07.06.2014 Views

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

If ‘councilism’ as an organised current has disappeared today, this is to be explained as much by the fragility of<br />

its basis in the 1960s and 70s (‘the students’ revolt’; ‘anti-bureaucratism’ and ‘anti-authoritarianism’) as by its<br />

negation of all organised activity. <strong>The</strong> councilist milieu has been less a milieu of structured groups with coherent<br />

positions – like those of council communism in the 1930s – than a nebulous cloud. This ‘cloud’ brought together<br />

the remnants of the Socialisme ou Barbarie current and the Situationists. 1289<br />

Today, with the disappearance of the <strong>Dutch</strong> and <strong>German</strong> communist left, there are almost no groups left that<br />

have any continuity with the old council communism. Rather there exists a current of ‘councilist’ ideas that<br />

manifest itself in the majority of the European countries on a more or less large scale can appear ephemerally<br />

through episodic periodicals or circles, but never in an organised and theoretically coherent way. Born in<br />

reaction to the leninism, and to the bolshevism of the communist parties or also to the ‘leftist’ groups (maoists<br />

and trotskyists), ‘councilism’ is politically unorganised and theoretically an informal current. Its bases are rather<br />

the rejection of ‘substitutionism’ and of all forms of organisation, in the same way as the old anarchist current.<br />

As such, it cannot have ‘formal’ and ‘organised expressions but remains at the mercy of social events. As a<br />

‘spontaneous’ current, its expressions are spontaneous and ephemeral. From this point of view, it can express the<br />

revolt of the intellectual layers of the petty bourgeoisie, against all bureaucracy, as was the case after 1968. But<br />

such a revolt appears and rises spontaneously from the momentary event.<br />

Nevertheless by its ‘anti-Leninism’ and its critique of all ‘apparatuses’ councilism has also crystallised, from<br />

about 1968 till 1975, the rejection of the official trade unions and of parliamentarism by significant numbers of<br />

radicalised workers. Above all it has expressed the mistrust of minorities of workers with regard to any political<br />

organisation, seen as ‘deadly’ in itself. In this sense ‘councilism’ appears more as a spontaneous reaction of<br />

these minorities during important social struggles. As an immediate reaction it cannot be a structured current, but<br />

is rather a nebulous movement, whose shape is difficult to grasp; a mixture of both ‘modernism’ at the level of<br />

everyday life and ‘contestation’ of all organisation at the political level.<br />

But, as political current, it is attached without any doubt to the left communism of the Twenties, which fought in<br />

an organized form the politics of the social democrat and leninist currents, whereas a new ‘revolutionary<br />

movement’ emerged on radically new bases: combat for autonomous workers councils and a new society free of<br />

any allegedly ‘workers State’ and party dictatorship.<br />

the ICC’s section in Holland, whose members came from the councilist milieu. Another of today’s currents, closer to the<br />

tradition of ‘bordigism’, is the British <strong>Communist</strong> Workers’ Organisation, which was originally a Scottish councilist group<br />

that came from Solidarity. Formed in 1974, at the beginning of the 1980s the CWO was associated with the Italian Battaglia<br />

Comunista group, which had split in 1952 with Bordiga’s International <strong>Communist</strong> Party (ICP). In every case, the break<br />

with ‘councilism’ was made possible by the personality of Marc Chirik, former trotskyist then bordigist militant,<br />

charismatic leader of the ICC, who remained always under the influence of Leninist conceptions. For the political trajectory<br />

of Marc Chirik, see our notice, to be published in the “Maitron” (Dictionnaire du mouvement ouvrier français), and the<br />

biographical Annex, in our work, Le Courant ‘bordiguiste’, 1919-1999, Italie, France, Belgique, Zoetermeer (Netherlands),<br />

1999.<br />

1288 <strong>The</strong> list of these groups is not short. In France, we can mention, among many others, the groups ‘Mouvement<br />

communiste’ (Jean Barrot’s group) and ‘Négation’ around 1975; in Scandinavia, the groups already cited: ‘Kommunismen’<br />

and ‘Internationell Arbetarkamp’; in Portugal, 1975, Combate, etc.<br />

1289 Although they sprang from a different tradition, the Situationist groups were the first, prior to 1968, to rediscover council<br />

communism [see: René Riésel, ‘Preliminaries on Councils and Councilist Organization’, in: Internationale Situationniste,<br />

No. 12, 1969. Translation and edition: Ken Knabb, Situationist International Anthology, 1995, Bureau of Public Secrets,<br />

P.O. Box 1044, Berkeley CA 94701).<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!