Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
18<br />
Evaluation of Open Space Form<br />
and Use in an Istanbul Squatter<br />
Settlement<br />
Noah Billig<br />
Clemson University, <strong>Department</strong> of Planning<br />
and <strong>Landscape</strong> Architecture, College of<br />
Architecture, Arts and Humanities, 124 Lee Hall,<br />
Box 340511, Clemson, South Carolina, USA<br />
29634-0511 (email: nbillig@clemson.edu)<br />
Abstract<br />
Istanbul’s interactions of squatterization and open<br />
space provide a context in which to study form and uses<br />
of landscape in the emerging informal city. <strong>Landscape</strong><br />
as a generative process and manifestation, such as that<br />
found in Istanbul’s squatter settlements, provides useful<br />
insights for designers, planners and residents for the<br />
future role of landscape and open space in the urban<br />
context. The landscapes of these squatter settlements<br />
are the outcome of squatterization as a process, yet<br />
they are also the reflection of cultural values and norms<br />
pertaining to public open space. This paper looks at the<br />
open spaces in the Istanbul squatter settlement of Pinar<br />
Mahalle. Through observation analysis, six open space<br />
typologies emerged: Mosque gardens; commercial<br />
streets; residential streets; small parks & playgrounds;<br />
other preserved vegetated areas; and spaces on or<br />
near the edge of the residential streets. An analysis<br />
of use and type found that the streets and areas near<br />
the street were the most social and used spaces,<br />
despite the location of a planned park and mosque<br />
garden in the settlement. These observations of open<br />
space form, type and use in squatter settlements<br />
show compelling examples of what is valued, useful<br />
and available in emerging urbanizing areas.<br />
Keywords<br />
Informal housing, squatter settlements, urban<br />
landscapes, urban open space, culture and open spaces<br />
For example, one of the pressing issues addressed at<br />
the Asia 2006 World Social Forum, under the theme of<br />
“Ecology and livelihoods,” was, “Problems of mega cities<br />
(Infrastructure, environment, transport, housing, violence,<br />
uncontrolled influx of population)” (World Social Forum<br />
2006). Thus, as cities increasingly face large populations<br />
and increased housing demands, it will be important to<br />
study and understand informal housing areas and the<br />
lessons that they can provide.<br />
Istanbul is dealing with this pressing issue. Fifty percent<br />
of Istanbul’s 15-20 million residents live in informal<br />
housing. Thus, studies are needed on urban design and<br />
planning in squatter settlements in Istanbul. This analysis<br />
is also important considering squatter settlements are<br />
prevalent in major cities throughout the developing world.<br />
Subsequently, the general question is asked: What<br />
lessons can planners and designers learn from studying<br />
informal settlements?<br />
Turkish informal settlements were caused by mass rural<br />
to urban migrations starting in the 1950s. Istanbul found<br />
that they could not meet the housing demands of the<br />
new residents. Therefore, self-help housing policies<br />
emerged in which people could establish squatter’s rights<br />
when constructing self-built homes on unoccupied land<br />
(Ergun 1991; Senyapili 2004). In Istanbul, unlike many<br />
developing countries’ squatter settlements, infrastructure<br />
(i.e. natural gas, water, roads, electricity, etc) has been<br />
retroactively established in most squatter neighborhoods<br />
(Ergun 2008). The results are neighborhoods with largely<br />
organic, resident-defined urban patterns that are also<br />
integrated into the city as a whole.<br />
Much of the literature and research involving informal<br />
housing sees it as a problem to be changed ((Türker-<br />
Devecigil 2005; Tas and Lightfoot 2005). This research<br />
tends to be bias from the onset, attaching values to a<br />
phenomenon that deserves to be looked at through an<br />
unbiased empirical lens. Other research over-romanti-<br />
Fig. 1: Mosque Garden<br />
Introduction<br />
Developing countries increasingly have “mega-cities”<br />
(cities with populations over 10 million) that are also<br />
developing into “global” cities. Many of these mega-cities<br />
have large unplanned and/or informal housing areas.<br />
Some estimate that, “by 2030, 1 person in 4 will be a<br />
slum dweller” (Neuwirth 2005). Informal housing and<br />
“slums” are issues that will demand increasing attention<br />
as populations rise, rural to urban migrations increase,<br />
and cities become more globalized. Subsequently,<br />
these issues are increasingly being called to attention.