07.06.2014 Views

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18<br />

Evaluation of Open Space Form<br />

and Use in an Istanbul Squatter<br />

Settlement<br />

Noah Billig<br />

Clemson University, <strong>Department</strong> of Planning<br />

and <strong>Landscape</strong> Architecture, College of<br />

Architecture, Arts and Humanities, 124 Lee Hall,<br />

Box 340511, Clemson, South Carolina, USA<br />

29634-0511 (email: nbillig@clemson.edu)<br />

Abstract<br />

Istanbul’s interactions of squatterization and open<br />

space provide a context in which to study form and uses<br />

of landscape in the emerging informal city. <strong>Landscape</strong><br />

as a generative process and manifestation, such as that<br />

found in Istanbul’s squatter settlements, provides useful<br />

insights for designers, planners and residents for the<br />

future role of landscape and open space in the urban<br />

context. The landscapes of these squatter settlements<br />

are the outcome of squatterization as a process, yet<br />

they are also the reflection of cultural values and norms<br />

pertaining to public open space. This paper looks at the<br />

open spaces in the Istanbul squatter settlement of Pinar<br />

Mahalle. Through observation analysis, six open space<br />

typologies emerged: Mosque gardens; commercial<br />

streets; residential streets; small parks & playgrounds;<br />

other preserved vegetated areas; and spaces on or<br />

near the edge of the residential streets. An analysis<br />

of use and type found that the streets and areas near<br />

the street were the most social and used spaces,<br />

despite the location of a planned park and mosque<br />

garden in the settlement. These observations of open<br />

space form, type and use in squatter settlements<br />

show compelling examples of what is valued, useful<br />

and available in emerging urbanizing areas.<br />

Keywords<br />

Informal housing, squatter settlements, urban<br />

landscapes, urban open space, culture and open spaces<br />

For example, one of the pressing issues addressed at<br />

the Asia 2006 World Social Forum, under the theme of<br />

“Ecology and livelihoods,” was, “Problems of mega cities<br />

(Infrastructure, environment, transport, housing, violence,<br />

uncontrolled influx of population)” (World Social Forum<br />

2006). Thus, as cities increasingly face large populations<br />

and increased housing demands, it will be important to<br />

study and understand informal housing areas and the<br />

lessons that they can provide.<br />

Istanbul is dealing with this pressing issue. Fifty percent<br />

of Istanbul’s 15-20 million residents live in informal<br />

housing. Thus, studies are needed on urban design and<br />

planning in squatter settlements in Istanbul. This analysis<br />

is also important considering squatter settlements are<br />

prevalent in major cities throughout the developing world.<br />

Subsequently, the general question is asked: What<br />

lessons can planners and designers learn from studying<br />

informal settlements?<br />

Turkish informal settlements were caused by mass rural<br />

to urban migrations starting in the 1950s. Istanbul found<br />

that they could not meet the housing demands of the<br />

new residents. Therefore, self-help housing policies<br />

emerged in which people could establish squatter’s rights<br />

when constructing self-built homes on unoccupied land<br />

(Ergun 1991; Senyapili 2004). In Istanbul, unlike many<br />

developing countries’ squatter settlements, infrastructure<br />

(i.e. natural gas, water, roads, electricity, etc) has been<br />

retroactively established in most squatter neighborhoods<br />

(Ergun 2008). The results are neighborhoods with largely<br />

organic, resident-defined urban patterns that are also<br />

integrated into the city as a whole.<br />

Much of the literature and research involving informal<br />

housing sees it as a problem to be changed ((Türker-<br />

Devecigil 2005; Tas and Lightfoot 2005). This research<br />

tends to be bias from the onset, attaching values to a<br />

phenomenon that deserves to be looked at through an<br />

unbiased empirical lens. Other research over-romanti-<br />

Fig. 1: Mosque Garden<br />

Introduction<br />

Developing countries increasingly have “mega-cities”<br />

(cities with populations over 10 million) that are also<br />

developing into “global” cities. Many of these mega-cities<br />

have large unplanned and/or informal housing areas.<br />

Some estimate that, “by 2030, 1 person in 4 will be a<br />

slum dweller” (Neuwirth 2005). Informal housing and<br />

“slums” are issues that will demand increasing attention<br />

as populations rise, rural to urban migrations increase,<br />

and cities become more globalized. Subsequently,<br />

these issues are increasingly being called to attention.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!