07.06.2014 Views

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

political organisation in Holland, and even the first if one took into account the Pact that the <strong>Dutch</strong> CP kept a<br />

semi-legal status for several months due to the <strong>German</strong>-Soviet Pact. 1148<br />

A Central Committee of 9 members was set up. It included Sneevliet, Menist, Dolleman, Gerritsen, de Haan-<br />

Zwagerman, Jan Koeslag, Pieter van ‘t Hart – known as Max Perthus (1910-1975) – Jan Schriefer and Stan<br />

Poppe (pseudonym: T. Woudstra); the latter went on to play a decisive role in the creation of the Spartacusbond.<br />

Sneevliet was the uncontested leader, writing almost all the political positions of the Front. At his side,<br />

Ab(raham) Menist – of Jewish origin – was a born organiser; Dolleman was the treasurer and responsible for<br />

publications.<br />

Under the management of this Central Committee an external bulletin was regularly published (Het MLL<br />

Bulletin) as well as an internal organ (Richtlijnen, i.e., Directives). For a while, the MLL Front propagandised<br />

militants of the socialist SDAP and published ‘Letters to the social-democrats’ (‘Brieven aan Sociaal-<br />

Democraten’). <strong>The</strong> latter were denounced as the “Judas of the workers’ movement”, after they took part in a<br />

<strong>Dutch</strong> union that brought together liberals, religious parties and social-democrats in July 1940. 1149 This union<br />

proclaimed its allegiance to the bourgeois monarchy of the House of Orange and hoped that <strong>German</strong> domination<br />

in Europe would allow Holland to keep Indonesia as a colony. <strong>The</strong> SDAP was not banned by the new nazi<br />

regime for several months. Many of the SDAP opposition who criticised their party chose another camp: the<br />

British.<br />

This policy of forcing the SDAP rank-and-file to confront the consequences of their party’s positions to the<br />

social and political reality brought a certain number of them into the MLL Front. <strong>The</strong> Front did not adopt the<br />

same policy towards the CPN. “Stalinism is fascism under its worst form”, it wrote. 1150<br />

It should to be noted that in its Bulletins, the MLL Front did not pronounce on the class nature of the socialist or<br />

communist parties. Its propaganda towards these parties, towards the SDAP in particular, showed that it still<br />

considered them as a part of the ‘workers’ movement’. In this sense the Front remained the continuation of the<br />

pre–war RSAP. But it was already differentiating itself both from the trotskyist parties and from the left<br />

socialists by its refusal to support either the ‘democratic’ camp or that of the USSR. Its action was oriented as<br />

much against the <strong>Dutch</strong> bourgeoisie as the <strong>German</strong>.<br />

To the two imperialist fronts, the MLL Front opposed the Third Front (Derde Front), that of the proletariat: “<strong>The</strong><br />

MLL Front wants the insurrection of the proletariat in the warring countries and the fraternisation of soldiers and<br />

workers through the struggle against the imperialist powers which has led them into this war. Such is the ‘Third<br />

Front’ which is propagated in the writings of the MLL–Front”. 1151<br />

This policy of the Front led the MLL to link up – at the end of 1940 – with the Vonk Groep (Spark group)<br />

formed by Jef Last (1898-1972), Tom Rot (1909-1982), Dirk Schilp (1893-1969), and left pacifist-socialists,<br />

including many artists and intellectuals, as Henriëtte Roland Holst. It was led also by Eddy Wijnkoop, a nephrew<br />

of David Wijnkoop, member of the MLL Front – who died in 1944 in the Mauthausen camp –, with the<br />

agreement of Sneevliet and the Central Committee. Publishing the illegal monthly De Vonk it defended the same<br />

point of view as the Marx-Lenin-Luxemburg Front.<br />

1148 Outlawed by the <strong>Dutch</strong> government, the CPN published its periodicals, Volksdagblad and Politiek en Cultuur, legally up<br />

to the end of June 1940 under <strong>German</strong> occupation. In the periodical Politiek en Cultuur [‘Vijf historische dagen’, June<br />

1940, pp. 321-325], Paul de Groot called for a “correct attitude” vis-à-vis the <strong>German</strong> occupation army.<br />

1149 Wim Bot, op. cit., p. 25. A very small part of the <strong>Dutch</strong> social democracy supported the <strong>German</strong> camp and collaborated<br />

with it, for example the ‘Troelstra Beweging Nederland’ [Troelstra Movement-Netherlands, or TBN – named after an old<br />

leader of the SDAP, and led by Paul Kiès). P. Kiès (1895-1968) had been in 1926 the first regular army officer member of<br />

the SDAP. Active agitator and journalist of the SDAP, he had built his own movement in 1938, which had a militant basis<br />

in Friesland, and in order to “get the best from the SDAP and the CPN”. After May 1940, Kiès became a nazi collaborator.<br />

Under arrest in May 1945, sentenced, he was freed in 1959. [See: BWSA 7 (1998), pp. 108-113.]<br />

1150 Wim Bot, op. cit., p. 31.<br />

1151 Cf. Perthus, op. cit., pp. 430-431.<br />

279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!