The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom
The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom
The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
political past, marked less by syndicalism than by left socialism, which they had rejected within the MLL Front.<br />
Such was the case of Stan Poppe.<br />
Stan Poppe (1899-1991) had played an important part in the OSP. He had worked as secretary within the party<br />
leadership. During the merger with the RSP, he had become a member of the RSAP’s political bureau. In 1936,<br />
he was made party secretary and treasurer, and in December was a delegate, with Ab Menist, to the Conference<br />
of the Centre for the 4 th International. Member of the high bodies of the RSAP in 1938, he was in 1940, one of<br />
the leaders of the MLL Front. In the Front, and later in the <strong>Communist</strong>enbond Spartacus, he was known under<br />
the pseudonym Tjeerd Woudstra. He was especially interested in economic studies, and his political orientation<br />
remained a mixture of Leninism and ‘councilism’.<br />
Most of the militants came from the old RSAP, without going through the trotskyist movement (anyway very<br />
weak in Holland). Many continued as militants in the Bond after the war, some to the end of their lives, like<br />
Bertus Nansink (died 1984) and Wiebe van der Wal. Others, like Jaap van Otterloo, Jan Vastenhouw, and Cees<br />
van der Kuile, left in 1950.<br />
Nonetheless, for another two years Spartacus’ evolution was marked by political ambiguities which showed that<br />
the spirit of the NAS had not totally disappeared. <strong>Left</strong> socialist reflexes reappeared during contacts with a socialdemocratic<br />
group which had left the RSAP at the beginning of the war, and whose strongest personality was<br />
Wijnand Romijn. At the end of 1943, the latter had written a pamphlet under the pseudonym Socius, which<br />
called for a ‘tactical’ support for the Allied war effort. Spartacus attacked this position violently, and gave up the<br />
merger negotiations with Romijn. 1183 However, the very fact that the proposal to merge with this group should<br />
be made, showed that the Bond had no class analysis of social democracy. Spartacus was a long way from the<br />
council communists, who had always denounced the socialist groups, right or left, as counter-revolutionary and<br />
bourgeois. This persistent effort to make contact with left socialists appeared again in November 1944, when it<br />
carried out joint work with the group ‘De Vonk’ (see Chap. 10), which finally collapsed because of political<br />
disagreements.<br />
Although the break with trotskyism was complete organisationally, the same was not true ideologically, as far as<br />
the left tendencies were concerned. During 1944, Poppe had two meetings with Vereeken’s group ‘Tegen de<br />
Stroom’ (Against the Current). Although the latter rejected the defence of the USSR in June 1941, it maintained<br />
its links with Raymond and Henri Molinier’s French Comité <strong>Communist</strong>e Internationaliste (CCI); after the war,<br />
it joined the 4 th International. 1184 Still more significant was the fact that even within the Bond, the last hesitations<br />
on the defence of the USSR never entirely disappeared. A small part of the organisation – which rejected the<br />
defence of the Russian camp in the ongoing war – was in favour of such a defence in the case of a Third World<br />
War between the Western Allies and the USSR. 1185<br />
For two years – until the theoretical contribution of the ex-GIC gained the upper hand – the Bond tried to clarify<br />
its political positions; its activity consisted largely of theoretical work in the form of pamphlets, and depended<br />
largely on the efforts of Bertus Nansink and above all Stan Poppe.<br />
This theoretical work is explained partly by the period – defeat of the strike of February 1941, deportations of<br />
workers, extermination of the Jewish proletarians by the nazism in its camps – which was far of favouring<br />
1183 See: Spartacus, ‘Bulletin van de revolutionair-socialistische Arbeidersbeweging in Nederland’, Jan. 1944.<br />
After the war, with Jacques de Kadt and others, Wijnand Romijn edited the independent left socialist periodical De<br />
Baanbreker, to which Gerard van ‘t Reve and Sal Tas gave some collaboration. This last one was after 1948 more and more<br />
involved in an “anticommunist” activity, getting in touch with the American unions and the Komintern. [See article by P.<br />
Koedijk, in BWSA 7 (1998), pp. 219-223]<br />
In 1946, inside the PvdA, Wijnand Romijn, with the redaction of the periodical De Vlam – Piet Meertens (1899-1985), Tom<br />
Rot (1909-1982), Sam de Wolf, Henriëtte Roland Holst –, gave birth to the Sociaal-Democratische Centrum, wich had 150<br />
members.<br />
1184 See G. Vereeken, <strong>The</strong> GPU in the Trotskyist movement (London: New Park, 1976), Chapter I.<br />
1185 See: ‘De Sovjet-Unie en wij’ (<strong>The</strong> Soviet-Union and us), in: Spartacus, Oct. 1942, and Feb. 1944.<br />
288