The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom
The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom
The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Politically, the RSV (like Roland Holst), can be considered as a ‘centrist’ group, between the SDAP and the<br />
SDP. On the one hand, it declared for “national and international mass action”, for the renewal of class<br />
movements; on the other, it refused to condemn the SDAP’s attitude to the war, in the name of a unity which<br />
should be concretised by the “concentration of all revolutionary workers”. Nonetheless, this hesitation did not<br />
prevent an increasingly active collaboration between the RSV and the SDP. However, in concrete practice the<br />
SDP – although it was clearer politically and theoretically – was to trail the RSV when in 1915, the renewal of<br />
international relations between revolutionary groups, which had been broken by the war, became a reality.<br />
From the outbreak of war, Lenin had naturally made contact with the <strong>Dutch</strong>. He urged the SDP to “create closer<br />
ties” between the Russians and the <strong>Dutch</strong>. 320 He was certainly not thinking of an association with Roland Holst,<br />
whom he saw – since she had adopted a centrist attitude towards the Tribunists in 1909 – as another Trotsky, or<br />
even Kautsky, transplanted to Holland. 321<br />
But the SDP remained divided about a clear activity of close collaboration with the <strong>German</strong> and Russian<br />
revolutionaries. A small minority of the party leadership around Gorter was determined to carry out international<br />
work against social-chauvinism and the kautskyist centre. Gorter thus proposed to Lenin the publication of a<br />
Marxist review, with Pannekoek as editor, to replace Kautsky’s Neue Zeit. 322 Lenin agreed entirely with this<br />
proposal. In reality, the efforts within the SDP towards regroupment with other revolutionary groups in<br />
Switzerland, before Zimmerwald, were the work of Gorter and Luteraan another member of the SDP leadership,<br />
and a delegate to the Bern international conference of socialist youth in April 1915, not as an official<br />
representative of the SDP, but as a member of the young socialist group ‘De Zaaier’ (‘<strong>The</strong> Sower’), which was<br />
independent of the party. 323 This organisation had 100 members, and published the journal De Jonge socialist<br />
(‘<strong>The</strong> Young Socialist’). Luteraan immediately made contact with Lenin. 324<br />
By contrast, the position of Tribunism’s old leaders – Wijnkoop, Ravesteyn, and Ceton – was very ambiguous.<br />
Lenin wanted to work closely with the <strong>Dutch</strong> in preparing the Zimmerwald Conference. In a letter to Wijnkoop,<br />
written during the summer, Lenin wrote forcefully: “But you and we are independent parties; we must do<br />
something: formulate the programme of the revolution, unmask and denounce the stupid and hypocritical<br />
slogans of peace”. 325 An urgent telegram was sent to Wijnkoop just before the Conference: “Come straight<br />
away!”. 326<br />
And yet, the SDP sent no delegates to the Conference, which took place from 5 th to 8 th September 1915.<br />
Wijnkoop and his friends circulated the – unconfirmed – information that the Conference’s organiser, the Swiss<br />
MP Robert Grimm, had voted at the beginning of the war in favour of credits for the mobilisation of the Swiss<br />
army. On 25 th September, De Tribune published the ‘Zimmerwald Manifesto’ written by Trotsky, but did not<br />
320 Letter from Lenin, in: Wiessing, Die holländische Schule des Marxismus (Hamburg: VSA, 1980), pp. 33-34.<br />
321 After Zimmerwald, Lenin became more ‘soft’ with Roland Holst, “a comrade, who stays in a median position between<br />
Marxists (‚De Tribune’, Gorter, Pannekoek) and opportunists” [Contre le courant, Vol. 2 (Paris: Maspéro reprint, 1970),<br />
p. 15)]. Roland Holst wrote a political article on Zimmerwald’s significance: De internationale socialistische konferentie van<br />
Zimmerwald, in: De Nieuwe Tijd (1915), pp. 591-599. She gave a personal (and relevant) testimony on the conference, in: Het<br />
Fundament (1935), ‘Herinneringen aan Zimmerwald’. In its unpublished ‘Memories’ on Leo Trotsky (Persoonlijke<br />
herinneringen aan Leo Trotski, 1940, IISG’s archives), she thought that the attitude of Trotsky was by far away more<br />
“positive” than that of Lenin, essentially “destructive”.<br />
322 Letter from Gorter, cited by Wiessing, op. cit., p. 34. This letter, like much of Gorter’s correspondence, can be found in<br />
the former ZPA (Zentrales Partei Archiv) of the Moscow Institute of Marxism-Leninism. Wiessing was able to gain access<br />
to them. Some letters of Gorter’s correspondence with Lenin have been published: Garmt Stuiveling, ‘Gorters brieven aan<br />
Lenin’, in a collective work: Willens en wetens (Amsterdam: Querido, 1967).<br />
323 See G. Harmsen, Blauwe en rode jeugd (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1961). <strong>The</strong> Bern conference was strongly oriented to the<br />
left. <strong>The</strong> Socialist Youth International published in its magazine Jugend Internationale contributions against the war.<br />
324 See Luteraan’s testimony, in an interview by Igor Cornelissen in 1964: ‘Lenin vroeg: hoe gaat het met Gorter?’ (‘Lenin<br />
asked me: how is Gorter?’), Vrij Nederland, 28 th Nov. 1964.<br />
325 Letter written in June or July 1915, in Lenin’s Letters: Briefe, Vol. IV (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1967), p. 80.<br />
326 H. Lademacher (ed.), Die Zimmerwalder Bewegung. Protokolle und Korrespondenz. Vol. II (<strong>The</strong> Hague: Mouton, 1967),<br />
p. 103.<br />
99