Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

44
holders (as Piemonte Region, River Basin Autority, 11
Municipalities) and the population directly affected by the
transformation of the landscape.
Using the TABLE 2, we recognize the acknowledgement of:
• the consolidated or identity values analyzed in
the three approaches as the geo-morphological
aspect of the river territory, the natural and rural
landscape and some important cultural buildings
(as Stupinigi Hunting Castle) that constitute a
common patrimony of the population. The river is
at the moment not perceived by the urban territory
of the 11 Municipalities, involved in the valorisation
project, that promotes their integration,
• Regulative values as the “legal binding” values
of the river territory as the Po River Park, the
SIC and ZPS; the institutional actors and the
population investigated in this analysis promote
the protection of the Historical Hunting paths,
partially non connected for the urban sprawl and
decide to create new system of attractiveness
networks (linked to the Green Belt Project of the
Turin Province and the ‘Contract of the Sangone
River Basin’)
• the values to be implemented are linked to limited
the environmental quality of the river habitat, the
functional and hydro-geological weaknesses, the
degraded and disused areas along the river; this
problems need the integration among ecological,
cultural and physical system of values and
networks, create a new relation among the social
and institutional perception of the territory, the
landscape, the river belt. Each phase analysis
contributed to define the thematic cartography,
specialist studies and it is based on the participation
of institutional actors and local population
categories (such as policy makers, universities
scholarship and students, associations), involved
in some workshop activities and internet session
and forum. (see the following link: www.provincia.
torino.it/ambiente/risorse_idriche/progetti/idra2).
References
Alexander, E. R. (Ed.) (2006): Evaluation in planning: Aldershot:
Ashgate.
Bailly, A., Raffestin, C., Reymond, H. (1980): ‘Les concepts du paysage
: problématique et représentations’. L’Espace géographique,
IX (4) : 277-286.
Brunetta, G. (2006): ‘Valutazione e pianificazione. Verso
l’integrazione?’ [Evaluation and Planning. Towards the integration?].
Italian Journal of Regional Science, 5 (3): 119-126.
Brunetta, G. and Peano, A. (Eds.) (2003): Valutazione ambientale
strategica. Aspetti metodologici, procedurali e criticità [Strategic
Environmental Assessment in Spatial Planning. Methodologies,
procedures and weaknesses]. Milan: IlSole24ore.
Brunetta, G. & Voghera, A. (2007): ‚Per una metodologia di valutazione
dei paesaggi‘ [A methodology for the landscape evaluation].
Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali: 88 (XXXVIII): 15-33.
Brunetta, G. and Voghera, A. (2008): ‚Evaluating Landscape for
Shared Values: Tools, Principles, and Methods‘. Landscape Research.
33:1:71 – 87.
CoE (2000): European Landscape Convention. Florence.
CoE (2008): Recommendation CM/Rec (2008)3 of the Committee
of Ministers to member states on the guidelines for the implementation
of the European Landscape Convention.
Coppola Pignatelli, P. (1992) L’identità come processo [Identity as
a process]. Rome: Officina.
Cosgrove, D. (1984): Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape.
London: Croom Helm.
Fusco Girard, L. (1998): ‘Conservation of cultural and naturale
heritage. Evaluation for good governance and democratic control’.
in Lichfield, N., Barbanente A., Borri, D., Khakee, A., Prat, A. (ed.s)
(1998): Evaluating in Planning: Facing the Challenge of Complexity.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Gorgeu, Y., Jenkins, C. (edit.) (1995): La charte paysagère outil
d’aménagement de l’espace intercommunal. Paris : La Documentation
Francaise.
Higuchi, T. (1989): The visual and spatial structure of landscapes.
Cambridge (USA): The MIT Press.
Jakle J. (1987): The visual elements of landscape, The University
of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.
Kaplan R., Kaplan S., Brown T. (1989), “Environmental Preferences.
a Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors“, in Environment
& Behavior, 5 (XXI): 509-530.
Oneto, G. (1987): Valutazione di impatto sul paesaggio [Landscape
Impact Evaluation]. Milan: Ed. Pirola.
Oneto, G. (1997): Manuale di pianificazione del paesaggio [Landscape
Planning Handbook]. Milan: Il Sole 24 Ore.
Peano, A. (Ed.) (2007): Atlante per la valorizzazione dei paesaggi
piemontesi [Atlas for the valorisation of Piedmont Landscapes],
(Turin: Inter-University Department Of Territorial Studies And Planning).
CD-rom.
Farjon, H. (2007): ‘Monitoring Program of perception and valuation
of landscape changes in the Netherlands’. Landscape Indicators.
Challenges and Perspectives. Barcelona: 29th and 30th of November.
Participation process of the Sangone Landscape, in: http://www.
provincia.torino.it/ambiente/risorse_idriche/progetti/idra2.