07.06.2014 Views

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

29<br />

Fig.2 Herbert Bayer Maya 1971/91s<br />

© Emil Nelson Gallery<br />

In this context Bayer’s wall elements of the Roswell Garden<br />

have to be discussed. Panels reveal and obstruct the<br />

spectator’s view. Boundaries and openness give rise to<br />

constantly changing space-perceptions, an artifice used<br />

also in Japanese architecture. As if painted fusuma slidescreens<br />

were detached from their architectural context<br />

the Roswell’s wall pieces form a fusion between disciplines.<br />

Bayer, who just like Gropius, points out during his<br />

stay that “Japan has had the Bauhaus in its long history<br />

of art” (Bayer 1960), combines Japanese impressions<br />

with Bauhaus convictions. In comparison to the words<br />

of the architect Hiroshi Hara on traditional Japanese<br />

architecture, where a “graphic structural expression to<br />

the functional elements” is given (Hara 1966:90), the<br />

wall elements relate literally to a graphical concept. They<br />

become the graphic itself. This graphic structural expression<br />

transforms in the Articulated Wall into a plastic<br />

expression, which is structural. The sculpture is structure,<br />

expanding in the following years to voluminous megastructural<br />

(con)structions, comparable to designs of the<br />

Metabolists.<br />

Units, Capsules and Metabolism<br />

In search of a new direction after the war the new<br />

Japanese architectural group rejects visual references<br />

to the past (cf. Wendelken 2000:289). Aspiring toward<br />

a dynamically constructed society and individuality (cf.<br />

Hara 1966:91), away from homogenous spaces, which<br />

are “connected with the fostering of homogenous humanity”<br />

as Hara states (ibid.:94), they shift their attention to<br />

the Metabolism <strong>–</strong> shinchintaisha <strong>–</strong> which proclaims the<br />

organism, acting on the environment and bringing out its<br />

own growth (cf. Kawazoe 1998/1991:148). Propagation in<br />

terms of construction, reproduction but also destruction is<br />

understood as part of a life process.<br />

The book on the Katsura Residence is therefore to<br />

be regarded as the climax of the debate on traditional<br />

architecture but also as its end. It is published in the<br />

same year as the World Design Conference (WoDeCo)<br />

in Tokyo is being held, where the Metabolists present<br />

their manifesto. According to Tange, modern science and<br />

pure physics as mathematics might present proposals<br />

for a “dynamic balance between technological systems<br />

and human existence” (WoDeCo 1960:180). Nature is<br />

regarded as the origin of reference for the aspired symbiosis<br />

between technology and mankind and integrated<br />

into the technological construction’s design process 7.<br />

Cells in the form of capsules or repetitive units within a<br />

large frame became afterwards somewhat a signature of<br />

Metabolism (cf. Wendelken 2000:293). The architect and<br />

theoretician Buckminster Fuller might be seen as a main<br />

source for this inspiration (cf. ibid.:294) 8. Fuller declares<br />

structure not a fixed entity, but a regenerative, spatial,<br />

and partial model of the universe, which can only be understandable<br />

as the sum of finite-limited units (cf. Kepes<br />

1965/1967:68), similar to Bayer’s voluminous maquettes.<br />

Studies such as Maya (1971) [Fig.2], Cubic Tower (1970)<br />

[Fig.3] or Pueblo (1971) 9, are comparable to designs<br />

like e.g. Arata Isozakis Clusters in the Air (1960-62)<br />

[Fig.4], where a quantity of prefabricated geometric volumes<br />

are stuck together 10.<br />

The projects share not only obvious formal alikeness,<br />

but also terms such as mass production and interchangeable<br />

capsule units 11. Consequently, they illustrate the<br />

notion of space, its mobile and temporary component, its<br />

constant transformation so to speak. They also underline<br />

Bayer’s shift from a structuralization of nature to a<br />

structuralization of space. Congruently in Japan space<br />

becomes the center of interest in the late 1950s in urban<br />

studies 12.<br />

Bayer’s Structur(re)alization of Nature and Space<br />

As early as in the 1940s Bayer’s fascination with the<br />

mountains’ inner structures (cf. Chanzit 1987/2005:41)<br />

becomes apparent in his Convolution paintings. To put it<br />

simply, nature is structure, but is also concurrently struc-<br />

Fig.3 Herbert Bayer<br />

Cubic Tower 1970<br />

© Emil Nelson Gallery<br />

Papers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!