

.56<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

04 05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, Hawaii Tourism Authority; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

52


Oahu scheduled air seats<br />

three-month forward commitments<br />

Thousands, s.a., (log scale)<br />

.8<br />

.7<br />

.6<br />

Domestic (right)<br />

International (left)<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

Aloha/ATA<br />

shutdowns<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

Thousands, s.a., (log scale)<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, Hawaii Tourism Authority; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

53


Neighbor Island scheduled air seats<br />

three-month forward commitments<br />

Domestic (right scale)<br />

International (left)<br />

Thousands, s.a., (log scale)<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

Aloha/ATA<br />

shutdowns<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

800<br />

750<br />

700<br />

650<br />

600<br />

550<br />

500<br />

Thousands, s.a., (log scale)<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii DBEDT, Hawaii Tourism Authority; seasonal adjustment by TZE<br />

54


Tourism summary<br />

It’s s <strong>the</strong> economy, stupid?<br />

• Recession “<strong>of</strong>ficially” started in December 2007<br />

• But consumers did not “capitulate” until well <strong>after</strong> Aloha/ATA shutdown<br />

• Remember—oil prices rose through summer 2008 (some “recession”)<br />

• By <strong>the</strong> time Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs collapsed, arrivals were finished falling<br />

• Tourism for most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining 18 months<br />

Supply, demand, complements and cross-elasticities<br />

• Aloha/ATA are a natural experiment: instantaneous travel supply drop<br />

• Mixed with first rising, <strong>the</strong>n falling oil prices (commodity bubble!)<br />

• Travel demand fell with consumer demand generally, later in 2008<br />

• Decrease in hotel room rates (complementary good) cushioned <strong>the</strong> fall<br />

• Stabilization—through H1N1 event—established base for <strong>recovery</strong><br />

• Both supply and demand are necessary for <strong>recovery</strong> ⇒ expansion<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

55


Macroeconomic policy issues<br />

• Mortgage delinquency close to a turning point—falling faster in much <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> country than in Hawaii, where it is hung up by slower “throughput” <strong>of</strong><br />

foreclosures and REOs involving mainland borrowers and lenders<br />

• Fed monetary policy has unwound “quantitative easing” but <strong>the</strong> fate <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> resulting balance sheet expansion remains undetermined<br />

• Return to a “normal” Fed Funds target will wait until monetary<br />

policymakers believe economic conditions warrant it—<strong>recovery</strong> is<br />

gaining traction, but Fed is concerned not to undermine it<br />

• Return to normal from 2004-2006 may have come “too late” and “too<br />

slowly,” relative to ideal (this is disputed by Bernanke)<br />

• Return to normal originally expected to begin mid-2010 has been<br />

deferred partly by global macroeconomic surprises (Greece and <strong>the</strong><br />

Eurozone, spring 2010)—it’s only a matter <strong>of</strong> time before rates rise<br />

• Fiscal balance issues will shortly replace monetary policy concerns<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

56


≥90-day mortgage delinquency<br />

Delinquency by state<br />

U.S. 4.91%<br />

Hawaii 3.79%<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Percent<br />

Dade, FL 23.1<br />

Riverside, CA 16.4<br />

Clark, NV 16.6<br />

<strong>Maui</strong>, HI 8.9<br />

Hawaii, HI 7.4<br />

Kauai, HI 5.6<br />

Honolulu, HI 3.3<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Data by state 2010Q1 Mortgage Bankers <strong>Association</strong>; by county 2009Q4, Federal Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> New York<br />

http://data.newyorkfed.org/creditconditions/ based on TransUnion LLC data; note possible inconsistency<br />

57


Composition <strong>of</strong> Federal Reserve assets<br />

2.5<br />

Securities held outright<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r assets<br />

Lehman<br />

Weekly, trillion dollars<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

Specific institutions<br />

TALF<br />

Term Auction credit<br />

Commercial Paper funding<br />

Central bank swaps<br />

Securities (T-Bills,<br />

Notes, Bonds, MBS<br />

and agency debt)<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

A-07 N-07 F-08 M-08 A-08 N-08 F-09 M-09 A-09 N-09 F-10 M-10<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r assets<br />

Specific institutions<br />

TALF, CB swaps*<br />

*Was zero, jumped to $9.2 bil in<br />

May (Greece); now $1.2 billion<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Sources: Federal Reserve Board through week <strong>of</strong> June 16, 2010; calculations by TZE<br />

58


Recession ended (2001.11), “transparent” removal <strong>of</strong><br />

accommodation began (2004.06), result: convergence<br />

Percent<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

When <strong>the</strong> Fed began removing accommodation in 2004, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

announced <strong>the</strong> Fed Funds target in “real time” and<br />

gave forward-looking statements in<br />

monetary policy decisions.<br />

Result: smooth<br />

convergence.<br />

99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06<br />

However, many people now<br />

would say (in hindsight) that <strong>the</strong><br />

Fed raised rates “too late” and<br />

“too slowly” to pre-empt <strong>the</strong> subprime<br />

mortgage (and derivatives)<br />

financial crisis, or to pre-empt a<br />

rational speculative bubble in<br />

house prices<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Sources: Federal Reserve Board, Federal Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> St. Louis; TZ Economics<br />

59


Fed funds and 10-year T-Note T<br />

yield trajectories<br />

along with Brewbaker’s end-2009 rate forecast<br />

6<br />

5<br />

Lehman<br />

(09/08)<br />

Greece<br />

(03/10)<br />

4<br />

Percent<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

NBER recession shaded<br />

06 07 08 09 10 11 12<br />

From <strong>the</strong> 2004-2006<br />

experience,it seemed that <strong>the</strong><br />

target Fed Funds rate increase<br />

could come as early as <strong>the</strong><br />

June 2010 FOMC meeting, but<br />

problems in Greece and <strong>the</strong><br />

Eurozone, plus less robust<br />

economic <strong>recovery</strong> data, have<br />

led to a deferral <strong>of</strong> those rate<br />

increases, allowing long-term<br />

rates to once again subside.<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Sources: Federal Reserve Board, Federal Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> St. Louis; TZ Economics<br />

60


Federal fiscal balance issues<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

61


Federal budget surplus projections,<br />

pre-Obama, as a percent <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

Note: CBO baseline surplus projections adjusted for<br />

CBO’s estimates <strong>of</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> continued war<br />

spending, continuation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2001 and 2003 tax<br />

cuts, preventing scheduled cuts in Medicare’s<br />

physician payment rates, and holding o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

discretionary outlays constant as a share <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Council <strong>of</strong> Economic Advisers, Economic Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> President (February 2010) estimates developed by CBO<br />

in 2009 (under Doug Holtz-Eakin); see http://www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/2010/2010_erp.pdf<br />

62


Percent <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

-8<br />

Federal budget surplus as percent <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

and <strong>the</strong> economic cycle<br />

On budget<br />

<strong>Inc</strong>luding S.S.<br />

Baseline forecast<br />

Obamanomics<br />

Baseline<br />

Post-Obama<br />

-10<br />

NBER recessions shaded<br />

-12<br />

70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Congressional Budget Office (http://www.cbo.gov/budget/budget.cfm)<br />

63


Federal budget surplus as percent <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Presidential political cycle<br />

4<br />

2<br />

R D R D R<br />

D<br />

(TBD)<br />

0<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

Baseline<br />

Post-Obama<br />

-8 On budget<br />

<strong>Inc</strong>luding S.S.<br />

-10 Baseline forecast<br />

Obamanomics<br />

-12<br />

70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20 25<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Congressional Budget Office (http://www.cbo.gov/budget/budget.cfm)<br />

64


Relevant fiscal policy issues<br />

• Benchmarking: to become a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eurozone, a country’s<br />

central government fiscal deficit must be lesss than 2.5 percentage<br />

points <strong>of</strong> GDP—U.S. couldn’t make <strong>the</strong> cut (no one could now)<br />

• Crude formula: debt shouldn’t grow faster than economies’ ability to<br />

service principal and interest<br />

• Counterpart <strong>of</strong> net U.S. dissaving is net foreign saving; problem arises if<br />

higher interest is required to leave foreign debt holders indifferent<br />

• Among <strong>the</strong> moving parts are foreign exchange rates (e.g. yuan/dollar)<br />

• Challenges to restoration <strong>of</strong> fiscal balance include fate <strong>of</strong> 2001, 2003 tax<br />

cut expiration, entitlements (medicare and social security), tax subsidies<br />

(mortgage interest deduction), and federal spending reductions<br />

• Articulation <strong>of</strong> credible commitment to plausible deficit reduction strategy<br />

necessary to prevent emergence <strong>of</strong> interest rate risk premium (actually,<br />

higher real rate) to compensate foreign holders <strong>of</strong> U.S. domestic debt<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

65


Signs<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

66


Got ARRA?<br />

Boulder,<br />

CO


Close-duh


“A A road sign<br />

must have a<br />

preposition”


Pau<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

70


Appendix 1: financial regulatory reform background<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

71


Financial reforms <strong>the</strong>mes<br />

• Among many origins <strong>of</strong> financial crisis:<br />

• Regulatory arbitrage—book assets <strong>of</strong>f balance sheet, via conduits<br />

• Maturity mismatches—riding <strong>the</strong> yield curve on overnight repos<br />

• Violation <strong>of</strong> Taylor Rule mixed with Asian demand for Treasuries<br />

• “Affordable housing” pressure on GSEs, rating agencies<br />

• Bank stock ownership limitations that impede corporate governance<br />

• Six reform ideas (Calomiris)<br />

• Smarter “micro prudential” regulation <strong>of</strong> banks<br />

• Eliminate distortions in housing finance that encourage leveraging<br />

• Improve stockholder discipline <strong>of</strong> banks<br />

• Counterparty “netting” and OTC transparency<br />

• Prepackaged “bridge bank” plans for large, complex financials<br />

• “Macro prudential” regulation <strong>of</strong> bank capital and liquidity standards<br />

Charles Calomiris’s views are also developed in an April 2009 working paper,<br />

http://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/ccalomiris/papers/PrudentialBankRegulation.pdf; see also Markus Brunnermeier’s<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Perspectives article http://www.princeton.edu/~markus/research/papers/liquidity_credit_crunch.pdf,<br />

and materials from panel discussion at <strong>the</strong> NABE spring policy conference with Calomiris at<br />

http://www.nabe.com/pc09/documents/Brunnermeier02b_NABE_2009_Brunnermeier.pdf.<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: NABE Spring 2009 Policy Conference, http://www.nabe.com/mem/pc09/calomiris-cato.pdf<br />

72


Someone to think about <strong>the</strong> big picture<br />

• Macro prudential regulation<br />

• Time-varying parameters (capital, liquidity, provisioning policies)<br />

• <strong>Inc</strong>rease capital requirements to tamp down asset price “bubbliciousness”<br />

• Form new regulator: Federal Reserve has its hands full<br />

• Problem identifying bubbles: false positives<br />

• Orderly resolution <strong>of</strong> systemically-embedded financial institutions<br />

• More on varying capital requirements<br />

• Excessive notional amounts <strong>of</strong> many securitization structures<br />

• Excessive speed with which financial innovations proliferate<br />

• Limit systemic exposure with higher capital requirements on CDOs, CDS<br />

• Lower requirements in interest rate swaps, o<strong>the</strong>rs with proven track records<br />

See materials from panel discussion at <strong>the</strong> NABE October 2009 Annual Meeting with Rene Stultz (Ohio State) on bank<br />

CEO compensation and Arvind Krishnamurthy (Northwestern) on financial crisis and regulation, who reports that with<br />

more than $400 trillion in notional amounts outstanding (gross), interest rate swaps have proven to be “a successful<br />

market with few blowups” http://www.nabe.com/mem/am09/krishnamurthy.pdf (Author’s note: versus $60 trillion in<br />

notional CDS amounts pre-Lehman, before netting <strong>of</strong>fseting counterparty exposures)<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: NABE Spring 2009 Policy Conference, NABE October 2009 Annual Meeting<br />

73


Appendix 2: Oahu tourism microeconomics<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

74


Model says supply shock preceded demand shock<br />

P 1<br />

P 2<br />

P<br />

P 0<br />

V 0<br />

V 1<br />

V<br />

S 2<br />

net reduction<br />

S 0<br />

08q1<br />

09q2<br />

D 0<br />

D 2<br />

net reduction<br />

V 2<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

75


Summarizing <strong>the</strong> predicted trajectory, 2008-2009<br />

2009<br />

P<br />

Theoretical prediction summarizing <strong>the</strong><br />

(P, V) price-volume trajectory traced<br />

out in <strong>the</strong> previous slide sequence<br />

P 1<br />

P 0<br />

V 0<br />

08q1<br />

P 2<br />

09q2<br />

V 1<br />

V 2<br />

V<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

76


Actual Oahu visitor arrivals in “price-quantity” space<br />

Real HNL air<br />

travel cost<br />

(2007 = 100)<br />

120<br />

110<br />

P<br />

08q3<br />

2010-?f<br />

08q1<br />

The actual fare (P), arrivals (V)<br />

trajectory traced out in (P, V)-<br />

space, quarterly from mid-2006<br />

through mid-2009<br />

Early collapse <strong>of</strong> travel was<br />

supply contraction (higher fuel<br />

costs, airline shutdowns)<br />

followed by collapse in travel<br />

demand, later response to falling<br />

lodging costs.<br />

100<br />

09q2<br />

(probably q3<br />

and q4)<br />

07q1<br />

90<br />

500 550 600 650 700 750<br />

V<br />

Oahu domestic<br />

arrivals (000, s.a.)<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Bureau <strong>of</strong> Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Labor; Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic Analysis, U.S.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce; Federal Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> St. Louis; Hawaii DBEDT; calculations by TZE<br />

77


Forecast requires both increased supply (lift) and<br />

demand <strong>recovery</strong>—macroeconomics in place for latter<br />

P<br />

S 2<br />

= K 1<br />

+ MC 2<br />

S 3<br />

= K 3<br />

+ MC 2<br />

P 1<br />

increased lift<br />

P 3<br />

P 2<br />

08q1<br />

D 3<br />

consumption revival<br />

*During 2010 gradual growth in<br />

travel demand from rising wealth<br />

and expected income should bring<br />

volumes back towards <strong>the</strong> starting<br />

point (2007), facilitated by entry (lift<br />

increases) and no material oil price<br />

changes (from $70-80/bbl)<br />

V 1<br />

V 2<br />

P 0<br />

V 0<br />

D 2<br />

V 3<br />

V<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

78


Tourism forecast: total visitor arrivals<br />

2000<br />

Quarterly in thousands, s.a., log scale<br />

1900<br />

1800<br />

1700<br />

1600<br />

1500<br />

1400<br />

1300<br />

9/11<br />

SARS<br />

Lehman<br />

Acceleration over next four<br />

quarters is expected to<br />

substantially rebuild arrivals<br />

volumes as lift is restored<br />

Actual<br />

Forecast<br />

00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14<br />

Slide copyright TZ Economics<br />

Source: Hawaii Tourism Authority, Hawaii DBEDT; seasonal adjustment and forecast by TZE<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!