07.06.2014 Views

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32<br />

A Fertile Wilderness: The CPR’s<br />

Ready-Made Farms, 1909-1919<br />

Elsa Lam<br />

Columbia University, Graduate School of Architecture,<br />

Planning and Preservation, 2960 Broadway, New York,<br />

NY, 10027 USA (e-mail: ehl2106@columbia.edu)<br />

Abstract<br />

This paper examines the Canadian Pacific Railway’s<br />

ready-made farm program, a key component in the<br />

creation of a new landscape image for the Canadian<br />

Prairie West. From 1909 to 1919, the program built<br />

and sold full, turn-key farms to novice British settlers.<br />

These farms set into place standardized structures<br />

and land allocations, comprising barns, houses,<br />

sheds, fences, and even ploughed fields. Depicted<br />

as emblematic of the Prairie landscape, completed<br />

farms became part of CPR promotional imagery and<br />

literature for audiences of potential immigrants. This<br />

paper traces the active construction and promotion<br />

of a series of utopian rural communities, rooted in<br />

nineteenth-century landscape and agrarian ideals.<br />

Keywords<br />

Colonial settlements, transportation landscapes,<br />

historical landscapes, landscape meanings, landscape<br />

utopias<br />

Introduction<br />

Over the course of the nineteenth century, the received<br />

view of the Canadian Prairies <strong>–</strong> the grasslands of present-day<br />

Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba <strong>–</strong> underwent<br />

a dramatic shift. At the beginning of the century, the<br />

Prairies were viewed as a deserted, terrifying wasteland.<br />

By the end of the century, a romantic view of the Canadian<br />

West was popularized that saw the same landscapes<br />

as an untouched, ‘fertile wilderness’ for both agricultural<br />

production and social renewal. This paper explores one<br />

manifestation of this dramatic shift in the perception and<br />

development of a landscape - the ready-made farm colonies<br />

created by the nation’s first transcontinental railway.<br />

As described by explorers, surveyors, and fur-traders<br />

from the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries, Western<br />

Canada was a hostile wilderness <strong>–</strong> to the North, a furtrading<br />

hinterland, to the South, a barren and windswept<br />

waste. This tone shifted when Canada annexed the<br />

Hudson’s Bay territories in 1869. As both the federal government<br />

and railway sought to make the region a centre<br />

of growth in the 1880s, official geographical and scientific<br />

reports were adjusted to meet expectations for its agricultural<br />

potential [1]. <strong>Landscape</strong>s beyond the treeline, once<br />

viewed as a “sterile, dreary waste” would before the end<br />

of the century be described in leading scientific accounts<br />

as presenting a rich soil, which with “a mere scratching<br />

[would] supply a household with food” (Keating 1823:<br />

238; Macoun 1882: 263-4).<br />

The construction of a transcontinental railway became<br />

a key imperative and symbol for the settlement of the<br />

newly promising Prairie landscapes. Although driven<br />

by profits rather than patriotism, the Canadian Pacific<br />

Railway Company, contracted to the task, became a<br />

touchstone of nation-building <strong>–</strong> a notion encapsulated in<br />

the company’s 1919 motto: “Ask the Canadian Pacific<br />

about Canada.” This position was reinforced by the<br />

railway’s dissemination of images and information on the<br />

Northwest, a principal aim of which was securing bone<br />

fide settlers to generate rail traffic. Beyond sponsoring<br />

artists, commissioning photographers, and publishing a<br />

wide variety of marketing materials, the railway company<br />

actively developed landscapes across the Prairies to this<br />

end. The Development <strong>Department</strong>’s initiatives <strong>–</strong> which<br />

included building demonstration farms and constructing<br />

irrigation infrastructure - culminated in the ready-made<br />

farm colonies.<br />

The colonies were comprised of anywhere from 5 to<br />

122 pre-built farms, each equipped with a house, barn,<br />

implement shed, and fencing, as well as fifty acres of<br />

ready-ploughed and sowed land, to be paid off over ten<br />

to twenty years [2]. Although commercial colonization<br />

companies had earlier offered pre-built tenant farms, the<br />

CPR’s program surpassed its short-lived predecessors in<br />

ambition and scale. Rather than producing patchwork development<br />

on conventional agricultural land, it aimed to<br />

establish stable, high-density farming communities in the<br />

Alberta dry belt, initially aiming to establish thousands of<br />

hand-selected farmers on ready-made farms in irrigated<br />

lands (Mills 1991: 56).<br />

Reserved for British Settlers<br />

The first notable feature of the ready-made colonies was<br />

their intended audience: married British settlers, with a<br />

moderate amount of capital and, preferably, previous<br />

agricultural experience [3]. In 1909, the CPR launched<br />

its 24-farm Nightingale Colony with an aggressive<br />

advertising campaign in British newspapers. “In order to<br />

save the settler the inconvenience of having to build his<br />

house, fence, and prepare his land in his first year while<br />

he would rather be attending to his crops, the Canadian<br />

Pacific Railway has prepared a number of Ready-Made<br />

Farms,” proclaimed a 1910 ad in the Manchester Guardian,<br />

noting in bold type, “They are reserved for British<br />

Settlers” [Fig. 1]. This was consonant with a longstanding<br />

Eastern Canadian vision of the West as an extension of<br />

the Empire (cf. Owram 1980, Berger 1970) and com-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!