07.06.2014 Views

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

The German-Dutch Communist Left - Libcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

organisations together, including that of Brandler and of Vereeken. 1142 <strong>The</strong> Front’s Manifesto called on workers<br />

to struggle against the war; and if the war broke out to finish with capitalism by revolution.<br />

It was in fact the question of war, and consequently the attitude of the RSAP towards Russia, which profoundly<br />

transformed the RSAP, at the price of a radical change of programme, then of orientation on all its programmatic<br />

positions. Sneevliet’s change of position on the Russian question was to be decisive, through the fact that he<br />

dominated the RSAP and the NAS with his powerful personality and all his authority. 1143<br />

In 1935 the Party programme took position for the defence of the USSR in the case of war. <strong>The</strong> crushing of the<br />

Barcelona workers by the <strong>Communist</strong> Party in May 1937, followed by the Moscow Trials, increased Sneevliet’s<br />

doubts on the validity of this point in the programme.<br />

In December 1939, the RSAP held its last conference. Due to the Hitler-Stalin Pact, the point on the defence of<br />

the USSR was scratched from the Party’s programme: “... the alliance between <strong>German</strong>y and Russia has<br />

practically rendered useless the paragraph concerning the duty to defend the Soviet Union”. “No-one now claims<br />

that if Russia finds itself engaged in war, the duty of the international working class is to unconditionally support<br />

the USSR”. 1144<br />

<strong>The</strong> resolution which removed this point from the programme was adopted by 806 mandates against 18. In fact,<br />

it was more by anti-fascism than by internationalism that the non-defence of the USSR was proclaimed. This<br />

was an ambiguity that had to be settled.<br />

Among the leaders of the organisation, only Willem Dolleman disagreed. 1145 With others he went on to represent<br />

the trotskyist vision after 22 nd June 1941 in the MLL Front.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Russian-Finnish War again posed the question of the defence of the USSR and that of the ‘right of peoples<br />

to self-determination’. Some militants, such as Hendrik van Driesten (1911-1944), proposed forming a front of<br />

the world proletariat against Russian intervention without allying with the Finnish bourgeoisie. Others criticised<br />

this position which could appear as supporting the Finnish bourgeoisie and denounced as opportunist Lenin’s<br />

slogan of ‘self-determination’. Implicitly denounced any slogan of struggle for ‘national determination”. 1146<br />

Without engaging in a theoretical debate on the nature of the USSR, which would have led to the formation of<br />

antagonistic tendencies, the RSAP prepared for illegality in 1938 convinced that the war would not spare the<br />

neutrality of Holland and that it was necessary to “strengthening the struggle against imperialist war”. 1147<br />

On 10 th May 1940, the <strong>German</strong> army invaded Holland, which capitulated after 6 days of fighting. Sneevliet, who<br />

was in Belgium, returned in order to continue the struggle underground. <strong>The</strong> RSAP ceased to exist. In its place<br />

an illegal organisation was constructed: the Marx-Lenin-Luxemburg Front. At first, it comprised 4,600 members,<br />

as against 2,500 in the RSAP. Clandestinity demanded a rigorous selection of reliable militants. In order to<br />

confront repression the MLL Front was built on a system of cells of 5 members, partitioned up and led by men of<br />

confidence who linked up vertically and horizontally with the illegal leadership and other cells. <strong>The</strong> double<br />

organisation disappeared: the NAS was liquidated in September. <strong>The</strong> RSAP became the second largest illegal<br />

1142 Georges Vereeken (1898-1988) led the group ‘Contre le Courant’ in Belgium, which refused to link up with the official<br />

trotskyist current. He was the personal friend of Sneevliet and had ties with the Frank-Molinier group.<br />

1143 Sneevliet had the reputation of being very authoritarian in the RSAP. His written contributions, and in particular his<br />

theses on organisation were innumerable.<br />

1144 Quoted by W. Bot, Tegen fascisme, kapitalisme en oorlog: Het Marx Lenin Luxemburg Front. July 1940-April 1942,<br />

(Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Syndikaat, 1983). <strong>The</strong> paragraph mentioned and the result of the vote can be found in De Nieuwe<br />

Fakkel, 22.12.1939. [English translation: ‘Generals Without Troops, <strong>Dutch</strong> trotskyism during the Occupation’, in<br />

Revolutionary History, Vol. 1, No. 4, London, Winter 1988-89.]<br />

1145 Most of Trotsky’s supporters left the RSAP in 1938. <strong>The</strong> remainder left the following year.<br />

1146 <strong>The</strong> Belgian trotskyists who published Correspondance internationale asserted, in their issue 14 of 15.12.39: “the RSAP<br />

has pushed equivocation to the limit, in organising collections for the Finnish people whereas these collections are sent to<br />

Finnish class organisations!”.<br />

1147 Wim Bot, op. cit., p. 11.<br />

278

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!