Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
81<br />
considering the goals in all three dimensions. The clearer<br />
and more precise the requirements are phrased, the<br />
easier the communication between all persons involved,<br />
the negotiation of differences in interests and also the<br />
realization process is.<br />
The model of ‘critical sustainability’ enables the integration<br />
of environmental, social and economic requirements<br />
by design. The results are design concepts which reach<br />
farther than ecological design concepts because of considering<br />
the natural, social and cultural systems of equal<br />
importance.<br />
The model is based on a very creative attitude <strong>–</strong> not only<br />
on the side of the landscape architects but also on the<br />
side of the clients. The integrative design approach offers<br />
possibilities for an added value through design by searching<br />
for synergies between the different dimensions of<br />
sustainability. An achieved added value is a great design<br />
accomplishment by the landscape architect but this has<br />
also to be asked for by the client.<br />
All actors involved face a great challenge by steering the<br />
process of sustainability actively and creatively to develop<br />
public open space as a solid structure in settlement<br />
areas.<br />
Endnotes<br />
[1] It is not the aim of this paper to focus on different decision makers<br />
or decision-making-processes.<br />
References<br />
Alisch, M. & Herrmann, H. (2001): Soziale Nachhaltigkeit: Lernprozesse<br />
<strong>für</strong> eine nachhaltige Zukunft. In: Alisch M. (ed.): sozial <strong>–</strong> gesund,<br />
nachhaltig: Vom Leitbild zu verträglichen Entscheidungen in<br />
der Stadt des 21. Jahrhunderts. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 95-116.<br />
Blazejczak, J. & Edler, D. (2004): Nachhaltigkeitskriterien aus ökologischer,<br />
ökonomischer und sozialer Perspektive <strong>–</strong> ein interdisziplinärer<br />
Ansatz. Messung von Nachhaltigkeit, Vierteljahreshefte zur<br />
Wirtschaftsforschung 1: 10-30.<br />
Gehl, J. (1987): Life between buildings. New York: Van Nostrand<br />
Reinhold<br />
Herrmann, H. & Lang, B. (2001): Perspektiven des Sozialen in der<br />
Stadt. In: Alisch M. (ed.): sozial <strong>–</strong> gesund, nachhaltig: Vom Leitbild<br />
zu verträglichen Entscheidungen in der Stadt des 21. Jahrhunderts.<br />
Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 29-45.<br />
Grimm-Pretner, D., Wück R., & Barthofer, R. (2009): Landschaftsarchitektur<br />
und Nachhaltige Entwicklung <strong>–</strong> Fokus Parks. Wien:<br />
Institut <strong>für</strong> Landschaftsarchitektur, Schriftenreihe ILA.<br />
Lyle, J.T. (1994): Regenerative design for sustainable development.<br />
New York: Wiley.<br />
Meyer, E. (2008): Sustaining beauty. The performance of appearance.<br />
A manifesto in three parts. In: Journal of <strong>Landscape</strong> Architecture<br />
/ spring 2008: 6-23.<br />
Papers