Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
151<br />
spaces (neighbourhood, villages);<br />
2) riparian system restoration (surface and subsurface<br />
hydrological system)<br />
3) vernacular features landscape utilised and seminatural<br />
landscape incorporated;<br />
4) role of local stakeholders (council concerned, farmers,<br />
recreation and environmental organisations,<br />
contracts) involved in the design and maintenance of<br />
landscape projects;<br />
5) diversity of recreational activities (public spaces and<br />
no motorized network created) [3];<br />
6) maintenance criteria (differential management);<br />
7) Public and biodiversity monitoring (inventories, conflicts,<br />
public preferences demanding).<br />
Conclusions<br />
An interesting literature of scientific authors and international<br />
organisations publications has confirmed the<br />
benefices of landscape connectivity to improve environment<br />
conditions for humans and nature evolution in<br />
urban regions. The landscape connectivity of ecological<br />
networks is becoming a criteria for urban regions planning<br />
as we have seen in the cases analysed. New local<br />
projects of ecological networks are changing periurban<br />
landscapes giving more spaces for nature and human<br />
needs. The studies on urban ecological networks being<br />
presently carried out could become the scientific base to<br />
be applied to countries where there is no or little experience<br />
in this field. It is well known that cities in Latin<br />
America countries, especially in Conosur countries, are<br />
growing chaotically, and ecological networks to protect<br />
nature and improve landscape conditions for human enjoyment<br />
and socio-cultural relationship play nowadays no<br />
role whatsoever. The reality is that the natural patrimony<br />
of the periurban territories is disappearing rapidly in<br />
many Latin American cities and metropolis like Santiago<br />
de Chile and Temuco. In this context, it is paramount and<br />
urgent to elaborate a definition of a “social need” for wildlife<br />
and nature, which must eventually become enshrined<br />
in local legislations. “No less important is the need to design<br />
comprehensive and integrated conservation plans,<br />
as well as a better use of adaptive management ”(Adams<br />
2005, p 151) for society and for biodiversity. To promote<br />
the benefits of political programs to develop ecological<br />
networking on the ground, will most definitely contribute<br />
to improve landscape and environment conditions for<br />
human and nature evolution.<br />
Endnotes<br />
[1] Hydrological system: river continuum, or riparian zone that<br />
contains by definition, the zone of intersection of the surface and<br />
subsurface hydrological systems. (Visible and visible water course)<br />
[2] The wildlife ecology it’s a new disciple , It’s mentioned in<br />
Adams 2005 article where he expose the international programs<br />
and activities evolution from 1912.<br />
[3] In this matrix, the multiple possibilities of usages has been<br />
classified in 8 sections: pedestrian, equestrian, motorized, farmers<br />
activities and services, aquatics, air, animalistic, cultural and<br />
artistic.<br />
References<br />
Adams (2005): urban wildlife ecology and conservation: A brief<br />
history of the discipline. Urban Ecosystems, 8, p 139-156.Sprinkler<br />
Science + Media Inc. Netherland.<br />
Ahern (1995): Greenways in the Usa: theory, trends and prospects<br />
http://conserveland.org/lpr/download/18971/Greenways.pdf [as<br />
accessed 15 April 2006]<br />
Ahern & Leitão (2002), Appling landscape ecological concepts and<br />
metrics in sustainable landscape planning , <strong>Landscape</strong> and urban<br />
Planning review., Elsevier ( 65-93)<br />
Ahern 2003. Integration of landscape ecology and landscape<br />
architecture: an evolutionary and reciprocal process (311-318).<br />
//INTEGRAS/TEMPLATES///INTEGRAS/CUP/3-PAGINATION/<br />
IPL/2-FIRST_PROOF/3B2/0521830532C30.3D <strong>–</strong> 311 <strong>–</strong> [311<strong>–</strong>319/9]<br />
20.11.2004 9:15PM<br />
Bonnin (2007): Connectivité écologique et gouvernance territoriale.<br />
http://conserveland.org/lpr/download/18971/Greenways.pdf[as<br />
accessed 15 April 2006]<br />
Briffet (2001): <strong>Landscape</strong> Research, Vol.26,N°2, 137-163<br />
Forman RTT (2008) : Urban Regions, Ecology and Planning Beyond<br />
the City. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/ New York.<br />
408 pp.<br />
Clergeau (2007) Une Ecologie du paysage, Editions Apogée. 137 p<br />
Coperrider ,A (1992): Reintegrating humans and nature in: Hudson,<br />
WE. ( Ed) <strong>Landscape</strong> and Biodiversity. Defrnders of wildlife, (<br />
Island Press) p 142 .<br />
Forman RTT (2004): Mosaico territorial para la región metropolitana<br />
de Barcelona. (Land Mosaic for the <strong>Great</strong>er Barcelona Region).<br />
Editorial Gustavo Gili, Barcelona.150 pp.<br />
Forman (2008): Urban regions, Ecology and Planning beyond the<br />
City. Cambridge University press. Collection: Cambridge Studies in<br />
<strong>Landscape</strong> Ecology<br />
Papers