Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
Landscape – Great Idea! X-LArch III - Department für Raum ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
102<br />
Fig. 8: Fragmentary planning<br />
model and green structures at<br />
the urban and territorial scales<br />
Fig.9: Times of dismantling<br />
vegetation and times for acceptance<br />
of new landscapes<br />
an effective understanding of urban landscape should not<br />
“cling exclusively to the notion of permanence, which is<br />
the weaker force at state” (Girot, 2006: 91).<br />
networks, processes and states of becoming, both natural<br />
and socio-cultural, while common numerical indicators<br />
depict single frames of a certain form.<br />
Conclusions<br />
“A site exists in un unlimited number of scales” (Pollack,<br />
2006:130): overlapping ecological dimensions, multiple<br />
scales of use and activity, scales of physical, infrastructural<br />
connection and of virtual, symbolic relation, ranges<br />
of environmental impact, temporal distribution, time<br />
evolving structures, times of space appropriation and<br />
“unanticipated spatial characteristics” that “may emerge<br />
from the interplay between elements and through inhabitation”<br />
(Pollack, 2006:138). In order to face this complex<br />
multiscalarity “there is a need of reinstate a balance<br />
between scientific and empiric, heuristic research on the<br />
landscapes of cities” (Girot, 2006: 91).<br />
Surely the research, in trying to integrate the multidimensional<br />
interpretation of urban landscape and the<br />
assessment of urban sustainability, has to cope with<br />
the difficulties in managing qualitative data derived from<br />
walkabout surveys and urban fieldwork, multimedia,<br />
participative investigation combining insider and outsider<br />
views: data which rarely satisfy the criteria of simplicity<br />
and reproducibility.<br />
Nevertheless, if the use of landscape as a connoting<br />
medium (while numerical indicators are denoting) implies<br />
a weak, unformalizable praxis, it has a strong cognitive<br />
value (Vallega, 2008: 42; Hak, 2008:62) in order to<br />
disseminate information, to help the public to develop<br />
a common language for discussion and to promote the<br />
idea of integrated action at diverse scales for sustainability,<br />
assuming that “where we live affects how we live”<br />
(DETR, 2000: 53).<br />
In particular, in reading the urban sites in relation with<br />
the targets of sustainability, the research is showing that<br />
the landscape lens works better in detecting cross-scale