Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

102 Fig. 8: Fragmentary planning model and green structures at the urban and territorial scales Fig.9: Times of dismantling vegetation and times for acceptance of new landscapes an effective understanding of urban landscape should not “cling exclusively to the notion of permanence, which is the weaker force at state” (Girot, 2006: 91). networks, processes and states of becoming, both natural and socio-cultural, while common numerical indicators depict single frames of a certain form. Conclusions “A site exists in un unlimited number of scales” (Pollack, 2006:130): overlapping ecological dimensions, multiple scales of use and activity, scales of physical, infrastructural connection and of virtual, symbolic relation, ranges of environmental impact, temporal distribution, time evolving structures, times of space appropriation and “unanticipated spatial characteristics” that “may emerge from the interplay between elements and through inhabitation” (Pollack, 2006:138). In order to face this complex multiscalarity “there is a need of reinstate a balance between scientific and empiric, heuristic research on the landscapes of cities” (Girot, 2006: 91). Surely the research, in trying to integrate the multidimensional interpretation of urban landscape and the assessment of urban sustainability, has to cope with the difficulties in managing qualitative data derived from walkabout surveys and urban fieldwork, multimedia, participative investigation combining insider and outsider views: data which rarely satisfy the criteria of simplicity and reproducibility. Nevertheless, if the use of landscape as a connoting medium (while numerical indicators are denoting) implies a weak, unformalizable praxis, it has a strong cognitive value (Vallega, 2008: 42; Hak, 2008:62) in order to disseminate information, to help the public to develop a common language for discussion and to promote the idea of integrated action at diverse scales for sustainability, assuming that “where we live affects how we live” (DETR, 2000: 53). In particular, in reading the urban sites in relation with the targets of sustainability, the research is showing that the landscape lens works better in detecting cross-scale
103 References Angrilli, M.: Infrastructures of Sustainability. http://www.planum.net/ topics/main/m-ecoscape-angrilli.htm [as accessed 30 September 2008] Birkeland, J., (2002): Design for sustainability. London: Earthscan. Borgström, S. T., et al., (2006): Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecology and Society 11(2): 16. http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art16/ [as accessed 30 September 2008] Camagni R., (1991): Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven Press. Carmona, M., et al., (2003): Public spaces – Urban spaces. Oxford: Architectural Press Castiglioni, B., (2007). Paesaggio e sostenibilità: alcuni riferimenti per la valutazione. in: Castiglioni B., De Marchi, M., eds.: Paesaggio, sostenibilità, valutazione. Padova: Università di Padova: 19-41. Corner, J., (2006): Terra Fluxus. In: Waldheim C., ed. The Landscape Urbanism Reader. New York: Princeton Architectural Press: 22-33 Dahl, A.L.. et al., (2008). Meeting Conceptual Challenges. in: Hak T., Dahl A.L., Moldan B., eds.: Sustainability Indicators: A Scientific Assessement. Washington D.C.: Island Press: 27-48 . DETR, (2000). Our Towns and Cities: The Future - Delivering an Urban Renaissance. London: Department of Environment, Transport and Regions, UK Farina, A., (2006): Il paesaggio cognitivo. Una nuova entità ecologica. Milano: Franco Angeli. Girot, C., (2006): Vision in motion: representing landscape in time. In: Waldheim C., ed. The Landscape Urbanism Reader. New York: Princeton Architectural Press: 87-103 Hak, T. et al., (2008). Identifying Methodological Challenges. in: Hak T., Dahl A.L., Moldan B., eds.: Sustainability Indicators: A Scientific Assessement. Washington D.C.: Island Press: 49-70 . Halbwacs, M., (1950): La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Trad. it.: La memoria collettiva. Milano: Unicopli, 1987) Lynch, K., (1972): What time is this place?. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Secchi, B.: In between. http://www.planum.net/topics/secchi-diario. html [as accessed 30 September 2008] Sheppard, S.R.J., (2001): Beyond visual resource management: Emerging theories of an ecological aesthetic and visible stewardship. In: Sheppard, S.R.J., Harshaw, H.W., eds.: Forests and Landscapes: Linking Ecology, Sustainability, and Aesthetics. Wallingford: IUFRO Research Series, No. 6: 149-172 Pollack, L., (2006): Constructed ground: Questions of Scale. In: Waldheim C., ed. The Landscape Urbanism Reader. New York: Princeton Architectural Press: 125-139 Turri, E., (1983): Antropologia del paesaggio: Milano: Edizioni di Comunità. Vallega A. (2008): Indicatori per il paesaggio. Milano: FrancoAngeli Vasishth A., Sloane D., (2002): Returning to ecology: an ecosystem approach to understanding the city. In: Dear M.J. (ed.): From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory. London: Sage: 343-372 Venturi Ferriolo, M., (2002): Etiche del paesaggio. Il progetto del mondo umano. Roma: Editori Riuniti. Papers
Page 1 and 2:
University of Natural Resources and
Page 3 and 4:
Authors of the papers are fully res
Page 5:
3 Day 2 Thursday, April 30, 2009 Se
Page 8 and 9:
6 The “Landscape-Infrastructure
Page 10 and 11:
8 a) b) Fig. 2 : Study of the perme
Page 12 and 13:
10 Endnotes [1] Bernetti, Casini, M
Page 14 and 15:
12 Urban landscapes need great idea
Page 16 and 17:
14 the term “overall expression
Page 18 and 19:
16 Fig. 2: Initial overall pictures
Page 20 and 21:
18 Evaluation of Open Space Form an
Page 22 and 23:
20 Fig. 5: Other vegetation This st
Page 24 and 25:
22 Type of activity: • Exercise/p
Page 26 and 27:
24 Landscaped, Modern, or Social? T
Page 28 and 29:
26 Fig. 2: Rose and Perennial Show
Page 30 and 31:
28 Herbert Bayer’s Megastructures
Page 32 and 33:
30 a large extent the Japanese deve
Page 34 and 35:
32 A Fertile Wilderness: The CPR’
Page 36 and 37:
34 Fig.3 as their destination. The
Page 38 and 39:
36 The Method of Structuralist Land
Page 40 and 41:
38 Fig. 2: SLA implements gender eq
Page 42 and 43:
40 Landscape Evaluation Process. A
Page 44 and 45:
42 systematic application of certai
Page 46 and 47:
44 holders (as Piemonte Region, Riv
Page 48 and 49:
46 Frameworks - Preparing rural lan
Page 50 and 51:
48 The issues are organized into fa
Page 52 and 53:
50 Do Landscape Architects make the
Page 54 and 55: 52 within the larger landscape piec
Page 56 and 57: 54 Landscape as Urban Structure: th
Page 58 and 59: 56 city extension area but also in
Page 60 and 61: 58 housing neighborhoods. Construct
Page 62 and 63: 60 “massive change, required - ni
Page 64 and 65: 62 architecture’s ability to conc
Page 66 and 67: 64 cape Journal 6 (1): 4-12 Jackson
Page 68 and 69: 66 Green Idea/Grey Reality Carl Smi
Page 70 and 71: 68 argument was put forward for omi
Page 72 and 73: 70 Green Streets Potential for Down
Page 74 and 75: 72 size of rain garden through the
Page 76 and 77: 74 Climate Change asks for Sustaina
Page 78 and 79: 76 Fig. 2: Simplified example (livi
Page 80 and 81: 78 Sustainability in Park Design -
Page 82 and 83: 80 Fig 2: Integrative Design Approa
Page 84 and 85: 82 Preserving community gardens in
Page 86 and 87: 84 the City applied the military so
Page 88 and 89: 86 Endnotes [1] Anyone interested i
Page 90 and 91: 88 Urban imageability & open space
Page 92 and 93: 90 ning up degraded wetlands, plant
Page 94 and 95: 92 How to balance the multiple role
Page 96 and 97: 94 to the site. The public domain i
Page 98 and 99: 96 public spaces in the HBA, and by
Page 100 and 101: 98 Questions of scale for sustainab
Page 102 and 103: 100 Fig. 4: Nested structure of an
Page 106 and 107: 104 Moving Land: International Buil
Page 108 and 109: 106 Fig. 3: Concept Desert/Oasis We
Page 110 and 111: 108 Exploring a New Mode of Sustain
Page 112 and 113: 110 Serveral private sectors initia
Page 114 and 115: 112 Structuring the Concept of Land
Page 116 and 117: 114 transformation; the regulative
Page 118 and 119: 116 Anti-planning, anti-design? Exp
Page 120 and 121: 118 ate them, provided they still r
Page 122 and 123: 120 Complexity Ethos + Strategies:
Page 124 and 125: 122 cher” from a twenty-five foot
Page 126 and 127: 124 Great Ideas in Landscapes Seen
Page 128 and 129: 126 Depending on motivation, these
Page 130 and 131: 128 The traditions of landscape sch
Page 132 and 133: 130 Landscape Insertions: Operation
Page 134 and 135: 132 Fig. 02: Llorca Stéphanie, AXY
Page 136 and 137: 134 and creative innovation that in
Page 138 and 139: 136 Significance of the post-mining
Page 140 and 141: 138 Designing the post-industrial c
Page 142 and 143: 140 Hidden landscapes - The Enclose
Page 144 and 145: 142 Fig. 3: Paley Park is an inters
Page 146 and 147: 144 House and Exterior in the archi
Page 148 and 149: 146 Fig. 4 architectonical work“
Page 150 and 151: 148 The socio-cultural role of peri
Page 152 and 153: 150 Ecological networks representat
Page 154 and 155:
152 Veneto integrated water landsca
Page 156 and 157:
154 Fig. 2: Ponte di Piave 2025 (A)
Page 158 and 159:
156 Observing the Landscape Roland
Page 160 and 161:
158 Fig. 2: signalman house and rai
Page 162 and 163:
160 Mobility and Territory Sanja Cv
Page 164 and 165:
162 Kevin Lynch’s Openness of the
Page 166 and 167:
164 Phytoremediation as an Experien
Page 168 and 169:
166 Fig. 2: Rhizotron: An undergrou
Page 170 and 171:
168
Page 172 and 173:
170
Page 174 and 175:
172
Page 176 and 177:
174
Page 178 and 179:
176
Page 180 and 181:
178
Page 184:
Many Thanks to our Supporters ILA -
show all

Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?